Animals grab at whatever attracts their attention. They regularly grab food from one another, and birds grab nesting materials from one another, and penguins sometimes steal babies from one another. Male animals will also rape females. The only time that an animal resists grabbing at something is when it is worried about being attacked by other animals.

When people settled into permanent cities, they began living among lots of things that stimulated their emotions to an excess, such as houses, clothing, tools, large amounts of food, and lots of sexually attractive women. This resulted in the people being stimulated more often, and to a greater extent, then their prehistoric ancestors had evolved for. The people with low levels of self-control were often grabbing at the material items, children, and other things that attracted their attention. That annoying behavior resulted in the development of laws, police, and security devices.

Unfortunately, laws and police cannot improve the mind of an animal. Every society has lots of laws and police, but millions of people around the world are routinely stealing items, raping women, and committing lots of other crimes. There are even people in the police departments, courts, and government that violate the laws.

To make the situation worse, there are a lot of people joining crime networks so that they can be more successful with crimes, or to get involved with crimes that they cannot do on their own, such as human trafficking and murder rituals.

Every culture tries to control or rehabilitate the badly behaved people, but this Constitution requires the security division to evict them.

Furthermore, this Constitution requires setting higher standards of behavior than any existing society has. For example, in addition to evicting people who commit the typical crimes of murder and rape, this Constitution authorizes the security division to evict anybody that they consider to be a destructive influence on society, such as the people who deceive us into marriage, hiring them for a job, or becoming their friend.

No culture yet considers deception to be a crime. Actually, every culture is doing the exact opposite. Specifically, every culture promotes the concept that information about ourselves is "private" and "personal", and that we will be "protected" by keeping secrets from other people. Every culture is still promoting the selfish animal attitude that it is acceptable to create a false image of ourselves, and to lie about our past and our true intentions. No culture promotes honesty.

Every culture gives us the freedom to deceive other people about our mental problems, criminal history, previous marriages, previous jobs, gambling habits, military service, and drug use. We also have the freedom to deceive people about our age, weight, height, income, and whether we have children. No culture considers a person to be disgusting when he lies about himself.

When Michael Peterson was running for mayor of Durham, North Carolina, he was exposed for lying about his military service and records, but he was not arrested, and he was not disqualified from becoming a government official.

Every culture is so tolerant of lies and secrecy that some people are now requesting the government to allow them to secretly change their name and gender. They justify that secrecy by claiming that transgender people are victims of abuse, and that secrecy will protect them, but secrecy and deception cannot improve human behavior. If it is true that some people are being abused, then we need to understand why they are being abused, and experiment with solutions to that problem.

This constitution advocates that we stop feeling sorry for the people who lie to us and try to manipulate us. Everybody must earn what they want in an honest manner. A person who wants to be our friend, employee, or spouse must earn that position. We should not tolerate people who deceive us into accepting them.

When a person deceives us into becoming their friend or spouse, they are wasting something more precious than material wealth. They are wasting a portion of our very short life. Likewise, when a person deceives us into hiring them for a job can cause a lot of trouble to a lot of people, including the future generations. That type of deception can give us incompetent doctors, government officials, and engineers.

There is no right or wrong to how honest people should be. There is nothing wrong a culture that allows and encourages people to lie about their age, mental illnesses, height, venereal diseases, alcoholism, drug addictions, gambling problems, debt, or previous crimes and marriages. We simply have to make a decision about what type of social environment we want to live in. We have to decide how much lying and deception we want to tolerate.

It is impossible to create a culture that pleases everybody. This constitution promotes my desires, which is to have very little tolerance for secrecy, deception, and lies in order to create a social environment that is almost as intimate as that of our prehistoric, nomadic ancestors. This constitution gives everybody the right to know the details of the people they live with.

This policy requires us to be intolerant of the people who want deception and secrecy, which will cause them to suffer. This is a complex issue, and it is discussed in more detail in the documents about diversity and setting higher standards for the citizens.

Every culture provides women with the freedom to get pregnant at any age, and without any regard to their education, mental health, or ability or desire to take care of a baby. However, if a woman wants to get married, she has to meet certain qualifications.

For example, in California, a person must be over the age of 18 to get married, which creates the bizarre situation in which young girls have the freedom to get pregnant and become a mother, but not the freedom to get married and become a wife. Those laws imply that it is more difficult to be a wife than a mother.

To make the situation more ridiculous, if the government considers parents to be abusive with their children, the government will take their children away from them, but the government shows no concern for whether married couples are abusive to their spouse. The government will not break up an abusive marriage, or even provide much protection to a wife who is abused by her husband. A woman can get a restraining order, but that doesn't protect her from a violent man.

This constitution has a different attitude towards marriage and children. Specifically, giving birth to a child is creating life, which puts people into the role of gods, and creating life is regarded as a more significant event than getting married. This constitution gives everybody the freedom to get married, but does not give people the freedom to create life. The Reproduction Ministry determines who is allowed to have children, and how many children. They also determine who is allowed to adopt children.

Life was so simple for our prehistoric ancestors that their children picked up everything they needed to know about marriage and raising children simply by growing up around other people. It was easy for prehistoric men to take care of their wives because all they had to do was provide their wives with food, tools, furs, and protection. Likewise, it was easy for women to raise babies because all they had to do was feed them and protect them from danger.

Today, however, a married couple has to deal with a lot of complex issues that did not exist in prehistoric times, and if they decide to have children, they have even more complex issues to deal with. Unfortunately, instead of preparing children for this complex world, schools and parents are giving children unrealistic expectations of marriage and life. Furthermore, modern culture is so inappropriate that many men are developing obnoxious obsessions with sex and women's sexual organs, and women are developing idiotic expectations of husbands.

It is no longer sensible for us to assume that children will pick up what they need to know about life simply by living among adults. Children today need an education in marriage, sex, raising children, food, allergies, diseases, digestion, recreational activities, and lots of other aspects of modern life.

The Teentown Ministry is required to create and experiment with school courses for the teenagers to educate them about marriage and raising children. Although we do not yet know enough about life to tell somebody how to have a successful marriage, or how to raise a child, there are certain concepts that the teenagers should be aware of.

The educational course about raising children must help teenagers develop realistic expectations of becoming a parent. The course must ensure that the teenagers understand the unpleasant aspects of having children, such as how pregnancy alters the appearance of a woman's body, and that parents will regularly have to change diapers and clean up vomit, food, and mucus. The teenagers must realize that children are a responsibility and a burden, and that a child will interfere with their sleep, leisure time, meals, and social life.

The educational course about marriage must help the boys realize that a wife is a female ape, not a sex toy or a princess, and the girls must realize that a husband is a male ape, not a prince or their best friend.

The schools are prohibited from teaching the unisex theory. Instead, the teenagers must be taught to allow their baby boys and girls to be different, rather than try to force them to behave in an identical manner. The teenagers must also be taught to learn about the differences between adult men and women so that they can do a better job of resolving issues with their spouse.

Exposing the teenagers to this information will increase the chances that they develop realistic expectations of marriage and children, and become a better parent and spouse.

One of the limitations of our mind is that we cannot accurately predict our behavior. For example, we often believe that we can do something, but partway through the project we become bored or disillusioned, and we want to abandon the goal, and sometimes do abandon it. We then start another goal, and we might abandon that one after a while, also. Some people repeat this process over and over.

For example, every year millions of Americans believe that they are willing to deal with the responsibilities of a pet animal, but every year millions of Americans become tired of their pet animal and either neglect it, or abandon it.

This problem is also occurring with marriages. Specifically, most of the people who get married believe that they will remain with their spouse forever, but many of them want a divorce after a few months or years.

Even worse, there are some people who insist that they are willing to deal with the responsibilities of raising children, but after a few years some of the fathers want to abandon their wife and children, and sometimes mothers also neglect or abandon their children.

If a prehistoric father abandoned his wife and children, he would be much less likely to pass his particular genes onto the future generations. Today, however, it is so easy for women to raise children without a husband that those men are able to reproduce successfully, thereby increasing the number of men who have cannot complete the projects that they start.

Furthermore, unlike such animals as lions, which kill the babies of other lions, when a woman gets remarried, her new husband cannot kill the children of her previous husband. Therefore, the children of failed marriages are raised by men who are not their fathers.

To complicate this issue, the people who get divorced are not necessarily inferior to those who remain married. There are several reasons for this:

	1)	People today have such incredible secrecy that we don't know much about a person until we get married. Almost everybody is creating phony images of themselves, so we could say most people got married to the fantasy that their spouse created. Therefore, we could describe almost every married person as both a victim of deception, and a perpetrator of deception.
	2)	Children today are picking up unrealistic expectations of weddings, sex, children, and marriage from the romance novels, movies, television programs, wedding pornography, sexual pornography, religions, feminists, and anti-evolution idiots. That unrealistic information can cause people to choose an inappropriate spouse, and/or become frustrated, confused, disappointed, or angry with their spouse when their marriage doesn't meet their fantasy expectations.
	3)	Most people have a difficult time finding a spouse today because our natural courtship activities are inappropriate in our modern cities. Many of us live in an area that has a mixture of extremely incompatible people who have widely different intellectual and emotional characteristics, and that requires analyzing a lot of people, which is unnatural for us. For example, single women want men to give them gifts, praise, and attention, not interview them. The people who are "ordinary" have an easy time finding a spouse because they are surrounded by people who are similar to them, but people who are unusual have to meet a lot of people before they find somebody who is compatible. The end result is that some of the unusual people "pick the lesser of the evils" by getting married to somebody that they don't have a lot in common with, which can result in a failed marriage.
	4)	Humans were designed to live only long enough to raise children. Therefore, men and women were supposed to form a relationship for only two to three decades. However, people today are living beyond the age of 50, and that puts us into a phase of life when we do not have children, and when our bodies and minds are deteriorating. Therefore, we should consider the possibility that a couple that is compatible while they are young and raising children might become incompatible when they are over 40 or 50. If we find evidence for that problem, then we should experiment with encouraging the older people to get involved with courtship activities so that they can determine whether there is somebody that they are more compatible with during their final decades of life. That requires we stop regarding divorce as a terrible thing as regard it as part of the process of growing old.

Marriages are becoming increasingly unpleasant and unstable. Since we have intense cravings to form relationships, we should push ourselves into understanding ourselves and experimenting with ways to reduce the problems between men and women.

Marriages should improve significantly simply because everybody will have free access to homes and other necessities, and all of the men will be equal in material wealth, thereby making it impossible for women to select a man according to his wealth. Women will be more likely to choose a man that they are truly compatible with.

We should also be able to improve marriages by experimenting with our culture rather than following traditions or doing what our emotions crave. An example mentioned here is that we could experiment with weddings that are social events rather than something that resembles the coronation of a queen. A woman should be concerned about who she is marrying, not the wedding.

Other documents have pointed out that most of us believe that we are experts on abortion, religion, recreational activities, marijuana, feminism, vegetarianism, Donald Trump, and Nazis. As a result, we frequently give lectures to other people on what they should believe, and we insult the people who disagree with us. That is not treating people as team members. That is behaving like a King or Queen and giving a lecture to a servant.

To understand how detrimental this behavior is, imagine a business that provided their employees with the right to behave in this manner. Imagine if most of the employees were constantly giving lectures to one another about all aspects of the business, such as how to do their job, which of their managers should be fired, which foods the company cafeteria should provide, how the offices should be decorated, what the working hours and days should be, and which projects the company should invest in.

Or imagine a military giving their members the right to lecture one another about their organization. Imagine soldiers constantly lecturing each other about how to do their jobs, what their uniforms should look like, which of their officers should be demoted, and which foods they should eat.

Businesses and militaries do not allow their members to behave like Kings and Queens. They require them to behave like team members who work together for the benefit of the team.

Our culture has been evolving to give us what we want and avoid what we dislike. We want to be at the top of the hierarchy, and we dislike criticism. We want to feel important, and we want to insult other people. We want people to be submissive to us, not equal to us.

As a result these emotional cravings and fears, every culture has evolved to allow the public to behave as if they are kings and queens. Our governments, businesses, schools, sports groups, and other organizations pander to us and treat us as if we are special people.

We have such intense cravings for status that we have devised a thousands of  recreational and social activities that offer us a wide variety of trophies and prizes so that we can become the center of attention and feel important.

We will create a more pleasant environment when we suppress our craving to behave like Kings and Queens, and push ourselves into treating other people as our friends and team members.

To dampen our arrogant behavior, this Constitution treats the people in influential positions as city employees, and nobody is permitted to pander to the public. Everybody is required to treat other people as their friends and team members. Nobody gets special treatment.

We have such a strong attraction to children that most people regard them as bundles of joy rather than as young, ape-like creatures. This unrealistic fantasy of children causes people to set unrealistic expectations for children.

An example is how many parents expect their children to be well behaved at formal dinners, and to appreciate the decorations, the ambiance, and fancy meals. However, the younger a child is, the less he cares about the such issues, and the more likely he is to behave like a monkey.

We torment children and ourselves by expecting them to behave like adults.

Instead of designing meals to fit a young, ape-like creature, they torment their children by giving them meals designed for adults, and be expecting their children to appreciate the meals.

Many parents add to the problem, by scolding their children for misbehaving, or threatening them with punishments.

This Constitution requires the Restaurants Minister to provide separate restaurants for the children, and the meals must also be designed for children.

Parents are permitted to eat with their children, but nobody is allowed to pressure parents into eating with their children. Since this Constitution prohibits the unisex theory, nobody is permitted to insult a father for being a "bad parent" if he eats with other adults rather than his children, and the fathers who choose to eat with their children cannot be praised as being "good fathers".

The people who try to manipulate fathers with insults or praise are behaving like an arrogant dictator who believes that he knows the proper behavior for fathers. This constitution provides fathers and mothers with the freedom to choose who they eat with, and they have the freedom to eat with other adults rather than with their own children.

Half of the children will always be below-average in their behavior, intelligence, emotional characteristics, and physical characteristics, and a small percentage of children will be such misfits that they cannot properly fit into society.

Although we cannot expect children to behave as well as adults, we need to set standards for children's behavior, and we must deal with the children who cannot meet the standards.

All cultures encourage adults to pander to the misfit children, and to ignore or make excuses for their bad behavior. We enjoy pandering to children because we have a strong craving to take care of children, but now that we prevent nature from killing the defective children, we must pass judgment on which of the children are worth our time and resources.

Ignoring the misfit children is allowing them to torment their school teachers, neighbors, parents, and other children. They are also likely to become misfit adults, and when they reproduce, they are likely to create even more misfit children in the next generation.

Modern humans must exert enough self-control over our attractions to children to pass judgment on which of them are so inferior that they need to be euthanized. The children who are allowed to live must meet standards, and those who cannot meet the standards need to be put on restrictions, such as putting them in their own schools or classrooms, and restricting them to certain restaurants and recreational activities.

This constitution also encourages organizations to stop pandering to the troublesome children. For example, teachers, doctors, and dentists can refuse to work with the children that annoy them.

Example: Doctors can reject irritating children

There are some British television programs that show the activities that their hospitals, and they occasionally show doctors and nurses asking a child for permission to give him some type of medical procedure, or asking a child if it is acceptable for them to move him to another room in the hospital. This constitution regards that type of behavior as detrimental. Adults must provide guidance to children, not ask them for permission to do something.

Every culture today promotes the attitude that when children resist medical or dental procedures, we should pander to them by offering them candy, or by giving them praise, or by trying to explain to them why they should allow the medical procedure. This constitution regards that type of behavior as detrimental because it encourages the children to do as they please rather than listen to the adults. It also wastes the time of the adults on a very frustrating activity.

Furthermore, as described in this document, the lower-quality people need more medical attention than the higher-quality people. This results in doctors wasting a lot of their time pandering to, and providing medical attention to, some of the worst behaved and most undesirable members of society, such as the violent people who stab and shoot one another; the mentally defective children who hurt themselves by riding a skateboard on a stairway; and stupid children who shove items deep into their ear or nose.

This constitution requires the doctors, police officers, school officials, and other adults to stop giving pity to, and pandering to, the troublesome people, including troublesome children. Children are to be regarded as young humans, not as precious resources.

We must expect children to behave worse than adults, but we must pass judgment on which of the children are displaying such crude behavior that they should be regarded as "misfits", "inferior", and "unacceptable".

If a child puts up a resistance to a medical or dental procedure, then the doctor or dentist has the option of ignoring the child. Even that the doctor or dentist decides to help the child, his bad behavior must be mentioned in his entry of the People database, and it will lower his social credit score, and reduce his chances that he is considered acceptable for reproduction.

If a child is so annoying that no doctor wants to deal with him, and if the child suffers medical problems or dies as a result, that is his problem. Doctors are not required to pander to badly behaved children or adults.

This constitution requires everybody to behave in a respectable manner, and those who do not are regarded as misfits who are behaving like an animal, and none of us owe them any pity or special treatment.

If a doctor or a teacher were to give extra time to a misfit, then they are denying time for the well behaved people. That is the opposite of what this Constitution advocates. We should help the high-quality people, not the misfits. Although this might seem to be a cruel policy, it is the same policy that farmers follow. Specifically, farmers take care of their healthy plants and animals, and they ignore or euthanize the defective plants and animals.

This constitution believes that one of the primary problems in the world today is the desire to feel sorry for the losers, retards, troublesome people, criminals, and mentally disturbed people.

Feeling sorry for the misfits does not help them, or other people, or the future generations. Instead, it wastes our time, and it encourages more bad behavior. Furthermore, if those badly behaved people are allowed to reproduce, then we have even more of them in the next generation.

Instead of trying to fix the badly behaved children, they should be prohibited from reproducing so that there are fewer of them in every generation.

Teachers, doctors, dentists, and other adults are required to put their effort into helping the high-quality children and adults, rather than waste their time trying to help the low-quality people.