Hufschmid's main page
Apollo page


More Apollo information

I thought my Science Challenge #24 would be more than enough evidence that the Apollo moon landings were faked. However, understanding that science challenge requires you understand why the earth's sky is blue during the day, and why stars cannot be seen at night in densely populated cities.

I have discovered that there are very few people who understand why nobody in a city can see stars at night. Therefore, I will provide some more information about Apollo.

1) NASA wants to measure radiation on the moon

NASA is planning to send astronauts to the moon by the year 2020. However, before they send people to the moon, they want to measure the radiation levels on the moon with an unmanned probe named CRaTER:

Didn't NASA measure radiation levels in the 1960s?

NASA sent several Surveyor probes to the moon during the 1960s before sending the Apollo astronauts:

NASA claims the purpose of the probes was to analyze the moon's surface. At the time those probes landed on the moon, nobody knew whether the moon's surface was hard enough for people to walk on. Some people wondered if areas on the moon were covered with such a thick layer of powder that the Apollo spacecraft would sink into it.

The Surveyor probes showed that it was possible to land a spacecraft on the moon because the surface was crushed rocks, not deep, soft powder.

NASA admits that the Surveyor 6 measured solar protons and cosmic rays:

What did the probe determine? Were the solar protons and cosmic rays at such a low level that the astronauts would be safe? Why is NASA so secretive about radiation levels in outer space?

After discovering that the moon was safe to walk on, NASA claims to have sent six teams of astronauts to the moon. They landed in six different locations. However, none of them bothered to measure the radiation.

NASA claims that the Apollo astronauts never bothered to measure radiation levels because they were on the moon for only a couple days. A more likely explanation for why the astronauts never measured radiation levels on the moon is because they never went to the moon.

Furthermore, it is possible that the Surveyor probe discovered that radiation levels on the moon were so high that no astronaut could possibly survive in those thin spacesuits and that lousy lunar lander. Perhaps NASA classified all the radiation measurements as “Top Secret” so that we do not realize that outer space is dangerous.

2) The 1969 press conference was psychotic
After Neil Armstrong, Michael Collins, and Buzz Aldrin returned from the moon in 1969, they held a press conference to tell the world about their incredible trip to the moon.

These three men just accomplished the most incredible feat the human race has ever achieved. If you had been in their position, wouldn't you have been excited, proud of America, and happy to describe your trip to the moon?

The facial and body expressions of the astronauts suggest that they are suffering from extreme emotional stress.

Why would they appear to be so nervous and awkward? NASA wants us to believe that all of the astronauts are extremely introverted. But watch the first few minutes of their interview, and ask yourself, are they really introverted? Or are they suffering stress because they are lying about going to the moon?

3) All Apollo astronauts are psychotic

All 12 Apollo astronauts remained hidden from the public after coming back from the moon. NASA wants us to believe that all 12 astronauts are too shy to give interviews.

Neil Armstrong is the best example of this. Here is an article about his bizarre behavior from The Cincinnati Enquirer:

From the book One Giant Leap by Leon Wagener, page 298 we have another description of this psychotic astronaut:

When Neil started as a professor at the University of Cincinnati in 1970, news executives from the area's radio, TV, and print media were summoned to a downtown restaurant to hear an ultimatum: they were not to request interviews with the space hero who would be living in their midst, because none would be granted; they were to totally ignore his presence and not consider it legitimate news. Amazingly, the group agreed—with one exception. Lawrence H. Rogers, then head of Taft Broadcasting Corporation, owners of a chain of television and radio stations in the region, howled in protest. "The reason they gave was that Neil had no secretary and would be overwhelmed with requests. I raised my hand and said, 'That's the most preposterous thing I have ever heard.' I told them Armstrong was the most famous explorer since Christopher Columbus; it would have been criminal journalistically to not write about him and praise what he had accomplished."
What are the chances that 100% of the Apollo astronauts are so introverted that they are incapable of visiting children in school, going onto television shows to talk about the moon, and giving interviews to reporters?

Neil Armstrong may no longer be the most psychotic astronaut!

Did you hear about Lisa Nowak, Clark McClelland, or Ed Mitchell? I have some information about them on this page.

4) The moon is not bright

Many people dismiss my Science Challenge #24 on the grounds that the moon's surface reflects so much light that the astronauts could not see stars.

I thought this Science Challenge #25 might help, but most people cannot understand that one, either.

So I will tell you the answer: the moon is not a bright object. 

It is easy to measure the level of reflected light from the moon, and from that you can determine what percentage of the sunlight the moon is reflecting. You will discover that the moon does not reflect very much sunlight.

There is a very simple description from NASA that everybody can understand:

...the moon is about the poorest reflector in the solar system. The amount of light reflected by a celestial object is called the albedo (Latin: albus, white). The moon reflects only 7% of the sunlight that falls upon it, so the albedo is 0.07
This means that astronauts on the moon would not be overwhelmed with the brightness of the lunar surface. Rather, they would be amazed at how dark the surface is.

5) The technology was too primitive in the 1960's

The computers of the 1960's would not qualify as computers by today's standards. Rather, they were “electronic adding machines”.

Manufacturing technology was horrible by comparison to what we have today because they did not have computer-controlled milling machines or lathes.

I have a PDF file with information:

6) U2 pilots can see stars
In my PDF file (see link above) I point out that a U2 pilot said that when he climbs to high altitudes the sky becomes dark, the stars become brighter, and more stars become visible:
“The air is so much clearer up there; you can see what seems to be 10 times more stars. They just carpet the sky."
The original web page is gone, but you can still get it at the Internet archive by clicking here. Also, I have a copy here.
Update 1: Somebody discovered this news article that should help you:
"seeing stars appear while it is day time". (I have a copy here.)
Update 2: Somebody else pointed out that photos taken by astronauts in the space station show stars everywhere:
Update 3: Somebody pointed out that another astronaut made a remark about how he doesn't sleep much because he is spending a lot of his time looking out the window:
"I sleep the minimum amount possible"
Update 4: Somebody pointed out that the pilot for the SR-71 Blackbird also was astounded by both the stars and the meteors that he could see when he was high up in the sky:
"Shooting stars flashed across the canvas every few seconds"
Everybody can see stars... except the Apollo astronauts!
7) NASA wants to crash a probe into the moon
In April 2006 NASA announced a plan to send a probe to the moon in 2008 to determine if there is water on the moon.

Didn't NASA already analyze the 400 kilograms of moon rocks that 6 teams of astronauts brought back to the Earth from 6 different locations on the moon?

Furthermore, this latest probe will crash into the moon, not land gently!

NASA claims to have the technology to put men on the moon, and bring them home again, so why are they planning a primitive, destructive crash?

8) Hubble telescope looks at moon

In this amazing report, we discover that NASA is using the Hubble telescope to look at ultraviolet light reflected from moon in order to determine what type of minerals are on the surface of the moon.

Do I have to repeat this:

Didn't NASA already analyze the 400 kilograms of moon rocks that 6 teams of astronauts brought back to the Earth from 6 different locations on the moon?

NASA wants us to believe that those 400 kilograms is not enough; that the experiments conducted by the astronauts is not enough. Do you believe that looking at the moon with a telescope does a better job than 12 men on the moon?

9) Moon rocks are in Antarctica?
Barbara Cohen, a researcher from the University of New Mexico, was picking up rocks in Antarctica. She sent them to Houston, Texas for an analysis.

The scientists in Houston discovered that one of the Antarctic rocks closely matched the NASA moon rocks.

The scientists then concluded that one of the rocks from Antarctica was actually from the moon: id=4526

How did rocks from the moon get in Antarctica?

Update: I made a science challenge about this question:

NASA and Ms. Cohen want us to believe that a big meteor crashed into the moon a while ago, and pieces of the moon were sent flying into space. A few of those pieces landed in Antarctica.

Take a look at how far away the moon is from the earth. If it were true that rocks were ejected from the moon with such velocity that they could escape the moon's gravity and fly out into space, what are the chances that any of them would survive the fall through the atmosphere and land on tiny Antarctica hundreds of thousands of kilometers away? Furthermore, the rock has to land in a location where humans can find it many years later.

A more sensible explanation is that the NASA moon rocks were rocks from Antarctica

Therefore, when someone travels to Antarctica and sends rock samples to Houston, Texas for analysis, some of the rocks will closely match the Apollo moon rocks.

10) Lunar rocket was silent, too many photos...
Other people who looked at Apollo found other problems. For example, Jack White counted the photos taken by the astronauts on the moon, divided it by the time they were on the moon, and points out that they took too many photos:

Note: keep in mind that I have discovered that most of the "truth seekers" have turned out to be "Wolves In Sheep's Clothing" who are trying to control their opposition. Instead of trying to expose the Apollo Moon landing hoax, the Holocaust lies, the 9/11 attack, etc., they release only some information about their crimes in order to attract your attention to their website, and then they mix in some propaganda, and they suggest you visit other sites that are also under their control so that you remain in their network of websites, thereby preventing you from getting an accurate understanding of how extensively the Jews and Israel are involved with these crimes. They shift the blame to the CIA, the military, the corporations, and the Bush family. So be suspicious of everybody!

Bill Kaysing or Bart Sibrel (I forget which) pointed out that the rocket engine on the lunar lander was silent. You can listen to it (actually, you can not listen to it) at this site, where an excerpt of the Official Apollo Video is available:

It is so quiet that it appears the astronauts are in a protected Hollywood studio.


Once you understand the wolf in sheep's clothing trick and realize that most of the 9/11 researchers are criminals who are actually trying to dominate the investigation, keep in mind that most of the Apollo researchers are also criminals who are trying to dominate the investigation of the moon landing.

So become a smart fish; ie, take their bait, but don't bite their hook.

Please learn about the concept of a wolf in sheep clothing! I have an introduction to the issue here.