To get away with
pretend to be a crime fighter
By Eric Hufschmid
11 Oct 2005
updated 21 Oct 2005
Update #1 and #2 here 24 December 2018
9-11 attack is not
people think I am exaggerating when I tell them that the 9-11 "truth
is dominated by wolves in sheep's clothing.
Those of us who expose corruption actually face two
Convincing people that our government is corrupt beyond anything they
Convincing people that most of the "truth seekers"
are trying to cover
up the corruption, or they are rival criminals trying to take over
Bush appears vulnerable.
Thousands of people were murdered, billions of
of property was destroyed, and thousands are still suffering health
from breathing the demolition debris. And wars are still going on
of the attack.
is the preferred weapon
The people who did 9-11 have a lot to lose if they are
they have a lot to gain if they remain in control.
Furthermore, 9-11 was not their first crime. Many of
them were involved
in other crimes that they must cover up.
Do you really think these people are so foolish that
they will sit idly
by while people expose them? If so, take a look at some of the
suicides and accidents during the past decade.
committed suicide by shooting himself in the head, twice.
Ruppert insists this is possible.
Other people suspect Ruppert is a wolf in sheep's
clothing who is trying
to deflect attention away from the Zionists and onto the CIA,
Cheney, and Peak Oil. Some
think Mossad killed Gary Webb.
Setting up suicides and airplane accidents is
risky, so they kill us only as a last resort. They prefer to pay
maybe thousands, of people to pretend to be 9-11 "truth seekers".
The best way to get away with a crime is to be
of the crime. Since people have trouble understanding this concept when
I explain how it applies to 9-11, maybe it will be easier to understand
if you imagine how it could happen to you. So let's
look at how
a gang of car thieves can get away with stealing your
Let's assume that you have a neighbor named Joe, who
you assume is an
ordinary, honest citizen. In reality, Joe is part of a gang that steals
cars, and Joe wants to steal your car. What is the
best way for
Joe and his gang get away with car thefts?
the victim ahead of time
Joe could tell you that he was browsing an
Internet site where
car thieves often send messages to each other, and he noticed a lot of
chatter about stealing a car in your neighborhood.
to help solve the crime
A few days later, Joe steals your car. Your first
reaction would be,
"Oh what a
fool I am. I should have listened
to my wonderful neighbor Joe, who tried to warn me."
Not many people would wonder, "Wait a minute... if you know where car
are talking to each other on the Internet, why not tell the police and
let them identify the people?"
When you tell Joe that your car was stolen, Joe
Joe then announces that he wants to rid the neighborhood of
Joe offers to start an organization of truth
seekers who will
assist the police in their search for evidence. He tells you that he
collect information about the crime and pass it on to you and the
You would be grateful to Joe. It would never occur to
you that Joe is
sifting through all of the evidence that comes to him and discarding
that implicates Joe or his friends in the crime. The only evidence he
on to the police are the ones that send them in the wrong direction.
By fooling people into sending him the evidence, Joe
also finds out
which citizens he has to watch, and possibly blackmail or kill.
Joe could pay some of his criminal friends to
pretend to be
witnesses to the theft of your car. The news reporters and police would
never suspect that these witnesses are actually part of the gang that
your car, and that they are sending the police in the wrong direction.
naive people to pay for the
Joe could also pay his friends to call radio talk
shows to spread the
false evidence to the public.
Joe could also pay his friends to request the radio
talk shows and newspapers
to interview Ralph. This creates the impression that Ralph is a popular
person, but in reality he is a member of the gang that steals cars, and
all he really wants to do is spread false information.
After a few months Joe could ask for donations.
He could complain
that running the investigation is time-consuming and expensive, and he
would appreciate donations of any type.
the truth with nonsense
The naive people who donate money would not realize
that they are paying
Joe to cover up his crime.
Few, if any, of the people who donate money will have
the nerve to ask
Joe how much money is being donated, or what happens to that donated
The few who ask will be provided with deceptive answers.
Asking for money has an additional advantage;
specifically, it fools
people into assuming Joe is an ordinary, honest citizen, not a wealthy
criminal with secret sources of money.
Some people in your neighborhood might take it
to investigate the theft of your car simply because they are concerned
about crime. They might discuss evidence on message boards and web
These independent, truly honest citizens are a
threat to Joe's
gang because they might discover that Joe is involved in organized
They might even put up a web site that exposes Joe.
conspiracy theories a bad image
To protect himself, Joe pays his criminal friends to
join the honest
message boards and pretend that they are honest citizens who want to
the truth about the crime. In reality they would post thousands of
and deceptive messages. They would bury the few useful messages.
Joe could turn some people away from the few
honest web sites
by giving a bad image to the people who claim Joe is a criminal. Joe
pay his friends to post ridiculous theories in order to make the
boards look like they are dominated by people with mental disorders.
For example, one of Joe's friends could post a
shows a blurry, mysterious object in the sky above Joe's car. The
is a bird that is out of focus, but Joe's friend tries to encourage
to believe that it might be an alien spacecraft, and that perhaps the
stole your car for their museum of human technology.
discussions on message
Another of Joe's criminal friends could announce that
he heard from
a reliable source that your car was picked up by the police along the
By flooding the message boards with stupid and
deceptive messages, the
honest messages are lost in the nonsense. Some of the honest citizens
look at the message board will be so overwhelmed by the nonsense that
ignore the issue.
Joe could pay his friends to join Internet
message boards using
false names. The purpose would be to simulate discussions. They would
they were independent citizens.
For a simplistic example of how a conversation might
that Joe inherited some money when his father died:
||I think Joe is stealing cars.
||Why do you say that?
||You shouldn't accuse Joe of a crime without
proof. This is disgusting!!!!
||Well, Joe has a lot of money. How could he
get so much from an ordinary
||Yeah, Joe does have a nice house, and an
||You might be on to something Ralph. We
should call the police!
||Stop it, you idiots! I know Joe, and he
recently inherited money when
his father died.
||Oh, I feel so stupid for jumping to
||Me too. I hope Joe doesn't read these
||We owe Joe an apology.
Find useful idiots to
It is difficult to lie. The best way to spread
is to find a fool to do the work for you. Convince the fool that the
is actually the truth, and then the fool will spread the lie for you.
he believes the lie, he will be sincere when he talks about it.
Joe appear to be a victim
An example are the fools who try to convince us that
the airplanes that
hit the World Trade Centers were holograms or blue screen illusions.
One of Joe's friends could post sarcastic
messages on a regular
basis that make fun of the people who accuse Joe of crimes, such as:
the honest sites
we all know Joe stole the
car. I saw it on the Internet, so it must be true!"
When there is a serious traffic accident, or a severe rainstorm,
Joe's friends could post such sarcastic messages as:
"As we all
know, the accident was Joe's
fault. It's always Joe's fault. Let's blame Joe!"
These messages will fool a few naive people into assuming that Joe is always
a victim, and we should not consider the accusations to be serious,
to the way Pollacks were the primary subject for jokes when I was a
"I suppose Joe
will be blamed for the thunderstorm!
Everything is Joe's fault."
Joe could pay his criminal friends to create
thousands of "truth
seeker" web sites in order to bury the few honest web sites.
When honest citizens look on the Internet for
information about car
thefts, they will almost certainly encounter one of the deceptive web
from Joe's friends, not one of the honest web sites.
The end result is that they get a distorted or
unpleasant view of the
To make his "truth seeker" web sites appear
more honest, Joe
could tell his friends to openly boast about their honesty. For
of the possible remarks:
the honest citizens a bad image
"The World's Most Trusted Source
"Established Experts In Counter
"The World's Only Established Experts In Counter Propaganda
"We Demand Honesty in Government".
If those silly statements fool a few people, then it was worth Joe's
When an honest citizen exposes information that
Joe does not
want exposed, Joe could pay his friends to find something about the
to complain about. For example, if a citizen creates a video that
Joe's gang, the gang could try to give the video a bad image with such
a maze of links to all
video looks like some amateur made
it in his garage. You will embarrass those of us in the Truth Seeking
if you show people such crummy video!"
guy's voice is terrible! You can't
show that lousy video to people! It will turn people away! Come on, he
needs a professional narrator!"
Even if only a few people are fooled into keeping the video a secret,
Joe's friends can also spread rumors about the
citizen, such as he is
anti-American, a Fascist, a Nazi, an anti-semite, or a communist. Lots
of people are affected by those insults, which is why they are so
Joe could tell his friends to link their web
sites to each
other. When each of the sites have a few links to a couple of the other
sites, it creates the illusion that each site provides more
The honest citizen assumes that every time he
on another of the
links that he is getting a better understanding of
issue, when in
every site he clicks on is from the same criminal
to honest sites only when pressured
More details about how they use this trick with their Nazi
sites is here.
Joe tells his friends to include a few links to
one or two
honest sites only when people start wondering why they ignore those
sites. However, they will put the link in an obscure place.
the honest sites appear controversial
This creates the illusion that they are aware of the
honest sites, and
that they support the honest sites, but in reality a couple links in an
obscure location will not have any significant effect.
One of the truth groups might write,
the honest citizens of being
no consensus among the truth
seekers as to whether Joe actually committed any crime. However, in
to be fair, we provide all sides of the issue, and so we provide you
an article from Jim, who believes Joe is a criminal. "
This technique creates the impression that they are fair and unbiased.
Unknown to the common people, Jim is one of Joe's friends, and he
writes his article in a manner that most people will disregard.
Furthermore, by providing lots of compliments, they
take advantage of
the people who are suffering from low self-esteem. For example:
the evidence and decide for
yourself. We don't want to tell you what to think. The American people
are intelligent, educated people. We provide the information, you
make the decision."
When a citizen exposes Joe or his gang, Joe
could accuse that
citizen of being a member of a gang of car thieves who is trying to
people into thinking Joe is the criminal in order to hide his own
blackmail traps for government
Other members of Joe's gang can accuse other
citizens of being
If Joe's friends create hundreds of these accusations,
citizen can become so overwhelmed with the complexity that they will
be sure who to trust.
Joe and some of his friends could produce child
and arrange trips to Thailand to have sex with children. Imagine that
father purchases a trip to Thailand.
One of Joe's friends can then use blackmail to control
what your father
says and does, but your father would not realize that Joe is involved
this blackmail. Your father would be working for Joe without realizing
If some of the news executives or police officials in
your city purchase
trips to Thailand, then Joe could influence the news and the police.
could also pressure these blackmailed officials into hiring Joe's
friends. Eventually Joe could acquire a lot of control over your city.
Another type of blackmail trap is to encourage
people to profit
from Joe's crimes, such as buying stock in one of Joe's companies that
sells stolen car parts.
a victim of mysterious hate
Even if only a few policemen, lawyers, and FBI agents
can be lured into
this, those few people add to the officials that Joe can control with
To further keep himself in control of the city,
Joe could pay
a friend to spray a swastika on his house. Some naive people will feel
sorry for Joe; they will defend him when he is accused of being a
organizations to arrest Joe
Joe could also call the newspaper and television
reporters to his house
and announce that he is a victim of a hate crime, and that the city
pass hate crime laws to stop the attacks on innocent crime-fighters and
Joe could use the hate crime legislation to demand the
arrest of people
who try to expose him.
Joe could pay his friends to create
organizations that want
to arrest Joe. For example, one of the organizations might be called
which stands for Arrest Car Thieves.
attention to the government
The ACT web site is full of anger towards Joe. The
that Joe be arrested. They also ask people to join their organization.
However, in reality they want the names and addresses of their
Furthermore, Joe might also be able to use some of the
ACT members as
idiots. For example, Joe's friends might be able to convince
them to throw a rock through Joe's window. That person could later be
reinforcing the belief that ACT is a group of idiots who commit
acts of violence, and that the city needs "hate crime" legislation.
Joe can also look through the members of ACT to see if
any of them can
be blackmailed, bribed, or threatened.
You must be careful when you join organizations, and
you must be very
of the leadership, but very few people are.
Joe could pay his friends to divert attention
to the mayor
of the city, who Joe helped to elect. The mayor is an idiot, so Joe
people to create web sites and newspaper articles that ridicule the
and imply that he is responsible for the crime because he did not
enough money for the police, or because the mayor is allowing
due to his stupidity.
your friends expose you as a
One of Joe's friends might write an article that the
mayor was warned
that a car might be stolen, but the mayor ignored the warning. This
that the stupid mayor is the reason cars are stolen.
Another of Joe's friends might write an article that
implies that perhaps
the mayor let your car get stolen so that he could use the theft of the
car as justification for increasing the police budget.
By writing hundreds of slightly different, idiotic
theories, the public
will be confused, and many people will not notice the honest articles.
Because it is possible that Joe will eventually
as a criminal, Joe prepares for that possibility by arranging for lots
of his friends to be truth seekers who expose Joe as a criminal.
The way this deceptions works is if Joe decides that
he can no longer
cover up his crime because some citizens are about to expose some
information, he can tell his friends to quickly expose him before the
citizens do it.
This allows Joe's friends to become the honest crime
fighters who expose
a terrible criminal. His friends will be the center of attention, and
can then try to minimize the damage and punishment, and prevent the
of the gang from getting caught.
|Update #2 on 24
December 2018: |
Is the FBI pedophile document a fraud?
Some people, such as Johnny Supertramp, are claiming this document is not a real FBI document because they cannot find it on the FBI site.
They are claiming that the symbols in that document, such as the two to the right, are not really pedophile symbols, and that doughnut shops, pizza parlors, and the other businesses that use those symbols are not involved with pedophiles.
That is equivalent to somebody claiming that the Protocols of Zion are not a real document of the Zionist movement because they cannot find it on any of the official Zionist organization websites.
Update #1 24
Can you see how pedophiles
are using these tricks to cover up their crimes?
I wrote this document in 2005, when YouTube was
insignificant. Today, however, hundreds of people are using YouTube to
discuss the evidence that a pedophile network is operating within our
government and media, and that there are some pizza parlors, donut
shops, and other businesses involved with it, also.
If you understand the concepts in this document, then you should
consider that most of the people who are posting videos and
messages about the pedophile issue are actually pedophiles who are
trying to cover up their crimes, or criminals who are helping the
pedophiles in return for some favor, such as money, or to avoid jail.
I have not bothered to listen to all of the
hundreds of videos, but I have noticed that the pedophiles
have been successful in one particular trick. Specifically, fooling
people into focusing on pedophiles of no significance rather than
investigating the Comet Ping Pong Pizza shop, James Alefantis, Tim
Cook, John Podesta, and others.
David Todeschini, (USANet4truth),
created a lot of videos to expose pedophiles. However, he was convicted
of raping a young boy, and he spent some time in jail. Many of the
people who are posting comments on YouTube are advocating that the
pedophile investigators expose Todeschini as a fraud.
Another person, Random Rants of Ryan, has also been creating videos to
discuss the pedophile issue. He created videos that provide evidence
that John Podesta and other important people are involved with
pedophilia. On 7 October 2018 Ryan went on YouTube live, and as was
typical of his live YouTube videos, lots of people began posting
messages to him.
Take a look
at the messages that were posted by "Slys Dolphin" (in blue). My comments
beneath show my interpretation. What do you think?
Slys Dolphin begins by suggesting that Ryan put his time into getting
dave t (Dave Todeschini) and Gunk (I'm not sure who that is) thrown off
Slys Dolphin: why not get gunk and
dave t thrown off the internet and then go back after people that will
never see a day in court @random rants of ryan ?
Dolphin implies that John Podesta and the other famous people that Ryan
complains about will never see a day in court, which implies that Ryan
is wasting his time trying to expose famous people. Dolphin
then tries to make himself look innocent:
Slys Dolphin: just a question
A bit later he repeats this:
Slys Dolphin: a valid question
When Ryan responds that he has already exposed Dave and Gunk,
Dolphin becomes upset and tries to put pressure on Ryan by complaining
that some of the pedophile investigators that Ryan criticizes as frauds
have better videos about Gunk and Dave, and that those investigators
care more about exposing pedophiles than Ryan:
Slys Dolphin: those guys that you
all hate sure have good videos about gunk and dave, they seem to
actually care about kids and exposing podos and groomers on you tube.
too bad no one else cares.
Dolphin tries to make it appear as if Ryan doesn't really care about
children, or about exposing pedophiles. Dolphin also implies that he is
sad by the lack of concern. When Ryan doesn't care, Slys Dolphin
becomes upset and tries to put more pressure on Ryan:
Slys Dolphin: podesta will never
see a day in court, gunk and dave are making money off pizzagate. seems
like a no brainer to go after them if you bigger channels cared about
yt and kids.
Dolphin emphasizes that Podesta is too important to be arrested, and
that the convicted pedophiles are making money by talking about
pizzagate. Dolphin struggles to convince Ryan that it is a waste of
time to investigate Podesta. He tries to make it appear as if Ryan
doesn't care about protecting the children.
When Ryan ignores Dolphin, Dolphin threatens to withdraw financial or
Slys Dolphin: its so hard to
support you guys when you dont go after the gunk and dave.
That remark is essentially, "I'm going to hold my breath until my face
turns blue unless you do what I demand!"
How does Slys Dolphin know that James Alefantis, John Podesta, and
others will "never see a day in court"? He doesn't!
Rather, I think that is what he is hoping for! I
think Dolphin is working with the pedophiles, and that he wants people
like Ryan to waste their time on insignificant people, such as
Even if Todeschini did indeed rape his
nephew, he is insignificant compared to the
pedophiles who are holding leadership
positions in our government, media, FBI, police
departments, military, schools, and hospitals.
Ryan was apparently smart enough to avoid being
triced by Dolphin, but Betty Washam
was fooled into getting into such a fight with David Todeschini that
she called the police to complain about him!
The point I want to bring to your attention is that you
should assume that everybody who is
exposing pedophilia is a wolf in sheep's clothing. I have recommended
hundreds of times that everybody be suspicious of everybody else.
Listen to what other people say, but be suspicious of them.
If one of the truth seekers is truly honest, he
will eventually realize that he is surrounded by wolves in
sheep's clothing, and so he will understand why you are
suspicious of him.
He should be suspicious of everybody, also! The people who whine about
suspicion, or who want secrecy, are likely to be the criminals.
One of the concepts that Ryan doesn't seem to understand is that wolves
in sheep's clothing are often exposing a lot of truth in order to
attract our attention to them and get us to trust them. For example,
Ryan and I agree that Isaac Kappy is doing damage control, but that
doesn't mean we should ignore what Kappy says.
Kappy, vegan Mikey, and the others may be doing damage control for the
pedophiles in return for avoiding jail for some crime they committed,
or because they need money, or because they want to help the
pedophiles, but it doesn't matter why they are doing damage control.
They are putting out some useful information, and that can help other
people realize that there really is a pedophile network operating in
our government, media, schools, and businesses.
Kappy, vegan Mikey, and the others may be mixing false information with
the truth, and they are certain to omit a lot of important details, but
it doesn't matter. Let them speak. Don't be afraid of them. As long as
people understand the wolf in sheep's clothing trick, and the Pied
Piper trick, let the pedophiles expose what they know.
People who are working with a crime network will be able to say things
that nobody else would dare say, such as making definite
accusations that Spielberg is a pedophile. They are not likely
offer evidence to back up their accusations,
I have no idea what Steven Spielberg does. I would never make an
accusation that he is involved with pedophilia, or that his friends
murdered Heather O'Rourke. However, if Spielberg is involved with a
gigantic, international pedophile network, then those pedophiles may
have decided to let Kappy accuse Spielberg and his friends of
pedophilia and murder, but not let Kappy offer evidence to back up the
By making such blatant accusations, they hope
that Kappy will attract people away from the honest
By not providing evidence, other people will
dismiss Kappy as an idiot,
and the police will not have any justification for arresting Spielberg
or his friends.
There are a lot of pedophile investigators on YouTube, but all of them
seem to mix idiotic remarks into their videos, such as insisting that
the Apollo moon landings really did occur, or that the Nazis really did
kill and burn 6 million Jews. You should be suspicious of all of the
investigators and truth seekers.
Some of the pedophile investigators might be stupid or ignorant
rather than liars, but it is just as foolish to trust a stupid,
ignorant person as it is
to trust a liar.
the similarity to 9-11,
My imaginary example of how Joe could steal
your car is happening
with the September 11 attack, and all of the other big crimes. However,
the deception with 9-11 is much more intense and complex.
most members of 911truth are
For example, take a look at 911truth.org, a group of
in New York City. In their description
of themselves they write:
is a campaign to educate
the public about the Sept. 11th coverup and inspire popular pressure to
overturn the "incompetence theory" and expose the truth surrounding the
events of 9/11; namely, that elements within the U.S. government must
been complicit, or worse, for the attacks to happen the way they did.
Since 911truth.org wants to expose the truth, you might expect them
to show the evidence that the towers and Building 7 were demolished
explosives. But they have the
following remark about this issue:
Case for Demolitions
see the deception?
no consensus on this issue among 911Truth.org
staff or within the 9/11 truth movement, but here is a collection of
many of them by Jim Hoffman, arguing that the WTC buildings must have
demolished using explosives. Plus a few past milestones on the
Judge for yourselves...
Nicholas Levis has a role of some sort with this
group. That fact alone
should make you suspicious of them. Since at least 2002 several people
have been complaining that Nicholas Levis cannot be trusted.
In 2004 Jimmy Walter allowed Levis to help set up a
9-11 meeting in
New York City. During the meeting it became so obvious that he was a
that security guards had to drag Levis out of the meeting.
Here is WingTV's
description of Levis.
is War Criminal
After I wrote this article, some people
complained that most
members of 911truth.org are honest citizens.
out when they deflect attention
Most of the employees of the Enron Corporation may
have been honest,
but that doesn't mean the executives of the company can be trusted.
How many times do these 9-11 "truth seekers" have to
behave in a suspicious
manner before you ignore them?
What if somebody commits suicide by chaining himself
to a fence and
then shooting himself with a firing squad? And what if Mike Ruppert
that this method of suicide is entirely possible? Would you continue to
trust Ruppert? Or would you ask yourself,
"Wait a minute, how can Ruppert be so certain
it was a suicide?
Why doesn't Ruppert want an investigation? Why are we looking to
for guidance when he makes such stupid remarks?"
The inability to select quality leaders is one of the world's primary
Most people turn to whoever makes them feel good; whoever gives them
entertainment, and hope.
The excuses people make for Tom
Flocco is another example. I have heard some people say
"Well, Flocco might make some dumb remarks
about Barbara Olson,
but some of what he says is true, so we should continue to look to him
as a leader of the truth movement."
This is as ridiculous as somebody saying,
"Well, Bush might be involved in 9/11 and
numerous other big
crimes, but some of what he does is useful, so we should continue to
If you make excuses for idiotic and criminal behavior, how are we going
to take care of our nation?
A lot of people realize that George Bush is a
puppet, but who
is telling Bush what to do?
of Bush's opponents are
A "truth seeker" named Dr. Justin Frank has the
answer. He tells us
that George Bush is a puppet, but he is "A
Puppet Who Chose His Puppeteers".
Dr. Frank is trying to convince us that there is no
need to look at
the people giving orders to George Bush because George Bush chose those
people. Therefore, to understand the actions of George Bush, we only
to look at George Bush!
Dr. Frank wants us to believe that if we look at
we will discover that they are following the orders
of George Bush.
Does this make sense to you?
There are a lot of critics of the Bush
very few of them are honest about 9/11, the Kennedy assassination, the
attack of the USS Liberty, or any other scam.
They claim to be "truth seekers" who want to get rid
of the evil Bush
government and replace it with an honest government. However, none of
truth seekers are being honest.
Many of the truth seekers seem to be part of the group
that gave us
9-11, and some of the truth seekers seem to be part of a rival
of criminals who are fighting with the Bush administration
of America. You and I are just pawns in their game of world conquest.
The MoveOn organization encourages their
members to get together
and be exposed to videos and other information about corruption. This
a wonderful method to educate people. The organization has tremendous
However, the only information that their members are exposed to is
that makes the Bush administration and the Fox news network look like
The MoveOn members are some of the most
ignorant people when
it comes to 9/11 and other crimes. The most likely explanation is that
George Soros and other people behind the MoveOn organization are a
gang fighting for control of the American people.
The Air America radio network
They are not interested in
exposing crime; rather, they are interested
in getting control of the people. They are
deceiving their members
with their particular propaganda.
Some people suspect George Soros of being in the same
as George Bush, but for all we know, they are on different teams that
together sometimes, but fight with each other most of the time.
As with Al Capone and other gangs, people such as
Soros and Bush may
be selfish beyond anything you have imagined, and both of them may
about killing each other.
Air America claims to be providing people with
the truth, but
just like Tom Flocco, Mike Ruppert, 911truth.org, and most other "truth
seekers" who condemn Bush, they appear to be either working with Bush,
or working with some rival group of criminals.
the Green Party
They titillate their listeners with insults about Bush
but they suppress a lot of important books, people, and
When Mike Malloy had a show about the 9/11 attack (on
2005), one of the people who helped Air America get started, Steve
decided to sit in the studio with him.
The show is available at
It is Malloy's show on
Friday, September 30th, 2005.
The direct link to the mp3 file is:
I suppose Mike Malloy knows a lot about the 9/11
attack, and the management
of Air America were concerned that he or his callers might let out too
much information. So they sent Sinton to sit in the studio with Mike,
Sinton tried to promote the idea that conspiracy theories about 9/11
The people who listen to Air America are as deceived
as the people who
watch the television news. The naive citizens who provide Air America
money, advertising, or any other support are helping a group
Most leaders of the groups we call "liberals" are
wolves in sheep's
clothing. They are not exposing corruption, nor are they educating
Rather, they are taking advantage of the anger towards Bush,
and corporate greed.
The liberals condemn Bush for being stupid, and they
for having incompetent leadership, but the leaders for the liberals are
just as corrupt. If the liberals had even 20% of the intelligence they
think they have, they would investigate Soros, Sinton, and all of the
top ranking liberals.
I was complaining to a member of the Green
Party that the Green
Party is worthless, and one of the reasons I gave was that they will
tell their members about 9/11.
The anti-war groups
His response was that the leader of the Southern
Mike Feinstein, was a psychopath, and that he is
not part of the 9-11 cover-up. He explained to me that Feinstein was
by his fellow Green Party members of stealing
money from the Green Party.
Why would anybody remain a member of the Green Party
when they think
their leader is a psychopath? Well, for the same reason millions of
followed the Kings and Queens of Europe, Napoleon, Hitler, Stalin, and
Bush. Namely, humans and animals have a strong tendency to follow, and
most humans and animals are lousy at thinking.
If it is true that Feinstein is stealing money from
the Green Party,
he may be part of the criminal network that gave us 9-11. Or the
network may have noticed that Feinstein is dishonest, and they are
his criminal background to blackmail him.
Perhaps the reason that nobody can remove him from the
Green Party is
because he has a lot of support from a lot of criminals. Or perhaps he
is honest, and the criminals are trying to make him appear to be a
in order to get rid of him!
Regardless of whether Feinstein is an honest citizen,
or a blackmailed criminal, the Green Party is not providing their
with any useful information, so what value does the Green Party have?
are the members wasting their time and money with such a worthless
The Green Party is not helping
America. It is of more use to
the Bush administration and other criminals because it suppresses
about corruption. The same is true of almost every other large
Most of the organizations that claim to be
struggling for peace
refuse to provide information about 9-11 and other corruption. Worse
stop attempts by their members to discuss
organization is of value?
The leaders of these groups have a lot of excuses as
to why they will
not discuss 9/11 and other crimes. For example, I have heard some
of Veterans for Peace insist that they want to support veterans, so
is not an issue that concerns them.
However, the war is based on the 9/11 attack, so if
they really want
to stop the wars and help the veterans, they should expose
Are the leaders of the Veterans for Peace groups truly
that they cannot see the value in exposing 9/11? Or are they afraid to
expose it because they worry they will die in an airplane crash? Or are
the leaders part of the criminal network that is trying to cover up
crimes? Or are they blackmailed or bribed into covering up these
I don't know what is wrong with Veterans for Peace or
the anti-war groups,
but I know better than to join or support a useless organization.
There are thousands of organizations and web
sites that claim
to be trying to help us. However, we must judge an organization and
leaders by their accomplishments, not by what they
more critical of message boards
If you belong to an organization, ask yourself, what
has it done for
you or the world? Be serious when answering that
question. Be as
critical of your organization as you are of
Don't be a hypocrite by supporting a crummy or corrupt
you condemn Bush for corruption and incompetence. The world does not
from hypocrisy; it improves when people develop intelligent suggestions
and do some real work.
Unless we raise standards for people in leadership
will improve. We don't need a rival group of criminals and hypocrites
replace Bush. We need to get higher quality leaders.
Next time you look at an Internet message
board, see if you
can spot the simulated conversations. For example, the following is a
message board. (Update:
that message has been deleted, and from the Internet Archive also shows
people started doubting that man
went to the moon. I remember then asking them to use HUBBLE to take
of the moon so we could see the flag and any other crap they left. They
said they couldnīt use hubble to photgraph the moon because it was
too close to earth. I just noticed this article that says the Hubble
look at the moon.
Now take some
pictures of your blast craters
After that message was posted, somebody else
pointed out that
the Hubble does not have the power to see a flag on the moon.
out for "fishermen"
Is that a simulated conversation? It becomes easier to
answer that question
when you look through the other messages on the board. The above
appeared on 20 Oct 2005. On 5 Oct 2005 somebody else posted a very similar
that message has been deleted, and from the Internet Archive also shows
it deleted), and on 23 Aug 2005 almost the same
conversation occurred. Take a look now in case they erase or
Although we will never know for certain, I think all
three of those
messages are coming from people who are trying to cover up the Apollo
A technique that criminals use is perhaps best
"fishing". For example, somebody might post a message that he thinks
Bush was involved in 9/11. In reality he is hoping to identify people
agree with him, or he is trying to determine what percentage of the
on the message boards have this opinion.
There are some sites on the Internet that appear to be
"Nazi" or anti-semite
sites. For example:
From my casual observation of those sites, I would guess that they are
operated by FBI agents or Zionists, and I suspect that they are looking
for people who are angry at the US government or Israel. They post
messages, such as "Kill all Niggers and Jews!". The angry messages are
like worms on a hook, and they wait for people to bite them.
Even stranger, there are a lot of sites that are are
registered to "Network
Solutions", a company located in Herndon Virginia. Some of them are
sites, some are "truth seeker" sites that provide deception, and some
them offer pornography that is so extreme that most Internet service
would not tolerate them. For example, the following web sites are all
to Network Solutions:
Why are all of these sites claiming Network
is the registrant? Is there a connection between these sites?
details about Network Solutions
I don't know the answer to those questions, but I
would consider the
possibility that they are sites of a government agency (not necessarily
the American government), and that they are watching everybody who
Most of the customers and employees of Network
Solutions may be honest,
but that doesn't mean the company can be trusted.
Until the late 1990s, everybody purchased
Internet domain names
from Network Solutions because they had a monopoly. Therefore, it is
surprising that lots of web sites show "Network Solutions" as the
the domain was registered with.
I am not accusing Network Solutions of being a
Instead, I am suggesting we consider the possibility that they and
Internet service companies have been infiltrated by criminals.
There are many accusations that Israel was tapping
American phone lines,
spying on government officials, and blackmailing Americans. And don't
about the accusations of their involvement in 9/11, the USS Liberty
the JFK assassination, the Apollo moon landing, and numerous other
There have also been many examples of organized crime
with legitimate businesses for a variety of reasons.
So why not consider the possibility that Israel -- or
some other group
-- is infiltrating Internet service companies?
When you catch somebody lying to you or committing a
crime, you should
assume that you caught only a fraction of their total lies and crimes.
Only a fool would think that he caught their one and only crime. And
you catch a nation lying to you hundreds of times,
why not wonder
if maybe they lied more than a hundred times?
Here are just three examples of Israeli spies:
Suspected of Tapping White House Phone Lines
Cameron Investigates Israeli spies
Expose Israeli Spies
We should not be afraid to look critically at
politicians, FBI agents, and other people in positions of authority.
Why would a criminal network, or a foreign government,
would want to
infiltrate Internet service companies? Lots of reasons. For example:
To observe government e-mail and data
If a criminal network can convince government
agencies to call
their technicians to provide technical services for their Internet
the criminals will be able to get access to their e-mail and data
going through the Internet. This makes it impossible for anybody to
that they are snooping.
Also, if Network Solutions can convince a government
agency to use the
computers and phone lines of Network Solutions for web sites, that
Network Solutions direct access to the email and data of the government
To acquire blackmail material
If a prostitute, pornography producer, con
artist, or car thief
were to make the mistake of letting a criminal organization host his
site, those criminals would be able to snoop through his e-mail and
To cause trouble for customers they don't like
In 2003 an employee at Network Solutions
caused serious disruption
to Al Jazeera's web site. Different news reports explain it
but it is described as a "mistake". Here is one account:
Racine hijacks Al-Jazeera
And here is another:
attack on Al-Jazeera
To upload videos from Osama
Mistakes happen all the time, but it is possible
that it was deliberate
Occasionally you will hear that an Al Qaeda
a message or a video on the Internet. Have you ever wondered how they
this without being identified?
To disrupt other people's web sites
If Network Solutions is hosting a site that is owned
by an Arab, they
could put messages and videos directly onto the hard disks.
The Arab would have no idea how the Al Qaeda
terrorist posted video
onto his site, and neither would any of the honest FBI agents. It would
never occur to anybody that a technician in Virginia transfered the
directly onto the computers from a CD-ROM.
Even if Network Solutions does not have direct
access to any Arab site,
they could upload the video from their computers in Virginia, and if an
honest FBI agent contacted them about it, the conversation would go
FBI agent: It looks as if one of
your customers uploaded a video to a web site in Iraq. Could you look
it for us?
Solutions: Certainly! We are patriotic,
honest Americans, and the last thing we want is a terrorist to be using
Solutions: Sorry Mr. FBI agent.
We carefully studied all of our records, but we could not find anybody
posting to Iraq. You made a mistake. But don't worry; we won't tell
boss about your incompetence. We'll forget you ever suspected such a
thing. You can return the favor in the future.
In 1997 an employee at Network Solutions was
reported to have
caused a computer to send corrupted files to 10 servers around the
The mistake caused messages to be returned to senders and cut off
to US web sites for some European users.
To spread viruses and spam
Note: It is the 7th
Certainly this could be an accident, but it could
also have been deliberate
sabotage, or a test of whether they can bring down the entire Internet.
When a group of criminals are in control of
an Internet service
provider, they can spread viruses, spam, and spy programs without
about somebody calling the FBI. This is especially true if the
work for the FBI.
If an honest FBI agent traced some of the viruses to
he would be told by that he must be mistaken.
Most of us (or all of us?) get spam messages every
day. How could somebody
possibly spread so much spam without the FBI figuring out who is doing
it? And how can people possibly spread viruses without the FBI figuring
out who is doing it?
For all we know, the viruses are coming from
government agencies, and
virus protection companies have been infiltrated by these same agencies
in order to secretly send back information about how the virus
software can be defeated.
Perhaps the FBI arrests virus producers only if they
are not part of
their criminal network.
Why would any government want to produce viruses? To
waste our time
and money. If the goal is to destroy America, everything that hurts
is another nail in the coffin. Viruses, spam, and junk faxes may seem
but they waste a lot of time, money, and resources.
As I learn more about Network Solutions I may
they are wonderful, responsible people. Perhaps I will discover that
Bollyn is correct that the company Tucows
is the company we should be investigating.
difficult to solve these crimes!
Criminals have a dilemma. Specifically, if they
try to cover
up their crime, they risk
giving us clues about who they are and how they did the crime.
if they remain hidden, they risk being exposed by those of us who are
The FBI could figure out who some of the criminals are
simply by watching
the message boards for suspicious activity.
The FBI could also identify the criminals by watching
the honest citizens
to see who contacts us via email, phone, and in
person. Some of
the people who contact us are criminals who are trying to fool us with
If the FBI was interested in solving crimes, it would
not be difficult
for them to identify thousands of suspects.
These crimes are occurring right in front of our
faces. The criminals
get away with them because the government is covering them up,
most people cannot figure out who to turn to for guidance,
because there is a shortage of evidence.