|The man and woman are not
underwear, and they are doing something that would be considered perverted
today, and possibly illegal. They
be described as "exposing themselves".
In the painting for August, and in many other paintings
ago, people would swim naked in rivers, or wash themselves naked.
suits, especially for children, were rare.
Why were people in that era more tolerant of nudity? Was
because they had grown up around nudity?
Have attitudes towards nudity
There is an isolated beach in my city where some
go to be naked. The police cannot drive to this beach, so sometimes
travel by horse to arrest some of the people who are naked. Nobody
ago would have been arrested for being naked in an isolated area, so
do Americans send armed adult men on
horseback to arrest people in an isolated
area who are simply naked?
But wait! Before you answer that question,
keep in mind that
while these armed men are arresting naked people at an isolated beach,
there are thousands of businesses and advertising agencies that are
titillating both adults and children in
television shows, advertisements, movies, songs, and magazines in order
to sell products. Furthermore,
are businesses profiting from beauty pageants in which young girls look
and behave like miniature prostitutes!
So, how do you explain
harmless nudity but the
of constant sexual titillation,
of which is bordering on child pornography?
But wait! Before you answer that question,
consider that we
toilet humor on television,
movies, advertisements, and artwork.
|Have you seen this
artwork of Jesus that was put in a church in Oklahoma? How about the "Suri
Cruise Bronzed Poop"?
|How about this
CNET news article about Stephen Hawking's ideas on aliens? Is that your
idea of selecting a photo that fits the article?
|The toilet humor in children's cartoons is often
explained as due to
sloppy drawings, such as this Bugs Bunny scene, or this
priest in The Little Mermaid.
So, now how do
our sexual attitudes?
wait! Before you answer that question, consider that we
"subliminal messages" in
and cartoons (this
video shows some). It doesn't matter whether subliminal messages are
altering our attitudes. The issue we should think about is: Why
do we tolerate people who are trying to manipulate us with subliminal
So, now how do you
explain our sexual
wait! Before you answer that question, consider how we ignore
all of the evidence that Congressman Barney Frank and other influential
men are routinely raping orphan
all throughout America and Europe, and some men are purchasing children
as sex slaves. And nobody seems to
care that Josef Fritzl may have been just
one of many members of a pedophilia
network. Some people complain about the molesting of
in the Catholic Church, but they seem more interested in profiting from
it than in stopping it.
So, now how do you
explain our intolerance
of harmless nudity and our acceptance
of manipulation, abuse, constant sexual titillation, borderline child
toilet humor, raping of children, and sex slaves? When I was a
it seemed to me that our attitudes were backwards.
What about you? Who do you
think should the police arrest?
a) The naked people at isolated beaches.
b) The people in our media, government, schools, advertising agencies,
churches, and businesses who produce or promote toilet humor, or who
sexual titillation or subliminal messages to manipulate us, or who are
involved with pedophilia or sex slavery.
Years ago I was riding a bicycle on a hot summer day,
bike path passed by a small river, and some areas were deep enough to
swimming. I was getting so hot that I couldn't resist the desire to
in the water, but I didn't have a bathing suit. So I stopped near an
that was somewhat isolated, took off my clothes, and jumped in the
When I got out I had to stand naked in the sunshine for a while in
to dry off. It's possible that somebody saw me and called the police,
the police would have arrived after I was gone.
Historians could help us
the Victorian era
I'm not advocating public nudity or nudist colonies.
Actually, I pointed
out in part 2 of my social
articles that there are sensible reasons to prohibit nudity in
However, when people are outdoors and want to go swimming in a river or
lake, and if they don't have a bathing suit, what
is the problem with them doing so naked?
I discussed the attempt by feminists to change our
in Part 2 of my
Dumbing Down articles
so I won't repeat myself, but to summarize it, when I was a child,
was a nationwide campaign by feminists to change our attitudes. For
article, I'd like to point out something I didn't mention before,
that we were told that women during the Victorian era (about 1837-1900)
were miserable because of the extreme prudishness of the era. We were
drawings of women at the beach completely covered in elaborate
swimwear (more drawings are here).
Why would anybody want to swim while dressed in such clothing?
I also remember being shocked to hear the feminists complain
women were not supposed to enjoy sex
or have orgasms.
At the time, I and other children assumed that the feminists
us the truth, just as we assumed we were told the truth about the Nazis
killing 6 million Jews. However, once you realize that people in the
and schools routinely lie to us, we
should demand evidence that a significant
number of women during the Victorian era were swimming in those
and that women were truly trying not to enjoy sex.
Furthermore, we need to know why
women were wearing those costumes at the beach. Was it because men were
them to do so? Or were only wealthy women wearing that elaborate
at the beach, and were they doing so because they
Take a look at how women are behaving today.
A lot of the cruel and idiotic things that women are doing to
are self-inflicted. For example,
a lot of men promote high-heeled shoes, there are also a lot of men
the women to stop it. However, the women don't support the men who
these shoes; rather; they ignore our complaints and torture themselves
in those shoes.
The situation is so ridiculous that women are even dancing
on television while wearing high-heeled shoes. If you are a man, it
be easier for you to understand how ridiculous the situation is if you
yourself wearing high heeled shoes during extremely difficult physical
activities. Would you tolerate it?
How ridiculous does the situation have to get before women
complain? What if the female gymnasts, tennis players, and swimmers
wearing high heeled shoes?
Our interpretation of a
depends on who
Some women also get breast implants even when their
boyfriend or husband
doesn't want it. Did you listen to Mel Gibson insult his ex-girlfriend
for getting breast implants while she was nursing
If women had more sense, they would support the men who
behavior from both men and women. Unfortunately, most men and women
like stupid animals. A lot of the suffering that is going on in this
- by both men and women - is self-inflicted. In
some cases, such as with high-heeled shoes and other clothing issues,
are doing what everybody else does. The only way Americans are going to
switch to the metric system, or stop wearing high heeled shoes, or stop
referring to a pair of pants as a "pair", is if we get real leaders who
force these changes on the nation. The people are not going to make the
changes voluntarily or willingly.
Of course, if there are people who want to implement my idea
some completely new cities, then we can bring these changes to the new
cities and ignore everybody else.
The point I want to make is that if historians were honest,
and if they
had access to adequate documentation, they could help us understand the
Victorian era and resolve such issues as whether women were suffering
"sexism". And real historians would be valuable in helping us to decide
what we want for our future.
In every group of animals, plants, and people, we
that some are doing wonderful, some are on the verge of death, and most
are ordinary. Therefore, when we
animals or humans, we have to look at a large,
random sample or we will end up with a distorted view. For
as I mentioned here
4 of my Dumbing Down articles, if we were to judge Ireland according to
the immigrants to America about a century ago, we would assume that the
primary food in Ireland was the potato, and that everybody was on the
us by our "official" image
For another example, when I was a teenager I met a couple
and when I asked them why they moved to America, they said it was
there were no jobs in Greece. I visualized a Greek newspaper in which
section for employment opportunities was almost completely empty.
If the earth had been covered with video surveillance
cameras for the
past few thousand years, we would be able to get a very accurate
of human life and history. For example, we would be able to analyze
in Ireland during the potato famine, and that would allow us to
who among them depended upon potatoes as their primary food. We would
that some of the Irish people had plenty
of food to eat because potatoes were a small part of their diet. We
also have noticed that some potato crops were doing fine.
And if we were to look at Greece, we would have found that there were
over the area.
Unfortunately, since we don't have video surveillance of
the only way we can determine what life was like centuries ago is to
what the people left behind, such as their paintings, books, music, and
material items. However, we have to be careful making assumptions based
on that limited information because it may not reflect all
of society. One artist, for example, may paint pictures of wealthy
whereas another artist may prefer to paint the poor people, the
and the drunks. In such a case, neither of those two artists would be
us adequate information about society. An artist would have to paint
"ordinary" people and their "ordinary" activities in order to give us a
good idea of what was going on. In fact, the reason I selected that
of 12 paintings in Très
Riches Heures is because they appear to be showing ordinary scenes
from ordinary life.
Since you are reading my
articles, you probably already realize that the American and European
is promoting propaganda about the 9/11 attack, the Holocaust, and
of other events. And you probably realize that my
opinions are available to you only
because of the Internet, and that the people who dominate the world
now do not want to give me or my opinions any publicity. Even the
in the so-called 9/11 "truth movement" have become so frightened of me
that they no longer give me publicity. If it were not for the Internet,
you wouldn't even realize that I existed. Instead, you would know about
ordinary - or priceless - paintings.
If it were not for the
we would be in big trouble
Keeping the value of the Internet in mind, imagine if the
had gone into a wild frenzy after the 9/11 attack and inadvertently
a world war that caused so much destruction that the world reverted to
a primitive existence, similar to the Middle Ages. In such a case,
from now, historians would try to figure out what happened by looking
the information we had left behind in newspapers, television, and
books. It should be obvious that they would end up with an incredibly
distorted view of life in our era. For example, they would
to the conclusion that the Nazis had killed 6 million Jews, and that
Muslims were terrorizing Europe and America, and that most intelligent
scientists were convinced that humans were causing the planet to become
warmer, and that the solution was to impose carbon taxes. They would
believe that we had put men on the moon six different times, and that
Gore and Barack Obama won the Nobel prizes because they were two of the
most intelligent men of our era.
Those future historians would eventually figure out that we
the Apollo moon landing, but it's possible that there wouldn't be
information available for them to figure out who was truly responsible
for 9/11, or that the Jews were lying about the Holocaust.
The Internet is allowing me to circumvent the
the world, and this brings up some very important issues:
The leaders of an
1) Why should we trust any
There may be millions
of news reporters,
history professors, government officials, scientists, and other people
lying to us right now about the
attack, the Holocaust, the Apollo moon landing, and global warming. It
doesn't matter whether those people are lying because they
want to or because they're afraid
to tell the truth. The lying is so extreme and
so extensive that we ought
how many years has this
been occurring? Were the news reports, history books, and other
that were created in America around the 1700s also full of lies and
Were people during the Middle Ages also putting propaganda into their
There are official documents from government agencies,
and scientists that prove that that Nazis killed 6 million Jews, and
astronauts landed on the moon. Since we cannot believe the official
of the past few decades, why should we believe the official documents
were created centuries ago? Is there any propaganda in the ancient
and Roman documents? What about the hieroglyphics that the Egyptians
I suspect that the propaganda increased by a significant
the Zionist movement became officially established in 1897, but
crime networks have been in existence in many nations for centuries,
individual people have been lying ever since people have existed.
the best policy to follow is to be suspicious
of all documents and try to verify all information.
This concept also applies to the documents from churches.
The Catholic Church, the Mormon church, and other churches are doing absolutely
nothing to expose the lies about 9/11, the Holocaust, etc.,
and many churches are involved with pedophilia, or the making of money.
We have to consider that this type of disgusting behavior has been
on with churches for centuries. Furthermore, it's possible that the
churches were even more disgusting
than they are today because centuries ago it was difficult for people
see what was actually going on in the churches. Therefore, the churches
may have been even more of a refuge for freaks than they are today.
2) How many people have been suppressed
The entire world is under attack by a network of freaks,
most of whom
refer to themselves as "Jews". As with all criminals, and they cannot
us in fair competition, except perhaps in a few areas, such as
and possibly some areas of math. Their methods for achieving success is
to murder their competitors, or
people who are successful, or suppress us
in some other manner, such as kidnappings, blackmail, and damaging our
bodies (such as breaking the legs of athletes). It makes me wonder how
many people have already become one of their victims. How many
people have they killed, kidnapped, or suppressed? How much damage have
these disgusting criminals done to the human race? What would life be
today if our ancestors hadn't been so tolerant of crime, monarchies,
win the Olympics, or be elected to a government office, or do anything
unusual. He will live a very ordinary life. If a person
something that's unusual, his achievement is proof that there is
unusual about him.
This concept may seem obvious, but the American people don't
understand it. For example, the attitude in America is that "ordinary"
people are capable of becoming president because we have a fair and
democracy. However this concept doesn't make sense. The idea that an
person can become president is as idiotic as the idea that an ordinary
person can win the Olympics, or that an ordinary person will be among
After Ronald Reagan was elected president, I heard some
that Reagan was proof that ordinary people can become president of
However, Reagan was not ordinary.
is evidence that he was assisted by the gigantic crime network of Jews
who were trying to get the Bush family into the presidency, but George
Bush didn't appeal to enough voters, so they used Reagan to attract
attention. Reagan was a puppet of
gigantic crime network, not an "ordinary" person.
An ordinary person will never
into a top leadership position. Ordinary people live ordinary lives.
one of the rules of life that you can't beat. The leaders of a
will always be "unusual" people. They will be ordinary in some
but there is something unusual about them. Ideally they are unusually
good at leadership, but during the past few centuries it
as if most (or all?) of the men who have risen to the top in society
achieved their success because they are puppets of a crime network, or
because they inherited their position, or because they excelled at
frightening, intimidating, bribing, murdering, lying, or deceiving.
Our natural tendency is to assume that the leaders of an
are better than their members, and this was certainly true during
times. However, the people who are getting control of nations today,
who are getting control of churches, charities, think tanks, and
are not desirable people. They
to be involved with crime networks. They also seem to have extreme
for fame, material items, and pampering by servants. Therefore, we have
to be careful judging an organization according to the behavior of the
people in leadership positions.
The Catholic Church might be a simple example to explain
The Catholic church officials are not "ordinary" men. There is
unusual about them. First of all, they are religious fanatics, and
they are much more involved with homosexuality and pedophilia than the
members of the church. Therefore, the church officials do not represent
the members of the church, so we cannot understand the lives of the
by looking at the behavior, friends, or relationships of the church
Consider how this concept applies to the feminist
For example, the feminists claim that women were miserable
during the Victorian era, and that they weren't
allowed to enjoy sex, but I suspect that if there had been
surveillance in everybody's bedroom, we would discover that most women
were living the same type of life as their ancestors. I think the
sexual attitudes of the Victorian era were coming from the weird
people in leadership positions, not
the ordinary people.
The feminist movement is
It's possible that the reason the Victorian era developed an
prudishness and of women who never enjoyed sex is because the men who
to top leadership positions during that era may have been very strange.
For example, some of them may have been too selfish or neurotic to
a woman sexually, and some men may have selected a woman according to
political benefit her family provided him, in which case there may not
have been any affection between them.
Furthermore, according to Kay Griggs,
a lot of our top military leaders are homosexual,
and they get married in order to create the
they are heterosexual. This idiotic situation may have occurred during
the Victorian era, also. In such a case, some of the women may have
married to homosexuals, and the women may not
have realized it! The homosexual men may have hid their
by promoting the theory that women shouldn't enjoy sex or have orgasms.
If that seems like a crazy possibility, consider that the Catholic
promotes the attitude that church officials should never get married. I
suspect that they created that rule simply to hide their homosexuality
and keep the heterosexual men out of the church.
For another example of this concept, Barney Frank is a
Massachusetts, but we wouldn't be able to understand the lives of the
in Massachusetts by looking at his
life and relationships.
The point I'm trying to make is that when the feminists
the Victorian era, or the Puritans, or any other group of men that
abusive to women, we have to keep in mind that those men may be a very
small group of very weird men.
Some aspects of the feminist movement appealed to me
as a child,
such as the concept of girls becoming more sexually active. However, as
I grew up I began to notice that the feminist attitudes were idiotic
unrealistic. For example, I eventually encountered women who were
or who weren't 100% certain who the father of their child was, and I
that they really were the low
women. From my own casual observations, most of the women who have been
raped were raped by men that they associated
The reason for this is very simple. People tend to associate with
that they have something in common with. Women with mental disorders
to associate with men who have mental disorders, and then the two of
have strange relationships. Also, women with mental disorders often do
annoying things that cause men to lose their temper.
I would describe
attitudes as "childish"
If America had been dominated by people like me, the
would have ended long ago. As I mentioned in my audio file for
December 2008, Sweden also went through a dramatic sexual
when I was a child. Why is Sweden continuing to promote this
Obviously, people like me do not dominate Sweden, either. So, what kind
of people are in control of our world?
I was most "sensitive" to sexual issues somewhere
ages of 10 and 14. At that time I was easily embarrassed by nudity and
sexual issues, and I was also attracted to, and stimulated by, the
titillation on television and in advertisements. I also enjoyed "toilet
humor", and I was impressed by the intelligent
material in television shows, magazines, and newspapers. Even the
However, as I grew up, I lost my interest in toilet humor,
and I became
much less embarrassed by sexual issues. The constant sexual titillation
became annoying, and television and other media seemed idiotic and
I also lost my embarrassment of nudity. I was even more confused by the
total lack of information about childbirth. We are allowed
observe animals give birth and nurse their babies, but we are not
to observe human women give birth or nurse their babies. Why not?
toilet humor about childbirth,
such as this
idiotic statue of Britney Spears giving birth while on her hands and
The attitudes in America towards sexual issues remind
my own attitudes during my early teenage years. At that age it would
been impossible for me to have a
discussion about childbirth, masturbation, or any sexual issue. I would
have giggled, become embarrassed, and felt extremely awkward. It seems
as if the human mind, at least boys, go through some type of changes
our teenage years that makes us very sensitive to sexual issues.
Who has a problem with nudity?
By my late teenage years I was so disgusted with American
society that I decided to never get a television set, or purchase
or newspapers. I wanted to avoid American society, not become a member
of it. It felt to me as if the people who dominate America were at the
emotional level of a child; as if they had never completely matured.
reminded me of the time when somebody in my family put a cocoon in a
so that we could watch it transform into a butterfly, but one of its
didn't properly develop. I wasn't sure if we had damaged the cocoon in
the process of picking it and putting it into a jar, or if it was
for some other reason. Regardless, the men who dominated America
me of that butterfly that didn't completely mature. We are dominated by
men who have the bodies of an adult, but they have the emotional
of a teenage boy.
I think our sexual attitudes should be reversed. I
rid of the toilet humor and the sexual titillation, and I would allow
to swim naked at beaches and rivers. I don't have any problem with
Also, I don't consider naked children to
be sexually appealing. I think young girls are more appealing when
they are dressed as miniature prostitutes, and especially when their
has been edited, as this one has. These visual images fool my mind into
thinking that I'm looking at a young, beautiful woman rather than a
girl who has been dressed like a prostitute and then edited
to appear even more beautiful.
What is different
Sure, the edited photo of that little girl is attractive,
among us wants this kind of deception and manipulation? Why
should we allow businesses to profit from this type of photo editing? I
think we should stop this abuse,
obviously, people like me don't dominate America. So, what kind of
dominate America? What kind of people will complain about somebody
who is naked at an isolated beach while enjoying toilet humor and
sexual titillation? That particular attitude reminds me of when I was
12 to 14 years
If we were to reverse our sexual policies and allow nudity
and rivers, there would probably be a lot of incidents in which men
trouble controlling themselves around the naked people. Children might
complain that they are being stared at, or touched, and women might
that men are brushing up against them or making lewd remarks. Most
would react to the abuse by wanting to bring back the policy of
nudity, but as I mentioned in part 2
of my social technology articles in which I complain about providing
beaches or trains for women, we shouldn't change society to fit the
behaved people. Rather, we should design society for the high quality
and remove the people who can't fit in.
If we had a database that had details of everybody's
we would be able to determine how similar we are to one another. For
how many people besides me have tried to design their own clothing? Is
that unusual or typical?
I made a very sloppy
For another example, when my mother was teaching me how to
use a toilet,
I was confused as to why there were so many pieces to it. There are
just a few pieces; namely, a bowl, a seat, and a lid, but to my little
mind, it seemed like a lot of pieces because I couldn't understand the
purpose of the lid or the seat. I was wondering why we don't remove
apparently unnecessary pieces and sit directly on the porcelain bowl.
I wondered about the purpose of those pieces for months,
before one day I became so independent that I decided to find out if
are really necessary. I decided to sit directly on the porcelain bowl,
and if everything went fine, then I would proudly announce to my mother
that we don't need those plastic pieces. However, as soon as my skin
the porcelain, I jumped up and understood the purpose of the plastic
Do I need to tell you that the porcelain is very cold, and that it is
to fit our body, so the edges are uncomfortable? Or did you and most
children also do this same experiment?
One silly project I did as a teenager that I don't
other people have done is when I became fascinated with gas turbines
jet engines. I wanted to build my own jet engine. However, I didn't
the slightest idea how to design the curvy turbine blades, and there
no possible way I could have manufactured such a thing even if somebody
gave me the blueprints, but I was so fascinated that I decided to make
centrifugal fan (like the
black fan in the photo below) by cutting the pieces from a steel, Almond
Roca can and welding the pieces together.
|Since I knew that I couldn't possibly create a fan that
had any value,
I didn't want to waste too much of my time, so I didn't bother trying
draw anything on paper, or even measure any of the components. I
have known what to draw or measure anyway. And I wouldn't have known
to do the math that was necessary to design the fan.
I decided to create this fan visually with an acetylene
torch. I cut
the bottom off the can, slit the cylindrical part of the can, and
it so that I had some metal to work with.
My plan was to cut the parts with an acetylene torch
according to what
looked visually accurate, and then weld the pieces together.
As I look back at this now, I can't help but laugh. It
seems like a
joke. But there was a reason I wanted to do it, as I'll explain later.
I started cutting blades visually
according to what I thought they should look
However, I didn't have a cutting tip that was small enough to cut such
thin steel, so I used a welding
which creates very sloppy cuts. Droplets of steel would collect along
edges. Some droplets were larger than I was expecting, and the cuts
sloppier, also, so I could see that the fan was going to become much
than I had imagined, but I kept going anyway.
I enjoy analyzing myself
After cutting the pieces that I wanted, I used a grinder to
of some of the large drops of steel, and to smooth out some of the
I didn't bother trying for perfection, however. Then I welded the
together. Unfortunately, I wasn't a good welder, especially not with
steel, so it was a crummy job. But I kept going anyway. Eventually I
all the blades together, although they didn't fit very well because
was a slightly different size and shape, and my welding was terrible. I
can still faintly remember what it looked like. The Almond Roca can was
pink on one side, and the torch burned the pink paint along the edges,
so the components were pink on one side, bare metal on the other, and
along their edges. So the completed fan had a lot of pink.
I attached it to a 3 hp electric motor, turned it on, and
at how much it vibrated. However, it didn't destroy itself. And then I
tossed it in the trash.
You might wonder why I would bother making something
knew would be worthless, and why I would do a sloppy job of it. One
reason was that I've always wanted to do something when I was a
teenager. I didn't want to shop, or be pampered by servants, or sit in
a classroom. I wanted to make things and think about things. But the
reason I built that centrifugal fan was to get a better understanding
my mind and my thoughts. When I was a child I noticed that a lot of
I visualized in my mind was unrealistic.
For example, I could visualize myself picking up a pencil and then
a perfect circle on a piece of paper. But when I tried to draw a
I could never make one accurately. Obviously, I
couldn't trust my own thoughts. This was rather confusing,
a bit disappointing.
We cannot trust our own
Also, as a child I had seen lots of cartoons in which the
would cut up pieces of wood with no apparent effort, and then nail the
pieces together into elaborate houses or furniture. They made it look
easy. When I got older and my dad let me use a wood saw, I was amazed
how difficult it was to make accurate cuts, and that it was much more
than the cartoons made it appear.
There were also many times during my childhood that I
some of my brilliant thoughts were ridiculous. As a teenager I was
wondering which of the ideas in my mind are realistic, and which are ridiculous.
Sometimes I would do a silly experiment just to get a better
of my mind and my abilities.
In my mind I could easily
a jet engine all by myself, and one day I became so annoyed over the
of whether these thoughts were realistic that I decided to put my
ideas to a test by building a centrifugal fan just to find out if it
as easy as it seemed in my mind. In my mind I could pick up a torch and
cut blades out of a sheet of steel with incredible precision, but is
realistic? Or is my mind completely out of touch with reality? Could I
move my hands smoothly? And how long would it take to weld the blades
In my mind I could weld the entire fan within a few minutes. And what
the welds look like?
These type of experiments may seem worthless, but
me to realize that my mind has no idea what
is, and that I must
something to "connect" my thoughts to reality. These experiments also
me to understand how people could believe in perpetual motion machines,
and why they would believe that they were capable of turning iron into
gold. These experiments also helped me to understand why millions of
intelligent people can believe in God, psychic abilities, devils, and
I tried to fly like the Super-Heros
The human mind was never designed to understand the
universe. It was
designed to look for food, sleep at night, raise children, and then
We were not designed to analyze the universe, create jet engines, or
develop software for computers. I design software for a living, but it
took years for me to get used to the stupidity of a computer and enjoy
this. A lot of the jobs we do today are not "natural" to us. The type
jobs that are natural to us are searching for food, and looking for a
place when something frightens us. It's not natural for us to spend
a day trying to control a stupid piece of electronic equipment.
Our mind was never designed to deal with reality. Our mind
is so out
of touch with the real world that we can develop theories that don't
any sense, such as, the sun is being carried around in a chariot, or
there is an alternative universe in a fifth dimension. What is a "fifth
dimension"? How can a person develop a theory about "another dimension"
when nobody can explain what "another dimension" is? Obviously, the
brain is nothing but an advanced monkey brain.
I often became irritated with some of the thoughts I found
in my mind,
so I would conduct experiments to put some of my thoughts to the test.
This helped me to realize that the human mind has no inherent sense of
reality. We have to learn to be critical of our thoughts and look for
in the real world to support our brilliant theories. These experiments
also helped me to figure out what I like and dislike, and what I'm
of, and what I'm not very good at.
However, I don't want to create the impression that I
or dangerous experiments. I did these experiments to understand myself,
not to risk death or find excitement.
For another example of my idiotic experiments, when I
preteen child, I wanted to fly like the Superheros in comic books
and cartoons, and when I climbed trees, I wanted to jump from one
to the next. One day I thought to myself that maybe
I am actually capable of flying. I could fly in my mind... so... maybe
I could do it in real life! How would I know if I don't give it a try?
I decided to try, although I didn't have much confidence, so
put much effort into it. I decided to run a few steps, and then jump
the air while throwing my hands up in the air like the superheroes. As
you might guess, I flew only a short distance. However, that simple
ended my curiosity about whether I could fly. That was one of the many
simple experiments that helped me to realize that my mind is out of
with reality, and that I have to be very
the thoughts that I find inside my mind.
This might seem to be an obvious
concept, but I'm not sure that many people have a good understanding of
it. An example are the scientists who develop detailed
theories about how the universe was created in a Big
Bang, or they come up with intricate details about an animal
or human based on a piece of a bone.
And have you heard of their idiotic concept of a wormhole?
Is this some type of intellectual humor? Or do some scientists actually
believe in a theory that is 0% fact and 100% speculation?
Hawking even claims it will affect
time, and allow us to visit other universes,
(or the people who claim to speak for Hawking make these stupid claims.
Maybe Hawking doesn't actually speak - maybe he is another Howard
or Jimmy Walter who is kept on drugs while parasitic people benefit
and pretend that he is alive and well).
My brother was more
experimenting with food
Different people have different interests, so they
different experiments. One of my brothers was more curious about foods
(he is the second tallest child in the photo
of my movie about Holocaust Denial Survival). For example, one day he
some snails from our backyard, let them live in cornmeal for a couple
and then fried them and ate them. I wasn't interested, however. Another
time he ate a small rattlesnake that he caught. I wasn't interested in
Why do we need to brush
My final example of my personality is that during my
years I was questioning the claims of cosmetic companies that we must
a lot of time and money with hair products. I was wondering how our
survived without shampoo, combs, or brushes. Animals don't use
or tools, either. So why do we need them?
don't listen to them!
I decided to stop brushing my hair and see what happens. At
I had long hair that was touching my shoulders, and I was losing
in society so I didn't care what people thought of me. And to speed up
the experiment, I decided not to use my fingers to remove the
that form. I wanted to see what would happen if I just left my hair
as if I was living in 10,000 BC and was too busy to worry about my
I didn't use any soap or shampoo on my hair, and it's possible that I
avoided getting it wet in the shower, but I can't remember the details.
After a couple weeks a small tangle had formed at the back
of my head.
I thought that it might continue to grow, but when I finally stopped
experiment after about six weeks, it was still about the same size.
flattened, it was about a centimeter in width and about 2 cm in length.
I suppose that if I had been sleeping in the dirt and leaves like
did 20,000 years ago, it would have become larger because it would have
collected dirt and twigs.
The rest of my hair remained fine. My hair never became
filthy or stinky,
and nothing bad happened to my scalp. My hair didn't get increasingly
either. It just reached a certain level. I didn't have droplets of oil
coming out of my hair.
The conclusion of this experiment is that people with hair
only have to brush it slightly in the morning to prevent tangles. I
came to the conclusion that we should not use soaps or shampoos on our
hair because the soaps remove the natural oil from our hair. The soap
create fluffy hair, which might look attractive in photographs, but dry
hair is difficult to control, and it gets full of static electricity.
I think the cosmetic companies are exploiting people,
Our hair doesn't need much maintenance. If you get motor oil in your
you need to use soap to remove it, but you can remove dust and
with a quick rinse in plain water. And that will leave most of your
oil in your hair.
Last night I decided to watch the ABC television show
to see how they described the suspicious event that day in which James
three people hostage at the Discovery Channel. They didn't have
to say about that strange incident but afterwards they had a report
about head lice. The host made a remark that there is a method of
lice "if you can stomach it". Amy
who started The
Whisperers to remove lice, said that we can prevent lice simply by
not washing our hair. She said that our natural oils make it
difficult for the lice to cling to our hair. However, as she said this,
she made an awful facial expression
and said that it would give us "really gross hair".
We resist changes
This is not true! Our
never washed their hair.
they rinsed their hair with water, and their hair often got wet from
rain, but they never used soap or shampoo. Animals never wash their
either. If your hair becomes filthy or stinky when you don't wash it,
because you have a problem; it's not
a characteristic of the human race. Every species of animal produces
and fragrances for their hair, and every animal should smell nice to
members of their species. Likewise, every opening in your body has some
way to protect itself from bacteria, insects, and other potential
Your ears produce a "wax", for example, and it should have a nice
You need to use soap to remove motor oil and certain other
and your crotch and hands need daily cleaning, and you need to brush
your hair slightly to prevent tangles, but otherwise, our bodies don't
need much maintenance. If the human race is becoming stinky and filthy,
it's because we are becoming increasingly defective.
Incidentally, my hair got longer and longer during
and I discovered that the reason is because humans have a tendency to
changes. When I was a child, my father would cut our hair very short,
when he stopped doing that, I cut my own hair. Every time I cut my hair
I thought I was cutting the same amount that had grown the last time,
slowly my hair grew longer and longer.
The lesson I learned from cutting my own hair is that when
happens to us gradually, we don't notice it. But when something changes
rapidly, we not only notice it, but we might resist it, even if it's
and even if it's beneficial, and - the strangest of all - even if we
want to do it! I wanted to cut my hair, but I had trouble
as much as I needed to because my mind was resisting the dramatic
So I ended up with long hair even though I didn't
actually want it! When I left home at age 19, I decided to
over, and so I cut my hair very short, and then I kept it under control
A society is oppressive
only to the misfits
I would describe myself as a misfit in America
because I don't
like this nation's attitude. When I was a teenager, I often assumed
there's something wrong with me, but today I think that there are a lot
of people like me around the world, and that the reason we feel like
is because the world is becoming dominated by a crude group of people.
Those crude people were the misfits centuries earlier, but now they
so people like me are the misfits today.
I would explain the sexual revolution that occurred in
America as a
change in the type of people who were dominating society. Specifically,
decades ago people like me had a lot of influence over America, and
created a certain standard of morality. At that time the women who were
raped, and the men who were doing the rape, didn't like being treated
freaks. Eventually those freaks were in such large numbers and getting
so much control over the government and media that they began imposing
their standards of morality on the nation. They began reversing
and encouraging everybody to have more casual sex, and to stop being
of themselves for getting raped, or being a rapist, or picking up a
When people like me
society, the crude people feel oppressed. From their point of view,
like me are prudish, stifling, and oppressive. They react to people
me by hiding their activities and fantasizing about becoming free of
abusive aristocrats who prevent them from enjoying life. They consider
themselves fighting for freedom and happiness.
Freedom is whatever you
When the situation reverses and the freaks
become the dominant group in society, then they impose their crude
on us, and people like me become the misfits who feel oppressed, and we
fantasize about liberating ourselves. From my point of view, they don't
provide us with sexual freedom. Rather, they are neurotic, abusive,
A society is "oppressive" only if you want to do
that society doesn't want you to do. We don't like being forced to
our desires. Conversely, you will consider a society to be providing
with freedom if you can behave as you naturally want to behave.
From the point of view of many of our government
school officials, sheriffs, district attorneys, lawyers, and business
freedom is being able to purchase children and use them as sex
slaves, or - as with Josef Fritzl
- using your own children as sex toys. To the people who enjoy
freedom is being able to use drugs. To the men who want to follow the
beware" policy, freedom is being allowed to openly carry guns in
and have fistfights and shootings in public. To the people who want to
have sex with animals, freedom is being able to do that without being
I don't think America provides me with the type of freedom
that I want.
I want the freedom to walk anywhere in my city without worrying about
people I live among. I want the freedom to trust the people that I live
with. I don't want to live in fear of them. I want the freedom to walk
away from my house without locking the doors, and without worrying
somebody vandalizing or stealing my items. I don't want to follow the
beware" philosophy. I want the freedom to purchase products without
that I'm going to be cheated. If I had children, I would want to have
freedom to let them wander around the city by themselves. I don't want
to be a bodyguard for my children. When I get on an airplane, I want to
able to trust the mechanics who maintain the airplane. When I go to a
I want to trust him and his abilities.
Everybody makes mistakes, so I'm tolerant of mistakes, but I
to live around people who deliberately
cause trouble. I want them exiled
But I am forced by society to tolerate the abuse by destructive people.
I am oppressed. I want the freedom
to exile or kill
criminals. I hate living in fear
my own government officials, lawyers, businessmen, and history
I want to live among people I can trust and respect. What about you?
What is freedom to you?
When I was a child, I assumed that the different
races of people
were just different shapes and colors of the same human, and that the
who were causing trouble were genetically defective, or suffering brain
damage as a result of accidents, strokes, or disease.
However, I now suspect that there are some significant
differences between the different races of people. In such a case, it
be impossible to mix all of the
races together in one society. Instead, we would have to allow
races to have different nations or cities.
|If it turns out that some people really are a more
then they will never fit in with
modern humans. Those primitive races would need their
They would then be able to openly carry guns
for protection and follow the "buyer beware"
philosophy. They could tell fart jokes
without embarrassment and show beastiality on television. NAMBLA could
be a respectable social club, and Barney Frank could host a television
game show in which the grand prize is a vacation at an orphanage.
|I think the "melting pot" philosophy in which all of
races coexist peacefully, is unrealistic, and besides, what is wrong
different nations having different "social technology" (ie, culture)?
|Imagine a society in which there is a particular race
of Indians who
have a particular style of food, clothing, rules for marriage and
How would your life
be harmed by
those people dressing in a different style than you?
How would your life be harmed by
people eating a different style of food?
As long as every society cooperates
with the others, there is no problem if we
to force everybody to wear the same style of clothing or eat the same
The people who are causing trouble in this world are
who are committing crimes, starting wars, blackmailing people, or being
parasitic. Therefore, our concern should be removing the destructive
parasitic people and creating a world in which the people cooperate
each other and contribute to the human race. We
need to force everybody to be identical.
Why has architecture
Every society should be under pressure to use the same
system for measurements,
calendars, and numbers, and ideally we would all be able to speak one
language, but we don't need to force all people to follow the same
In fact, I think it would make the world much more
interesting if different societies had different architecture,
food, etc. Therefore, rather than pressure the Japanese, Indians,
etc., to dress and behave like us, we should tell them to do
as they please.
|Another fascinating aspect of those 12 paintings of the
Riches Heures is that they show castles that are amazingly
at least considering that the architects and construction workers of
era had very crude technology. As you look at the the following
"What would these people have
built if they had
access to modern materials and technology? Would they have made
even more decorative structures? Or would they have preferred
make the rectangular buildings that are popular today,
such as the World Trade Center towers?"