|
|
|
Fájdalmas Megtévesztések harmadik rész Painful Deceptions, part 3 The engines are 9 ft. in diameter, and they have some heavy steel components. The small figure next to the engines is a 6 foot tall man to show how large these engines are. The landing gear also contains massive metal components. Even if this scrap belongs to Flight 77, where is the rest of the airplane? How can 60 tons of metal disappear? Water can easily vaporize and drift away in the breeze, but airplanes do not vaporize. Flight 77 also had several tons of people and luggage. Where are they? This delicate scrap looks like it belongs to a Global Hawk, or similar size drone or missile, not a Boeing 757. The circular object behind the firemen is supposedly part of the engine of flight 77. Only one of these engine objects was found, but Flight 77 had two large engines, not one small engine. Is it a coincidence that a Global Hawk has just one small engine? This piece of landing gear was found inside the Pentagon. This tire rim was also found inside. Unfortunately, these scraps do not prove that Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon. A Global Hawk also has tires and landing gear. Is this a piece of Flight 77? It would be helpful if the military would release high-quality photos of these pieces so we could see them clearly. So why doesn't the military provide better photos? Perhaps because a high quality photo of this item would show us that it's so small and delicate that it looks like it belongs on a Global Hawk. Here is another thin piece of metal that would fit better on a Global Hawk than a 757. Furthermore, a 757 would leave a total of 60 tons of scrap, not just a few pieces that were so thin that people could pick them up without effort. These tiny scraps of aircraft would make sense if a Global Hawk crashed into the Pentagon because the Global Hawk was designed to be extremely lightweight. One reason for its low weight is to allow it to remain in the air for a very long time so it can observe people on the ground for long periods. It can remain in the air for as long as 35 hours. Another reason for its low weight is to reduce the power requirements of the engine, which in turn reduces the noise and heat from the engine. This makes it difficult for people to hear it, or pick it up with infrared sensors. A Global Hawk is like an eggshell with an engine. Christopher Bollyn of the American Free Press spoke with Steve Riskus who saw the plane hit the Pentagon, and took these photos of the fire before the firemen arrived. Steve said the plane flew by his windshield, but he did not hear much noise. This could be used as evidence that a Global Hawk, or similar quiet aircraft, hit the Pentagon. By comparison, the first plane to crash into the World Trade Center was recorded on video because a cameraman heard the plane before it reached him. The microphone of his video recorder also picked up the sound of its engines. However, that plane never came closer to him than about a thousand feet, whereas the plane at the Pentagon was only inches above the cars. A video available at Blockbuster video stores shows the first airplane hitting the towers. The video is called 9/11, The Filmmakers Commemorative Edition. Here is a sample of it. That airplane never came closer to the people than about 1,000 ft., but we can clearly hear it. If a Boeing 757 flew 400 mph only inches above the cars, the noise would have been deafening. Also, people would have felt the vibration from the engines, the turbulence from the wings, and the exhaust from the engines. This photo resembles those from other disasters. Specifically, most of the people are dressed to deal with fire, or they have gloves and work boots. There are no secretaries in high-heeled shoes, nor are there any children. However, a few photos show executives wandering around among the firemen. Who are these two guys? Why are they picking up scraps? They do not have gloves on, nor work boots. They are holding the parts away from their body, which is a sign that they are worried about getting their clothes dirty. So why are they walking around in the firefighting foam, water, human body parts, and sharp scraps of airplane? Why are they so concerned about finding scraps of Flight 77 that they will rush out among the firemen to help them pick up a few scraps? The police are suppose to arrest people who pick up evidence. For example, on February 4, 2003, two people were arrested for picking up space shuttle debris. They face 10 years in prison and an incredible fine. Why didn't the police arrest these guys? Are these the FBI investigators? If so, why didn't they let the workers with gloves and boots pick the scraps up? A Boeing 757 would leave 60 tons of scrap, in which case these two guys would not be able to contribute anything significant to the cleanup. But if a Global Hawk crashed into the Pentagon, there would be only 4 tons of scrap. Furthermore, since more than 50% of a Global Hawk is carbon fiber and resin, rather than aluminum, if most of non-metallic material burned, there would be less than 2 tons of scrap. This would explain the mystery of why there are so few scraps. However, a Global Hawk has aluminum in the body. Any large pieces of aluminum would have to be hidden because they would not look like pieces of a Boeing 757. What a coincidence that some guys carried away a large box hidden behind a tarp. Some of these guys are overweight. There was no shortage of younger guys in better physical shape, many of whom had gloves and boots. Why would these guys carry away this secret item? What is inside this box, and where did they take it? Why the secrecy if the military has nothing to hide? As if there were not enough strange aspects to the scraps, a news helicopter shows a line of people picking up small items from the grass. Who are these people? They are not firemen or policemen. Why are they picking up evidence at a disaster? This very rapid cleanup also happened at the World Trade center. At both the Pentagon and the World Trade Center, the cleanup crews were on the site immediately and removed the evidence before investigators could look at it. At the Pentagon some of the cleanup crew were executives. If a Global Hawk crashed into the Pentagon, the pieces of carbon fiber would have to be picked up quickly because if somebody had found a piece of it, he would have announced: Hey, this aint no American Airlines 757. We just got hit by some high tech aircraft. Perhaps the reason Flight 77 vanished from radar near Ohio was because it landed at a military base in the area. Then a Global Hawk may have been sent up to replace it. Since a Global Hawk can fly above 60,000 ft., it could fly from Ohio to the Pentagon above the commercial airplanes. Since it is small and more than 50% carbon fiber, it is not as noticeable on radar as commercial airplanes, especially not when flying at 60,000 feet. This would explain why the air traffic controllers never noticed it on their radar as it traveled to the Pentagon. It also flies at 400 m.p.h., which is the speed the military claims Flight 77 was flying when it hit the Pentagon. Seismic sensors are buried around the world for measuring earthquakes and other events. The sensors are so sensitive that many of them picked up the airplanes as they crashed into the WTC, and they picked up the crash in Pennsylvania. They also picked up the collapse of the towers, and the collapse of Building 7. However, there is no seismic data for the airplane crashing into the pentagon. The scientists who analyzed the data reported: "Despite detailed analysis of the data, we could not find a clear seismic signal." A seismic station near the Pentagon does not show any clear sign of an airplane crash. A different station shows a blip that might be an airplane crash at 9:39. And a third station shows nothing. The blip in the middle graph, which I colored red to make more visible, appears to be a possible airplane crash, but the scientists who analyzed the data claim that it occurred at too high a frequency. The question this leads us to is, would the frequency be too high for the explosion of a missile? |