A transcript of the audio
29 December 2007
Judging by the way the media is treating the assassination of Benazir
Bhutto, I would conclude that the Zionists were involved in her murder.
One reason is because the Zionists didn't wait for an investigation. On
the day that she was killed, the 27th, they immediately began telling us
that it was an attack by Al Qaeda.
Furthermore, the Zionists don't want the people in Pakistan to remain
calm. Instead, they're trying to incite violence.
And the news reports that we get in America and Europe are even more
suspicious. On the 28th there were lots of reports that riots were breaking
out, and the nation was on the verge of self-destruction. And what's even
more suspicious are the reports that suggest that terrorists will somehow
get access to Pakistan's nuclear bombs. A report from Reuters has the remark:
"Security experts fear Pakistan's nuclear materials could fall into
the hands of Islamic militants"
This morning, the 29th, there are more of these reports, and they
are even more ridiculous. A British news report has the headline "Who is
in control of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal?"
Imagine if, after President Kennedy had been assassinated, the Zionists
had produced news reports with such headlines as: "Who is in control of
America's nuclear arsenal?"
or "Security experts fear that America's nuclear material could fall
into the hands of terrorists."
Another reason I think the Zionists are involved with Bhutto's murder
is because as soon as it happened, lots of idiotic messages started to
appear on the Internet message boards to confuse the issue by suggesting
that maybe the Bush administration was responsible for the murder, or maybe
the Neocons killed her, or maybe she was killed by the president of Pakistan,
or maybe she was working for the CIA.
This is exactly what they do with 9/11, the Apollo moon landing hoax,
and other crimes. They saturate the Internet with thousands of slightly
different theories so that when people look on the Internet for more information,
they're confused or overwhelmed.
Bhutto's family is also suspicious, and so is the creation of Pakistan.
Her grandfather was somehow involved with the creation of Pakistan in 1947,
so he may have had connections with Zionists in the British government.
And her father was an official in the government of Pakistan. In 1967 he
started the Pakistan People's Party, which promoted democracy and socialism.
He was elected president of Pakistan in 1971 and he started their nuclear
weapons program in 1972. He disregarded Henry Kissinger's threat to stop
the development of nuclear weapons, so we ought to wonder if Kissinger
and his friends were involved with his murder in 1979.
Benazir Bhutto is also extremely suspicious. She was elected Prime Minister
of Pakistan twice and removed both times on charges of corruption. She
moved out of Pakistan in 1998. Then, two months ago the Pakistan government
decided to give her amnesty and remove all charges of corruption. That
allowed her to return to Pakistan and enter the election so that she could
run against the government that just gave amnesty. Does that make sense
to you? It looks like she and the Pakistan government had been tricked
by the Zionists. Hopefully the Pakistan government won't be tricked into
allowing this assassination to escalate into a war.
The Zionists still have almost total control of the media, and they
still routinely outsmart governments and people all over the world. And
I suspect that they were responsible for the mysterious shooting at the
shopping center in Omaha, Nebraska, and those mysterious fires in California,
and the mysterious fires in Greece, and the demolition of the levees in
New Orleans after hurricane Katrina passed through.
As you contemplate these events, it's easy to come to the conclusion
that Zionists are doing whatever they please, and that we're having no
effect on them.
However, as strange as it may seem, there are reasons to believe that
the Zionists are running into some very serious resistance today. A simple
example is that they've been trying for years to convince America to bomb
Iran, and they're still failing at it. And they're failures to protect
themselves from exposure on the Internet. There are more people today who
are aware of Zionism than there were last year, and unless they can stop
us, there'll be more people next year who are aware of them.
It's also interesting to consider why government officials in different
nations have been predicting a very big 9/11 type of attack ever since
2002. Remember years ago when we were told that there would be a big attack
at Christmas, or during a sports event, or on New Year's Eve? And this
year Michael Chertoff predicted a big attack in the summer of 2007. Why
would they make so many predictions that never come true? If they're trying
to frighten us, it's not working. Their failed predictions make them appear
incompetent or paranoid.
You might wonder if the reason they haven't done another big attack
is because they're afraid that millions of us won't fall for the trick.
But they weren't afraid to do 9/11, so if they're afraid now, that means
were beating them.
However, I don't think they're afraid to attack us. And I don't think
they're making predictions simply to frighten us. I think they've been
trying to stage a big attack, but their attempts have been failures because
there's too many people who are wise to their tricks, and there may be
people who are secretly sabotaging them.
Although it's impossible to know what they're doing, judging by the
remarks and behavior of Michael Chertoff, Alex Jones, and other people,
I was expecting a major attack on August 28, and then later we discover
that six nuclear missiles were accidentally flown across the country on
August 30. As I mentioned in one of my other audio files, I doubt that
that was an accident. I suspect that they were planning to use those nuclear
bombs for another 9/11 attack, but they failed.
It also seemed like they tried to stage some type of attack, or perhaps
ruin the economy, in September, and again in October, and in November,
and I was even more certain of an attack for the morning of December 14,
but nothing happened.
But perhaps I'm making ridiculous assumptions. Perhaps the reason there
hasn't been a big attack yet is simply because they weren't ready until
now. Perhaps this assassination in Pakistan is the first step in the next
big attack. The next step might be to create so much chaos in Pakistan
that they can claim that Al Qaeda has stolen some nuclear bombs. Then lots
of nuclear bombs could explode at the Pentagon, or at the governments of
Europe, and that would create so much chaos that the Zionists might be
able to start killing those of us who cause trouble for them, and then
they could get total control of Europe and America.
Unfortunately, it's not easy for us to figure out if we're having an
effect on the Zionists. For example, if Pakistan calms down during the
next few weeks and the world returns to normal, we won't know if it's because
the Zionists failed with their plan to attack us with nuclear bombs, or
if it's because they never had any such plan.
However, I think they've been trying and failing to conduct a large-scale
attack. The reason I say this is because I'm sure they would agree with
me that they're going to lose unless they can create tremendous chaos.
They have control of us right now, but they're being exposed all over the
world, and they're not going to save themselves by lighting fires, or shooting
people in a shopping mall, or assassinating a few people. They've got to
create chaos on such a large scale that they can start arresting or killing
those of us who are exposing and resisting them.
They're not facing just a few thousand enemies today. There must be
millions of us around the world, and we're growing every month. If all
they do are little attacks, they're not going to stop us, which means that
we're going to continue exposing them, and eventually they'll be enough
of us to destroy them.
No matter how I look at the past few years, it seems to me that we're
slowly defeating this crime network. I don't see how they can save themselves
without creating large-scale chaos, and then killing us during the chaos.
I think they're in a very desperate situation, which would explain why
they're pushing so hard to convince us that Pakistan is about to self-destruct
and that Al Qaeda will steal nuclear bombs.
The Zionists are also trying to make us fear and hate Pakistan. Did
you know that the latest version of the Loose Change video emphasizes a
Pakistan connection to the 9/11 attack? The Zionists have been trying for
years to set Pakistan up as one of the nations involved in the 9/11 attack.
But even if they get a war started, that doesn't mean we can't turn
it around. So don't get worried, and whatever you do, don't relax yet.
We must continue exposing them, especially now that they're trying to create
violence in Pakistan.
Another sign that the Zionists are in trouble is that recent report
from Israel that shows a third of the young Israelis want to leave Israel.
An organization is in big trouble when its members start losing interest.
Did you see that report? By the way, I'm now sending out e-mail messages
almost every day about new items on my site, so if you sign up for the
messages, then you won't have to check my site for changes.
The point I'm trying to make here is that even though the Zionists are
still in control, the evidence suggests that they're in serious trouble,
and it's going to get worse for them every month. If this continues, they
will soon become so vulnerable that we'll have to deal with the question
that none of the other so-called truth seekers want to talk about, namely:
What are we going to do with the people in the Zionist network? And
what should we do with Israel? What should we do with the dishonest truth
seekers, such as The Scholars For 9/11 Truth, and Jeff Rense, and Alex
Jones? What should we do with the thousands of people in the mysterious
institutions, such as the Tavistock Institute and the Heritage Foundation?
And what do we do with all the government officials who've been working
for Zionists?
In my audio file for Dec 10th, I played an excerpt of Daryl Smith in
which he said we're "not going to be the monsters that we're fighting".
Years ago that remark would have meant nothing to me because I assumed
that the Zionists were just the Aztecs, the Vikings, the French, and the
Irish. All groups of people have been fighting with their neighbors over
territory. I assumed the Zionists were the same.
But now that I know what these Zionists have been doing to us, I can
see why they worry that we will treat them in the same manner that they
treat us. Imagine keeping Madeleine Albright as a sex slave in your basement.
Or how about using Joe Lieberman's children in a blood sacrifice? And I
haven't heard from Christopher Bollyn for a long time. Imagine keeping
Alex Jones and his family as prisoners and forcing them to pretend that
they're free. Or imagine sending Congressman Barney Frank to parties so
that people could rape him. Or how about killing all of the intelligent
Jews and leaving only the stupid ones behind to serve us as a source of
labor and sex?
Now that I know more about these Zionists, I can understand why Smith
and the others are worried that we might treat them in the manner that
they treat us.
So, what are we going to do with these criminals? Should they all be
executed? Should they be put into jail? Should we force them to spend their
lives doing something productive for us? Should we sterilize them and send
them into exile so that they can finish their lives without bothering us?
Should we send the Israelis to Khazaria and let Russia deal with them?
This may seem like a simple issue to resolve, but I'm sure it's going
to bring up discussions about who is a criminal, and who is a victim. Some
of the people who have been assisting the Zionist crime network seem to
be doing so only because they were tricked or threatened, not because they
wanted to help them.
If you are older than 50 years of age, it should be easy for you to
understand how people could be tricked. During the 1950s and 1960s the
Zionists were saturating us with propaganda that the Russians were going
to attack us with nuclear bombs. Some people became so frightened that
they built fallout shelters. I still have faint memories of my elementary
school running some type of exercise to train us on what to do in case
the Russians attacked. The school would set off an alarm, and then we would
climb under our desks.
We were also saturated with propaganda that Communists were going to
take over the world. When I was a teenager, I believed the propaganda that
the Americans got involved with the Vietnam War in order to protect the
Vietnamese. Something seemed strange about the manner in which the Vietnam
war was being fought, but I assumed that the war had been corrupted by
selfish businessmen who were using the war to make money, and I assumed
that the people who became top military leaders were people who enjoyed
war and considered it as a game.
I can understand why people in that era, especially the younger ones,
assisted with the war. However, those people could be described as victims
of Zionism even though they caused a lot of suffering for America and Vietnam.
The situation becomes even more complicated when you listen to what
Kay Griggs says about the military. She says the Zionists routinely abuse
and manipulate children in order to turn them into a type of slave who
can be controlled through bribery, blackmail, and threats. She also says
that the Zionists pressure some military personnel into doing embarrassing
or illegal activities in order to blackmail them. These people could be
also described as victims even though they may have assisted the crime
network.
I can also understand how people could be tricked into assisting with
the Apollo moon landing hoax. The Zionists may have told people that NASA
needs a few more years before they can put men on the moon, and in the
meantime they will fake a moon landing in order to make America look so
technically advanced that the Russians are afraid to attack us. The Zionists
could reassure people that NASA will put men on the moon by 1980, and then
everybody would laugh at how they fooled the Russians. The Americans who
fell for this trick would have assisted with a crime, but they could be
described as victims rather than as criminals.
Some of the people who assist the mysterious organizations that we refer
to as "think tanks" could also be described as victims. There seem to be
hundreds of these organizations, such as the Hudson Institute, The Brookings
Institution, and the Rand Corporation, The Milken Institute, and the New
Democrat Network. There must be thousands of people worldwide who support
these organizations, and some of these people are probably naive citizens
who assume that they're assisting a legitimate organization.
A few months ago I was talking to a man who was donating money on a
routine basis to the Ludwig von Mises Institute. About two years ago he
stopped giving them money because it occurred to him that the organization
never accomplishes anything. He didn't know much about Zionism, so he didn't
think of them as a Zionist organization. Instead he simply decided that
they were incompetent.
I advocate that we destroy every one of these organizations, and we
should assume that all of their members are Zionist agents until proven
innocent.
To understand my reasoning, imagine that you decide to buy a farm and
raise some sheep. A real estate agent takes you to a farm that's for sale,
and you look closely at one of the sheep and notice that it's actually
a wolf in sheep's clothing. You look closely at a sheep that is lying on
the ground and discover that its dead. You look at another sheep and discover
it's another wolf. How many sheep would you have to look at before you
decided you don't want that particular farm?
I don't have the time to investigate all of the mysterious organizations,
but every time I look at one I find connections to Zionism, or Israel,
or the banking families, or the Rockefellers. We would be fools to assume
that any of them are honest.
Some of the organizations appear to be groups of religious fanatics.
For example, The Discovery Institute, which is the primary group promoting
the concept of "Intelligent Design".
In case you don't know what Intelligent Design is, it's a form of creationism
that's designed to circumvent the law in America. Our public schools are
not supposed to promote any religion, and since creationism is based on
the Bible, it's considered to be the theory of a particular religion, and
therefore creationism is not allowed in public schools. Some devious religious
people are trying to circumvent the law by removing references to the Bible
and telling us that Intelligent Design is a scientific theory, not a biblical
theory. I suppose if they get away with this trick they'll re-write the
Bible to remove all references to religion and refer to it as "The Biography
of Jesus Christ".
The Discovery Institute appears to be just another group of dishonest
and diabolical religious fanatics, but it was originally part of the Hudson
Institute, and that group was created by people from the Rand Corporation,
so for all we know the Discovery Institute is just another group of dishonest
and diabolical Zionists. This would make the most sense since the Zionists
are the people who repeatedly exhibit this diabolical behavior.
We would be fools to take the chance that any of these mysterious organizations
are honest. And even if some of them are honest, none of them are actually
doing something useful for us, so we should eliminate all of them simply
on the grounds of incompetence.
We should shut down all of the charities for the same reason. Some of
these charities may be under the supervision of honest people, but all
of them are incompetent. The charities are based on principles that don't
make sense. For example, we're not going to stop starvation simply by giving
bags of rice to hungry people.
The charities that give toys to orphans and poor children during Christmas
are especially ridiculous. We don't improve the life of an orphan by giving
him a toy.
It's foolish to allow these charities to continue. They've been trying
to stop starvation, poverty, and other problems for decades, but they haven't
accomplished anything yet. All of them are based on the idiotic theory
that we can solve problems by feeling sorry for people.
Some of these charities may be Zionist organizations, but some charities
may be groups of honest people who just don't have the ability to understand
that they're not doing anything of value. All of them should be shut down
and investigated.
There are also a lot of mysterious organizations connected to the United
Nations, the European Union, and our governments. For example, there's
the Nexus Institute, which has such partners as the German Marshall Fund
of the United States. And consider the Organization for Security and Co-operation
in Europe, which has a budget of €168 million for 2007. What has this
organization accomplished with all that money?
Then there's the European Parliament. This is a very large organization,
but what is it doing to help Europe? One of their web pages shows 120 members
in the climate change committee. What is a climate change committee doing
for Europe?
All of these organizations should be shut down, and everybody involved
with them should be investigated. These organizations are intangible entities,
so destroying that doesn't hurt anything.
So let's assume that we investigate everybody and we make a determination
of who deserves to be referred to as a "criminal". What are we supposed
to do with the criminals?
Many people have been advocating that we arrest the criminals and put
them in jail, but they assume that there were only a few hundred criminals,
or at most, a few thousand. However, the Internet is allowing us to discover
that the Zionist crime network is larger than we had ever imagined. For
example, a few years ago most of us didn't know about the Armenian genocide
of 1915, or the bombing of the King David Hotel in 1946, or that the Zionists
were manipulating the Nazis, or that the Zionists were lying to us about
the Holocaust.
The Internet is removing the secrecy that has been protecting the Zionists,
and so today we're discovering that this network is much larger than other
crime gangs, and that they have been committing a lot more crimes than
we had imagined. There is even evidence that the ancestors of the Zionists
were responsible for the Crusades of the Middle Ages.
Even the most generous among us might decide that there's more than
100,000 people who should be classified as Zionist criminals, and some
of us may want to classify millions of people as criminals. What are we
going to do with so many criminals?
A much more important question that we should start discussing is:
"Who among us is going to make a decision on what to do with the criminals?"
The reason this issue is so important is that we have to be careful
to keep the Zionist infiltrators out. The Zionists are going to try to
protect their friends within the network, and they're going to try shifting
the blame to the people they're willing to sacrifice.
Look at what happened with the Knights Templar in the 1300s. A few of
them are killed, and most people assumed that the network was destroyed,
but most of the people in the network survived, and it appears that many
of them, maybe most of them, continued their operations in secrecy. The
network was not destroyed.
In 1776, Adam Weishaupt created the Illuminati organization, and less
than 10 years later the government thought they had gotten rid of it by
banning it. But did they really get rid of it, or did some of the members
simply continue to operate in secrecy?
Are we ever going to learn from the mistakes of our ancestors? We don't
get rid of organized crime network by arresting a few members or passing
a law to forbid their organization. Every Zionist criminal has to be dealt
with. This requires that we prevent Zionist infiltrators from protecting
their friends in the network.
So, how do we keep out the Zionist infiltrators? The only way we can
protect ourselves is to investigate everybody who wants to be involved
with the decision of who is a criminal, and what we should do with the
criminals.
There are lots of people struggling right now to give themselves the
reputation of a "truth seeker", such as the Scholars For 9/11 Truth, the
Architects And Engineers For 9/11 Truth, Alex Jones, Dylan Avery, Webster
Tarpley, and Daryl Smith. Nobody should get a free ticket to the trial
of Zionism simply because they made a video about 9/11. Nobody should get
a free ride. Everybody, without exception, must be investigated for Zionist
connections. I don't care if you investigate me, so why should anybody
else care if we look to see if they have connections to Zionism?
Another suggestion I have is that we refuse to allow the public to get
involved in these decisions. There are two reasons for this.
One is that most people have proven themselves to be incredibly selfish,
incompetent, and incapable of facing reality. The majority of people want
to play like children, not deal with problems. They're still ignoring our
attempts to expose 9/11 and Zionism, and many of them are still ridiculing
us. A lot of people appear to be intelligent, but they're suffering from
some type of mental disorder that interferes with their ability to see
something as obvious as the demolition of Building 7. People with such
lousy minds are not going to add anything of value to the discussion of
what to do with Zionism.
The second reason we should not allow the public to get involved is
because they have proven themselves to be easily manipulated. If we allow
the public to get involved, then the Zionists would be able to influence
the decisions simply by influencing the public. We would be in the same
idiotic situation that we're in right now. We would have to put up with
the Zionist propaganda from Hollywood stars, from websites, and from Nobel
prize winners.
We should learn from 9/11 and face the fact that the majority of people
are mental nitwits. We have to tell the majority of people to keep their
mouths shut.
Furthermore, making a decision on what to do with the criminals is the
easy work. The more difficult job is figuring out how to fix our nations.
The Zionists had done a tremendous amount of damage to the world, so after
we get rid of them, we have a big mess to clean up. They've ruined our
school system; they've filled our history books with propaganda; they've
encouraged women to rebel against men, they've been instigating racial
fights; and they've been infiltrating and manipulating religions.
Furthermore, some of our problems have nothing to do with Zionism or
crime. One problem that is starting to hurt all nations right now -- especially
America -- is that technology is making it increasingly difficult for people
to find jobs. To understand this, consider how the economy has changed
over the past two centuries.
In 1800 most men were self-employed farmers, and most women worked at
home. The farming techniques in that era were so simple that none of the
farmers needed much of an education or intelligence. Their job was mostly
physical labor. A boy could learn how to become a farmer just by watching
his father.
There weren't many businesses in 1800, and most of the jobs in that
era were so simple that people could learn the job while they were working.
Some jobs didn't even require people to know how to read, or do arithmetic.
It doesn't take much intelligence to see what's happening. Technology
is replacing people who were doing the simple jobs. This trend is going
to continue. Industrial robots are becoming more advanced, and Japan is
experimenting with robots that can walk and avoid obstacles. When these
robots become more advanced, they'll replace a lot of people who currently
have jobs. Will those people be able to find another job? Or will they
end up doing some useless government work?
These robots will be able to replace people that you probably never
thought could be replaced. For example, they can replace musicians. Have
you seen the video of the robot that plays musical instruments? These robots
make a player piano seem primitive.
There's not much of an interest in player pianos, so you may assume
that there won't be much of an interest in musical robots, but the player
piano is very limited whereas these robots have incredible versatility.
Robots have a tremendous advantage over human musicians because they never
get tired, they're available 24 hours a day, they can play all types of
music, and they can play better than a human. Furthermore, robots can play
music that humans don't have the ability to play because robots can move
more smoothly, more quickly, and more accurately. Musicians will be able
to write music that only the robots can play.
We could use musical robots at weddings, restaurants, and parties. Unlike
a CD player, when we're tired of listening to the musical robot, we can
tell them to do clean the floors or wash the windows.
Robots could also clean tables at restaurants and carry the dirty dishes
into the kitchen. They could go into a warehouse to find shoes for us,
and they can put shoes back if we decide we don't want them. Unlike a human
sales clerk, they won't complain about us.
And if we could get better governments and start designing better cities,
robots could do even more jobs, such as cleaning the city and the public
bathrooms, and picking up garbage, and separating garbage for recycling.
Take a look at what's been happening over the past couple hundred years.
It should be obvious that technology is taking away a lot of the jobs that
people used to do. This brings up the very unpleasant issue of what are
we going to do with all of the people who can't get a job?
In America, most of the unemployed people get jobs in the government,
the universities, insurance companies, investment companies, religions,
charities, and the "think tanks". Most of these people are parasites. However,
not all of them want to be parasites. Some of them are forced into this
situation because technology is reducing the number of jobs that they're
capable of doing.
Technology is making the jobs increasingly difficult, and it's going
to cause an increasingly larger percentage of the population to become
unemployable and parasitic.
This situation cannot continue forever. There's going to be a point
at which it starts causing trouble for society. We can already see problems
occurring, especially in America. There are companies all over America
that can't find engineers, machinists, and other skilled workers. Their
solution is to move their operation to some other country, or bring foreigners
into America to do the work.
The Boeing Aircraft Co., for example, hired thousands of Russian engineers
in Moscow. IBM is moving their operations to other nations. IBM is surviving
by moving some of their operations to foreign nations. For example, last
year IBM had 50,000 employees in India, and this year they have 73,000.
About 20% of IBM employees are in India today.
Some people complain that businesses are using foreigners only to save
money, and there certainly is some truth to that accusation, but that's
happening only on a small scale. Most businesses are truly having trouble
finding people with the skills and the desire to do the jobs that are available
today.
At the beginning of November I posted a link to a Kansas news report
that was complaining that in the Wichita area alone there were almost 9000
jobs that couldn't be filled.
When a retail store advertises a job for a sales clerk, hundreds of
people will apply. But when a business offers a job for a machinist or
a technician, it may not find anybody capable of doing the job, even though
the job pays more than the sales clerk.
Every year there are fewer people who can find a job. These unemployable
people are getting into parasitic jobs, mainly in the government and the
universities, and that causes tuition, taxes, insurance, and other expenses
to rise every year. Eventually there will be so many parasites that the
nation starts to deteriorate.
Some people hope that robots will eventually become so advanced that
they'll do all of the work so that humans don't have to anything, but how
could we possibly develop such advanced robots? We would need a lot of
very talented engineers, scientists, computer programmers, and other people
to design such robots and the factories that produce them. But where are
all those talented people? America doesn't even have enough talented people
to develop a modern, high speed train. The engineering jobs are becoming
so complex that some of the people who were productive engineers 100 years
ago would be failures as engineers today.
Most people can't understand that technology is causing people to become
unemployable, so they make ridiculous assumptions about why businesses
are having trouble finding employees. For example, some people in Russia
and Japan assume that the problem is a low population, so they encourage
women to have more babies. Did you see the news report from last year in
which President Putin proposed financial incentives to encourage women
to have babies?
Or how about the news reports that the Japanese are worried about their
declining population?
This situation is especially absurd in the case of Japan. Have you ever
seen photographs of Japan? How could anybody believe that Japan is suffering
from a shortage of people?
No nation is suffering from a shortage of people. Every nation could
easily survive a large decrease in population. Japan doesn't need 100 million
people. They could live a very nice life with only 10 million, or even
1 million.
The shortage of people is an illusion, but not an optical illusion,
it's an "emotional illusion".
If you can control your emotions, you can easily understand the problem.
For example, when a Hollywood director needs to hire somebody to act, dance,
or sing, they have no problem finding people with the talent and desire
to do the job.
However, if you are looking for a skilled machinist, or a supervisor
for an assembly line, or an engineer, you won't find hundreds of talented
people applying for the job. Furthermore, most of the people who apply
won't have the experience or ability to do the job properly anyway.
There's no shortage of people in any nation. There's only a shortage
of people with talent, skills, honesty, morality, intelligence, and a nice
personality. It's very easy to understand this concept, but our emotions
don't want to accept it. We find it unpleasant to face the possibility
that the majority of people, including our own relatives and family members,
don't have the ability to do the type of jobs that are available today.
Technology is causing problems for us in another way. Specifically,
it provides us with tremendous entertainment options, and every year more
people find themselves overwhelmed with the options and unable to control
themselves.
Technology provides us with an enormous variety of foods, and every
year more people have trouble controlling the quantity of food they eat.
Some people have so much trouble resisting the industrial foods that are
high in sugar and artificial flavors that they become sickly.
Technology is also providing us with lots of different gambling options.
We can gamble on sports events, and we can go to gambling casinos, and
we play government lotteries.
Technology also provides us with a wide variety of alcoholic beverages
and other drugs, and today we have lots of different forms of pornography.
When robots become available, there will certainly be businesses offering
them for use as sex.
Nobody 5000 years ago had a problem with gambling or alcohol or obesity,
but look at how many people today have a problem. And every year more people
find themselves unable to cope with modern life. Some of the people who
are doing fine today will have problems 10 years from now or 20 years from
now. For example, some of the people who can resist pornography today may
find it impossible to resist "sex robots", and some of them may end up
ruining their lives by spending too much time and money with those robots.
Each of us is slightly different, but each of us has limitations. Every
year more people reach their limitation and have trouble coping with the
increasingly complex world.
The majority of people are already beyond their limitations. They can't
properly deal with modern life. Most people can't handle the responsibility
of voting for government officials, for example. Some people have the intelligence
to make good decisions about voting, but they don't have the desire to
spend time researching the candidates and analyzing them. Other people
have the desire to research the candidates, but they don't have the intelligence
to make a good decision.
The issue of abortion is another example. Only a fraction of the population
has the desire to study this issue and the intelligence to develop a policy
that is worth considering. Most people are such intellectual nitwits that
they argue over whether abortion is right or wrong. They don't understand
that these complex issues don't have a right or wrong. We need to propose
policies and then discuss which ones we'd like to try. But most people
can't propose a policy for abortion because they don't have the ability
to develop such a policy. All they can do is argue over right or wrong.
The majority of people should not get involved in the abortion issue.
They have nothing to contribute. The people who claim that abortion is
a woman's "right" are not making any sense. What is a right? They don't
know what a "right" is. And the people who condemn abortion as murder don't
make sense, either.
As I mentioned in some of my documents, the people who argue over abortion
never do any research into the issue of why so many women want abortions,
or what we're going to do with the unwanted babies if we prevent abortions.
There's no research, and there's no discussions. The people only argue,
just like stupid animals that fight over territory.
The people who condemn abortion as murder bring up a very interesting
issue. These people claim that they're so concerned about human life that
they can't tolerate the killing of a fetus, and many of them also claim
to be upset about the suffering of the fetus during the abortion. They
create the impression that they have incredible concern for the life and
happiness of other people.
However, if these people were truly concerned about other people, why
don't they care what happens to the fetus after it's born? Have you heard
of a man named Paul Bonacci? He testified in court that he and other orphans
were taken to parties and used for sex by such people as Congressman Barney
Frank of Massachusetts. He also said that he was used to help kidnap other
people's children, and that those children were used as sex slaves, and
sometimes killed.
If Paul Bonacci's mother had tried to abort Paul, the anti-abortion
people would have staged dramatic displays and condemned the abortion as
murder. But they don't care that Paul ended up in an orphanage and was
raped repeatedly by government officials. They also don't care that other
children are being kidnapped and sold as sex slaves.
Furthermore, most of the people who condemn abortion as murder are Republicans,
and most of them support the war in Iraq. How can they be so traumatized
by an abortion and yet treat the killing of Iraqis as family entertainment?
And consider the anti-abortion people who show pictures of aborted fetuses
to women who are considering an abortion. They do this to convince the
women to give birth to their baby, but these people don't show pictures
of the war in order to shock us into stopping the war.
They want to save the life of a fetus, but after that fetus is born,
they don't care if it's raped, killed, abandoned in an orphanage, or sold
as a sex slave. My conclusion is the anti-abortion people don't really
care about abortion. Their opposition to abortion is for their own entertainment.
They want to feel special.
In my articles at my philosophy page, I refer to it this activity as
"mental masturbation". These people are stimulating their emotions, but
not their sexual emotions. They're stimulating themselves so that they
can feel special. Instead of using their hands to stimulate themselves,
they're stimulating themselves with words, such as:
"I'm such a wonderful, loving person that I can't tolerate the abortion
of a tiny fetus. I'm so special. Oh my, I'm so special. Oh, so special,
oh, god, I'm so special! Oh my God!"
Not everybody who opposes abortion is trying to feel special. Some people
oppose abortion because they realize that if abortion was a simple and
legal procedure, their parents would have aborted them, or society would
have demanded that they be aborted. Those people don't care about human
life; they're just feeling sorry for themselves. This is just another type
of mental masturbation in which the people stimulate their emotions.
A lot of people have noticed that some of the most active anti-abortionists
are men. Some women assume this is because men can't get pregnant, but
I think it's because of the male personality. All male animals and humans
want to be the dominant male. Men are constantly struggling to convince
other people that we're special. We boast about our high income, or our
college diplomas, or that we won a Nobel Prize, or that we traveled to
some unusual place that most people have never been to.
It's very difficult for men to face the fact that most of us are ordinary,
and that there's nothing special about most of us. Even those of us with
special talents only have special talents in a few narrow areas. In other
areas we're average or below average. Unfortunately, we can't stand the
thought that we're ordinary or below average. We're constantly looking
for some opportunity to boast about ourselves.
One of the simplest ways for a man to appear special is to condemn abortion.
This doesn't require any skills, talent, or even preparation. All a man
has to do is open his mouth and let the words come out. He can easily convince
himself that he's somebody special.
We consider it inappropriate to stimulate ourselves sexually in public,
but we consider it proper behavior to stimulate other types of emotions
in public. However, I think we need to change this attitude. I think we
should stand up to the people who condemn abortion as murder by telling
them to either say something intelligent about abortion, or quit jerking
themselves off. Tell them to masturbate in the privacy of their own home.
Humans are just like animals. Males struggle to be dominant, and the
females are sexually attracted to whoever the dominant male is, regardless
of what a jerk he may be. Have you ever noticed how women will offer themselves
to man simply because he's famous or wealthy? Phil Spector has no trouble
getting women even though several women accuse him of murdering his wives.
Women don't look for men who are responsible, or who contribute to society,
or who have useful skills, or who are intelligent. Instead, they look for
the dominant male. This crude behavior works fine for animals and primitive
humans, but in our era it's detrimental. Of course, I have more of these
opinions on my philosophy page, if you're interested.
The majority of people may be wonderful humans, but they are out of
place in this technically advanced world, and this situation is becoming
worse as technology advances. The majority of people are like apes in a
human world. They can't cope with this modern era.
A couple years ago I posted a document in which I tried to explain
that the world is the way it is because the majority of people are making
it this way. We can't blame the world's problems on a small minority of
criminals or Jews. For example, some people complain that the Jews were
the slave traders, and even though there's lots of evidence for that theory,
that doesn't explain why people purchased the slaves. Just because a Jew
offers you a slave doesn't mean that you have to purchase it.
Gambling is another good example. The Jews might be responsible for
the gambling casinos in Las Vegas and Macau, China, but they can't make
any of us go to their casinos and spend our money on gambling, prostitutes,
drugs, or alcohol.
Many people complain that the Jews control the media, but the Jews aren't
forcing any of us to purchase their publications or go to their Hollywood
movies.
It's not accurate to say the Jews are responsible for the worlds problems.
It makes more sense to say that the world's problems are a combination
of the people who don't fit in with this technically advanced era, and
the Jews who take advantage of these animal-like people. When you look
at the world in this manner then you'll realize that we can't improve the
world until we deal with both groups of people. We have to deal with the
animal-like people who don't fit in, and we have to deal with the people
who take advantage of them.
In that document I posted several years ago, I asked, What if there
was a planet in which everybody had a mind exactly like yours? Would the
people on that planet have any interest in gambling casinos? Would some
of the people try to use the others as slaves? Would there be any interest
in producing alcoholic beverages or other drugs? Would there be any need
for security cameras or policemen? Would there be any math, science, or
technology? Would you allow inheritances? Would the people enjoy one other
or would they be anti-social and lonely?
The world is a reflection of the human race, and every nation is a
reflection of its particular citizens. Every nation has a lot of corruption,
crime, loneliness, gambling, prostitution, drugs, and other problems because
the majority of people can't cope with the problems we face today. And
organized crime gangs prey on these people.
Our problems are not due to stupidity or ignorance. There are lots of
educated and intelligent people who can't cope with life. Perhaps the best
way to describe it is, that some people are simply better adapted to this
modern era.
A good example is food. An enormous number of people have problems with
food. Some of them eat too much because they can't control their cravings,
and some eat too little because they're afraid of gaining weight, and some
get sickly because they eat too much industrial foods. Some of these problems
are due to ignorance and stupidity, but there are a lot of intelligent
and educated people who have trouble with food. These people would have
been fine if they had been born 10,000 years ago when food was always in
short supply and when all of the food was natural and healthy, but they
can't cope with the situation today.
Most people also can't cope with material items, drugs, alcohol, jewelry,
prostitution, slavery, television, or voting for government officials.
One of the reasons our economy is so chaotic and corrupt is because
most business executives also have trouble with life. Both male and female
executives have trouble controlling their cravings for money, and most
men can't control their cravings to be important. Businesses are supposed
to compete with one another, and the competition is supposed to inspire
people to do a good job.
However, there aren't many people who are capable of competing. Most
business executives are fighting with each other in an attempt to become
rich and acquire more control over more people. And it doesn't make any
difference how much money they acquire; they always need more. No matter
how big their house is, it's not big enough. And no matter how many employees
they have control over, they never have enough to satisfy their cravings.
These business executives are like primitive savages who can't stop
fighting with each other. They're like fat people who can't stop stuffing
food into their mouths. They're intelligent monkeys in a human world.
These neurotic businessmen are turning our economy into a war zone.
These businessmen are not stupid or ignorant; rather, they have a mind
that is designed for a primitive life of thousands of years ago, and like
most of the population, they're out of place today.
The inability of people to understand the complexity of modern life
is allowing Zionist Jews to turn people into voluntary slaves. An example
is The Butterfly Project. The Zionists created this program for schools.
The children are told to create butterflies out of paper or other material,
and each butterfly is supposed to represent a dead Jewish child who was
killed by the Nazis during the Holocaust.
The purpose of the program is to convince the Goy children that millions
of Jews were killed by the Nazis, and it stimulates the emotions of the
Goy children so that they feel sadness for the dead Jewish children.
Most people can understand the concept of slavery, but they can't understand
that the Butterfly Project is a diabolical program to turn people into
voluntary slaves. We arrest people for slavery today, but nobody is arrested
for promoting the Butterfly Project.
What's the difference between forcing a person to be a slave, and manipulating
him through propaganda into becoming a voluntary slave? The difference
is that most people don't have the intellectual capacity to understand
the concept of voluntary slavery, except in very obvious situations.
For example, if a man offers candy to a child in return for letting
him have sex, most people would complain that the man is committing a crime,
even though the child may defend the man and insist that he wanted to have
sex.
However, when a Hollywood producer offers an adult a job in a movie
in return for sex, nobody would consider the Hollywood producer to be committing
a crime.
For another example, when a salesman tricks an old man into donating
money or buying products he doesn't want, almost everybody considers it
to be a crime, even though the old man voluntarily gave the money. But
when people are tricked into giving money to the Mormon church, or Scientology,
almost nobody considers it to be a crime.
Most people don't have the intelligence to understand that this behavior
is abusive and detrimental to society. It ruins human relationships. It
might help you to understand how destructive this behavior is if you imagine
everybody doing it every day. Imagine asking a sales clerk a question,
or asking your teenage son to help you move some furniture, and they respond
that they'll do what you want, and answer your questions, after you perform
oral sex on them.
A lot of the abuse is too subtle for most people to understand. For
example, consider the television shows that play phony laughter after somebody
makes a joke. The phony laughter is intended to stimulate the people watching
television. But is this abusive? Most people don't think so. But
imagine everybody behaving like this. Imagine everybody carrying around
an audio player and every time they make a joke, they turn on this player
to create laughter.
The Butterfly Project is an abusive, disgusting program to turn people
into voluntary slaves. The Zionists are behaving like that amazing parasite
that gets inside a snail's body and takes control of its mind. Have you
seen the video of that parasite? I'll put a link to that video in the file
that has this audio.
I suppose there are Jews who will defend this practice on the grounds
that we treat animals in this same manner. For example, there are people
who force horses to become accustomed to wearing saddles and allowing people
to ride them, and then we use those horses as slaves to entertain us. Are
we abusing those horses? Should we let horses live in their natural condition?
If it's acceptable to use an animal as a slave, why not also permit
the use of stupid humans? When the Israelis trick the dumb Americans into
attacking Iraqis, is that wrong? Or is that equivalent to putting a saddle
on a horse and taking a ride around a park?
The Zionist Jews who control the diamond industry have trained almost
every woman into believing that diamonds are a girl's best friend. Is it
wrong for the Zionist Jews to use women in this manner? Or should we consider
it similar to training a circus seal to jump through a hoop?
I wouldn't say this is an issue of right or wrong. I would say we have
to make a decision on what type of world we want to live in. Do you want
to live in a world in which a portion of the human population is using
the other people as animals? Do you want to live in a world in which some
of us are masters and some of us are slaves?
A lot of people expect technology to solve our problems, but technology
is the reason we have these problems, and advances in technology are making
the situation worse for us. Technology provides us with physical comforts,
but it adds complexity to modern life.
Furthermore, technology allows people to cause tremendous amounts of
suffering. In 10,000 B.C. for example, an individual couldn't cause much
damage to the world, but today an individual can easily kill dozens of
people with poisons and guns, and groups of criminals can instigate wars
or conduct big false flag operations, such as 9/11.
Technology is not going to save us from our problems. Technology is
actually going to make our problems worse. Consider the issue of euthanasia.
Thousands of years ago this issue was of no significance because people
rarely became so old or injured or sickly that they wanted somebody to
put them out of their misery. Today we can keep people alive for so long
that many people wish they could die rather than continue with their slow
and painful death.
Today we have to deal with the issue of euthanasia, but most people
can't discuss this issue. Most people's reaction to this issue is to ignore
it or hope that new technology will solve it, but technology will not solve
this problem. Instead, advances in technology will make this problem worse.
Nobody thousands of years ago were laying in a hospital bed and wishing
that they would die. Today there may be thousands of people around the
world wishing they would die. Next year there will be more of these people.
And the year after that there will be even more of them. Technology is
making this situation worse every year, but the majority of people refuse
to deal with this problem.
Most people cannot discuss the issue of euthanasia in a serious manner.
Instead, they boast about how they're so special that they can't allow
euthanasia under any circumstance because that would be murder. These people
are not discussing the issue. What they're doing is using the issue to
jerk themselves off. They're masturbating over this issue. They're stimulating
themselves into thinking they're special. We're not going to solve our
problems by people who jerk themselves off in public. We need people who
can learn about the issues, discuss them, and experiment with different
policies.
We also need people who can deal with the illusion that we have a shortage
of people. This problem is also going to get worse as technology improves.
The jobs 10 years from now are going to be even more demanding, and the
jobs 10 years after that will require even more intelligence and skills.
America will continue to lose manufacturing jobs to the nations that have
better quality businessmen and a more skilled labor force. A few decades
ago America was one of the world's biggest producers of trains, but nobody
wants American trains today. A couple days ago China announced the production
of much more advanced trains that travel 300 kilometers per hour.
IBM developed the micro hard disk many years ago, but it didn't have
enough people to do something with that project. Today Hitachi and Samsung
are producing millions of them, and they've reduced them in size and increase
their capacity. Hitachi has one model of Micro Drive that is the size of
a compact flash card, and it holds 6 GB. I'll put some links to the photos
and information about them.
This brings me to the final issue I want to mention. After we get rid
of Zionism we still have a lot of problems to deal with. We have to start
dealing with the fact that technology is changing life for humans, and
most of the people today cannot deal with this technically advanced era.
We have to deal with this illusion that there is a shortage of people,
and we have to deal with the people who can't cope with gambling, alcohol,
money, food, and material items.
We have a lot of work to do, but we can deal with it, or a least some
of us can. |
Benazir
Bhutto's family -- and the nation of Pakistan
-- is suspicious and mysterious.
Do
you consider the Butterfly Project as a form of slavery?
