| The ADL has smeared me since November 2001 for challenging the accepted
version of 9/11 and bringing forth evidence of Israeli involvement in the
terror attacks that changed the world.
My cardinal sin as a 9/11 researcher and activist – the thing that made
me Public Enemy No. 1 in the eyes of the ADL – is that I have brought forth
evidence that implicates Israeli intelligence and a network of highly-placed
Zionist agents in the U.S. government and media in the "false flag" terror
attacks and the subsequent cover-up of the truth.
It should come as no surprise that because I discuss the evidence of
Israeli involvement in 9/11, my reporting is strictly taboo in the controlled
media. I have also been marginalized within the so-called "9/11 truth movement,"
which, like the media, is largely controlled by wealthy and influential
Zionists.
One 9/11 "truth seeker," for example, Jenna Orkin of New York
City, whose father was known as the "Mighty Ork" of Hollywood, played the
"anti-Semite" card to prevent me from speaking in Vienna during the European
Truth Tour financed by Jimmy Walter in 2005.
More on Orkin: Zion-Pest-Control.htm
Supporters of Israel and the Zionist-controlled media have sought to
brand me as an anti-Semite in order to avoid discussing the evidence.
That is exactly what CNN did to me in January 2007. From a 2-hour interview,
which they claimed to have arranged to discuss the evidence of 9-11, they
included only the briefest segment in which I was asked, "Are you an anti-Semite?"
Please listen to the raw audio and then watch the edited
CNN interview to understand the true goal of CNN:
Bollyn-CNN-interview.html
9/11 & NETANYAHU'S "MAD FANTASY"
Having studied the Israeli-Palestinian conflict for decades and earned
a degree in its history, I was aware, long before 2001, of the Zionist
history of using "false flag" terrorism to advance Israel's strategic objectives.
I was also aware that one of Israel's chief objectives is to bring the
armies of the United States and other western nations into the Middle East
on a long-term basis to defeat and defang the most recalcitrant foes of
the Zionist state, primarily Iraq, Iran, and Syria.
A goal of Israel's regional strategy is to "Balkanize" or partition
the nations of the Middle East into weak ethnic "statelets," as was done
with the former Yugoslavia.
See: Bollyn-Balkanize_Iraq.html
The "War on Terror" is a radical Zionist concept, first introduced and
articulated by Benjamin Netanyahu, the extreme right-wing Israeli politician,
in a series of books and articles which appeared not long after Israel's
criminal and disastrous invasion of Lebanon failed in the mid-1980s. Netanyahu's
first book on the subject, Terrorism: How the West Can Win, appeared in
1986.
Three days after 9/11, Netanyahu, the former Israeli prime minister,
was on Fox News telling Brit Hume and the gullible American public what
the government should do to "counter the threat of further Islamic terrorist
attacks" on the United States:
| "I think what is required right now is for the United States not merely
to seek out the specific perpetrator here, but to go and dismantle the
entire evil empire of terrorism, because, if we don't, what I wrote in
1995, while it didn't come to fruition in precisely the way – they didn't
plant a nuclear bomb in the twin towers – they used a 350-ton conventional
bomb.
But these regimes that are part of this terror network are developing
now nuclear weapons. If we don't dismantle this terror network in time,
the regimes and the organizations that have absolutely no inhibition in
destroying the United States and its allies. Then what we will see is that
one day their mad fantasy will bring about not tens of thousands or even
20,000 victims in the United States, but hundreds of thousands or millions.
They are after our civilization. We must summon the forces of civilization
and the force and the power to act against them now, when we have the power
and when we still have the time to do so." |
These rabid thoughts are those of one of the chief Zionist architects
of the "War on Terror." Netanyahu was saying what he thought the United
States had to do to respond to 9/11 – and this is exactly what President
George W. Bush and the U.S. Congress have done. The Zionist dominated government
of Great Britain has done the same.
There is, however, ample evidence to prove that 9/11 was an elaborate
"false flag" operation designed to kick start the Zionist "War on Terror"
that Netanyahu and his Zionist cohort had long dreamed of and actively
promoted.
Apart from the obvious fact that Israel was the main beneficiary of
the terror attacks, which were quickly blamed on 19 Arabs, there were hundreds
of Israeli suspects who were apprehended as suspects in the attacks.
Most conspicuous were the gangs of Israeli intelligence agents, such
as the 5 "dancing Israelis," who operated disguised as "moving men" and
were caught filming themselves celebrating with the burning World Trade
Center in the background. Similar teams of Israeli "movers," in moving
vans that tested positive for explosives, were caught later near sensitive
military facilities across the United States.
There were also more than 120 fake Israeli "art students" who evidently
managed the "Arab hijackers" in south Florida. Other Israeli "art students"
were caught trying to infiltrate strategic targets across the nation.
ISRAEL'S TERRORIST HISTORY
Familiar with the 1983 bombing of the Marine barracks in Beirut, the
Lavon Affair, and the attack on the USS Liberty, I know that the State
of Israel has a long history of perpetrating "false flag" attacks on American
targets in order to create the impression that the Arab states are anti-American
and that Israel is the only trustworthy ally in the region.
In early 2001, both the United States and Israel came under radical
regimes of the extreme right, the Christian-Zionist Republican Party of
George W. Bush and the Jabotinsky-Irgun Likud Party of Ariel Sharon, respectively.
This unfortunate congruence of ideological allies presaged more genocidal
violence of the type Israel had inflicted on Lebanon in 1982 when the former
Irgun terrorist Menachem Begin and genocidaire Ariel Sharon held power
in Israel and Ronald Reagan occupied the White House.
As Israelis know very well, the bloodletting often begins with the loss
of their own. Ariel Sharon perfected the bloody art of provocation and
false flag terrorism among the Palestinians and Israelis in order to foment
the violence and civil strife that allowed him to realize his strategic
goals.
From the beginning, 9/11 had all the hallmarks of a spectacular act
of Zionist terrorism: an Israeli crime designed to be blamed on Arabs.
As an independent journalist writing for a "populist" weekly newspaper
in Washington, D.C., I was allowed to think – and write – about the evidence
of the unthinkable: Israeli involvement in 9/11.
By the end of November 2001, after having written a series of articles
based on evidence that was in the public domain, the ADL listed me under
"Miscellaneous Hate Groups/Anti-Semitic Groups" as working for a "conspiratorial
and anti-Semitic weekly newspaper," which had "turned to the subject of
the 9/11 attacks as grist for its mill."
See: www.adl.org/terrorism_america/saying_121101.asp
Oddly, the ADL singled out my article entitled, "Some Survivors Say
Bombs Exploded Inside WTC," which had nothing to do with Israel, without
mentioning my first 9/11 article about the 5 dancing Israelis who were
nabbed celebrating the attacks on the World Trade Center.
The Anti-Defamation League obviously wanted to defame me without bringing
attention to the very real evidence of Israeli involvement while the nation's
wounds were still raw.
When the ADL listed me as an "anti-Semitic" journalist on November 29,
2001, I had already made the prudent decision to move to Europe. Realizing
that my analysis of 9/11 directly challenged the "official" version and
that the murder of 3,000 people was being covered up by the government
and the controlled media of the United States, I thought I would be safer
writing from Europe.
The ADL has continued to put me on its smear sheets of "anti-Semitic
conspiracy theorists" ever since. On September 7, 2006, for example, three
weeks after I was attacked and TASERed by a local officer/agent of the
Dept. of Homeland Security, the ADL put out a national press release in
which I was the first person listed as a "conspiracy theorist" who "blamed
the Israeli intelligence agency Mossad for (sic) the Israeli government
for the attacks."
See:
www.adl.org/main_Anti_Semitism_Domestic/9_11_conspiracy_theories.htm
The ADL exercises considerable influence within local police departments
across the United States. It is most unusual and improper for an advocacy
group working for a foreign state to wield such influence over law enforcement
agencies. When a local policeman opened his book to write up a report,
I saw that he had an ADL instruction brochure with their guidelines for
carrying out an investigation.
If I was Public Enemy Number 1 for the ADL when I was assaulted and
TASERed by out-of-uniform police, I need to know what the ADL had told
the local police about me prior to the assault. Had the ADL smeared my
name to the police? This would explain why the local police force was so
hostile to me. They had probably been prepared with misinformation that
prejudiced the police against me. The police, who are meant to serve and
protect the public, are now being used as attack dogs for the State of
Israel.
Immediately after I was beaten and TASERed by the out-of-uniform hit
squad, I was attacked in the media by two people, Lisa Guliani and Scott
Makufka (a.k.a. Victor Thorn) who supposedly worked with the 9/11 truth
movement. What was most bizarre about this attack on my credibility is
that these people were working closely with Michael Bernard Piper (a.k.a.
Michael Collins Piper) and the American Free Press, a Washington-based
weekly I wrote for at the time.
Guliani and Makufka wrote articles and produced Internet radio shows
on WING TV, their website, in which they attacked the credibility of my
account of what happened when I was assaulted and TASERed. Without even
contacting me, Guliani and Makufka sought to impugn my credibility by relying
solely on information provided by a police spokesman, Lt. Richard Russo,
who could only refer to the police report of the incident.
The police arrest report was written by Michael Barber, the out-of-uniform
officer who led the three-man tactical team which assaulted me. Barber
had also worked with the Dept. of Homeland Security in post-Katrina New
Orleans. Barber is the man who handcuffed and TASERed me while I was held
down by two men, one of whom was kneeling on the critical temporal pressure
point of my head.
Barber's arrest report was written after the arrest with little regard
for the truth but with an obvious concern to present a version of events
that would justify the police assault and use of the TASER on a restrained
and subdued individual. It should be noted that the TASER is the last level
of force short of using lethal force in the use of force continuum, and
should only be used when all other options have failed to bring a suspect
under control.
The arrest report is obviously full of lies and fabrications, some of
which clearly contradict each other. The report does reveal, however, that
the out-of-uniform team had made preparations to assault and TASER me,
which they did within 20 seconds of my coming out of the house. The documented
transmission logs of the police and fire departments help to expose the
lies of the police arrest report.
See: Timeline_of_Events-arrest.html
SETTING THE STAGE
The fact that no fewer than 5 police cars with 8 officers and two emergency
vehicles from the fire department were en route to my house before anyone
had even arrived on the scene indicates that the police were treating my
non-emergency 911 call in a most unusual way.
The out-of-uniform tactical unit (No. 6744) led by Michael Barber intentionally
misled 911 dispatch with false information that there was a "fight in progress"
at my house at 20:01:03, i.e. three minutes before they even arrived at
20:03:56. This false report led the fire dispatcher, who sits beside the
police dispatcher, to send an emergency crew of paramedics and a fire engine
to the scene (20:01:06).
Deputy Fire Chief Robert Gorvett looked into why the paramedics arrived
on the scene at the same time as the out-of-uniform unit. Chief Gorvett
told me that it was because the out-of-uniform tactical unit in vehicle
6744 had informed 911 dispatch of "violence at the scene" 3 minutes before
they arrived.
Gorvett said that the medics had not examined my injuries because Ofc.
Wesley Schulz had told them that it was not necessary. Schulz also denied
me medical attention during the entire time I was in police custody although
I told him that my right elbow was injured.
Why did the out-of-uniform tactical unit provide false information to
the 911 dispatch? At that time there was certainly no "fight in progress"
at my house and I was not even at home. I was still on my way home from
the store where I had made the 911 call. Barber's team evidently provided
this misleading information in order to have emergency personnel on the
scene in case their planned assault resulted in serious injury or death.
As it happened, the fire department emergency medical vehicles arrived
on the scene at 20:03:57, exactly one second after the out-of-uniform police
unit.
BARBER'S LIES
The following are some of the lies contained in the police report written
by Ofc. Michael Barber.
The arrest report, written by Barber, begins: "I, M. Barber #275 was
patrolling in a blue unmarked police car with Ofc. Stoy #210 and Ofc. Felgenhauer
#225 near Kingman and Illinois. All of us were wearing blue jeans t-shirts
and black vests which carry body armor, clearly marked with a badge and
the word 'Police' on said vest."
But later in the report Barber says: "We explained to him that we were
with Hoffman Estates Police Dept. and Ofc. Felgenhauer showed him his badge."
First of all, these men never told me that they were with the Hoffman
Estates Police Dept. And why would Felgenhauer have to show me his badge
(which he didn't) if his armored vest was "clearly marked with a badge,"
as Barber wrote in the second sentence of the report?
My wife, Helje, was the first one to confront the three armed intruders
on our driveway but Barber's report omits this fact. The men did not say
hello, introduce themselves, or even say they were responding to my 911
call. Who these unidentified men were and what they wanted were our primary
concerns.
When Helje asked them to identify themselves, they seemed perplexed.
If the three men were wearing identical vests with police badges and the
word "Police" on the front, she certainly would have seen it and not have
asked, "Who are you?"
The first obligation of a plainclothes police officer is to identify
himself as a police officer to the person he engages.
Unable or unwilling to show a proper badge or a police ID, Felgenhauer
pulled out his Illinois driver's license. This seemed very suspicious to
Helje. Barber flashed some kind of a badge on his belt by lifting up his
body armor. This interaction occurred with Helje in the first 30 seconds,
before I came into the scene.
None of these men were willing to give their names. The identities of
these unidentified men were only revealed to us a month later, on September
18, by Lt. Perritano in a hand-written note.
One man is all that is required to explain – common sense would say
that the other two should have remained in the car. Why should a team of
three unidentified armed men in body armor, the very cause of my concern,
march up my driveway to explain? It certainly appears that these men had
a plan to intimidate and assault me – not explain their presence around
my house.
During the assault, Helje tried to take photographs but was physically
blocked and threatened with arrest by Ofc. Felgenhauer if she dared try
to photograph the police assault. These photographs would have shown what
the men did and wore during the assault.
Barber's arrest report begins with a fundamental lie in the police version
of events. Contrary to what Barber wrote, there was no "Officer Presence,"
the first level in the use of force continuum, i.e. there were no visible
uniforms or badges on the body armor vests of the three men. No police
IDs were shown and the word "Police" was not printed on vests. How should
we have known these men were police?
It was precisely because these men refused to provide any identification
that the situation was not peacefully resolved. These men were aggressive
and confrontational. They intentionally created tension by refusing to
show any police identification to me.
Why weren't these men prepared to show their police identification –
if that was really the reason they had come to my house?
Their failure to identify themselves is what prevented them from resolving
this 911 call in a professional manner. It appears that they conspired
to confront me in order to assault me.
Barber's report continues: "At approximately 1930 hours, we conducted
a traffic stop near Kingman and Roselle."
I don't know if this is true or not, but why would an out-of-uniform
tactical unit wearing body armor in an unmarked police car conduct a routine
traffic stop while on a "gang suppression mission," which is what they
told my brother they had been doing?
For that matter, why would a tactical unit on a "gang suppression" mission
bother to answer a non-emergency 911 call? Why not let the normal uniformed
police office handle the resident's call about the suspicious vehicle?
A month later, Lt. Perritano said these men had actually been doing
"cross training." Was I part of the cross training? Was I the gang to be
suppressed?
"At 1947 hours patrol received a call of a suspicious vehicle, a dark
colored Ford Crown Victoria with 3 white males in the car…" Barber wrote.
"We explained to dispatch that it was probably our patrol car and we would
respond to the call and explain to the complaint (sic) that we were the
police."
Here the report contradicts what Chief of Police Clint Herdegen told
us during the August 17 meeting, which we taped. Herdegen told us that
he had sent the out-of-uniform unit to our house to identify themselves
and explain their purpose in our neighborhood.
If these were the orders given to the men by Chief Herdegen, why did
the men fail to follow them? What were the real orders these men were operating
under?
Furthermore, why would Herdegen send the tactical unit to my house after
the 911 dispatcher had already dispatched uniformed Ofc. John Fitzgerald
to respond to my call? And why does Herdegen's communication not appear
in the transmission log?
Was Herdegen involved in this conspiracy from the beginning? Did he
send this unit to patrol around my house in the first place – before my
911 call? How often does Chief Herdegen get involved in non-emergency 911
calls?
Barber wrote, "He [Bollyn] immediately said something to the effect
of 'what agency are you with and why are you patrolling on my street. I
saw you guys drive by 2 days ago?'"
Yes, I did ask the three men who they were and what agency they were
with. I would not have asked this if their vests said "Police" and were
"clearly marked with a badge."
I said that I had seen them prowling around my house for two days in
a row and I wanted to know who they were and what they were doing around
my house.
If the police chief had ordered these three men to my house to identify
and explain themselves, why didn't they do that?
"We smelled an extreme odor of an alcoholic beverage coming from his
breath and I also noticed that his eyes were bloodshot and glossy," Barber
wrote.
This is a lie. I was sober, I had just biked to and from the store where
I made the 911 call. I was standing at least 6 feet from the men on my
driveway. I had been doing my journalistic work, researching and writing
at the computer and making telephone calls all day. My eyes were neither
bloodshot nor glossy, although I do wear contact lenses. It was the end
of the day and my eyes get tired, especially after sitting in front of
the computer all day long.
If the medics would have checked me on the scene, they would have witnessed
that I was sober. No field sobriety test was done by the police either.
As a matter of fact, no medical attention was given to me although I had
been TASERed and my elbow had been injured.
"Ofc. Felgenhauer noticing the agitated state of Bollyn called for immediate
backup," Barber wrote.
We certainly didn't see Felgenhauer do this and there were three of
us watching these men closely. Furthermore, there is no indication of this
in the transmission log. The log, in fact, shows that there were at least
8 officers in 5 police vehicles either on the scene or en route to my house
before the out-of-uniform unit had even arrived.
One marked police car had arrived first, but had kept itself at some
distance from my house. Now, why would a uniformed police officer (Joseph
Kruschel) responding to a resident's non-emergency 911 call do that?
A second police car arrived shortly before I was attacked. This was
Ofc. Fitzgerald, the uniformed police officer who had been dispatched to
handle the call in the first place, according to the police log. Why had
Fitzgerald not responded to the call instead of the tactical unit? Did
Herdegen tell him to hold back and let the tactical team confront me first?
Is this not proof of a conspiracy to entrap, threaten and provoke a
physical altercation?
"Bollyn was yelling louder and louder as time progressed," Barber continues.
"Bollyn was clenching his teeth and began rocking his body back and forth
in an aggressive demeanor and I saw his right hand opening and closing
into a fist. We once again tried to explain to him who we were and what
we were doing."
This is a complete fabrication. None of this is true. My encounter with
the police was extremely short, lasting about 15-20 seconds before they
attacked me. There was certainly no clenching of teeth or fists and I did
not rock my body in any way. These are lies.
The three men did nothing to de-escalate the situation. They did not
conduct themselves as professional police. These men made no attempt to
identify themselves or explain what they were doing. If they had identified
themselves or worn badges on their vests there would have been no reason
for me to fear them or fetch my brother from the house to help me.
"He then said something to the effect of, 'You are just a bunch of Fed
bastards…,'" Barber wrote.
This is an interesting fabrication. If they had worn clearly visible
badges and had identified themselves as Hoffman Estates police, why would
I be calling them "Fed bastards?" This makes no sense at all.
"I asked him to calm down," Barber continues, "at which time he raised
his left hand in a pointing fashion, pointing his finger approximately
3 inches in front of my face and said 'I'm on my property.' His chin was
lowered, teethed (sic) clenched and his body was bladed like in a boxer
stance. I saw his right hand now clinched in a fist. I immediately stepped
back and told him to put his fist down."
These are all fabrications. This description is presented in the arrest
report in order for Barber to say that I threatened him and that I was
close enough to deliver a blow. These are the requirements for the charge
of aggravated assault.
I made no fist at any time, nor was my "body bladed like in a boxer
stance." I have no history of violence or fighting, I am not a boxer, nor
have I had any training in martial arts or self defense.
There were three armed men wearing body armor confronting my wife and
child and I was completely unarmed. Here the officer says that I am physically
threatening him while he has two armed men beside him and another 8 officers
arriving behind him? This is quite preposterous.
The fact is that I never got closer than about 6 feet to these men and
my arm is less than 3 feet long.
Barber continues: "As I stepped back, he stepped towards me again. I
put my right hand up to stop him from coming any closer to me…"
This is pure fantasy. Barber is creating a scene that simply did not
occur. I was no closer than 6 feet from these three men and had no desire
to get any closer. Barber did not have to raise his hand to keep me from
coming closer. He is trying to go through the steps of the use of force
continuum in order to justify what he said he did next – unsnap the holster
to his weapon.
"UNSNAPPED MY HOLSTER"
Barber continues, "…and unsnapped my holster to my X-26 taser with my
left hand."
When Barber unsnapped the holster to his weapon as he stood facing me,
I would have seen this as a clear warning of an imminent assault with a
weapon. I would have perceived this as a direct threat to my life by an
unidentified intruder.
The fact that Ofc. Barber says he unsnapped the holster to his TASER
gun seconds after his arrival, indicates that he was more prepared to use
a weapon than he was to identify himself.
Here Barber indicates that he was preparing to use his TASER and even
letting the suspect know that he intended to use a weapon.
This is evidence that it was Ofc. Barber who was preparing for an armed
assault and who had the ability to deliver it.
I was standing about 6 feet from Barber when he unsnapped his holster
for his weapon. At that point I certainly realized that my life was in
danger and that I had to get away from him. I said something like, "I'm
going to get my brother. I need some help," and turned toward my house
and took 6 quick steps for the door.
For Barber to have un-holstered his weapon clearly signaled to me that
he presented a threat to my life. Should I not be in fear for my life if
I see one of these three unidentified armed men grab for a gun?
Let's pause for logic. If, indeed, these men had just finished identifying
themselves, and explaining their business on my street, it would have made
no sense for me to get my brother from the house or run for my life.
"Based on his aggressive demeanor and his prior statements about being
anti-government, I felt that he was going into the house to retrieve a
firearm," Barber wrote.
Here Barber tries to portray me as "extremely dangerous" and "violent",
obviously something he had been briefed about prior to his mission. I had
made no "anti-government" statements. This is the exactly the kind of language
found in the ADL "training" information provided to police.
I had not committed a crime. I was never told that I was under arrest.
What would I be arrested for? Was I to be arrested for asking these aggressive
and hostile intruders to show their identification and explain their business
on my property?
How did Barber "feel" that I was going to retrieve a firearm? They had
no search warrant for a gun. I have no weapons nor do I have a history
of owning or training with weapons. If the police were watching me, as
Ofc. Fitzgerald later said, I can presume they would have been aware of
these facts.
"I grabbed him around the waste (sic) from behind telling him
he was under arrest as he opened the screen door to his house," Barber
wrote. "He was still attempting to go in the house. He then began stating
something to the effect of 'you are on my property, you can't arrest me.'
With the help of Ofc. Stoy and Felgenhauer we were able to prevent him
from going into the house however his arms were flailing around as if he
were trying to strike us. We were able to trip him, all of us falling to
the ground. He attempted to get up several times still trying to fight
with us. Based on his size, we could not get his hands behind his back
and had a hard time preventing him from getting up off the ground. When
we were able to stop him from getting up he would then put his hands underneath
him preventing us from handcuffing him."
This is false. I was thrown to the ground before I could open the
front door. My left hand was immediately handcuffed from behind and my
right arm was pinned beneath my body.
Two men then knelt on top of me: Ofc. Stoy knelt directly on my temple,
pressing on the temporal pressure point with his full body weight (ca.
200 lbs.). Putting pressure on the temporal pressure point effectively
paralyzes an important nerve center, but it also cuts off blood to the
brain and can cause permanent damage if held over thirty seconds.
Stoy remained kneeling on this critical pressure point for at least
2 minutes. This is why my face turned purple and my eyes were bulging out,
as my wife noticed with alarm. This is when she ran to get the camera.
This use of intense pressure on the critical temporal pressure point
is not a recognized police procedure. This pressure hold is meant to torture
or paralyze the victim and cause permanent injury. Stoy is a former guard
at Cook County Jail.
The other man, Barber, knelt on my right elbow and back. His kneeling
on my elbow is probably what caused the occult fracture. I was immediately
pinned to the ground and unable to resist. My left hand was handcuffed
and my right arm was stuck beneath my body when I was thrown to the ground.
I couldn't move anything even if I wanted to.
"I then deployed my X-26 taser ser. #x00-178384," Barber wrote, "removing
the cartridge to pre-pare for what is commonly referred to by Taser as
a drive stun. I applied the taser to the left portion of his rib cage/back,
yelled 'stop resisting' and discharged the taser."
This is a fundamental lie for Barber. He wants to show that I was resisting
arrest and that he had only used the TASER to subdue me. This is, however,
completely false.
I was already completely subdued and handcuffed with two men holding
me down when I felt this square object placed against my lower back on
the left side of my spine. There was no verbal warning of any kind given
prior to being TASERed.
I then felt this terrible shock throughout my body. The use of the TASER
was completely unjustified. The TASERing was done only to injure and torture
me. I believe it was premeditated. Barber notes that he had unsnapped his
holster 15 seconds after meeting me. The use of the TASER in this case
is clearly criminal.
Barber continues: "He immediately stopped resisting and the taser was
deactivated. (Attached is the information downloaded from the above taser
documenting the taser discharge). Several Officers responded to our location.
Ofc. Felgenhauer was able to handcuff Bollyn's left wrist at this time
and we commanded him several times to remove his right hand from under
his body."
This is a lie. I was not resisting at any time. How can somebody remove
their arm from beneath their body with two men kneeling on top of them?
In the police arrest report there is no mention that Ofc. Stoy was kneeling
on my temporal pressure point.
It is a lie that Felgenhauer handcuffed my left wrist. Felgenhauer was
not involved in the assault. My left hand was handcuffed immediately and
it was Barber who handcuffed me. Barber is trying to hide the fact that
he had handcuffed my left hand prior to TASERing me. To TASER a person
who is handcuffed and completely restrained is unjustified and usually
considered an act of torture.
"I then met with Jay Bollyn, brother of the offender who had
come out of the house during the incident…" Barber wrote. "Jay said that
his brother is very anti-government and writes for an anti-government paper
in Washington, D.C. He said that his brother does have a violent temper
and does consume alcohol. When he came home from work today he noticed
that Bollyn did seem angry as if something had set him off, but didn't
know what. Jay said he didn't see the incident, just heard the commotion
and came outside to see what was happening. He said his brother has not
received any psychological treatment."
Here Barber uses the ADL's "anti-government" phrase twice in one
sentence.
Jay Bollyn read this report about what he supposedly said and responded:
"I said that you write for a weekly newspaper, located in D.C.
that focuses on government conspiracies. I did not say anything at all
about a violent temper or alcohol. What I did say was that you seemed 'animated',
and I did use that exact word. I don't remember any discussion about psychological
treatment. If I was asked about this, I would have said that I was not
aware of any such treatment.
"The most blatantly untrue statement," the older Bollyn wrote, "which
is completely fabricated, is about the violent temper."
Barber continued: "I then was able to relay to my immediate supervisor
that a taser had been discharged. With the information from his family
member concerning his anti-government sentiment and today's actions of
the same nature, paramedics were to be called upon his display of lesser
aggression. Bollyn appeared to be in good health and not injured."
This is a fabrication. No member of my family informed Barber that I
have an anti-government sentiment. It is more likely that Barber was told
this by somebody else, like the ADL, before the incident.
Barber's use of the phrase "Today's actions of the same nature" indicates
that he had been given information about my alleged "anti-government sentiment"
earlier. Who, beside the ADL, would have given the local police such information?
I told the police several times that my right elbow was injured. I told
them that they had injured my arm before they put me in the cell. They
completely ignored this. They then put me into a cell in which there was
no running drinking water. I told Ofc. Fitzgerald that I desperately needed
a glass of water.
Fitzgerald was obviously aware that there was no water in the cell.
"Drink from the toilet," he said. Why would he say such a thing? I wondered
if they treated everyone so badly.
I asked Fitzgerald why they had been prowling around my house for two
days in a row. "We're watching you," he said. There were two other officers
present when he said this.
This comment indicates that the ADL or another agency had instructed
the police to conduct close surveillance of my home. |
