To get away with crimes,
pretend to be a crime fighter
By Eric Hufschmid
11 Oct 2005
updated 21 Oct 2005
people think I am exaggerating when I tell them that the 9-11 "truth movement"
is dominated by wolves in sheep's clothing.
The 9-11 attack is not
Those of us who expose corruption actually face two problems:
Convincing people that our government is corrupt beyond anything they dreamed
Convincing people that most of the "truth seekers" are trying to cover
up the corruption, or they are rival criminals trying to take over while
Bush appears vulnerable.
Thousands of people were murdered, billions of dollars worth
of property was destroyed, and thousands are still suffering health problems
from breathing the demolition debris. And wars are still going on because
of the attack.
Deception is the preferred weapon
The people who did 9-11 have a lot to lose if they are exposed, and
they have a lot to gain if they remain in control.
Furthermore, 9-11 was not their first crime. Many of them were involved
in other crimes that they must cover up.
Do you really think these people are so foolish that they will sit idly
by while people expose them? If so, take a look at some of the suspicious
suicides and accidents during the past decade.
example, Gary Webb
committed suicide by shooting himself in the head, twice. Mike
Ruppert insists this is possible.
Other people suspect Ruppert is a wolf in sheep's clothing who is trying
to deflect attention away from the Zionists and onto the CIA, vice-president
Cheney, and Peak Oil. Some
think Mossad killed Gary Webb.
Setting up suicides and airplane accidents is expensive and
risky, so they kill us only as a last resort. They prefer to pay hundreds,
maybe thousands, of people to pretend to be 9-11 "truth seekers".
The best way to get away with a crime is to be the investigator
of the crime. Since people have trouble understanding this concept when
I explain how it applies to 9-11, maybe it will be easier to understand
if you imagine how it could happen to you. So let's look at how
a gang of car thieves can get away with stealing your car.
Let's assume that you have a neighbor named Joe, who you assume is an
ordinary, honest citizen. In reality, Joe is part of a gang that steals
cars, and Joe wants to steal your car. What is the best way for
Joe and his gang get away with car thefts?
Warn the victim ahead of time
Joe could tell you that he was browsing an Internet site where
car thieves often send messages to each other, and he noticed a lot of
chatter about stealing a car in your neighborhood.
Offer to help solve the crime
A few days later, Joe steals your car. Your first reaction would be,
"Oh what a fool I am. I should have listened
to my wonderful neighbor Joe, who tried to warn me."
Not many people would wonder, "Wait a minute... if you know where car thieves
are talking to each other on the Internet, why not tell the police and
let them identify the people?"
When you tell Joe that your car was stolen, Joe fakes sadness.
Joe then announces that he wants to rid the neighborhood of crime.
Joe offers to start an organization of truth seekers who will
assist the police in their search for evidence. He tells you that he will
collect information about the crime and pass it on to you and the police.
Give false evidence
You would be grateful to Joe. It would never occur to you that Joe is
sifting through all of the evidence that comes to him and discarding anything
that implicates Joe or his friends in the crime. The only evidence he passes
on to the police are the ones that send them in the wrong direction.
By fooling people into sending him the evidence, Joe also finds out
which citizens he has to watch, and possibly blackmail or kill.
Joe could pay some of his criminal friends to pretend to be
witnesses to the theft of your car. The news reporters and police would
never suspect that these witnesses are actually part of the gang that stole
your car, and that they are sending the police in the wrong direction.
Find naive people to pay for the
Joe could also pay his friends to call radio talk shows to spread the
false evidence to the public.
Joe could also pay his friends to request the radio talk shows and newspapers
to interview Ralph. This creates the impression that Ralph is a popular
person, but in reality he is a member of the gang that steals cars, and
all he really wants to do is spread false information.
After a few months Joe could ask for donations. He could complain
that running the investigation is time-consuming and expensive, and he
would appreciate donations of any type.
Bury the truth with nonsense
The naive people who donate money would not realize that they are paying
Joe to cover up his crime.
Few, if any, of the people who donate money will have the nerve to ask
Joe how much money is being donated, or what happens to that donated money.
The few who ask will be provided with deceptive answers.
Asking for money has an additional advantage; specifically, it fools
people into assuming Joe is an ordinary, honest citizen, not a wealthy
criminal with secret sources of money.
Some people in your neighborhood might take it upon themselves
to investigate the theft of your car simply because they are concerned
about crime. They might discuss evidence on message boards and web sites.
These independent, truly honest citizens are a threat to Joe's
gang because they might discover that Joe is involved in organized crime.
They might even put up a web site that exposes Joe.
Give conspiracy theories a bad image
To protect himself, Joe pays his criminal friends to join the honest
message boards and pretend that they are honest citizens who want to uncover
the truth about the crime. In reality they would post thousands of idiotic
and deceptive messages. They would bury the few useful messages.
Joe could turn some people away from the few honest web sites
by giving a bad image to the people who claim Joe is a criminal. Joe could
pay his friends to post ridiculous theories in order to make the message
boards look like they are dominated by people with mental disorders.
For example, one of Joe's friends could post a photograph that
shows a blurry, mysterious object in the sky above Joe's car. The object
is a bird that is out of focus, but Joe's friend tries to encourage people
to believe that it might be an alien spacecraft, and that perhaps the aliens
stole your car for their museum of human technology.
Simulate discussions on message
Another of Joe's criminal friends could announce that he heard from
a reliable source that your car was picked up by the police along the Polish-Austrian
By flooding the message boards with stupid and deceptive messages, the
honest messages are lost in the nonsense. Some of the honest citizens who
look at the message board will be so overwhelmed by the nonsense that they
ignore the issue.
Joe could pay his friends to join Internet message boards using
false names. The purpose would be to simulate discussions. They would pretend
they were independent citizens.
For a simplistic example of how a conversation might appear, assume
that Joe inherited some money when his father died:
Find useful idiots to promote nonsense
||I think Joe is stealing cars.
||Why do you say that?
||You shouldn't accuse Joe of a crime without proof. This is disgusting!!!!
||Well, Joe has a lot of money. How could he get so much from an ordinary
||Yeah, Joe does have a nice house, and an expensive car.
||You might be on to something Ralph. We should call the police!
||Stop it, you idiots! I know Joe, and he recently inherited money when
his father died.
||Oh, I feel so stupid for jumping to conclusions.
||Me too. I hope Joe doesn't read these messages.
||We owe Joe an apology.
It is difficult to lie. The best way to spread false information
is to find a fool to do the work for you. Convince the fool that the lie
is actually the truth, and then the fool will spread the lie for you. Since
he believes the lie, he will be sincere when he talks about it.
Make Joe appear to be a victim
An example are the fools who try to convince us that the airplanes that
hit the World Trade Centers were holograms or blue screen illusions.
One of Joe's friends could post sarcastic messages on a regular
basis that make fun of the people who accuse Joe of crimes, such as:
Outnumber the honest sites
"Oh, yeah, we all know Joe stole the
car. I saw it on the Internet, so it must be true!"
When there is a serious traffic accident, or a severe rainstorm,
Joe's friends could post such sarcastic messages as:
"As we all know, the accident was Joe's
fault. It's always Joe's fault. Let's blame Joe!"
These messages will fool a few naive people into assuming that Joe is always
a victim, and we should not consider the accusations to be serious, similar
to the way Pollacks were the primary subject for jokes when I was a child.
"I suppose Joe will be blamed for the thunderstorm!
Everything is Joe's fault."
Joe could pay his criminal friends to create thousands of "truth
seeker" web sites in order to bury the few honest web sites.
Boast about honesty
When honest citizens look on the Internet for information about car
thefts, they will almost certainly encounter one of the deceptive web sites
from Joe's friends, not one of the honest web sites.
The end result is that they get a distorted or unpleasant view of the
To make his "truth seeker" web sites appear more honest, Joe
could tell his friends to openly boast about their honesty. For examples
of the possible remarks:
Give the honest citizens a bad image
"The World's Most Trusted Source For Truth".
If those silly statements fool a few people, then it was worth Joe's money
"Established Experts In Counter Propaganda"
"The World's Only Established Experts In Counter Propaganda Science".
"We Demand Honesty in Government".
When an honest citizen exposes information that Joe does not
want exposed, Joe could pay his friends to find something about the citizen
to complain about. For example, if a citizen creates a video that exposes
Joe's gang, the gang could try to give the video a bad image with such
Create a maze of links to all deceptive
"That video looks like some amateur made
it in his garage. You will embarrass those of us in the Truth Seeking movement
if you show people such crummy video!"
"That guy's voice is terrible! You can't
show that lousy video to people! It will turn people away! Come on, he
needs a professional narrator!"
Even if only a few people are fooled into keeping the video a secret, Joe
Joe's friends can also spread rumors about the citizen, such as he is
anti-American, a Fascist, a Nazi, an anti-semite, or a communist. Lots
of people are affected by those insults, which is why they are so frequently
Joe could tell his friends to link their web sites to each
other. When each of the sites have a few links to a couple of the other
sites, it creates the illusion that each site provides more information.
Link to honest sites only when pressured
The honest citizen assumes that every time he clicks on another of the
links that he is getting a better understanding of issue, when in reality
every site he clicks on is from the same criminal organization.
Joe tells his friends to include a few links to one or two
honest sites only when people start wondering why they ignore those honest
sites. However, they will put the link in an obscure place.
Make the honest sites appear controversial
This creates the illusion that they are aware of the honest sites, and
that they support the honest sites, but in reality a couple links in an
obscure location will not have any significant effect.
One of the truth groups might write,
Accuse the honest citizens of being
"There is no consensus among the truth
seekers as to whether Joe actually committed any crime. However, in order
to be fair, we provide all sides of the issue, and so we provide you with
an article from Jim, who believes Joe is a criminal. "
This technique creates the impression that they are fair and unbiased.
Unknown to the common people, Jim is one of Joe's friends, and he deliberately
writes his article in a manner that most people will disregard.
Furthermore, by providing lots of compliments, they take advantage of
the people who are suffering from low self-esteem. For example:
"Look over the evidence and decide for
yourself. We don't want to tell you what to think. The American people
are intelligent, educated people. We provide the information, you
make the decision."
When a citizen exposes Joe or his gang, Joe could accuse that
citizen of being a member of a gang of car thieves who is trying to fool
people into thinking Joe is the criminal in order to hide his own crimes.
Set blackmail traps for government
Other members of Joe's gang can accuse other citizens of being
If Joe's friends create hundreds of these accusations, the ordinary
citizen can become so overwhelmed with the complexity that they will not
be sure who to trust.
Joe and some of his friends could produce child pornography
and arrange trips to Thailand to have sex with children. Imagine that your
father purchases a trip to Thailand.
One of Joe's friends can then use blackmail to control what your father
says and does, but your father would not realize that Joe is involved in
this blackmail. Your father would be working for Joe without realizing
If some of the news executives or police officials in your city purchase
trips to Thailand, then Joe could influence the news and the police. Joe
could also pressure these blackmailed officials into hiring Joe's criminal
friends. Eventually Joe could acquire a lot of control over your city.
Another type of blackmail trap is to encourage people to profit
from Joe's crimes, such as buying stock in one of Joe's companies that
sells stolen car parts.
Become a victim of mysterious hate
Even if only a few policemen, lawyers, and FBI agents can be lured into
this, those few people add to the officials that Joe can control with blackmail.
To further keep himself in control of the city, Joe could pay
a friend to spray a swastika on his house. Some naive people will feel
sorry for Joe; they will defend him when he is accused of being a criminal.
Create organizations to arrest Joe
Joe could also call the newspaper and television reporters to his house
and announce that he is a victim of a hate crime, and that the city must
pass hate crime laws to stop the attacks on innocent crime-fighters and
Joe could use the hate crime legislation to demand the arrest of people
who try to expose him.
Joe could pay his friends to create organizations that want
to arrest Joe. For example, one of the organizations might be called ACT,
which stands for Arrest Car Thieves.
Deflect attention to the government
The ACT web site is full of anger towards Joe. The organization demands
that Joe be arrested. They also ask people to join their organization.
However, in reality they want the names and addresses of their potential
Furthermore, Joe might also be able to use some of the ACT members as
idiots. For example, Joe's friends might be able to convince one of
them to throw a rock through Joe's window. That person could later be arrested,
reinforcing the belief that ACT is a group of idiots who commit senseless
acts of violence, and that the city needs "hate crime" legislation.
Joe can also look through the members of ACT to see if any of them can
be blackmailed, bribed, or threatened.
You must be careful when you join organizations, and you must be very
of the leadership, but very few people are.
Joe could pay his friends to divert attention to the mayor
of the city, who Joe helped to elect. The mayor is an idiot, so Joe hires
people to create web sites and newspaper articles that ridicule the mayor
and imply that he is responsible for the crime because he did not provide
enough money for the police, or because the mayor is allowing corruption
due to his stupidity.
Let your friends expose you as a
One of Joe's friends might write an article that the mayor was warned
that a car might be stolen, but the mayor ignored the warning. This implies
that the stupid mayor is the reason cars are stolen.
Another of Joe's friends might write an article that implies that perhaps
the mayor let your car get stolen so that he could use the theft of the
car as justification for increasing the police budget.
By writing hundreds of slightly different, idiotic theories, the public
will be confused, and many people will not notice the honest articles.
Because it is possible that Joe will eventually be exposed
as a criminal, Joe prepares for that possibility by arranging for lots
of his friends to be truth seekers who expose Joe as a criminal.
The way this deceptions works is if Joe decides that he can no longer
cover up his crime because some citizens are about to expose some critical
information, he can tell his friends to quickly expose him before the honest
citizens do it.
This allows Joe's friends to become the honest crime fighters who expose
a terrible criminal. His friends will be the center of attention, and they
can then try to minimize the damage and punishment, and prevent the rest
of the gang from getting caught.
See the similarity to 9-11,
My imaginary example of how Joe could steal your car is happening
with the September 11 attack, and all of the other big crimes. However,
the deception with 9-11 is much more intense and complex.
"But most members of 911truth are
For example, take a look at 911truth.org, a group of "truth seekers"
in New York City. In their description
of themselves they write:
911Truth.Org is a campaign to educate
the public about the Sept. 11th coverup and inspire popular pressure to
overturn the "incompetence theory" and expose the truth surrounding the
events of 9/11; namely, that elements within the U.S. government must have
been complicit, or worse, for the attacks to happen the way they did.
Since 911truth.org wants to expose the truth, you might expect them
to show the evidence that the towers and Building 7 were demolished with
explosives. But they have the
following remark about this issue:
The Case for Demolitions
Can you see the deception?
There is no consensus on this issue among 911Truth.org
staff or within the 9/11 truth movement, but here is a collection of articles,
many of them by Jim Hoffman, arguing that the WTC buildings must have been
demolished using explosives. Plus a few past milestones on the evidence.
Judge for yourselves...
Nicholas Levis has a role of some sort with this group. That fact alone
should make you suspicious of them. Since at least 2002 several people
have been complaining that Nicholas Levis cannot be trusted.
In 2004 Jimmy Walter allowed Levis to help set up a 9-11 meeting in
New York City. During the meeting it became so obvious that he was a trouble-maker
that security guards had to drag Levis out of the meeting.
Here is WingTV's
description of Levis.
is War Criminal
After I wrote this article, some people complained that most
members of 911truth.org are honest citizens.
Watch out when they deflect attention
Most of the employees of the Enron Corporation may have been honest,
but that doesn't mean the executives of the company can be trusted.
How many times do these 9-11 "truth seekers" have to behave in a suspicious
manner before you ignore them?
What if somebody commits suicide by chaining himself to a fence and
then shooting himself with a firing squad? And what if Mike Ruppert announces
that this method of suicide is entirely possible? Would you continue to
trust Ruppert? Or would you ask yourself,
"Wait a minute, how can Ruppert be so certain it was a suicide?
Why doesn't Ruppert want an investigation? Why are we looking to Ruppert
for guidance when he makes such stupid remarks?"
The inability to select quality leaders is one of the world's primary problems.
Most people turn to whoever makes them feel good; whoever gives them praise,
entertainment, and hope.
The excuses people make for Tom
Flocco is another example. I have heard some people say something like,
"Well, Flocco might make some dumb remarks about Barbara Olson,
but some of what he says is true, so we should continue to look to him
as a leader of the truth movement."
This is as ridiculous as somebody saying,
"Well, Bush might be involved in 9/11 and numerous other big
crimes, but some of what he does is useful, so we should continue to follow
If you make excuses for idiotic and criminal behavior, how are we going
to take care of our nation?
A lot of people realize that George Bush is a puppet, but who
is telling Bush what to do?
Most of Bush's opponents are
A "truth seeker" named Dr. Justin Frank has the answer. He tells us
that George Bush is a puppet, but he is "A
Puppet Who Chose His Puppeteers".
Dr. Frank is trying to convince us that there is no need to look at
the people giving orders to George Bush because George Bush chose those
people. Therefore, to understand the actions of George Bush, we only have
to look at George Bush!
Dr. Frank wants us to believe that if we look at Bush's puppeteers,
we will discover that they are following the orders of George Bush.
Does this make sense to you?
There are a lot of critics of the Bush administration, but
very few of them are honest about 9/11, the Kennedy assassination, the
attack of the USS Liberty, or any other scam.
They claim to be "truth seekers" who want to get rid of the evil Bush
government and replace it with an honest government. However, none of these
truth seekers are being honest.
Many of the truth seekers seem to be part of the group that gave us
9-11, and some of the truth seekers seem to be part of a rival group
of criminals who are fighting with the Bush administration for control
of America. You and I are just pawns in their game of world conquest.
The MoveOn organization encourages their members to get together
and be exposed to videos and other information about corruption. This is
a wonderful method to educate people. The organization has tremendous potential.
However, the only information that their members are exposed to is propaganda
that makes the Bush administration and the Fox news network look like evil
The MoveOn members are some of the most ignorant people when
it comes to 9/11 and other crimes. The most likely explanation is that
George Soros and other people behind the MoveOn organization are a rival
gang fighting for control of the American people.
Example: The Air America radio network
They are not interested in exposing crime; rather, they are interested
in getting control of the people. They are deceiving their members
with their particular propaganda.
Some people suspect George Soros of being in the same criminal gang
as George Bush, but for all we know, they are on different teams that work
together sometimes, but fight with each other most of the time.
As with Al Capone and other gangs, people such as Soros and Bush may
be selfish beyond anything you have imagined, and both of them may fantasize
about killing each other.
Air America claims to be providing people with the truth, but
just like Tom Flocco, Mike Ruppert, 911truth.org, and most other "truth
seekers" who condemn Bush, they appear to be either working with Bush,
or working with some rival group of criminals.
Example: the Green Party
They titillate their listeners with insults about Bush and corporations,
but they suppress a lot of important books, people, and subjects.
When Mike Malloy had a show about the 9/11 attack (on September 30,
2005), one of the people who helped Air America get started, Steve Sinton,
decided to sit in the studio with him.
The show is available at this site:
It is Malloy's show on Friday, September 30th, 2005.
The direct link to the mp3 file is:
I suppose Mike Malloy knows a lot about the 9/11 attack, and the management
of Air America were concerned that he or his callers might let out too
much information. So they sent Sinton to sit in the studio with Mike, and
Sinton tried to promote the idea that conspiracy theories about 9/11 are
The people who listen to Air America are as deceived as the people who
watch the television news. The naive citizens who provide Air America with
money, advertising, or any other support are helping a group of criminals.
Most leaders of the groups we call "liberals" are wolves in sheep's
clothing. They are not exposing corruption, nor are they educating people.
Rather, they are taking advantage of the anger towards Bush, Republicans,
and corporate greed.
The liberals condemn Bush for being stupid, and they criticize Republicans
for having incompetent leadership, but the leaders for the liberals are
just as corrupt. If the liberals had even 20% of the intelligence they
think they have, they would investigate Soros, Sinton, and all of the other
top ranking liberals.
I was complaining to a member of the Green Party that the Green
Party is worthless, and one of the reasons I gave was that they will not
tell their members about 9/11.
Example: The anti-war groups
His response was that the leader of the Southern California branch,
Mike Feinstein, was a psychopath, and that he is merely dishonest,
not part of the 9-11 cover-up. He explained to me that Feinstein was accused
by his fellow Green Party members of stealing
money from the Green Party.
Why would anybody remain a member of the Green Party when they think
their leader is a psychopath? Well, for the same reason millions of people
followed the Kings and Queens of Europe, Napoleon, Hitler, Stalin, and
Bush. Namely, humans and animals have a strong tendency to follow, and
most humans and animals are lousy at thinking.
If it is true that Feinstein is stealing money from the Green Party,
he may be part of the criminal network that gave us 9-11. Or the criminal
network may have noticed that Feinstein is dishonest, and they are using
his criminal background to blackmail him.
Perhaps the reason that nobody can remove him from the Green Party is
because he has a lot of support from a lot of criminals. Or perhaps he
is honest, and the criminals are trying to make him appear to be a criminal
in order to get rid of him!
Regardless of whether Feinstein is an honest citizen, a psychopath,
or a blackmailed criminal, the Green Party is not providing their members
with any useful information, so what value does the Green Party have? Why
are the members wasting their time and money with such a worthless organization?
The Green Party is not helping America. It is of more use to
the Bush administration and other criminals because it suppresses information
about corruption. The same is true of almost every other large organization.
Most of the organizations that claim to be struggling for peace
refuse to provide information about 9-11 and other corruption. Worse yet,
stop attempts by their members to discuss these issues.
Which organization is of value?
The leaders of these groups have a lot of excuses as to why they will
not discuss 9/11 and other crimes. For example, I have heard some leaders
of Veterans for Peace insist that they want to support veterans, so 9/11
is not an issue that concerns them.
However, the war is based on the 9/11 attack, so if they really want
to stop the wars and help the veterans, they should expose the 9/11
Are the leaders of the Veterans for Peace groups truly so stupid
that they cannot see the value in exposing 9/11? Or are they afraid to
expose it because they worry they will die in an airplane crash? Or are
the leaders part of the criminal network that is trying to cover up these
crimes? Or are they blackmailed or bribed into covering up these crimes?
I don't know what is wrong with Veterans for Peace or the anti-war groups,
but I know better than to join or support a useless organization.
There are thousands of organizations and web sites that claim
to be trying to help us. However, we must judge an organization and their
leaders by their accomplishments, not by what they promise.
Be more critical of message boards
If you belong to an organization, ask yourself, what has it done for
you or the world? Be serious when answering that question. Be as
critical of your organization as you are of President Bush.
Don't be a hypocrite by supporting a crummy or corrupt leader while
you condemn Bush for corruption and incompetence. The world does not improve
from hypocrisy; it improves when people develop intelligent suggestions
and do some real work.
Unless we raise standards for people in leadership position, nothing
will improve. We don't need a rival group of criminals and hypocrites to
replace Bush. We need to get higher quality leaders.
Next time you look at an Internet message board, see if you
can spot the simulated conversations. For example, the following is a real
message board. (Update:
that message has been deleted, and from the Internet Archive also shows
When people started doubting that man
went to the moon. I remember then asking them to use HUBBLE to take pictures
of the moon so we could see the flag and any other crap they left. They
said they couldn´t use hubble to photgraph the moon because it was
too close to earth. I just noticed this article that says the Hubble can
look at the moon.
Now take some pictures of your blast craters
After that message was posted, somebody else pointed out that
the Hubble does not have the power to see a flag on the moon.
Watch out for "fishermen"
Is that a simulated conversation? It becomes easier to answer that question
when you look through the other messages on the board. The above "discussion"
appeared on 20 Oct 2005. On 5 Oct 2005 somebody else posted a very similar
that message has been deleted, and from the Internet Archive also shows
it deleted), and on 23 Aug 2005 almost the same
conversation occurred. Take a look now in case they erase or edit them.
Although we will never know for certain, I think all three of those
messages are coming from people who are trying to cover up the Apollo moon
A technique that criminals use is perhaps best described as
"fishing". For example, somebody might post a message that he thinks George
Bush was involved in 9/11. In reality he is hoping to identify people who
agree with him, or he is trying to determine what percentage of the people
on the message boards have this opinion.
There are some sites on the Internet that appear to be "Nazi" or anti-semite
sites. For example:
From my casual observation of those sites, I would guess that they are
operated by FBI agents or Zionists, and I suspect that they are looking
for people who are angry at the US government or Israel. They post angry
messages, such as "Kill all Niggers and Jews!". The angry messages are
like worms on a hook, and they wait for people to bite them.
Even stranger, there are a lot of sites that are are registered to "Network
Solutions", a company located in Herndon Virginia. Some of them are angry
sites, some are "truth seeker" sites that provide deception, and some of
them offer pornography that is so extreme that most Internet service providers
would not tolerate them. For example, the following web sites are all registered
to Network Solutions:
Why are all of these sites claiming Network Solutions
is the registrant? Is there a connection between these sites?
More details about Network Solutions
I don't know the answer to those questions, but I would consider the
possibility that they are sites of a government agency (not necessarily
the American government), and that they are watching everybody who contacts
Most of the customers and employees of Network Solutions may be honest,
but that doesn't mean the company can be trusted.
Until the late 1990s, everybody purchased Internet domain names
from Network Solutions because they had a monopoly. Therefore, it is not
surprising that lots of web sites show "Network Solutions" as the company
the domain was registered with.
I am not accusing Network Solutions of being a criminal organization.
Instead, I am suggesting we consider the possibility that they and other
Internet service companies have been infiltrated by criminals.
There are many accusations that Israel was tapping American phone lines,
spying on government officials, and blackmailing Americans. And don't forget
about the accusations of their involvement in 9/11, the USS Liberty attack,
the JFK assassination, the Apollo moon landing, and numerous other crimes.
There have also been many examples of organized crime getting involved
with legitimate businesses for a variety of reasons.
So why not consider the possibility that Israel -- or some other group
-- is infiltrating Internet service companies?
When you catch somebody lying to you or committing a crime, you should
assume that you caught only a fraction of their total lies and crimes.
Only a fool would think that he caught their one and only crime. And when
you catch a nation lying to you hundreds of times, why not wonder
if maybe they lied more than a hundred times?
Here are just three examples of Israeli spies:
Suspected of Tapping White House Phone Lines
Cameron Investigates Israeli spies
Drug Enforcement Administration
Expose Israeli Spies
We should not be afraid to look critically at business executives,
politicians, FBI agents, and other people in positions of authority.
Why would a criminal network, or a foreign government, would want to
infiltrate Internet service companies? Lots of reasons. For example:
To observe government e-mail and data
If a criminal network can convince government agencies to call
their technicians to provide technical services for their Internet computers,
the criminals will be able to get access to their e-mail and data without
going through the Internet. This makes it impossible for anybody to realize
that they are snooping.
Also, if Network Solutions can convince a government agency to use the
computers and phone lines of Network Solutions for web sites, that gives
Network Solutions direct access to the email and data of the government
To acquire blackmail material
If a prostitute, pornography producer, con artist, or car thief
were to make the mistake of letting a criminal organization host his web
site, those criminals would be able to snoop through his e-mail and identify
To cause trouble for customers they don't like
In 2003 an employee at Network Solutions caused serious disruption
to Al Jazeera's web site. Different news reports explain it differently,
but it is described as a "mistake". Here is one account:
Racine hijacks Al-Jazeera
And here is another:
attack on Al-Jazeera
To upload videos from Osama
Mistakes happen all the time, but it is possible that it was deliberate
Occasionally you will hear that an Al Qaeda terrorist posted
a message or a video on the Internet. Have you ever wondered how they do
this without being identified?
To disrupt other people's web sites
If Network Solutions is hosting a site that is owned by an Arab, they
could put messages and videos directly onto the hard disks.
The Arab would have no idea how the Al Qaeda terrorist posted video
onto his site, and neither would any of the honest FBI agents. It would
never occur to anybody that a technician in Virginia transfered the video
directly onto the computers from a CD-ROM.
Even if Network Solutions does not have direct access to any Arab site,
they could upload the video from their computers in Virginia, and if an
honest FBI agent contacted them about it, the conversation would go like
Honest FBI agent: It looks as if one of
your customers uploaded a video to a web site in Iraq. Could you look into
it for us?
Network Solutions: Certainly! We are patriotic,
honest Americans, and the last thing we want is a terrorist to be using
(Several days later.)
Network Solutions: Sorry Mr. FBI agent.
We carefully studied all of our records, but we could not find anybody
posting to Iraq. You made a mistake. But don't worry; we won't tell your
boss about your incompetence. We'll forget you ever suspected such a stupid
thing. You can return the favor in the future.
In 1997 an employee at Network Solutions was reported to have
caused a computer to send corrupted files to 10 servers around the world.
The mistake caused messages to be returned to senders and cut off access
to US web sites for some European users.
To spread viruses and spam
Note: It is the 7th paragraph down
Certainly this could be an accident, but it could also have been deliberate
sabotage, or a test of whether they can bring down the entire Internet.
When a group of criminals are in control of an Internet service
provider, they can spread viruses, spam, and spy programs without worrying
about somebody calling the FBI. This is especially true if the criminals
work for the FBI.
If an honest FBI agent traced some of the viruses to the criminals,
he would be told by that he must be mistaken.
Most of us (or all of us?) get spam messages every day. How could somebody
possibly spread so much spam without the FBI figuring out who is doing
it? And how can people possibly spread viruses without the FBI figuring
out who is doing it?
For all we know, the viruses are coming from government agencies, and
virus protection companies have been infiltrated by these same agencies
in order to secretly send back information about how the virus protection
software can be defeated.
Perhaps the FBI arrests virus producers only if they are not part of
their criminal network.
Why would any government want to produce viruses? To waste our time
and money. If the goal is to destroy America, everything that hurts America
is another nail in the coffin. Viruses, spam, and junk faxes may seem insignificant,
but they waste a lot of time, money, and resources.
As I learn more about Network Solutions I may discover that
they are wonderful, responsible people. Perhaps I will discover that Christopher
Bollyn is correct that the company Tucows
is the company we should be investigating.
It is not
difficult to solve these crimes!
Criminals have a dilemma. Specifically, if they try to cover
up their crime, they risk
giving us clues about who they are and how they did the crime. But
if they remain hidden, they risk being exposed by those of us who are investigating.
The FBI could figure out who some of the criminals are simply by watching
the message boards for suspicious activity.
The FBI could also identify the criminals by watching the honest citizens
to see who contacts us via email, phone, and in person. Some of
the people who contact us are criminals who are trying to fool us with
If the FBI was interested in solving crimes, it would not be difficult
for them to identify thousands of suspects.
These crimes are occurring right in front of our faces. The criminals
get away with them because the government is covering them up, and
most people cannot figure out who to turn to for guidance, not
because there is a shortage of evidence.