|Are murder rituals really happening?
The Jews have been accused
of conducting murder
rituals for many centuries. The illustration below, from 1493, shows
the Jews draining a Christian child of his blood.
Years ago I put a link to a
of a Jewish woman in Chicago, Vicki Polin, who claimed on the
Oprah television show in 1989 that murder rituals were
occurring in her
family, some of whom were in influential positions of Chicago.
Unfortunately, neither the police nor the journalists had any interest
in investigating the issue and determining whether she was
telling the truth.
||Also in 1989, the Australian division of the 60 Minutes television
program broadcast an interview with a young British girl name Teresa
who claimed that she had witnessed the ritual killings of animals and
people, and that she had been abused. Unfortunately, none of the
British authorities were interested in investigating her accusations.
That television program is on the Internet in two pieces. Here is part one, and here is part two.
the past year, these type of accusations have been getting a lot more
attention, but this time they are coming from two young children,
Gabriel and Alisa Dearman, who live in Hampstead, England. These
children claim their father, Ricky Dearman, is the
leader of a cult, and that their school was involved
Update 29 November 2017: The original videos of Alisa and Gabriel have been deleted by YouTube, so here are two new links.
is a police interview with Alisa, and here
is a police interview with Gabriel, and here they are in a parking lot. Their mother
recorded this video
to explain her side of the issue.
The children claim that this cult would regularly have sex with
the children at the school, and that they would kill babies
during rituals, drink their blood, and eat some of
flesh. They said most of the babies were provided to the cult by the
British government's social services, and that some babies were
and delivered by courier services, such as DHL.
Yard investigated the children's accusations and came to the conclusion
that the children were forced into making false accusations because
they were tortured
and given drugs by their mother, Ella Draper, and
her boyfriend, Abraham Christie.
People are referring to this case on the Internet as the Hampstead
or the Hampstead hoax
, depending upon whether the
person believes the children or Scotland Yard.
case is difficult to resolve because the only witnesses are
young children. Should we believe two children? Or should we believe
hundreds of intelligent, respectable
adults in Scotland Yard, the media, the schools, and the police
difficulty of resolving this issue becomes more apparent when you add
more detail to those questions, like this: should we believe Scotland
Yard, the journalists, and other authorities, who are lying to
about the creation of Israel, the 9/11 attack, the Apollo moon landing,
the attack on the USS Liberty, the Holocaust, the world wars, and
hundreds of other issues, and who have repeatedly ignored
complaints of pedophilia, such as with Jimmy Saville, and who have also
terminated investigations of pedophilia, such as in this
case? Or should we believe the children and their
mother, who have nothing to gain by making such outrageous claims?
thought Shirley Temple was a good actress...
and Alisa provided a lot of video interviews with the police and other
people. The authorities want us to believe that these children are acting
and that Ella Draper and her boyfriend planned this incredible scam,
and then spent months or years torturing
the children, putting them on drugs
, and making
them rehearse the
Movies are filmed in short segments
partly because the actors cannot memorize hours of
dialogue. Those two children can produce hours of testimony
without making mistakes, and without stuttering, giggling, or
has tried to direct a play in which the actors are children, or who has
tried to get children to behave properly at the dinner table,
noticed that it is difficult to control the behavior of young children.
Ella Draper deserves an award for being the greatest director of
children that the world has ever seen.
the children are telling the truth...
Before we believe the
authorities, we ought to consider the possibility
that the children are telling the truth because - if they are - it
explain a lot of mysteries.
the children are telling the truth,
that means a lot of
government officials, policemen, journalists, teachers, doctors, and
other important people are involved with this cult, and that
there will be thousands of
government officials, journalists, doctors, and other people, and we
can be certain that they will put a phenomenal amount of effort
into making the children and their mother appear to be liars,
to kill them, or to have them arrested. It will be a very unfair
battle. This would explain why there is such intense anger towards
these two children and their mother, and why the police are so
desperate to have them arrested.
the children are telling the truth,
would provide an explanation
for how Jimmy Saville got away with pedophilia for
even though lots of people knew about it. And it also
explanation for why the British government refuses to consider the
possibility that Jimmy Saville was a member
a pedophile network
We should consider
British man is telling the truth when he claims
that when he was a child, he and about 15 other boys were
by a pedophile network that consisted of high-ranking British
military and government officials, and that they killed at least three
boys. And there is a Scotland Yard detective who claims that
investigation into a pedophile network was shut
by the Blair administration.
should be noted that Gabriel and Alisa claim that women
with this cult. Therefore, it would be foolish to assume that a woman
in the government, media, or police departments, who denies the
existence of this cult, or who denies knowledge of Jimmy Saville's
pedophilia, can be trusted simply because she is a woman.
Gabriel and Alisa can explain why so
many cases of pedophilia are never investigated, or
terminated, and why so many women in the government show no interest in
investigating these cases. The police and journalists will investigate
if the criminals are not
members of their network.
the children are telling the truth,
re-examine the photos
from the Rothschild parties. These two children can explain some of the
bizarre aspects of those parties. For example, the photo below shows
decorations in the center of one of the dinner tables. If you
were invited to a party, and your
dinner table had those decorations, would you be impressed?
The doll in the center of the table has had some of its body parts cut
off, similar to the children in the painting below, which depicts the
crimes that Jews were arrested for in 1710.
Gabriel and Alisa claim to have been forced
to dance around the skulls of babies, so perhaps that doll
with a hole in its forehead is symbolic of the cutting off of their
heads and the removal of the brains so that they can use the skull
is the source of the photos from
Rothschild party? As I warned readers in previous documents, the people
involved with a crime network will appear to be the most talented crime
investigators because they will be able to provide information that
else knows of. Therefore, be careful about trusting
the investigators who provide important information about a crime
unless they can provide a sensible explanation for how they got
information. For example, the photo above comes from a website that
claims to be exposing crimes, but in reality it is diverting attention
away from Israel and Jews and onto the bankers, the Bush
and the New World
In the painting below, the child laying on the table at
the upper left corner is being killed. I suppose the small child at the
bottom right corner is the next child to be sacrificed. The
decorations on the dinner table at the Rothschild party depict a scene
similar to that in the center of the painting in which a child has had
some of its limbs cut off.
Above the dead child on the floor are
three Jews are holding a barrel, with what appears to be a child inside.
A fourth Jew seems to be collecting blood from that child.
the children are telling the truth,
exposing only the tip of an iceberg. For example, how could it be
possible for the British government to provide the cult with babies if
this network was tiny and independent? And how could it be possible
for drugged babies to be shipped domestically and
through such courier services as DHL without a lot of people
being involved, and in different nations?
There are also
accusations that the cult was filming some of the sex and killings and
selling them as "snuff films". How could they get away with
that unless this operation had the protection of
Gordon Bowden claims to have investigated some businesses
for fraud, and he discovered a phenomenal
amount of fraud, and that there were connections to government
officials, the 1991 Desert Storm war, and the Hampstead case. The most
interesting remarks start about 10 minutes into this
interview, and go on for about 12 minutes. Three of his remarks:
• at 11:40 "massive fraud,
which is linked to the Labour Party"
• at 15:20 "a massive link to Zionism"
• at 17:00 "the biggest organized crime system in the world"
He claimed that everything he
uncovered is easy to see, but his explanation for why the police won't
do anything about it is:
I said to the police officers, the evidence is there, if you've got the
courage, you'll be breaking down the biggest organized crime system in
the world. But they won't have the courage because they operate with
commanders above them who are Freemasons. I don't want to go into that
because then you become classed as a conspiracy theorist."
22:40 he also says that he gave the information to the police and
government, but they will not do anything about these crimes because "it
will lock up Tony Blair, David Cameron, and the rest of the cronies who
have had this information, and they have been blackmailing each other
for many years.
He believes the "Freemasons" at the top
of the police and government hierarchy are preventing investigations,
but is it accurate to blame "Freemasons"? Or would it be more
accurate to blame "Jews
||The image to the right was the logo of a
Freemason group in Britain. Can you see the Jewish
star behind the Mason logo?
I mentioned these peculiar logos in my Masquerade
Party #3 video.
Some of the organizations changed their logos, perhaps in response to
my video, but don't let that fool you into thinking that Jews are no
longer hiding in the background of those organizations.
the children are telling the truth,
they provide credence to Vicki
Polin's accusations, and to the accusations from the Middle Ages
that some Jews kidnap children and kill them during bizarre religious
rituals, and then drink their blood. For example, Chaucer wrote The
Canterbury Tales 600 years ago
and it has a poem
about Jews kidnapping a Christian child and killing him for one of
their religious rituals.
The Jews expect us to believe that they have been accused of disgusting
crimes for centuries by every nation they have lived in simply because
everybody in the world is anti-Semitic, but consider if an individual
person were to receive as many accusations and evictions as the Jews.
imagine that a Chinese man gets married to a woman, and after a few months
she throws all of his possessions out into the street and accuses him
of kidnapping and killing some of the neighborhood children for use in
idiotic rituals. Since she also writes poetry, she writes a poem about
his killings. He insists that he is innocent, and that she is
Later he gets a job, but he is fired after a few
months because his employer complains that he was running a pornography
operation when he was supposed to be working. He insists that he is
innocent, and that his employer is anti-Chinese.
A few months
later he gets married again, but his new wife soon throws his
possessions onto the street and complains that he was stealing money
from her. He insists that the accusations are false, and that she is
Then he gets another job, but after a few months
he is fired, and his employer complains that he was running gambling
operations. He insists that he was innocent, and that the employer is
Then he gets married again, but after a few months
his wife throws his possessions onto the street and complains that he
was involved with ritual killings of some of the neighborhood children.
She is an artist, and she creates a painting that depicts him draining
the children of their blood and cutting them into pieces to eat. He
claims to be innocent, and that her painting is anti-Chinese.
this situation occurring year after year. Eventually even the stupid
people would suspect that at least some of the accusations are based on
events, and that none of the people are anti-Chinese.
the children are telling the truth,
should consider that Hollywood is the California division of this
cult. Ricky Dearman moved from England to California to become
actor. There is not much information about his life, but he was
provided with at least one acting job. What made him think that he
could be make a living as an actor when there is so much competition?
|Another of the "boy
friends" of Hollywood director Bryan Singer. Is he just
"friends" with the boys? Should the police investigate pedophilia and
murder in Hollywood? Or should they focus on Bill Cosby's antics with
We should consider the possibility that his cult is as
international and Jewish as Gordon Bowden's investigation has
suggested, and that many of the people in Hollywood are involved.
Perhaps Ricky Dearman got to know people in Hollywood because
their involvement with pedophilia and ritual killings.
Corey Feldman recently made more remarks
about the problem of pedophilia in Hollywood, although he continues to
be vague and evasive. (I mentioned his earlier remarks in
We ought to consider the possibility that the pedophiles that Corey
Feldman is refusing to identify are part of the same crime network that
Gabriel and Alisa are exposing.
We also ought to wonder if Roman
Polanski is being protected by a Polish division of this network. Is
that why the Polish government refuses to extradite Polanski? Who in
Poland is interested in protecting Polanski from extradition?
the children are telling the truth,
then we have an explanation for the mystery I mentioned in a
previous file; specifically, why would the British government want to
waste their time discussing whether they should ban Donald Trump from
The British government claims that they are trying to protect Britain,
these children are telling the truth, then many –
perhaps most – of the
British government officials are involved with this crime network, and
Donald Trump may not
a member of this network, and that would
explain why there are so many British government officials who
Donald Trump might become President of America.
this network is as international as it appears, then it would also help
to explain why there is so much fear of Donald Trump
among government officials in nations besides Britain.
the children are telling the truth,
support for a remark I made in an earlier file, namely:
Jew should be assumed guilty of whatever he accuses somebody else of.
Jews accused the Nazis of making lampshades out of human skin and soap
from their fat. Why would they accuse the Nazis of those
rather than something that is more typical during a war, such as
or rape? After
listening to those two children, I suggest we consider the possibility
that the Jews conceived of those accusations because
have been doing that for centuries
soap is so plentiful and inexpensive that the Jews have no
make it, but centuries ago they may have been kidnapping children for
soap, meat, leather, blood sausages, and other items.
Have you heard of the movie Soylent
Who came up with the concept of a government that is secretly killing
people and feeding other people with their dead bodies? Gabriel and
Alisa claim that the cult was eating
babies, and that some restaurants in the area were using some
the flesh from the babies. This leads me to wonder, was the movie
Soylent Green based upon what the Jews have actually been doing?
have mentioned in other documents, many Hollywood movies and TV shows
seem to be based on reality, but twisted a bit so that it is
not obvious. One of the best examples is the television show, The
in which a group of aliens is infiltrating our governments, media,
police, military, and other organizations, in order to take
control of our society.
1991 Desert Storm war got started partly because of the accusations
that the Iraqi soldiers were tossing babies out of incubators and
killing them. Who came up with that concept? If we could see all of
human history accurately, we might find that Jews
have been kidnapping and killing babies for centuries, and that their
familiarity with killing babies caused them to conceive the idea of
blaming the Iraqi soldiers of doing it. Furthermore, they may have been
instigating fights for centuries by making these type of accusations.
the children are telling the truth,
ought to take a closer look at the men who show an abnormal interest in
butts and anal sex. Gabriel complained that his father was
regularly forcing large
dildos into his butt, perhaps to stretch it open, and that the men
regularly have anal sex
with him. Why would they want to have anal sex with a boy when they
available, and they also have wives
Who among us would choose to have anal sex with a young boy if we
have those choices?
think that one of the reasons this crime network has been getting away
with their bizarre behavior for so many centuries is that many people
dismiss the accusations as absurd
cannot believe anybody would do what they are accused of doing.
prior to the 9/11 attack, somebody had told me that there were groups
of married men having anal sex with their sons during
orgies at a
school, I would have dismissed it as unrealistic
I can believe that a lonely, angry, mentally ill man might
want to rape little boys, but why would a group
men choose to have an orgy with their sons when they have wives
as unrealistic as choosing to go outside to eat dirt
when you have a nice meal at the dinner table. Even if a marriage was
failing, I would have considered such behavior to be unrealistic.
I mentioned in previous documents, some of the people who have been
for years have an abnormal fascination with butts, fart jokes,
sex. And have you noticed how many hazing rituals and
ceremonies involve butts? For example, two Welsh guards were pressured
into having some type of anal sex with one another, and at a high
school in New Jersey, football players held a new recruit while one of
them put his finger
in the recruit's butt, and then put his finger in the
were a teenager, did you have any
interest in having your friends grab and hold a teenage boy so
could put your finger in his butt? What is different about the minds of
the men who show fascinations with butts and anal sex? How
these men get
into leadership positions of our police, military, government, sports
groups, and corporations?
the children are telling the truth,
ought to wonder why
people are involved with such crude rituals. If
only one person in the world was involved with ritual killings, we
might dismiss it as just one person's mental
problems, but if Gabriel and Alisa are correct, this is a
Furthermore, Gabriel and Alisa say their father was involved,
mother, and her
which means that these practices are
being passed on from generation to generation, and that women are involved almost as much as men. How far back in their
ancestry does this
behavior go? How many other families are involved with these practices?
How and when did these families get involved with these practices?
Finally, Teresa, who was interviewed for the Australian 60 Minutes television program, said that her grandmother
was the person taking her to cult be abused. How did her grandmother get involved? Was her
mother involved, also?
race of humans equally
involved with these
practices? Or are certain genetic groups more involved? Does
this behavior seem to be due to genetic characteristics of
certain races or families? Or do these
people seem to be genetically the same as the rest of us and involved
with these practices simply because they were raised on the
belief that murder rituals and pedophilia are normal
cultural practices? Or do they get involved with these rituals because
they believe it will help
to keep them
young and healthy?
You might respond that nobody could be so stupid as to kill
babies and drink their blood simply because their ancestors have done
so, or because they believe they will remain young and healthy, but
history has thousands of examples of
people engaging in idiotic, dangerous, and violent practices,
especially people who are stupid, ignorant, or mentally ill.
more amazingly, when people behave in terrible manners they are usually
doing so to help
themselves or other people, not
anybody. For just three examples:
are religious parents who give exorcisms or beatings to
their children or spouses in order to help
find the truth, or get the devil out of their mind, or help them to
are people who like to torture themselves
to show their devotion to their particular god, as in the photo to the
right, which shows people participating in a parade to display their devotion.
• Every nation practices the policy that we can
cure a criminal of his bad behavior by torturing him with jail, or
beating him with a wet bamboo stick.
Many people believe that they can prevent murders by having a
death penalty and by killing the people who commit a murder.
Actually, our death penalty custom is not much more sensible than a
Jewish murder ritual. Killing a murderer will prevent him from causing
more problems for us, but it does not
future crimes. However, there are millions of people who believe that a
death penalty is capable of preventing crime.
between rituals and procedures
Ideally, we would have an authority of language to ensure our words
have sensible meanings. I think it would be useful if children were
taught to consider the word "ritual" and "procedure" as representing
significantly different concepts. I think this will help children make
better decisions on when they are following a ritual, and when they are
following a procedure.
For example, when a business provides an employee with a list of
instructions on how to operate a particular machine or assemble a
particular product, he is given a set of instructions that have been
carefully developed by the people in the business, and the business is
capable of providing a sensible and detailed explanation for each of
the instructions. The instructions are not
arbitrary or random.
For example, when an employee is told to tighten some bolts in a
clockwise direction with a torque wrench to a level of 44 foot-pounds
(or Newton-meters, to those of you who use the metric system), it is
because people did experiments and came to the conclusion that 44
provided the most optimum clamping force. They did not pick that number
We should use the word "ritual" to describe a
set of instructions that are lacking a sensible explanation. For
example, when Jews swing a chicken around their head to be forgiven for
their sins, they swing the chicken three
times, not four times, or two times, or
six times. Why three times? They have no sensible explanation for that.
Also, they swing the chicken above
their head, not
to their side, or between their legs. They do not toss the chicken into
the air and catch it, either.
When we regard the words "rituals" and "procedures" in that manner,
then we will notice an interesting difference between rituals and
procedures. Specifically, rituals are noticeably different between one
group of people and another, whereas procedures tend to be similar
regardless of who practices them. Rituals appear to have been created
For example, if an American business tells its employees to tighten
particular bolts on a particular material item to 44 foot-pounds, we
can be certain that if a Chinese company is producing a similar
product, they are telling their employees to tighten the corresponding
bolts to a very similar clamping force. The reason that
procedures will be similar between societies and eras is because they are
developed according to scientific experiments.
By comparison, rituals are senseless, and the result is that different
people will create noticeably different rituals for the same purpose.
For example, Jews swing chickens around their head to be forgiven from
their sins, whereas Christians are more likely to get on their knees
and pray to God to be forgiven. There is not much in common between
those two rituals.
When children are taught to consider rituals and procedures in this
manner, they can then be given exercises in passing judgment on which
of our customs are rituals, and which are procedures. When children get
into the habit of thinking of customs in this manner, they are likely
to make better decisions on which customs to follow, and which should
be updated to become more sensible.
Our death penalty, for example, shows signs of being a ritual, not a
procedure, because there are lots of instructions on how people must
conduct the death penalty, but none of the instructions have any
sensible explanations, and the instructions differ significantly
between one group of people and another, and between one era and
another. Different states in America follow different death penalty
The death penalty is a senseless ritual with arbitrary rules; it is not
a sensible procedure that people developed through careful study and
analysis. Some death penalty rituals provide the criminal with a last meal
for example, and that last meal is different between different groups
of people and eras. Each death penalty ritual also has a different
method of killing the criminal.
The state of Ohio tried to execute Romell Broom in 2009 by
injecting him with drugs, but for unknown reasons, they failed. After
two hours of sticking him with needles and injecting him with drugs,
, and he is still alive
When we compare the death penalty that societies follow to the manner
in which businesses kill animals, plants, trees, and other creatures,
we notice some very significant differences. Businesses want to
accomplish the job as quickly
as possible. They don't kill animals with expensive and time-consuming
firing squads, or a complicated sequence of drug injections, and they
don't give the animals a last meal. They don't put blindfolds on the
Furthermore, if an animal survives the execution, the businesses do not
give up and put the animal back in its cage, possibly with serious
physical or mental damage as a result of the failed execution. Instead,
if the execution fails, they try again, and if there are a lot of
failures, the management is likely to analyze
problem and find a way to improve
the success rate
of their procedures.
This brings us to another important difference between procedures and
rituals. When rituals fail to accomplish their goal, the people
following the rituals ignore the failure
procedures fail to accomplish their goal, the people analyze the issue
and try to improve
the procedures so that they are
more successful in the future.
Our technology has been improving throughout history because thousands
of people have been looking for ways to improve the procedures that we
use to create material items, but our governments, economic systems,
marital practices, courtship activities, and other culture does not
improve because every society promotes the philosophy that we should follow
regardless of its failure rate, rather than analyze culture and try to
Actually, many of our customs are becoming more irrational
through the years as a result of businesses manipulating them for
profit, and religions altering them in order to promote
their particular religion. An example is that the diamond businesses
have convinced women that they need diamonds.
Businesses also ruin our culture by encouraging us to be passive
voyeurs who watch other people engage in recreational events and social
activities, and to spend our leisure time with our cell phones, rather
than become active participants in life.
A child is considered intelligent when he asks his father about the
procedures to fix a flat tire on a bicycle, but he is reprimanded if he
asks his father why they pray to Jesus before they eat their dinner, or
why he must give a diamond ring to a woman. Children are encouraged
to improve the procedures that we use to make material items, but they
are told to shut up and obey our religions, voting system, economic
system, marital practices, holiday celebrations, and other social
culture is full of idiotic rituals
What is the difference between:
• A person who kills a criminal because he believes the killing will
• A Jew who swings a chicken around his head and then kills it so that
he can be forgiven for his sins.
• A person who kills a baby because he believes that drinking the
baby's blood will help him remain healthy.
• A person who believes he can alter other people's behavior by
sticking pins into voodoo dolls.
I would describe those type of practices as idiotic
and I don't think anybody who believes in those type of rituals
should be allowed in influential positions. We should set higher
standards for our leaders. When we allow into leadership
positions people who believe in practicing idiotic rituals, we are
allowing crude savages
influence our lives and future, and they will put pressure on
us to follow their particular customs regardless of how stupid they are.
addition to people around the world following senseless rituals, people
are following idiotic medical practices, also. For example, there
are so many Chinese who
believe that Manta Ray gills, rhinoceros horns, tiger penises, and
animal parts are aphrodisiacs or have magical medical powers
they are going to cause the extinction
of those animals if the rest of the world does not do something to stop
In June 2016 I received a copy of Amazing Wellness
in the mail, which is an advertisement for The Vitamin
Shoppe. One of the articles is titled, "The Youth Hormone". It promotes
human growth hormone as a way of remaining young, improving our mood,
improving our sex drive, getting rid of wrinkles, and other wonderful
benefits. The article creates the impression that this hormone is a
magical fountain of youth
However, the people who
believe that human growth hormone will keep us young are promoting a
policy that is as stupid as the people who believe Manta Ray gills will
cure our medical
problems, or that swinging a chicken around your head is going to
forgive you of your sins.
years ago some experiments at Stanford
University showed that injections of blood from young mice can improve
the health and life of older mice. This
article claims that Kim Jong-Il would inject himself with the blood of
healthy young virgins. Are there really people injecting
themselves with the blood of younger people? If so, how is that
practice any more sensible than the people who kill babies and
drink their blood in an attempt to remain young?
am not surprised to hear that replacing the blood of an older person
with the blood of someone young and healthy would provide a
temporary health benefit. The reason is simply because the younger
person's blood will have more appropriate levels of vitamins, salts,
oxygen, etc. However, the effect would not last very long
because the older person's liver, kidney, and other organs
quickly restore the blood to its original, decrepit
Although we cannot stop aging, it is possible for us to keep
ourselves in optimum health. Unfortunately, because each of our bodies
has subtle differences and defects, the lifestyle that will
keep us in
optimum health will be slightly different for different people. This
means that each of us needs to analyze
our body and
with our diet, sleeping patterns,
water consumption, exercise programs, etc., rather than mimic somebody
The more unhealthy a person is, the more likely
he will be to try something that has no sensible justification. For
example, some cancer patients
in America have traveled to Mexico to get cancer
cures that are legal there but illegal in America,
such as apricot pit extract. I don't know
anything about cancer, but if apricot pits – or any of the cures for
cancer – actually worked, we would have noticed it by now. There are
millions of people trying various types of cures for cancer,
and the fact that nobody has found a cure after decades of
experimentation is evidence that we don't have cure.
today treat cancer almost the same as the doctors of the
Middle Ages. Modern doctors either cut the cancerous area
out of our
body, or they try to kill the cancer with
chemicals or radiation. That is not
analogous to a doctor treating mental illness or migraine headaches by
cutting out a section of the person's brain.
Cutting off a woman's breast is not
curing her of cancer.
don't have a cure for cancer, or for migraine headaches, mental
illness, or thousands of other mental and physical disorders. However,
none of the people who are suffering from these disorders want to hear
that. They want to believe that there
is a cure somewhere in the world, and all they have to do is
find it. Many of these miserable people are willing to try a lot of
crazy medical products.
There are millions
of people around the world regularly
rituals that have a 100% failure rate, such as the death penalty, the
punishing of drug dealers, and the eating of apricot pits to cure
cancer. This is evidence that the human mind is so crude that it is
willing to repeatedly follow a ritual that has never
provided any benefits to anybody
irrational, senseless, and violent behavior of humans is
proof that the human mind is just a large version of a monkey
brain. And have you noticed how many people today either believe in
witches or believe that they
are a witch
? And let's not forget that in the span of
just a few decades, most women in Europe and America have been
convinced by the diamond businesses that "diamonds are a girl's best
friend". Giving a woman a diamond ring could be described as
an idiotic and wasteful marital ritual, but millions of people are
doing it, and they show no interest in looking critically at it or
developing more sensible marital customs.
Considering that there are millions
of people who
idiotic rituals, is it possible that some people's minds
are so crude that they are practicing murder rituals simply because
their ancestors did, or because they believe that drinking
the blood, or having sex with children, will help them remain young
You might respond that nobody is so stupid that they would follow a
cultural practice as disgusting as a murder ritual simply because their
it, but human history has lots of examples of
people following senseless cultural practices simply because
The people who refer to themselves as "conservatives" are the best
example of this problem. Many conservatives are intelligent, well
behaved, honest, and pleasant, but their emotional characteristics are
so similar to monkeys that they have a strong tendency to follow one
another rather than think for themselves.
Conservatives in every nation are following idiotic cultural
practices simply because their ancestors did. Rabbis, for
example, circumcise boys and drink the blood that dribbles
from the boy's
penis, as in the photo below.
Circumcision could be described
as a cruel and senseless ritual. There is no intelligent
justification for circumcision, and there is no sensible justification
for drinking the blood of a circumcised penis, but rabbis do
it, and most of the American boys from my generation were circumcised,
even though we are not Jewish.
People are circumcising boys simply because they are mimicking one
another, like stupid animals, not
because they analyzed the issue and came
to the conclusion that circumcision makes sense.
The Jews have lots of bizarre
rituals, some of which involve blood and
sacrifices of animals. For example, their Passover holiday is
lambs and smearing the blood on the entrance to their home
so that demons will "pass over" their home and go to somebody else's
Their idiotic ritual of swinging a chicken above their head and then
killing the chicken is not much different
from the killing of babies as described by Gabriel and Alisa.
Also, according to some
people, the Talmud permits sex with children. I don't have any desire
to read the Talmud to verify that
accusation, but there are lots of news reports of Jews having
sex with children. Newsweek
recently published an article
with the title, Child Abuse
Allegations Plague the Hasidic
article claims that, "there
is no evidence that child abuse is any more likely to occur in
ultra-Orthodox schools than in public or secular institutions
which implies that this problem plagues all American schools equally
However, it doesn't seem to me that anything
this universe is distributed equally
so I doubt if child abuse is spread equally among all of the schools in
America. I would bet that the abuse is worse at certain schools,
perhaps the Jewish
schools or Catholic schools. The only time something is distributed
equally is when humans
deliberately distribute it. The universe operates by random
that is not likely to result in equal distributions of anything.
If there was no secrecy, and if we
had complete video surveillance of the human population for the past
few thousand years, we might find that Jews
practicing sex with children and sacrificing humans, chickens, and
other animals for centuries, and possibly for thousands of years.
people might wonder why Jews would practice a custom that is illegal
We can see the answer to that question by looking at the attitude that
Jews have, such as the Jew in the video (at this page
who was trying to smuggle diseased eucalyptus leaves into Australia. He
told the customs official that Australia's laws are not his
laws. (Incidentally, the Jew was not
The Jews do not regard themselves as our friends, or as
members of our society. They regard themselves as a superior race who
are living among animals. Our laws do not apply to
them. They have no inhibitions about spreading diseases among us,
killing us, setting our forests on fire, or tricking us into starting
You might wonder how a group of people can be so
incredibly arrogant, but all societies and religions regard their group
superior. Humans are arrogant monkeys who boast about themselves and
insult other people for having idiotic foods,
clothing styles, and religions. The Jews are just a bit more arrogant
than the rest of us.
All of us
want to be a dictator
All of us have a
craving to compete for the top position of the social hierarchy. We
want to be the leader. Everybody, both men and women,
are in competition to be important, and to tell other people what to
think and how to live. We want to be respected, admired, and worshiped.
We want to give orders to other people and be pampered by them.
animal is low in the social hierarchy, he
accepts his position
and displays submission to the other males above him, and he does not
expect the females
to show much of an interest in
him. However, once he
becomes the dominant male, his attitude changes dramatically. He
becomes a dictator who expects the other animals to show submission,
and he expects the females to be receptive to him.
the same emotional characteristics. We have strong cravings to compete
with one another for the top positions in the social hierarchy, and we
regard the people who are at the top as our leaders, and we give them
special treatment. Female humans are sexually titillated by the
When a man is young and "ordinary", he will accept
his position and be submissive to the men above him, and he will not
expect the women to show much interest in him. He may not appear to be
arrogant. However, if he rises up in the social hierarchy as a result
of becoming wealthy or famous, then his attitude is likely to change
dramatically. If he considers himself to be one of the leaders of
society, then he will expect other people to be submissive to him and
give him special treatment, and he will expect the females to be more
receptive to him.
networks can take advantage of this characteristic by sending pretty
women to the men who believe that they are important. The man is likely
to assume that she is one of the thousands of women who are attracted
to him because of his high status, and that she is one of his many
rewards for being important. If he follows his monkey-like emotions, he
will have sex with as many women as the crime network sends to him, and
that can provide the crime network with lots of opportunities to
blackmail him, manipulate him, steal items from his home, or learn
about what he is doing.
Women behave in a very similar manner,
except without the sexual aspect. When a woman is low in the social
hierarchy, she will accept her position, but if she becomes wealthy or
famous, she is likely to think of herself as one
of the high ranking members of society, and that can cause her to
attitude and believe that she should get special treatment and
pampering by people who are below her.
When a low ranking
monkey does not display signs of submission to a high-ranking monkey,
the high-ranking monkey reacts with anger in order to pressure the low
ranking monkey into behaving submissively. Humans treat each
other in the exact same manner. For example, when
people who believe they are important are treated like an ordinary
person by policemen, airline personnel, or retail store clerks, the
important person is likely to get angry that he is not getting special
treatment. If the
important person does not have good control of his emotions, he may
blurt out some angry remark to let the low ranking
person realize that he is lower in the hierarchy.
For example, he might say, "Do
you know who I am?
That expression is the human equivalent of the snarling,
growling, and slapping that the dominant animals use to control the
lower ranking animals.
website has a list of 12 celebrities who made such remarks, and here
is a report about Ronnie Pickering, who made that type of remark but
who is so non-famous that the newspaper had to explain who he was.
hierarchy among humans is not as well-defined as it is with animals,
so after a man wins an award, makes a lot of money,
gets publicity, it is easy for him to make the mistake of
assuming that he
has finally become important, and he will finally get
treatment by other people and sex with lots of women.
The celebrities who blurt out "Do you know who I am" are not
displaying bizarre behavior. Rather, it is typical
animal behavior. It is how animals control their hierarchy.
humans and animals have this
characteristic; it is not
unique to celebrities. Remember that whenever you see a characteristic
in a small number of humans, you can be certain that it exists in all
humans. The reason is because all humans are created from the same
genetic pool. Each of us is unique, but our differences are subtle.
Some people describe this concept as "a difference of degree,
a difference of kind".
low ranking people who have never blurted out,
"do you know who I am", may believe that they are less arrogant than
celebrities who have made that remark, but if every low ranking person
had the opportunity to become rich and famous, we would certainly
discover that many of them have trouble resisting the craving to yell
that remark. We all
want to yell that remark. The emotional craving to make that
remark is a part of all human minds
Our craving to be dominant was beneficial
during prehistoric times because it inspired the men and women to
struggle to do something that would impress the other people, such as
create impressive tools, make impressive clothing, or become one of the
best hunters. By struggling to impress one another, they developed
useful products, and they stratified into a hierarchy with the most
talented people at the top.
Today, however, this craving is not
functioning properly. Our emotions want us to get to the top of the
hierarchy, but our emotions do not care how
there. During prehistoric times, people could become important only
by impressing people with their talents, but in our large, complex
societies, people can get to top positions of the hierarchy through a
variety of destructive manners, such as cheating, blackmail, murder,
inheritances, and gambling. People today can also rise to the top of
the hierarchy by plagiarizing and "einsteining
People can also become important today by
marrying important people, winning idiotic awards, and selling products
of no value but which have high popularity, such as the Pet Rock. A
person can also become wealthy and famous from just one event
such as singing one popular song, or winning one popular sports
contest, or acting in one popular movie.
emotions are no longer serving the purpose they evolved for. We need to
exert some self-control and think more often. When we strive to be
important, for example, we should ask ourselves, "Am I doing something useful? Or am I just
wasting my life on a senseless activity?
also need to exert self-control so that we don't start believing we are
more important than we really are. Our emotions are essentially looking
for any excuse they can find to feel special, and the result is that
whenever we win an award, make a lot of money, get a job with a fancy
title, appear on television, or create a popular Internet video, our
emotions will essentially jump up and down like an excited child, and
yell, "Yes! I did it! I am
now important! Everybody will now bow before me, and women will offer
themselves to me!
should exert some self-control and remind ourselves that we are not as
special as we like to believe, and we should not expect retail
store clerks, policemen, airline stewardessess, or other people to give
us special treatment, and we should not expect women to offer
themselves to us.
Some people control their emotions by
reminding themselves of remarks in the Bible, and some have tattooed
biblical remarks on their body. If you enjoy challenges, try to control
your emotions without using the Bible as a tool.
Conservatives are the most
likely to follow idiotic customs
Humans and animals have a strong
emotional craving to follow their
leaders for a very important reason. Specifically, this characteristic
allows the children of humans and animals to learn a lot of information
quickly without schools, teachers, or tests, and without
any understanding of what they are learning. By mimicking
parents and other adults, the children of both humans and animals
quickly learn which foods to eat, how to eat them, where to sleep, how
sleep, how to find water, and how
to make tools. The children of humans and animals rapidly pick up a lot
of important information simply by observing and mimicking the adults.
It may seem as if the ducks below are merely "following" their mother,
but they are doing more than that. They are learning
how to be ducks by mimicking her. The reason baby
animals cannot take care of themselves when they are raised by humans
is that they cannot learn how to be an animal by mimicking humans.
This characteristic was vital
times, but today we must exert enough self-control to
we are mimicking. We
must be concerned with who
our leaders are and how
they behave. We have to pass
judgment on whether we are mimicking people who are truly
with guidance, or whether we are mimicking a group of savages,
criminals, or mentally ill freaks.
Since each of us is genetically unique, some people have stronger
cravings to mimic than others. We also have different types of
education, and different intellectual abilities. The differences
between us cause some people to be much more likely to mimic an idiotic
both liberals and conservatives are following idiotic customs,
the conservatives seem to be much more resistant to looking critically
at their culture and experimenting with sensible practices.
causes conservatives to be more likely to follow an
In the areas of the world where education is at a lower level, or the
people are more stupid or more like monkeys, we find people who are
more willing to follow idiotic cultural practices. For example, a woman
in Pakistan burned
her daughter to death because she believed her daughter disgraced the
family by not following the appropriate customs for marriage. This
happened in June 2016, not the Middle Ages.
I am not aware of any parents in America and Europe who burned their
daughter to death for violating our marital customs, but there is no
shortage of examples of people in "modern" societies who are following
idiotic practices, and doing so decade after decade.
is a news report about a waitress in Canada who was forced by her
employer to wear high-heeled shoes. She complained that the shoes
caused her toes to bleed, and that one of her toenails died and fell
off, but her employer was more concerned with following established
shoe customs than in analyzing the issue of whether the shoes were
practical for waitresses. And here
is a report of a woman in London who was sent home without pay for
refusing to wear shoes with a heel that is between 2 and 4 inches.
These are also recent
events, not historical events
from the Middle Ages.
The people in "modern" nations often ridicule the ignorant, uneducated
people in Pakistan and other "Third World" nations for following crude
cultural practices, but our cultural practices are not "sensible". It
would be more accurate to describe our culture as "less idiotic".
Requiring women to wear high-heeled shoes, especially women who have to
walk or stand as they work, such as waitresses, could be described
as cruel, abusive, and idiotic. However, people are
doing this in the "advanced" nations.
The reason people in every nation are willing to follow idiotic
practices is because we have a strong emotional craving to mimic one
another. If our societies had appropriate leadership, then we would
have leaders who regularly analyze our culture and look for ways of
improving our clothing styles, shoes, holiday celebrations, courtship
procedures, and economy. When the people mimic those type of leaders,
they would be mimicking culture that is sensible, and which improves
through the years.
Unfortunately, the type of people who are getting into top positions of
society are not
appropriate leaders for this modern
world. They are better described as overly aggressive, selfish monkeys
who want to dominate
us, not provide us with
guidance. They want to be wealthy and famous, not analyze society's
problems and experiment with solutions. They want to feel important,
not research culture and look for ways of improving our leisure
activities, marriages, holidays, schools, or work environment. Our
leaders want bigger mansions, not
better train systems, recreational areas, and cities. They want statues
of themselves, not beautiful
parks, walkways, and bicycle paths.
The type of people who rise to leadership positions today are
behavior, such as the hoarding
of material items; the
fighting for status; the following of ancient customs; the blaming of
our problems on other societies; and the
practices of monarchies, inheritances, and special privileges.
Worse yet, our leaders do not encourage us to develop our talents and
participants in society. They want us to be submissive, obedient
slaves. They react to competition with anger or fear, like a monkey.
What is the difference between a British company that promotes
high-heeled shoes for women and the Chinese who
promote rhinoceros horns as a medical product? I would say
that both groups are mindlessly following
cultural practices that they picked
up during their childhood.
In other documents I pointed out that every generation mindlessly
follows the same policies for crime, even though the policies have a
100% failure rate. How is a man who repeatedly follows a failed
policy for crime prevention behaving in a more sensible manner than a
Chinese person who follows the practice of eating Tiger penises to
improve his sex life even though that practice also has a 100% failure
Some states in America have legalized marijuana, and there is no
evidence yet that the people in those particular states are suffering
as a result, but there are millions of people insisting
that the proper way to deal with marijuana is to follow the drug
policies of our parents, which is to punish the marijuana users and
dealers. Those people continue to insist that legalizing marijuana will
cause all sorts of trouble, even though there is no evidence to support
their fears, and they continue to insist that we can stop marijuana use
simply by making it illegal, even though that policy has a 100% failure
The human mind doesn't care what the evidence shows. We have a
strong craving to follow whatever culture we picked up as children,
regardless of how senseless it might be. We do not want to think for
experiment with life, or look critically at our culture.
What is the difference between people who:
• insist on following the
failed crime policies of their parents.
• drink the
blood of babies because their parents did it.
• believe that crime will cease if
everybody carries a gun.
• believe that having sex with
children will help them remain young and healthy.
• believe that we must pray to Jesus before we go
Because we are arrogant creatures, we have a tendency to boast about
our culture and insult other people's culture, but if Gabriel and Alisa
are telling us the truth, I suggest we use the ritual
of killing babies as
an example of how it is time for the human race to slap itself in the
face and start looking critically at its cultural practices. In my
opinion, a lot of the cultural practices of the modern world are just
as idiotic as the ritual of killing a baby and
drinking its blood.
and Alisa are evidence that sex information does not harm children
Americans are paranoid that their children will be psychologically
damaged if they are exposed to nudity or
sex education. America allows businesses to titillate children sexually
in advertisements, and we allow Hollywood and other businesses to
promote alcohol, drugs, idiotic pranks, and other dangerous, risky, or
obnoxious behavior, but
Americans will not allow a child to see a mother breast-feed a baby, or
see a woman's nipple, or to see any kind of sex act. Most Americans
will not allow schools to teach sex information, either.
and Alisa have been exposed to more types of sex acts and sex
many adults in America, but they show no signs of damage from it. What
is the difference between an American who believes that children will
be harmed if they see a mother breast-feed her baby, and a man who
believes that having sex with children will help him remain young?
I would say that both of
them are believing whatever they want to believe; that they are
mindlessly following idiotic cultural practices that they
picked up during their childhood; and that they are refusing to look
critically at their culture and experiment with improvements.
Children are not
harmed by information about their bodies,
sex, childbirth, digestion, or any other issue. The adults who believe
they are protecting their children by keeping them ignorant about sex,
digestion, childbirth, and other issues are not
children. Rather, they are helping to keep their children
ignorant, and that can lead to their children developing abnormal
fascinations with the
issues that they know almost nothing about.
British government is not interested in evidence
should be noted that much of what Gabriel and Alisa claim
verified. For example, they claim that the adults would remove skin
from the babies and make shoes from the skin. It would be very easy for
the police to search the schools to see if there really are any shoes
where the children claim they are,
and then analyze the shoes to see if they are made from human skin or
animal skin. Gabriel also claims that his butt hole would
as a result of the sexual abuse, and Alisa claims to have had
sex with lots of men and been
an abortion. How difficult
would it be for doctors to determine
if the children are showing signs of such extreme sexual abuse? The
police could also analyze the areas where the children claim the babies
were killed to see if they can find any evidence of blood, or the DNA
of missing children.
the 9/11 attack occurred, the FBI, Pentagon officials, and other
government agencies began confiscating security videos and destroying
evidence as fast as they
could. Have you seen the video of the
people at the Pentagon who were picking up and destroying evidence of
crashed into the Pentagon? The photo below is one frame from that
video. We ought to wonder if Scotland Yard and the British
have also already destroyed as much evidence of the pedophilia and
killings as they could find.
the crime network get the babies?
and Alisa believe that many of the babies were provided to the cult by
the British government's social services. They believe the babies came
from poor people who could not afford children, but we ought to
consider the possibility that some of those babies were the retarded
children of parents who could
afford them, but did not want a retarded child.
The reason we should
consider this possibility is because a crime network would be able to
both make money and protect itself by offering the service of getting
rid of retarded children, senile elderly people, and terminally ill
people who want to die. For example, if
a couple were to have a retarded child, somebody from the British
social services could offer to put the child out
of its misery to spare the parents from the burden of a retarded child.
After the child was killed, they could tell the parents,
your child to death. Remember, you agreed to have him killed, so you are
this, so you must help protect our network, or you are going to get in
trouble, also. Euthanasia is a good cause, and you are
protecting the British government, so don't feel guilty."
That blackmail scenario might seem ridiculous,
but if you ignore the possibility that a crime network is looking for
opportunities to blackmail people, you
might get caught in one of their blackmail traps.
I described in a previous document, blackmail is of no value unless the
victim can be frightened. Therefore, crime networks that blackmail
pedophiles are going to encourage society to hate pedophiles.
if a crime network is benefiting from the disposal of retarded children
or old people, they will want society to hate parents who kill
retarded children and to hate people who practice euthanasia. This
allows them to offer these services and then blackmail their victims.
I'd love to help, but it doesn't affect me or my family”
I mentioned in an earlier file, I have heard Americans justify their
apathy about the Mideast war on the grounds that the American military
personnel who suffer from that war are volunteers,
and if they don't
want to suffer, they should quit the military.
Many people use
that type of excuse to ignore the abuse of orphans, retarded children,
and homeless people, and I suspect many people would use that same
excuse to ignore the issue of murder rituals with babies. Specifically,
they will say that the murder rituals do not affect them or their
friends because the babies who are killed are usually the
unwanted babies, not the babies of "normal" people.
However, everybody suffers when we ignore crime networks because these
networks help their
members get into
top positions of our government, police departments, media, businesses,
charities, churches, schools,
and other organizations. They are filling our leadership positions with
lunatics, homosexuals, pedophiles, murderers, religious fanatics, and
mentally ill freaks.
should not ignore a crime network simply because their victims tend to
be unwanted people. That is as foolish as ignoring a fire that is
raging in your city simply because it happens to be in
somebody else's neighborhood.
The people who ignore crime networks are
hurting themselves and their family members, but they either cannot
understand this concept due to their ignorance or stupidity, or they
are choosing to ignore it so that they
can focus on titillating themselves
with television, food, and material items. Regardless of why they
behave in this awful manner, they are part of the reason that crime
networks are thriving and getting control of our nations.