Six Global Hawks were built as of Dec 2002, so if one of them crashed into the Pentagon, there should be one less in the inventory.

Christopher Bollyn spoke with the Air Force in Dec 2002, and they admitted that two Global Hawks were lost "in ongoing operations". Not surprisingly, the Air Force refused to explain what "in ongoing operations" means.

As previously mentioned, Flight 77 vanished from air traffic controllers near Ohio. Nearly an hour later it was noticed on radar near Washington DC. It was dropping from a high altitude. CBS News describes it as "a downward spiral, turning almost a complete circle".

How do we explain the sudden appearance on radar of Flight 77? Perhaps because it was actually one of the missing Global Hawks, not Flight 77. If a Global Hawk flew from Ohio to the Pentagon above 60,000 feet, it would not be easy to see on radar until it descended to below 10,000 feet.

Flight 77 dropped to tree top level and headed towards the Pentagon, but where are the are witnesses who heard the tremendous roar of its jet engines? The lack of noise suggests that Flight 77 was actually one of the missing Global Hawks, which are very quiet.

As the Global Hawk crossed into Pentagon property, a missile may have been fired at it. Perhaps the Pentagon has missiles in its security system. The missile would have shattered the Global Hawk and incinerated most of its carbon fiber, but just in case small pieces survived, people would have check for scraps.

The fuselage has an aluminum frame, so if a large piece of it survived, it would have to be quickly hidden, also.

While a Global Hawk and a missile can explain what happened at the Pentagon, where are the passengers and crew of Flight 77?

Before trying to answer that question, consider that the bodies of the Pentagon employees who died in the attack were shipped to a morgue in Virginia, and then they were shipped to a morgue in Dover, Delaware. Why the shuffling of dead bodies?

Next consider that dental records, DNA analysis, and other methods were used at Dover, Delaware to identify the body parts, and the investigators claim to have identified body parts of the passengers of Flight 77. How did passengers from Flight 77 end up at Dover when not even a dog could find them at the Pentagon?

Perhaps Flight 77 landed near Ohio, (and everybody was put into a room with a bomb). Their bodies could then shipped to the morgue in Dover, Delaware at the same time the dead Pentagon employees were being shipped to Dover. The people in Dover would never realize that the bodies were coming from different locations.

Building 7 was a 47 story building with a steel frame. No airplane crashed into it, nor did the towers fall onto it. However, this building disintegrated on September 11th.

This satellite image shows the World Trade Center about a year before the attack. Building 7 is the tall building at the top. Building 1 is the north tower. You can distinguish it from the south tower by its antenna. Buildings 4, 5 and 6 were office buildings. Building 3 was a hotel.

The attack on September 11th destroyed all seven of these buildings, and it damaged a few of the surrounding buildings.

Here is a view from an airplane of the rubble of Building 7. The pile is very small. How did a 47 story steel building crumble into such a tiny pile of rubble? Our government believes that fire caused it to disintegrate.

Fires erupted in Building 7 about 9 in the morning, a few moments after the plane crashed into the south tower. The fires burned all day.

This photo shows the fires at 3:00 p.m. The fires are not easy to see because they are small, and there's lots of dust and smoke in the air. Nearby buildings and reflections make it difficult to figure out where Building 7 is, so I'll fade out the other buildings for a moment so that you can see Building 7 more clearly.

There are only a few flames in only a few of the thousands of windows of this large building. Most floors do not have fires, and the floors that do are burning only in a few small areas. Compared to other office fires, these are small. Why didn't the sprinkler system extinguish them?

This photograph shows the rear of building 7.

This side of the building doesn't have many fires, either.

There are no fires anywhere along the base of the building. Incidently, in the background of this photograph are buildings five, on the left, and six, on the right. Both of those buildings have very serious fires burning inside them. It is interesting to note that our Government never bothered to explain how Building 5 ended up with such serious fires.

Despite the fact that the fires in Building 7 were so small that the sprinkler system should have extinguished them, at about 5:30 in the evening, the building suddenly crumbled into a pile of rubble.

How did a few little fires cause Building 7 to crumble? According to Bill Manning, editor in chief of Fire Engineering, a magazine for fire departments, fire has never destroyed a steel building. So how did a fire do what it had never done before?

Perhaps you wonder if incompetent architects designed this building with delicate steel beams. If so, take a look at the beam with the numeral 7 spray-painted on its end. To say the beams in Building 7 were massive would be an understatement. This building was straddling an -electrical substation for the city, so it had some of the thickest steel beams of any building on the planet.

At the upper left corner is a standard I-shaped beam. It would be considered massive in most buildings, but it seems delicate next to the biggest beams of Building 7.

As is typical in the design of buildings, bridges, and most industrial products, Building 7 was designed with more strength than it actually needed.

So how did a building with such a massive steel framework disintegrate into such a tiny pile of rubble from a few tiny fires?

A government agency, FEMA, conducted an investigation into why the buildings in the World Trade Center collapsed.

However, the editor of Fire Engineering magazine became so disgusted by the investigation that the January 2002 issue carried an angry article in which he accused the investigation of being "a half-baked farce."

Later that month both Bush and Cheney asked Tom Daschle to limit the investigation. Apparently, a half baked farce was more of an investigation than Bush and Cheney wanted. I suppose they would have preferred a quarter-baked farce.

In March 2002, the committee on science of the House of Representatives held a meeting to investigate the investigation. There were more insults and accusations at this meeting.

For example, Congressman Boehlert complained that the investigation seems shrouded in excessive secrecy.

Professor Corbet complained that they were trying to run an investigation with part-time engineers and scientists, and on a shoestring budget.

There were also accusations that landlords and insurance companies interfered with the investigation. It seems that a lot of people were helping President Bush ruin the investigation.

During April 2002, the final bits of rubble from the World Trade Center were removed. The thick pieces of steel were sold to foreign nations as scrap metal, and at a very low price, while the less valuable pieces were shipped by barge to be buried.

By May 2002 the World Trade Center had been cleaned up, and all the rubble destroyed, so nobody could conduct any further investigations into how the buildings collapsed.

The editor of Fire Engineering wrote months earlier that this destruction of rubble is illegal. He pointed out that our laws demand rubble be saved from major disasters so that we can learn what happened and improve our buildings and fire prevention techniques. Our government violated the law when it destroyed the rubble from the World Trade Center.

Here are some of the government officials who tried to impeach President Clinton. Tens of millions of Americans were outraged when Clinton lied to us about what he and Monica were doing. These Americans proudly boasted that they are law-abiding citizens, and they will not tolerate government officials who cheat, lie, or deceive. Yet millions of these same Americans either helped our government violate laws during the investigation of the World Trade Center collapse, or those who were not actively helping with the illegal activities were ignoring them.