Who benefits from the Eurovision song contest?
song contest occurs every year. The winner this year was Lena
Meyer-Landrut of Germany. After winning the contest, her song became
sold single song in Europe.
As with the Academy Awards, the winners get tremendous publicity, and
the gullible public, who idolize and follow entertainers like stupid sheep,
are easily tricked into liking the winners and purchasing their products.
The people organizing these contests can make a lot of money, and the
winners and their sponsors can make a lot of money, also. Furthermore,
the gullible public is easily influenced by the winners. Therefore, we
should assume that the criminal Jews are using these contests for both
profit and to manipulate public opinion.
|These 6 photos show Lena Meyer-Landrut,
the woman who won the Eurovision 2010 singing contest.
As she was walking towards the area to receive her award, she momentarily stops to have
her photo taken, and she waves at the camera.
|She makes a signal with her hand, which some people refer to as the
|She makes this hand signals three times,
apparently to make sure that the photographer gets a photo of it.
|To understand how strange this is, try doing this yourself.
This is not natural. This is an
awkward hand gesture.
Unless her finger is injured and stiff, she is doing this because she
was told to do it.
|During her third hand signal, her finger is starting to slip into a
more natural position.
If you try this yourself, you will notice that it's an awkward hand
gesture, which makes it useful as a gang signal
nobody is likely to do it by mistake.
The complete video is here.
Watch how fast she makes all three hand signals.
If that video is removed, here is a higher quality excerpt
||Does her dark fingernail polish or tattoo have some meaning to her
How about her different shoes? Was that merely for entertainment? Or
was it another attempt by the Jews to encourage people to disregard standards
of normality and behave in goofy manners?
“Dude, why should I care?”
Some people might respond,
“Why should I care that Jews are arranging
thousands of contests around the world? The contests don't affect me or
my life. Why should I tell other people that they cannot have these contests?
Who am I to judge what other people do? Why don't we allow other people
to have the freedom to do as they please rather than trying to control
one another? Why should I force my standards of morality on other people?
I wouldn't want them telling me what I can and cannot do. ”
The answer is that we are all indirectly
affected by crime. When we do nothing about a crime network, we allow it
to thrive and grow. You are not forcing your standards of morality on people
when you stand up to criminals, con artists, or parasites. Rather, you
are protecting society when you stand
up to criminals.
You have to make a distinction between forcing your opinions on other
people, and protecting your society from crime. Don't be fooled into thinking
that allowing abusive behavior is providing people with freedom. A person
should have freedom only when his behavior is either neutral or beneficial
to society. Anybody who behaves in a destructive manner should be stopped.
You should consider the world to be a garden, and your goal
is to remove the weeds, the gophers, and the fungus. Ignoring a group of
Jews who give a Nobel Prize to Al Gore and Barack Obama is like ignoring
gophers who are eating your flowers. You are allowing your garden to be
For centuries people have been ignoring the criminal Jews, and this
has allowed them to grow into a gigantic, international network with phenomenal
wealth. They have purchased media companies, businesses, land, and apartment
buildings. They are bribing government officials, policemen, and military
leaders. They are now dominating our television, our school curriculum,
and many other aspects of our lives. They are feeding children propaganda
about the Holocaust, Muslims, Nazis, and the Apollo moon landing. We are
to ignore destructive or parasitic behavior.
Eurovision is blatant with
Different types of contests attract different types of contestants
and spectators. For example, the people who follow the Nobel prizes are
a slightly more intelligent group than the people who follow the Eurovision
contests. As a result, the manipulation at the Nobel prizes has to be more
Apparently the spectators at Eurovision are so stupid that
the manipulation can be incredibly blatant without any of them complaining.
For example, at the end of the Eurovision 2010 singing contest, these two
hosts stimulate the audience with praise.
If the hosts of the Nobel prizes treated their audience in this manner,
I think the audience would be embarrassed or ashamed, but the audience
at Eurovision loved the blatant manipulation.
You can watch them in this