A transcript of the audio
Sunday, 2 December 2007
A lot of people wonder "When do we stop talking about 9/11 and Zionism
and start getting rid of this crime network?"
That is a very good question. We acquired more than enough evidence
that Zionists are responsible for 9/11, the Holocaust, and other crimes,
but unfortunately, the police agencies don't care. We've exposed the Zionist
network, and we've identified a lot of their members, but exposing a crime
network doesn't get rid of it. It simply means that the network is now
operating in the open rather than in secrecy.
The amazing refusal of the police, the military, the media, the professors,
and almost everybody else to even talk about this crime network is evidence
that a lot of people in leadership positions are working for this network,
either because they want to, or because they've been tricked into thinking
that they were joining a special organization of special people who are
going to improve the world, or because they're frightened, bribed, or blackmailed.
What I find particularly sad is that it is very easy to get rid of crime
networks. As I've mentioned before, the ordinary people could get rid of
all crime networks simply by saying “No” to their stolen merchandise, gambling
operations, newspapers, wars, drugs, political candidates, bribes, strip
clubs, and pornography. Crime networks depend upon ignorant, unhappy, stupid,
and mentally ill people for financial support and as Useful Idiots.
I'm also amazed that there are so many people willing to work for this
crime network. I suppose some of the members are religious fanatics who've
been tricked into thinking that they're serving God, but how difficult
is it to look through history and notice that this network hasn't done
anything to improve life for anybody, not even Jews?
Some members of the network are becoming incredibly wealthy, but what
is the network doing for the rest of the members? How can so many professors,
policemen, and military leaders be so easily fooled into joining a crime
gang that never accomplishes anything of value? Why can't the members see
how destructive their network is? How can they think of themselves as special
people when they haven't accomplished anything that they can be proud of?
And why can't the people outside the network see how destructive this
gang is? And why can't they understand that we should stop this gang now
before they create more wars and chaos? How can so many ordinary people
have such intense cravings for gambling, television, pornography, and drugs
that they'll give billions of dollars a year to this crime network? How
is it possible that the ordinary people can be so easily fooled into thinking
that Hillary Clinton, or Rudy Giuliani, or Ron Paul are world leaders?
I think one of the reasons that this network in still in control is
because most people, including some of their own members, are still falling
for their tricks. Some of us also occasionally fall for their tricks. Nobody
has an immunity to deception, so don't assume that they can't fool you.
We can all become victims.
However, by exposing their tricks, we can help people avoid becoming
victims. This is why I've been spending time during the last few months
trying to expose their tricks. As more people understand their tricks,
their network will become increasingly less effective.
In this audio file I will show how Zionists are encouraging self destructive
attitudes. It may seem silly to talk about attitudes, but your attitude
affects what your life is. Your attitude determines whether you become
a frightened victim of Zionism, or whether you help us to get rid of it.
Furthermore, I think the Zionists are using our schools and media to
encourage self-destructive attitudes, so if you're aware of this issue,
you can avoid inadvertently picking up the bad attitudes that they're promoting.
A simple example of bad attitudes are the messages I see once in a while
in which somebody will recommend one of my articles or audio files, but
they include a disclaimer such as:
"Although Hufschmid is not a Catholic, I feel it's important
that you look at his information".
Those type of disclaimers come from people with destructive attitudes.
Consider an extreme example to understand this. Imagine receiving an e-mail
message from a person who writes:
"Although Hufschmid doesn't smoke crystal meth, he has interesting
information about the Holocaust."
People have a natural tendency to segregate according to nationality, race,
religion, drug use, and other characteristics, and the Zionists take advantage
of this by encouraging segregation, arrogance, and fights.
Your attitude can make the difference between whether you become a productive
member of the human race that the rest of us are proud of, or whether you
behave like just another of the "Talking Animals".
Another destructive attitude is that most people believe that standing
up to organized crime gangs is taking a terrible risk. It seems that millions
of people today realize that 9/11 was a false flag operation by Zionists,
but most people worry that talking about this crime will put them in danger
of being fired from their job, or killed. It is true that if only a few
of us stand up to this crime network that we are very likely to be killed,
but if millions of people stood up, we have nothing to worry about. This
attitude that millions of people should live in fear of a group of criminals
is extremely detrimental.
So how do we change people's attitudes? How can we stop people from
being frightened of this crime network? Even our police and military are
frightened of crime gangs.
And why am I not frightened of it? The reason I'm not frightened is
because of my attitude. As I briefly mentioned in a document I posted years
ago, the way I look at this situation is that we're all going to die at
some point in time. Actually, it's much worse than what I originally wrote.
Almost every one of us is going to be tortured to death, and the torture
is going to go for years. We may be tortured by arthritis, strokes, cancer,
ringing in our ears, muscular dystrophy, or a deterioration of our digestive
system.
What difference does it make if a Zionist Jew tortures you to death
or if you are tortured to death by nature? The primary difference is that
torture by Zionists is intense but short, whereas torture by nature is
usually at a more mild level, but over a long period of time.
The people who worry about getting killed by Zionists are fools. Almost
all of us are going to finish our lives in pain, suffering, and misery.
Consider the two paths in life we can take. We can live in fear of Zionism,
or we can fight them. If we fight them, we risk being killed by them, but
we also have the opportunity to bring incredible improvements to the world
and our lives. If we can get rid of Zionism and other organized crime gangs,
we have the potential of creating a world where we use our technology to
create nice cities, a wonderful economy, and an amazing variety of food
and other products.
However, if we choose the other path and live in fear of Zionism, all
we can possibly gain is a few more years of the life that we have right
now. Furthermore, it's important for you to realize that hiding from Zionism
doesn't guarantee that you're going to have a long life.
If you think I'm exaggerating, consider the thousands of people who
died during the 9/11 attack, and the thousands of rescue workers who are
suffering serious health problems because they were breathing the dangerous
air at the World Trade Center. Millions of other people died from wars
instigated by Zionists, and thousands of people suffered from the mysterious
fires in Greece and California.
There have also been subway bombings in London and Madrid, and a mysterious
bridge collapsed in Minnesota. Most of the victims of those crimes were
doing nothing to fight Zionism, but they became victims anyway.
Some people worry that they'll get fired from their jobs if they talk
about Zionism, but a lot of people are losing their job because our economy
is deteriorating and because we're wasting a lot of money and resources
on war. Remaining silent about Zionism will not guarantee that you
keep your job.
To summarize this particular issue, almost all of us are going to be
tortured to death regardless of which path we take, and many of you are
going to lose your job simply because our nation is deteriorating. You
may become a victim of Zionism even if you choose to hide from them. But
if you choose to fight Zionism, you have the potential for tremendous rewards.
I say that only a fool would choose to live in fear and take the path
that offers nothing. Furthermore, some of you may be dead or mutilated
a year from now as a result of automobile accidents, or cancer, or strokes.
So don't be a frightened child. Take the path that offers rewards. Don't
be afraid to expose Zionism. Instead, consider it as an exciting adventure
to a new life. And enjoy the adventure!
Another example of detrimental attitudes is an e-mail message I received
the other day from the sister of Dan Wallace. I wrote about Dan Wallace
last year when he died mysteriously. He's the son of a firefighter who
died during the September 11 attack. Dan Wallace got involved with the
9/11 truth group in New York City. Last year he died during his sleep,
but he was only 23 years old. It's unusual for someone his age to die for
no apparent reason. I also found it rather peculiar that nobody in the
so-called truth movement seemed to care about his unusual death.
After he died, his close friend in the 9/11 truth group, Luke Rudkowski,
started getting a lot of publicity in this 9/11 truth movement. I wonder
if Rudkowski killed Dan Wallace, and in return, he was given a promotion.
As you can imagine, some people think I'm getting carried away with
my speculations. Some people assume that Dan Wallace died of natural causes.
Dan Wallace's sister is one of the people who wants me to stop promoting
crazy speculations. She asked me to remove her brother's name and picture
from my website. She said that her family has been through a lot of grief
already, and she implied that my article was making the situation worse.
However, the content of her message and the manner in which it was written
gave me the impression that the Zionists were putting pressure on her to
write the message in an attempt to convince me to remove the information
about her brother's death.
I assumed that those Zionists would read any message that I sent to
her in response, so I responded that unless she has proof that her brother
died of natural causes, his strange death might help other people realize
that they must be more suspicious of these so-called "truth seekers".
I also told her that either she is not Dan Wallace's sister, or the
Jews are putting pressure on her to help them cover up one of their murders.
I deliberately used the word "Jew" in my message because Daryl Smith didn't
like that word. He wanted me to use such expressions as "Jewish community"
or "Jewish people", so I suppose the Zionists are sensitive to the word
"Jew". I also added some critical remarks about the FBI, the police, and
the firemen to further irritate them. I'll put my response in the document
that has this audio file so that you can see it for yourself.
As I expected, my message did upset her, or it upset the Jews
who were reading her e-mail. She called me a leech. I'll let you read the
message yourself.
If she's under pressure by Zionists, then the people who know her should
observe her to figure out who those Zionists are. The American people should
come to her rescue. They should get the names, photos, and addresses of
those Zionists. Her father died during the 9/11 attack, and her brother
died mysteriously last year, and now she may be under pressure by the Zionists.
Furthermore, if the Zionists are pressuring her to remove my article about
her brother, then you should respond by passing my article to even more
people.
It's also possible that Dan Wallace died of natural causes, and that
his sister is not under any pressure by Zionist Jews, and that she's behaving
this way simply because she inadvertently picked up the destructive, crybaby
attitude that the Holocaust victims promote. The Holocaust victims are
always feeling sorry for themselves and looking for pity, and if anybody
looks into the Holocaust, they cry that the investigations will cause them
more grief and suffering.
It's important to realize that this crybaby attitude among the Holocaust
victims is just a trick.They behave in this manner because they're trying
to manipulate us, and they are trying to prevent us from looking into their
precious Holocaust. They know that if we investigate the Holocaust we'll
discover that the Zionists were involved with the Nazis, and that millions
of Jews are lying about what happened during World War II.
The attitude that investigating a crime will cause more grief to the
families of the victims is very destructive. It suppresses investigations
of crime, and it encourages people to get together with one another and
cry like babies. It's a disgusting attitude.
The only way we're going to get rid of crime is to understand why it's
happening and who's doing it. We should not appease the victims who want
to feel sorry for themselves.
The 9/11 attack, the Holocaust, and even the Apollo moon landing are
crimes that affect all of us in some manner. Many of the victims imply
that we have no right to analyze or discuss the crimes because we're not
victims. Actually, I agree that we don't have a “right” to investigate
the crimes. I would say society has a “responsibility” to investigate the
crimes so that we can expose and stop the crime networks, and prevent future
wars and terrorist attacks.
The Wallace family might respond that Dan is their family member, and
that people outside their family should not speculate on what happened
to Dan, but all humans are relatives of each other. If you follow your
ancestry far enough back in time, you'll find out that you are related
to the Wallace family, and so am I. We're all related to each other. I'm
a member of Dan Wallace's family, so why can't I investigate the death
of my relative?
I'm also related to the victims of the Holocaust, and I want an investigation
to find out if the Nazis really did kill my family members -- 6 million
of them! -- in gas chambers.
I'm also related to the victims of the USS Liberty attack, and I want
to find out why my family members were attacked.
I'm even a member of Martin Luther King's extended family, and I want
to know who killed my family member.
Dan Wallace's sister might respond that Dan is her brother, and that
her relationship overrides my relationship to Dan, but life is not a poker
game in which a sister trumps a distance cousin.
Dan Wallace got involved with a 9/11 truth group, and I say we have
a responsibility to look into his death and try to figure out if the truth
group killed him. If the New York City police were honest and responsible,
they would also investigate his death. We should also investigate whether
his sister is under pressure by Zionists, or whether she just has a bad
attitude.
If Dan Wallace was murdered, and if his sister succeeds in suppressing
information about the murder, then she will be helping the Zionists cover
up the murder of her brother.
I don't care if the Wallace family is upset by my wondering if Dan was
murdered. Almost every 9/11 truth seeker seems to be a Zionist agent, and
I say we have a responsibility to figure out if these truth groups are
murdering us.
I didn't look into the death of Dan Wallace because I care about my
distance cousin. Instead, I'm interested in knowing whether these truth
groups are murdering people. Dan Wallace is not the only person to die
mysteriously. And don't forget that Christopher Bollyn and his family appears
to have been kidnapped. I say that a society - and our police - have a
responsibility to investigate unusual suicides, disappearances, and deaths.
Let's now consider the possibility that Dan Wallace did died of natural
causes. In such a case, medical researchers and health officials ought
to have some curiosity as to why a 23 year old man in apparently good health,
died for no apparent reason. What would you think if you had a 23-year-old
son or brother who died for no reason? Wouldn't you wonder what's going
on?
My attitude is that a society should investigate the health problems
of its citizens in order to reduce those problems. Consider the reports
that autism and other disorders are increasing. If the people in our health
field were responsible, they would look to see if these reports are accurate,
and if so, they would study the issue to understand why health problems
are increasing.
There is evidence that some of our health problems are due to the chemicals,
such as pesticides and pollutants. There's also evidence that some chemicals
are so similar to female hormones that they may be partly responsible for
causing girls to develop too early and causing boys to become feminine.
To summarize the issue of Dan Wallace, we should investigate his death
regardless of whether he died of natural causes or murder. We're not going
to improve our health or reduce crime if the victims succeed in suppressing
investigations. We have to tell the victims to shut up and stop feeling
sorry for themselves.
Unfortunately, not many people can stand up to the victims. This is
especially true when trying to understand why boys are becoming feminine.
When we wonder if chemicals are creating homosexuals, we're implying that
homosexuals are some type of genetic defect, and that causes many homosexuals
to complain. We have to tell homosexuals to shut up, and quit feeling sorry
for themselves. We should investigate homosexuality and try to understand
what's causing it.
Homosexuality is an especially significant problem for us today because
they are very easily blackmailed, and they seem to be used as tools by
Zionists and other crime gangs. There is a suspiciously large amount of
homosexuals in the so-called patriot and truth movements, and in government,
and in the white supremacist and Nazi groups.
I think both heterosexuals and homosexuals have detrimental attitudes
towards this issue of homosexuality, and we must change our attitudes in
order to deal with this problem.
To understand how attitudes towards homosexuality can cause trouble,
I'll give you a simple example with one of my particular characteristics.
If you've seen what I look like, then you noticed that my skeleton is about
the same size as a tall 15-year-old boy.
As my teenage years were coming to an end, I started to realize that
my body wasn't going to become the proper size for an adult man. I could
have reacted in a lot of different ways. For example, I could have felt
sorry for myself, and I could have hated men who have normal sized bodies.
But instead I wondered, "what is wrong with my body?"
I couldn't answer the question, of course, and there was nothing I could
do to change the situation, so I decided to accept what I am. I'm also
bald, but I don't feel sorry for myself, and I don't hate people with hair.
And I don't make any attempt to pretend that I have hair. I just accept
it and deal with it.
Now consider homosexuals. If I had this problem, I wouldn't hate heterosexuals,
and I wouldn't feel sorry for myself. I don't wish other men were skinny
or bald, and I was homosexual, I wouldn't wish other people to be homosexual.
Instead, I would wonder "Why did I end up with this problem? What went
wrong during my development?"
I suppose some homosexuals wonder why they're homosexual, but the ones
who get the most publicity are the ones who promote homosexuality as an
alternative lifestyle. The attitude of these homosexuals is destructive.
They're not interested in understanding themselves or making their lives
better. They prefer to feel sorry for themselves, or hate heterosexuals,
or withdraw into a fantasy in which homosexuals are simply an alternative
lifestyle.
Many heterosexuals also have detrimental attitudes. Instead of wondering
why some people are homosexual, and instead of trying to find a way to
reduce the problem, many of them prefer to hate homosexuals, or feel sorry
for them.
If the number of Siamese twins was increasing every year, would you
hate the Siamese twins? Or would you wonder, why is this defect becoming
more common?
The point I'm trying to make is that your attitude towards life determines
whether you accomplish something of value, or whether you waste your life.
Problems are never solved by hatred, pouting, or fantasies. Problems are
solved only when we do serious research into the cause of the problem.
Homosexuality is a serious defect, and we should try to understand what's
causing it. If some of it is due to chemicals, then we can easily reduce
the number of homosexuals by doing a better job controlling the chemicals
that we produce.
I think if we were to study homosexuality we would find that only some
of them are truly born with this defect, and that many, or most, are not
real homosexuals. The real homosexuals will have an attraction to their
own sex long before they have any idea what sex is. But some people seem
to be heterosexual while young, and homosexual only later in life. I think
those particular homosexuals are actually frustrated heterosexuals who
have given up trying to find a spouse and decided to switch to homosexuality.
To those particular people, homosexuality is an alternative lifestyle.
However, rather than pretend that homosexuality is a sensible alternative
lifestyle, we should be wondering why people would want to make such a
switch.
I think that if we were to study this issue we'd discover that human
relationships today are worse than they've ever been in all of human history,
and that people today are not very happy. Our technology provides us with
lots of food, and we have houses that keep us warm in the winter, but technology
only brings us physical comforts. Material items don't do anything for
human relationships or our mind.
For thousands of years almost everybody has concentrated on improving
material items, not improving our social environment. As a result, we have
a lot of advanced material items, but it's debatable as to whether our
social lives have improved.
To get a better understanding of this concept, consider how houses and
religions have changed during the past few centuries. We developed a lot
of technology to provide ourselves with glass windows, plumbing, refrigerators,
and furniture. Our houses today are much more advanced than those of centuries
ago.
But what has improved in regards to religion? Some new religions have
developed, such as Mormons, Scientology, Protestants, and Baptists, but
how is this an improvement over the religions from thousands of years ago?
And how has the Catholic Church improved over what it was centuries ago?
The human race has acquired a lot of physical comforts, but I think
people today are more lonely, frustrated, and unhappy. Some of our problems
are due to deliberate sabotage caused by the Zionist crime network. They
instigate wars between nations; they encourage women to rebel against men;
they bring uneducated people into advanced nations in order to instigate
fights between different races; and they encourage fights between different
religions.
Different people react to the unhappiness and loneliness in different
ways. Some people become homosexual, but most people perfer to form a relationship
with a dog, or with the characters in television programs. Some people
react by trying to become famous or weathly.
If a man chooses to become homosexual because he's become frustrated
finding a woman, is he a bad person? If so, what about a lonely person
who becomes best friends with a dog? America has an incredible number of
pets, and they're increasing. And Americans are spending an incredible
amount of money on their pets. Is this because life is improving for Americans?
I don't think so. I think it's because Americans are becoming increasingly
lonely and unhappy, and millions of these miserable people are reacting
by using pets as substitutes for friends, spouses, and children.
If it's wrong for a man to turn to another man for sex, why isn't it
wrong for a person to use a dog as a substitute for a human friend? What's
the difference? Both activities are unnatural. Both are symptoms of loneliness
or some other problem.
People thousands of years ago had pets, but the animals were not their
friends. They were just animals. Today in America the pets have become
substitutes for humans. This problem has become so extreme that pets are
being given medical treatment that previously only humans would get, and
killing an animal is becoming equivalent to killing a human.
The symptoms of loneliness and unhappiness are everywhere in modern
society. Another example is that some single women pay for massages, but
I don't think it's because their muscles are sore. I think it's because
they desperately want somebody to touch them. What's the difference between
a lonely woman paying for a massage and a lonely man paying for sex? It's
the same behavior, except that men prefer sex, and women prefer affection.
Some lonely men buy inflatable plastic women. Most people consider this
to be bizarre behavior, but how is a man with an inflatable woman any worse
than a man who has a dog as a best friend? It's the same behavior, except
that the dog owners cause a lot of noise and filth in our neighborhoods.
Most people's attitudes are detrimental. When they're lonely or unhappy,
they don't try to understand the cause of their problem, and they don't
try to improve society. Instead, most people react by feeling sorry for
themselves, or hating people who are happy, or looking for a way to stimulate
themselves.
Take a look at the people who have intense cravings for fame, sex, money,
gambling, drugs, or other types of entertainment. These people may seem
to be enjoying life, but I think they're actually very unhappy, and their
reaction is to stimulate themselves to excess in the hope that they will
relieve their misery. They should be asking themselves, "Why do I have
these absurd cravings for fame or money or sex?"
If you want more of my opinions on this issue, go to the Philosophy
page of my website. The reason I brought this issue up is that I think
the Zionists are deliberately ruining society by encouraging bad attitudes.
Naomi Wolf is another example of these Zionists. She's a Jew who had personal
contact with Jesus and is now a Christian. She spent years encouraging
women to hate men and feel sorry for themselves, and today she gets a lot
of publicity so that she can promote her latest book called "The End Of
America". She tries to frighten us into believing that the Bush administration
is becoming another Nazi administration and will soon be putting us into
secret prison camps, and torturing us.
Even the 9/11 truth seekers are giving her publicity. For example, on
November 20, 2007 911blogger posted an interview of her.
911blogger.com/node/12610
A week later Alex Jones interviewed her and helped her to promote her
book and theory that George Bush is an American Hitler.
http://info.t1production.com/20071128_wed_alexmp3
To somebody who is truly naive, Naomi Wolf appears to be a loving Christian
hero who is risking her life trying to warn us about the rise of another
Hitler.
Hopefully all of you who visit my website can figure out what she's
really doing. She's trying to put all of the blame for the world's problems
onto George Bush and a few other Goyim, and she is trying to put herself
and her Jewish friends into the position of hero and savior.
She also starts a lot of her interviews by mentioning that her friend
is the daughter of Holocaust survivors. Like other Zionist criminals, she
loves to promote the Holocaust.
You ought to watch at least a portion of one of her videos because she's
another good example of how phenomenal the Zionist Jews are at lying. You
can't detect any sign in her facial expressions or voice that she's lying.
People like her fooled Christopher Bollyn. For example, Linda Shelton seemed
very pleasant and honest when I talked to her on the telephone, but when
I brought up the Holocaust and the Apollo moon landing, she became bitter.
If I hadn't brought those issues up with her, I never would have seen that
horrible side of Linda Shelton. She's like Daryl Smith, who also has two
extremely different personalities. These people remind me of the story
of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.
Incidentally, the Zionist agents give themselves away when they suppress
serious discussions of the Holocaust and the Apollo moon landing. They
only allow their own agents to talk about these issues, such as David Irving
or David Duke. They won't allow anybody to promote me or my website. The
KPFK radio station in California went so far as to put a message on their
website that they won't promote Jimmy Walter's DVD because it includes
some material from me.
The mysterious disappearance of Christopher Bollyn shows that you can't
trust people simply because they appear sweet and adorable. You must be
suspicious of everybody, especially Jews and people who promote the Holocaust
or the Apollo moon landing. Those are the two crimes that I get the most
pressure to keep quiet about. Even Daryl Smith wanted me to avoid the Apollo
moon landing.
Speaking of Smith, I saw a message on the Internet the other day that
reminded me of some of the phone conversations I had with him. The person
who posted the message said something to the effect that the public was
hopeless, and that it was causing a lot of frustration and stress in his
life to educate them, and that he decided to accept the fact that this
crime network is going to continue to rule over us regardless of how much
we try to stop it. He said that ever since he decided to give up fighting
them, he can finally relax and enjoy life again.
I suppose anybody who listens to my audio files has already experienced
the frustration of trying to help other people understand 9/11. We're all
shocked to discover that most people really don't want to know the truth,
and that trying to help them understand the problems we face is as frustrating
as trying to teach arithmetic to a dog.
The majority of people just don't have what it takes to deal with the
problems in this modern world. Some of them are educated and intelligent,
but their emotions are suitable only for a primitive life in which they
live in a small community, spend their day time searching for food, and
spend their evenings sitting around the campfire. They have serious problems
coping with modern issues, such as money, credit cards, alcohol, presidential
elections, pornography, organized crime, and television.
Before the Internet, I can understand why people would give up after
a few years and either quit wasting their time, or join the Zionist crime
network. Today, however, the Internet is allowing us to contact each other
and spread information easily. As I mentioned in my other audio files,
I think we're starting to beat the Zionists.
Other people also have noticed that it's easier today to talk about
9/11 and Zionism than it was just a year ago. Since it appears as if we're
starting to beat them, why would anybody want to quit at this point in
time? Furthermore, if a person wants to quit, why doesn't he just quit
quietly? Why does he post messages on the Internet to convince the rest
of us that our struggle is hopeless and that we should also quit?
Well, I think the people who are posting those messages are Zionist
agents. When an honest person becomes frustrated, he simply quits. He doesn't
go on a campaign to convince the rest of us to quit, also. Take a look
at other activities to understand this. For example, when a person becomes
frustrated in his struggle to become a professional athlete, he just quits
and find something else to do. He doesn't go on a campaign to convince
other athletes to also quit.
That message about quiting reminded me of some of the conversations
I had with Daryl Smith, and it made me notice that Smith shows no sign
of giving up. Actually, he's expanding his operation. He just started the
website iamthewitness.tv so that he can provide videos. He also just purchased
more equipment.
The expansion of Smith's operation won't seem strange to you until I
explain some of the conversations we've had over the past couple years.
Smith started doing radio shows in January 2005, and sometime before
October of that same year he complained to me that his website and radio
show were not increasing in popularity very quickly, and he started asking
me why we are wasting our time and money on people who don't care. I don't
know when he first started complaining, but I know that I posted an article
at my site in October 2005 in which I mention his concerns at the end of
the article, so it had to be before October of 2005. The article is called
What
is Zionism?
WhatIsZionism.htm
During the next two years Smith would occasionally tell me that he was
getting tired of the struggle, and that he felt like quitting so that he
could get back to a normal life. He would complain that his wife doesn't
like him sitting at a computer all day, and he would complain that the
struggle was unpleasant and causing a lot of frustration and stress in
his life. He also complained that it was ruining his health. He also complained
to a certain extent on some of his radio shows. He was also worried that
he would get arrested for Holocaust denial, or that the Mossad would kill
him.
When he would bring up this issue of quitting during our phone conversations,
I would respond in the same manner every time. I would tell him to take
a break for a few weeks or months. We would discuss the issue for a while,
and eventually he would tell me that he can't take any time off because
even though he gets frustrating, it would bother him even more to quit.
I don't know how many of these conversations we had, but it seemed like
they were increasing as time went on. Since they always ended the same
way, I felt like telling him, "Oh, please, not again! We just went through
this last month!"
So that brings me up to today. I stopped working with Smith on September
8, 2007. The first thing I did was to move some of the files I created
for him over to my site because I thought he might delete his site and
quit. To my surprise, he didn't quit. He started announcing that his health
problems were not very serious, and that he wants to expand his operation.
But if his health is so good, why was he telling me his health was lousy?
And if he wants to expand his operation now, why was he telling me that
he wanted to quit?
Well, I now suspect that all of those depressing conversations in which
he told me that he wanted to stop the struggle to expose Zionism because
it was ruining his life, his marriage, and his health was an attempt to
get me depressed, frustrated, and disillusioned. Since I never did get
depressed or show any sign that I wanted to quit, he would try again, and
again, and again.
I dismissed his depressing conversations as being due to his poor health
and his emotional disorders, but now I think they were all deliberate attempts
to ruin my attitude.
The reason you should be aware of this issue is that you might also
encounter people who try to convince you that the struggle is hopeless,
and that you should give up. Don't let them fool you. They're trying to
become like a ball and chain around your leg. They're trying to drag you
down.
If somebody truly cannot deal with the stress, tell them to quietly
give up and let the rest of us deal with it. Tell them that they're not
going to help the situation with their depressing attitude.
Zionist agents are in a predicament. Their attempts to manipulate us
can backfire because if we discover that they're agents, we can analyze
their behavior, identify their tricks, and then warn other people about
them and their tricks.
Furthermore, once we expose a Zionist agent, we should consider that
all of the people they've been associating with in promoting are also agents.
for example, Smith promoted Dr. Sahib Mustaqim Bleher, who describes himself
as a German who moved to England and became a Muslim. He founded the Islamic
Party of Britain with several other people, such as David Pidcock, who
is another person that Smith promotes. Pidcock is an Englishman who also
became a Muslim. Pidcock wrote several books, such as Satanic Voices, Ancient
And Modern, which is currently on the main page of Smith's website.
Both Pidcock and Bleher provide some interesting information, but that
doesn't mean they're honest. Their information may be nothing more than
bait to lure gullible Goyim over to their site and away from the honest
researchers. My advice is don't trust any Caucasian Muslim. Even if a Muslim
look like an Arab, be careful because some Arabs have sold out to the Zionists,
and some Arabs are actually Jews who are pretending to be Arabs.
It's also interesting that the website Mathaba.net, which refers to
itself as a news agency, promotes those Caucasian Muslims. They also promote
Professor Chossudovsky of Global Research, Mike Rivero of whatreallyhappened.com,
Lyndon LaRouche, and Kurt Nimmo.
Obviously, Mathaba.net is not a news agency. It's just another Zionist
propaganda site, and it provides more evidence that those Caucasian Muslims,
Pidcock and Bleher, are also Zionist agents.
Smith also promoted a woman named Felicity Arbuthnot. She works with
the website UNobserver.com, which creates the impression that it's watching
over the United Nations and protecting Arabs, but that website promotes
such goofballs as Mike Ruppert who has FromTheWilderness.com.
They also promote the Traprock Peace Group. A woman who claims to be
an expert on the depleted uranium issue is Leuren Moret, and she doesn't
have her own website, so she promotes the Traprock Peace Group website.
Even if you don't know anything about Leuren Moret, you should immediately
realize that she cannot be trusted when I tell you that she's a regular
guest on the Jeff Rense radio show. Anybody who is promoted by Jeff Rense
should be regarded with suspicion, and anybody who appears regularly on
his show should be considered a definite Zionist agent.
Rense has a list of his guests, so if you think I'm exaggerating, take
a look at who he promotes. His guest list what is a who's who of Zionist
agents. The Zionists are inadvertently helping us by providing lists of
their agents. If we can just find enough people who want to do something,
we can put an end to this Zionist nightmare quickly.
rense.com/about/GUESTSLINKS.htm
Another suspicious aspect of Leuren Moret is that when Christopher Bollyn
traveled to San Francisco to interview a nuclear physicist, Moret would
want to be at the interview. Zionist agents are always trying to watch
us and manipulate us.
Furthermore, she was always claiming to be low on money, so I sent her
a free copy of some videos including my own, before I realized she couldn't
be trusted. The Zionists are always trying to trick us into feeling sorry
for them and doing things for them. They consider themselves clever when
they trick us, but what they really are is disgusting parasites and con
artists.
This attitude that criminals are clever is another destructive attitude.
A person is not clever when he gets away with a crime. The reason is because
it's much easier to destroy than it is to create. If a criminal truly had
talent, he would be able to make a living in an honest manner. It takes
talent, for example, to design and build a nice home, but it doesn't take
talent to light it on fire.
If Leuren Moret was truly a talented scientist, as she claims, then
she would be able to make an honest living. She wouldn't need to beg for
handouts. The same is true with the other Zionist agents. If they're such
talented people, why are they begging us for small amounts of money? The
reason they beg for money is because they're not clever people. They can
barely feed themselves. They're losers. They depend upon crime and handouts
because they have so much trouble making an honest living.
The Zionists consider themselves clever because they can start fires,
murder people, deceive us, and find ways to abuse laws, but that's not
talent. If the Zionists were truly talented, they would be able to solve
problems that nobody else could solve, and their opinions on life would
be so valuable that we would want to save them for future generations.
We would also be able to see the evidence of their brilliance in their
personal lives and in Israel. But as I mentioned in some of my other audio
files, we don't see any evidence in their lives or in Israel that they
have wonderful qualities. What we instead see is evidence that they are
amazingly selfish, untrustworthy, neurotic, and parasitic. Some of them
might make intelligent remarks once in a while, but before you let yourself
be impressed by them, ask yourself, were they the source of that intelligent
information? Or did they steal it from somebody like me?
Before you become impressed by somebody, take a look at whether they
were the person who created the information, or if they just stole it.
The Zionists always turn out to be plagiarizers, thieves, and con artists.
They're disgusting freaks, and we must find enough people who are willing
to stand up to them. They're a cancer on this planet. If we can get rid
of them, we can start the process of bringing about better governments,
better cities, a better economy, a better media, and a better school system.
Speaking of government leaders, Ron Paul was recently interviewed on
television and he claimed that we are not allowed to have a central bank
under the control of the government, and that we should have competition
with money. Listen to this excerpt:
Lawrence Kudlow:
Give us a sense of where you'd like to go.
Ron Paul:
Well, we should follow the law, and the law is the Constitution, and
the Constitution says that only gold and silver should be legal tender.
We don't really have clear authority to have a central bank. Jefferson
and Jackson got rid of a national bank because they didn't like it. We've
only had a central bank for a relatively short period of time.
But we can't get rid of the Fed in a day or a week. But we could legalize
competing currencies. I mean we compete with currencies around the world
all the time. But why can't we have gold and silver competing as currency
and let people save?
Get the taxes off currency. You can't tax money. So there's a way to
develop a competing currency under the current situation, and if people
don't like the fiat currency that continues to lose its value, they can
opt out and start dealing in gold and silver.
Ron Paul wants his friends in the gold and silver business to have
a competing currency. Does this make sense to you? Ron Paul is just another
Zionist puppet. We're not going to solve our problems by swapping one Zionist
puppet with another. We've got to get rid of this entire crime network.
When I pointed out in one of my previous audio files that Ron Paul is
involved with the Ludwig von Mises Institute, somebody noticed that a homosexual
bishop, Robert Sirico, is involved with the group acton.org, and it also
is involved with the Mises Institute. It's not a coincidence that Ron Paul
is getting tremendous support from Zionist Jews, homosexual Bishops, Jeff
Rense, Alex Jones, and other suspicious people. Ron Paul is just another
deceptive Zionist puppet.
Don't let Ron Paul fool you, and don't fear Zionism. They don't have
any magic powers over us. They're a group of selfish, abusive freaks who
depend upon murder, blackmail, bribery, and deception. We can beat them
by exposing them and their tricks.
For example, have you seen the recent news report about a teacher in
Sudan who is threatened with death for allowing a student to name a teddy
bear Muhammad? I would bet that Zionist Jews set up that incident and are
promoting it in order to create anger towards Muslims. It seems similar
to those cartoons of Muhammad that were published in Denmark. As Christopher
Bollyn showed in a series of articles, those cartoons were coming from
Zionists.
The Zionists did similar tricks to make Germany look bad prior to World
War II. We can defeat these criminals by exposing their tricks. So help
me to spread this information. And don't let anybody fool you into quiting.
We are beating them. This is why they're struggling so much right now to
saturate us with Holocaust propaganda, and it's why Naomi Wolf is trying
to frighten us into believing that Bush is another Hitler. The Zionists
are on the defensive today. This appears to be the first time they have
ever been on the defensive.
The Internet has allowed us to remove their secrecy, and there's no
possible way for them to get it back. They have been exposed, and we know
who they are. Now we just have to find enough people who want to get rid
of this crime network.
So try to develop a better attitude. Don't feel sorry for yourself.
Learn to accept what you are, and try to understand your problems. Don't
pretend that you're perfect, or that you're something you're not. Encourage
discussions and research. Set a good example and inspire other people.
Try to counteract the destructive attitudes and the fear that the Zionists
are encouraging. |
