Hufschmid's main page

 
A message from Eric Hufschmid

8 July 2007


There appears to be a big increase in the attempt to push aside Bollyn, Smith, and myself. If they can fool you into ignoring us, they can get rid of us, and that will leave the Zionist agents in control of the truth movement.
Warning: I no longer trust Smith (my reasons are here) but while I was working with him, we created some useful interviews

 

The Zionist movement is in serious trouble right now, and I think they are panicking. They are being exposed all over the world. They have depended upon control of the media to confuse and deceive people, but the Internet, CD-ROMs, and DVDs are allowing us to expose them.

I don't think there's anything they can do to save Zionism. Even if they stop all of the people in North America from talking, there are people talking in Europe, Japan, China, and India. They can't stop the entire world.

On Friday, 6 July 2007, Alex Jones interviewedh one of the Rothschild family members. Why would anybody from the Rothschilds be willing to go on that radio station and be abused by Alex Jones? It was an attempt to give credibility to Alex Jones. You can listen to it if you want:
prisonplanet.com/audio/060707rothschild.mp3

Four recent issues:

1) Victor Ostrovsky has my video of him removed

On 7 July 2007 youtube removed the video I made about Victor Ostrovsky because he complained that it was a copyright infringement. It is still available at this page: HowToHelp.html
The video is:
Victor Ostrovsky; an ex-mossad agent?
Victor-Ostrovsky.wmv


2) Why don't I trust any of you?

I have been complaining for years that virtually all of the leaders in the truth movement, anti-war movement, peace movement, Nazi groups, and other organizations are Zionist agents, and I have an article to explain that it is our responsibility to investigate our leaders, with no exceptions:
InvestigateTheTruthSeekers.htm

Several months ago Daryl Smith came to the conclusion that the NOLAJBS forum was full of Zionist agents. Suzette and Jim Kerr (of PlanetQuo.com) were defending Smith and wondering who at NOLAJBS was a Zionist agent and who was honest.

Suzette and Kerr pestered me repeatedly to get involved with the investigation of the people at that forum, and they wanted me to provide information about a young woman named Nina who posts messages at NOLAJBS in support of Smith, but I told them that I don't know Nina, and I wasn't interested in investigating NOLAJBS.

Suzette and Kerr were concerned that she might be a Zionist agent, and I gave them my typical response; namely, that if she is a Zionist agent, it would be wonderful if they could uncover this information and expose it. However, I told them that I wasn't interested in investigating NOLAJBS. As far as I'm concerned, all of the forums that talk about 9/11, the Illuminati, the New World order, UFOs, remote viewing, and Zionism should be considered guilty until proven innocent.

Some people ask me, "How can we trust Christopher Bollyn? How can we trust Daryl Smith? How can we trust Eric Hufschmid?" My response to such questions is that you are a fool to give blind obedience to anybody.

One of the reasons we are having so much trouble in the world is that there is no investigation of the people in leadership positions. For example, who is Ron Paul? Why are so many people willing to elect him as president when they don't know anything about him? And who are the people providing us with news reports at Reuters, the BBC, and other agencies? Who are the people in control of the police departments and the FBI? Who is Suzette, and why is she promoting this goofy site:
www.fixedearth.com

Some people get upset when they discover that I refuse to guarantee their honesty, but why should I guarantee anybody other than myself? Furthermore, some of the information I provide may be inaccurate and I don't realize it yet. It would be best if you checked the information yourself and make sure it seems correct. Discuss possible errors.

People become especially upset with me when they discover that I am encouraging investigations of them. They consider me to be "casting suspicions" on them, or "attacking" them. For example, if somebody sends me an e-mail message that says something like,

"You suggest we investigate everybody... what about John Doe? He might be a Zionist agent. Why don't you help us investigate and expose him?"
My response to such a message would be something like:
"I'm not interested in looking into John Doe, but it would be great if you could expose his Zionist connections. Good luck!"
If John Doe were to see that e-mail message, he is likely to get angry with me for implying that he was a Zionist agent, but what have I done wrong? Linda Shelton is complaining that we implied that she was a Zionist:
Linda-Shelton-and-Bollyn.html

Why is it wrong to ask who Linda Shelton is? Why is it wrong to wonder why she became so friendly with the Bollyn family? Why should we treat her as a queen?

I don't complain when people investigate me. In fact, Phil Jayhan and his team of Zionist agents who blame the Vatican for the world's corruption, have been investigating me for several years, but I don't complain.


3) Somebody sent e-mail under my account PainfulQuestions@aol.com

On Sunday morning, 8 July 2007, Smith received an email from Linda Shelton. She sent him a message that I sent to Linda Shelton earlier that morning, but I never sent the email to Linda Shelton!

Also, on that same Sunday morning, I discovered that my e-mail account had reached its limit of 1000 messages. Almost all of them were automatic replies to a message about Harold Rosenthal, or messages that the e-mail could not be delivered. However, I did not send those e-mail messages.

This brings up a very important issue. The Internet is full of viruses, and people are somehow capable of sending e-mail messages under other people's accounts.

Somebody may be doing this to me in order to justify having me arrested for sending out spam, or maybe they're just trying to get people to block my e-mail address. What is the FBI doing to stop this type of crime?

Our FBI insisted that there was no such thing as organized crime until Robert Kennedy forced Edgar Hoover to acknowledge that it exists. Whether Hoover was part of the crime network or just one of their blackmail puppets is irrelevant; the point is that the FBI has been -- and still is -- protecting organized crime. The FBI seems to arrest only the people who are outside of their crime network.

Ted Gunderson was one of the top FBI agents; did he ever solve a case? The American Free Press lists Gunderson as part of their Southwest regional Bureau. Is he, or other FBI agents, or the American Free Press, going to look into the strange disappearance of Christopher Bollyn? What do the FBI agents ever do to help us?

Have you heard the accusations that the FBI collects material that they can use to blackmail people with? They may be using this material to keep police departments, military officials, politicians, and university professors under control.

The Americans would demand that the government stop funding the FBI. Then all the FBI agents should be investigated.


4) Religious fanatics are a disgrace

Here is a message Smith and I received on 5 July 2007 from a man who claims to be a Catholic:
Daryl and Eric,

Let this Bollyn situation be a warning to you both that you may be next and very shortly. Unless you become true Catholics, God will not protect you and send you to Hell for all eternity. Go to www.johnthebaptist.us for your only hope of salvation.