Sexual inhibitions are too extreme
This constitution puts a
lot of emphasis on overcoming inhibitions
about our bodies because sexual inhibitions are causing a lot of
trouble for us.
Although we don't know what relationships were like between prehistoric
men and women, it is unlikely that prehistoric couples were arguing and
fighting as often as they do today, and it is unlikely that there was
as much loneliness as there is today.
Nobody knows why men and women today have such miserable relationships
so the only way we can improve our lives is to find the courage to experiment
with our culture, and this constitution advocates reducing the
inhibitions about the human body.
This is based on the assumption that many of the problems we
are having is the result of our abnormal social environment in which
children are deprived of an adequate understanding of sex, childbirth,
digestion, and many other issues, and they pick up unrealistic and
perverted attitudes from Hollywood movies, businesses, and religious
fanatics. Two problems with our modern
culture are:
|
1) |
Men develop obnoxious sexual obsessions.
Examples of this problem have been mentioned in many documents, such as
how men giggle at or become hysterical with sexual information, and how
teenage boys become obsessed with trying to see what a woman's crotch
and breasts look like.
|
|
2)
|
We are terrified that somebody will see us
naked
The sexual inhibitions of Americans is so extreme that in 2004 many of
them began using phrase "wardrobe
malfunction" to describe the "terrifying" incident in which
something happens with our clothing that exposes our "intimate parts".
By comparison, the February
painting from the early 1400s shows that the people in
France had no concern about somebody seeing their intimate parts.
|
An example of how our
sexual inhibitions are causing idiotic and detrimental behavior is the
World Naked Bike Ride in London. This is an annual event in which
people who are almost completely naked ride bicycles around the streets
of London.
The organization that arranges the event claims that it " demonstrates the vulnerability of
cyclists and is a protest against car culture." In addition to
reducing accidents between bicycles and motor vehicles, the protests
are also supposed to reduce the paranoia of nudity.
It is unlikely that our prehistoric ancestors would have conceived of
an event in which they are naked in front of the other members of their
group, and if they had decided to have such an event, it is unlikely
that the other members would have cared that they were naked.
It is unlikely that our prehistoric ancestors would have conceived of
the idea that being naked in front of the other members would improve
life for the group, and if they had decided to do such a thing, it is
unlikely that the other members would have cared that they were naked.
Rather than ignore or insult the World Naked Bicycle Ride, we ought to
analyze it and try to learn from it. Some lessons that we can learn are:
• Nudity makes most
people uncomfortable or angry
The World Naked Bike Ride
is one of the most peaceful and quiet protests, and doesn't seem to
produce any litter, but some of the English citizens were more
intolerant of those protesters than the protesters who are destructive.
For example, this
video shows people along the streets throwing objects at one of the
naked bicycle riders and knocking him on the asphalt, and some of the
people posting comments to the
video advocate arresting the naked people.
If those protesters had been wearing clothing, most people would have
ignored them, but by being naked, they stimulated anger and awkwardness
in a lot of people.
Modern culture has caused so many people to become so sexually
inhibited that many people become more angry with people who are naked
in public than they are with corrupt government officials, illegal
immigrants, people who litter, shoplifters, bicycle thieves, and many
other destructive
people.
If King Charles and other royal family members were to walk along a
public street, most of the British citizens would have been excited to encounter them, and many
would bow in submission. None of them would throw rocks at King
Charles, yell insults, or knock him onto the ground. However, those
royal family members are more of a nuisance to Britain than the naked
bicycle riders.
Journalists routinely lie to the British public, but none of the
British citizens throw rocks at the journalists, or push them onto the
ground. Likewise, they do not throw rocks at the Pope or other
religious leaders, or push them onto the ground.
One lesson to learn from the naked bicycle riders is that the public
often reacts with anger towards people who are not causing them any
trouble, or not causing much trouble. Another example is how some
people become upset with a waitress
who they believe has mistreated them, even though waitresses are among
the least troublesome people.
The majority of people cannot deal with the complex problems of our
modern era. They become angry at people who do not cause them any
trouble, and they bow in submission to the people who are involved with
pedophile networks, financial crimes, human trafficking, wars,
deceptive news reports, and racial fights.
The reason some people react with anger towards naked people is because
naked bodies stimulate certain emotions that make them uncomfortable.
They want to stop the uncomfortable feelings, and an animal's only two
reactions is to run away or become angry.
By comparison, most people bow before King Charles because they regard
him as being at the top of the social hierarchy, rather than a
worthless parasite, and that stimulates their desire to become
submissive. They also submissively accepted the explanation
of why a naked boy climbed
out of a window at Buckingham Palace and fell to the ground. They did
not become angry that such an event would be in a television program,
or why.
When we tell people that we have been lied to about the 9/11 attack or
the Holocaust, they become uncomfortable at the thought that they were
lied to, and most people react just like an animal. Specifically, they
either ignore the information, or they become angry at us and insult us
for
being conspiracy theorists or Nazis.
The public doesn't have an adequate understanding of their emotions,
and they don't have much self-control, and this results in them
behaving like stupid animals. It also makes it easy to manipulate them
by stimulating certain emotions.
• Protests cannot
reduce bicycle accidents
It is dangerous to ride a
bicycle in most cities because of the high density of motor vehicles,
and it is visually unpleasant because the cities are almost entirely
ugly buildings, roads, and parking lots. However, protests cannot reduce accidents between
bicycles and motor vehicles, and cannot
make the cities more attractive.
Protests are an adult
version of a temper tantrum, and tantrums cannot improve our cities or
culture.
A tantrum is an effective technique for a young child to
pressure his mother into stopping whatever she is doing and giving him
whatever he wants, but protests by
adults are more likely to cause other adults to become disgusted or
angry, rather than cause them to submissively give the protesters
whatever they are demanding.
The only way to improve our cities is for a lot of people to put a lot
of labor and resources into experimenting with a better city and
culture. We must put a lot of time and effort into thinking,
researching, discussing, and working
together, but protests cannot
make people stop whatever they are doing and switch to those activities.
This Constitution reduces bicycle accidents by designing cities in
which the main transportation system is underground, and the city
consists of neighborhoods of tall buildings surrounded by bicycle
paths, parks, foot paths, and recreational areas. We would also reduce
accidents by making more of the bicycle paths one-way only, as in the
image below:
In addition to reducing
bicycle accident significantly, that type of
city will also make it more pleasurable
to ride a bicycle because
the bicycle paths will be surrounded by beautiful and quiet parks,
creeks, and ponds.
In addition, by giving every neighborhood different architecture,
parks, gardens, ponds, creeks, and swimming areas, riding a bicycle in
the city will be even more enjoyable.
However, we cannot improve a city by having
protests, throwing rocks, praying, making insults, or whining. We also cannot improve our city if we have
leaders who only care about mansions, yachts, pampering, and sex.
We need leaders who will be our team
members and friends,
rather than pampered royalty.
In order to create a better city, we need to restrict it to people who
are willing to put a lot of their time and effort into working for the benefit of the city, and who have
the courage to experiment with
new ideas.
• Naked protesters
cannot reduce sexual problems
It is idiotic to believe
that being naked is going to assist in making the protest more
effective. Furthermore, it is uncomfortable to ride a bicycle naked
because our crotch was not designed to rub against plastic or leather
seats.
Their desire to be naked during the bicycle ride seems to be because
the organizers are irritated by the sexual inhibitions of modern
society, and they believe that their naked bodies will help the public
and government officials to control their inhibitions.
This is a variation of the liberal philosophy that we can fix a
person's problems with therapy, rehabilitation programs, punishments,
or counseling. However, their nudity is more likely to irritate the
people who cannot control their inhibitions, rather than provide them
with psychological therapy that helps them eliminate their inhibitions.
Protests
are illegal
It is idiotic to promote
the attitude that the public can improve the world by having protests
in
the public streets. We must experiment with a better method of
allowing the public to express their suggestions on how to improve our
culture. The method this Constitution uses is to have the Database
Ministry maintain a Suggestions
category; require the government to respond to the suggestions; and
give credit to a person if one of his ideas turns out to be beneficial.
This constitution also requires the government to experiment with
methods to reduce sexual inhibitions. In addition to providing children
with sex education, the children must be exposed to so much nudity that
they become as accustomed to it as our prehistoric ancestors.
That should cause the children to become adults who are tired of
looking at other people's crotches, and prefer to wear attractive
clothing, but who do not become hysterical, angry, or embarrassed when
they see a naked body.
We need to know who is
sexually defective
The advanced nations are providing
us with so much secrecy, and keeping us so ignorant about human bodies,
that some people are getting married without realizing that their
spouse has defective organs. Many people have no idea if they, their
children, or their spouse has "normal" sexual organs.
Although it might seem to be unnecessary to know who among us has
defective sexual organs, it is just as important to know that as it is
to know who has mental problems, diabetes, cancer, and blindness.
Humans and other animals are very finicky
about who they reproduce with because that is one of the ways that
nature maintains the genetic health of a species.
Our nomadic ancestors were aware of what everybody's body looked like,
smelled like, and how it functioned, and the people with the
higher-quality bodies had an advantage in attracting a spouse.
However, during the past few thousand years, people have been able to
hide their sexual organs, and many defective people have been able to
survive to adulthood, get married, and raise children. This has
resulted in every generation having increasingly defective sexual
organs.
Today we must make decisions about who should reproduce, and that
requires we analyze their sexual organs, digestive system, teeth, sweat
glands, oil glands, liver, heart, eyes, ears, and all other
characteristics.
We cannot allow people who want to have children to be secretive about
their genetic characteristics. Their children will be a random sample
of their genetic characteristics, and this constitution gives all
children the right to have the best chance to be healthy.
Everybody also has the right to live among people who are mentally and
physically healthy, and who can be trusted, and who will contribute
something of value to society. Nobody has the right to produce
defective children.
|
If we had grown
up in a society in which women
were covering
their faces with 
