|
|
| Note from Eric Hufschmid: Somebody sent me this transcript to the "Silence of the Sheeple" video. |
|
October 2007 What should we do with the traitorous, selfish, cowardly jerks who interfere with our attempts to replace the "ruling elite"? On YouTube here. A direct link to my video: Silence-of-the-Sheeple.wmv |
|
The following is a transcript of this video by Eric Hufschmid. We've been somewhat successful in helping people realize that the 9/11 attack was a false flag operation, but we've been failures at convincing people to help us do something about this problem. This is shocking when you consider how easy it is for people to help. For example, people could refuse to purchase the magazines and newspapers that lie to us about 9/11, the Apollo moon landing, and the Holocaust. This would bankrupt the businesses that lie to us. People could also refuse to give money or support to the politicians who refuse to be honest about 9/11 and other issues. People could also discuss 9/11 and related issues with their friends and coworkers, and encourage them look at our websites and videos, but most people refuse to discuss these issues. Some people interfere with the spread of information by reprimanding those of us who discuss these issues in public. Most people prefer to spend their time entertaining themselves with Hollywood gossip, sports, and Harry Potter. People frequently get together to demand money, and they could get together to demand a real investigation of 9/11 and the Holocaust, but, just like animals, most people are so selfish that they will act only if they see a direct benefit to themselves. I can understand women and children not taking a leadership role, but how can we respect men who are too cowardly or selfish to talk about 9/11? And why are the police in America and Europe refusing to arrest the criminals? Those of us who criticize the sheeple are sometimes accused of being just another group of arrogant elitists who merely want to replace the current group of arrogant elitists. This brings up the interesting issue of whether it's possible to get rid of these arrogant elitists. America's Constitution was supposed to prevent this ruling class of arrogant elitists by setting up a government of submissive representatives who serve the people. Unfortunately, the Constitution is not working very well. A good example is the war in Iraq. As of 2007, most Americans want the war to stop, but the government officials are ignoring them. However, the problems with the American Constitution is too complicated for this brief video. I have documents on my Internet site to explain this in more detail. Is it possible for us to learn from our mistakes and develop an improved government system that truly does avoid this ruling elite? There were no elitists thousands of years ago, why do we need them today? Our ancestors didn't have laws, supervisors, policemen, or governments. Everybody was free to do whatever they pleased. So why do you and I have to tolerate all of these arrogant authorities and their laws? Many of these authorities are forcing us to follow laws that are detrimental, selfish, or destructive. An example I mention on my website is that we are forbidden to use of Stevia and hemp. We are also forced us to waste time and money on airport security to protect us from fictional Arab terrorists who want to kill us because we love freedom. We can — and should — get rid of the selfish laws and the corrupt authorities. However, we cannot get rid of a ruling elite because leadership is required for advanced activities, whether it be a construction crew, a symphony, a high school, a factory, or a business. The most obvious reason that we need leadership is to coordinate a large group of people. However, there is a more important reason why we benefit from a ruling elite. Specifically, there are differences in our abilities, so a group of people will be able to accomplish a lot more when they select their more talented members for leadership. A group of construction workers, for example, will create more impressive structures in less time and for less expense when they put their more talented people in control of the group. This creates a ruling elite in which the leaders think of themselves as more talented than the people they supervise. The only way to avoid a ruling elite is to put ordinary people in control of the group, or create some type of representative leadership. Nobody would tolerate that type of leadership for a construction crew, factory, or business, so why would we tolerate it with a nation? People have to face the fact that we cannot get rid of this concept of a ruling elite. There are too many benefits to putting the more talented people into leadership positions. It is foolish to waste time fantasizing about Marxism, anarchy, or representative governments. The only sensible way to improve the world is to put better people into the ruling elite. We can also improve the structure of our governments, businesses, schools, and other organizations; and we can improve the laws that we follow. People have to change their attitudes towards leadership. Instead of complaining about a ruling elite and their laws, our goal should be to improve the ruling elite and their laws, just as we strive to improve computers, airplanes, and other technology. We will always have a ruling elite for every large organization, and the ruling elite will always think of themselves as better than the people they rule over. We can change the people in the ruling elite, but we cannot get rid of the ruling elite. We can change or remove laws, but we cannot get rid of every law. We can change how our economy operates, and we can change the people who control our businesses, but we cannot get rid of people in positions of authority. The world is not suffering because there is a ruling elite. It is suffering because of the people who currently make up this ruling elite. Some are incompetent, some are mentally ill, and many are promoting an idiotic religious fantasy of re-creating Israel and conquering the world. The people who are trying to create Israel imagine themselves as intelligent and talented, but if the people creating Israel were truly talented, then we would see evidence of their talent. Do you see any sign that Israel is any better than any other nation? Is their economy any more advanced than ours? Have their cities been designed in a better manner? Do they have less crime or corruption? The people involved in the Zionist movement certainly do show exceptional talent, but only in cheating, lying, deceiving, intimidating, killing, torturing, and threatening. These talents are desirable only to an organized crime gang. These are not people who belong in the ruling elite. Construction crews, symphonies, and sports groups usually acquire leaders who are truly talented. These leaders usually earned their position. By comparison, political leaders have been achieving their position through monarchies, crime, and deception. We can improve the world simply by changing the people who are in this ruling elite, but how can we get rid of the current group? And how can we find better people to replace them? The human race has a very serious dilemma. The current leaders obviously will not help us replace them, and the majority of people won't help us, either. So how do we give ourselves a better ruling elite? There are lots of ways to improve the world, but we can't seriously make plans until we know how many people we have on our side, and we have to know who they are. Are there any people in the police force willing to help us? Are there any people in the military? Our plans would depend on who is willing to do something. If we could get a lot of military people on our side, we could improve the situation quickly. Unfortunately, most of them naively think that our enemy is Iraq. However, the war has been with the Zionists and other organized crime gangs for centuries. Christopher Bollyn and his family are victims, and so was Anna Lindh of Sweden, Jürgen Möllemann of Germany, thousands of rescue workers in New York City, and millions of other people during the world wars, the Communist revolutions, and the Crusades. Right now the military believes that the war is with Iraq. The soldiers who refuse to fight this war are criticized as deserters. However, the real war is here in America and Europe, and the battle is with the Zionists. The true deserters of this war are our friends, relatives, and neighbors. Actually, these people are worse than deserters. They're not simply hiding from the battle and expecting us to do the fighting for them. Instead, they provide money to the criminals by purchasing their products and services. To make the situation even worse, many citizens try to stop us from fighting Zionism. They insult us, and they try to stop us from discussing the issue in public. If any soldier was caught behaving in this manner, he would be considered an enemy and killed immediately. The military doesn't tolerate such horrendous behavior from other soldiers, so why are they tolerating it from citizens? Does it really matter whether traitorous, selfish, and cowardly behavior comes from a soldier or from a citizen? This horde of "talking animals" is interfering with our attempts to improve the world. It makes me wonder, what if the military killed some of them. Would that shock the others into realizing that this is not a game, and they better start helping US instead of the criminal network? |