Truth from Lies?
And how do we determine who to trust?
updated 15 March 2007
After I wrote about the deception in the 9/11 movement, people have been asking me, "How can we figure out who to trust?"
Only lies need secrecy; only lies need protection from laws. Only lies benefit from fear, secrecy, blackmail, gossip, and confiscation of evidence.
For example, to determine the truth about the 9/11 attack, we only have to bring out all of the video recordings, the photographs, the rubble from the World Trade Center, the seismic data, and the testimony of the witnesses. By letting us see everything, we will eventually figure out what happened and who is a liar.
However, the media and government are suppressing some video recordings, witnesses, scientific analyses, and people (such as myself). The government also destroyed most of the rubble from the towers, and there are accusations that they destroyed other evidence also. This destruction of evidence is proof that they are hiding something.
Nobody destroys evidence or suppresses people if they are trying to spread the truth. The truth is supported with evidence. The more evidence we have, the more we can be certain of what the truth is. Therefore, to spread the truth, expose all evidence.
By comparison, if somebody is promoting a lie, he must suppress the
particular people and information that expose the lie.
The Incubator Babies
Do you remember the stories circulating in America in 1990 about the
evil Iraqi soldiers who were throwing babies out of their incubators?
Am I allowed to ask, how many babies were thrown out of the incubator? Am I an incubator baby denier for asking such a question?
Some people claim that zero babies were thrown out of incubators, and that the entire story is a hoax in order to enrage the Americans. Here are two articles about it, in case you never heard of this:
Are the people who make these accusations Incubator Baby Deniers? Should they be arrested? Should they be told to shut up?
The truth about the incubator baby story does not need laws to protect
it. There is no reason to tell anybody to be quiet about it. The truth
about the incubator babies will come out when we expose all evidence,
not when we tell people to shut up.
Ignore the pressure to hide evidence
Lots of people and organizations claim to be "truth seekers" in regards to 9-11. However, if they were truly honest, they would encourage people to look at all of the evidence.
For example, the MoveOn organization ignores some of the most important evidence of 9-11. The Air America radio network also ignores lots of critical information and people.
It is the ordinary, unknown citizens who pass out videos, books, and
web sites. If this world improves, it will be because of those unknown
citizens who are ignoring the large organizations and passing out the suppressed
information to their friends and neighbors.
Should I keep quiet on some issues?
Occasionally somebody will advise me to stop talking about one or both of these issues:
Why should I ignore those two subjects? How does the truth on those subjects benefit by suppressing discussions of them?
I have been given two, completely different sets of reasons as to why
I should remain quiet, depending on whether the person telling me to keep
my mouth shut promotes the official story. The two groups of reasons are:
1) The people who tell me that Apollo astronauts really did land on the moon, and the official Holocaust story is 99% accurate, tell me to shut my mouth because...
Case 1: The Apollo astronauts really did land on the moon, and the official Holocaust story is at least 99% accurate.
I know a man who is a few years older than me. He was drafted and sent to fight in the Vietnam war. However, he had no desire to kill Vietnamese. He did not understand why he should consider the Vietnamese to be his enemy.Case 2: Apollo and the Holocaust are indeed hoaxes.
It should be obvious that if these are hoaxes, then the pressure on me to shut my mouth is to prevent me from exposing the lies.
The truth does not need suppression
The US military has no reason to hide information about the Vietnam War... if they want the truth about the war to be known.
However, if they want to hide the truth, then they will need to suppress people, questions, and evidence. The same applies to the North Vietnamese and Chinese governments.
The only way we will really know what was going on with the Vietnam War is if all of the governments stop their suppression of information.
Governments justify their suppression of information on the grounds
that they are protecting national security. In reality, every government
is protecting their incompetence, their criminal activity, and their embarrassing
It is OK to discuss the Vietnam War
There is nothing wrong with asking questions about the Vietnam War, and there is nothing wrong with asking how many people died.
There is nothing wrong with asking questions about the Civil War, either, and there's nothing wrong with asking if George Washington really did have his missing teeth replaced with pieces of wood, and whether he really did chop down a cherry tree.
So why is it wrong to ask questions about what was going on inside those Nazi prison camps? Why is it wrong to ask how many Jews died in those prison camps? If Jews have nothing to hide, why are they trying to stop people from discussing this issue? Why don't they proudly announce to the world,
"Go ahead and look closely at the Nazi prison camps. You will find that we Jews have been honest about them; that we have been telling you the truth."I don't see how we are helping the human race by remaining silent on any issue.
Laws against Apollo Denial
What would you think if the United States government passed a law that allowed it to arrest people who did not believe Apollo astronauts landed on the moon? Would you approve of a government that put "Apollo Deniers" in jail?
Would you approve of our government arresting people who do not believe Oswald killed Kennedy? Would you support a law against "Lee Harvey Oswald Denial"?
The people who are described as "Historians" often disagree with each other on historical details. Since they can't agree on the official version, why should we expect the common people to agree? To complicate the issue, every nation has a slightly different version of history.
To add even more absurdity to this issue, history sometimes changes when a nation gets new government officials. An example is the change in Russian history when Stalin replaced Lenin.
We are not going to make our history books more accurate by arresting
people who disagree with some arbitrary, official version of history.
Does any government really believe that we need laws against Holocaust Denial?
There is currently a man named Ernst Zundel who was taken from America,
sent to Canada, and then sent to Germany for a trial, supposedly because
he is a Holocaust denier. In February 2007, Zundel was sent to jail for
Could any government possibly be so stupid that they believe they are helping the world by arresting "Holocaust Deniers"? I don't think so!
The arrest of Holocaust Deniers seems to be an attempt to frighten people into remaining silent about the Holocaust. And the only reason for this is because the Holocaust promoters are trying to hide something; they are trying to protect a lie.
The truth about the Holocaust does not come out when people are arrested. Rather, lies about the Holocaust are protected when people are arrested.
The truth about the Holocaust will come out when all of the photos and information is released, and when we are allowed to discuss the information.
People who question the official story of the Holocaust are not Holocaust
Deniers. Rather, they are Holocaust Truth Seekers, or HoloHoax
Are Holocaust trials a deception?
As I mentioned in my document "To get away with crimes, pretend to be a crime fighter", the deception with 9-11 and other large crimes is much more complex than my simple example of a car thief.
Let me give you a few possible examples of what is going on with the arrest of Ernst Zundel.
• The Zionists are worried about Ernst Zundel is exposing the HoloHoax, and so they are trying to use him as an example to show us that they control the world, and we better keep our mouths shut or we will go to jail, also.
To understand this, imagine what a trial for an "Apollo Denier" would be like. For example, Richard Hoagland, who frequently appears on Coast-to-Coast AM radio, believes that Apollo astronauts landed on the moon, but that NASA faked many of the photographs in order to cover up the ancient civilizations the Apollo astronauts discovered on the moon.
Hoagland could be classified as an Apollo Denier because he is accusing NASA of faking photos, lying to the world, and covering up the greatest discovery of the human race; namely, that there are alien civilizations on both the moon and Mars.
If the government were to arrest Richard Hoagland for Denying Apollo, the trial would have to be a sham because both the government and Richard Hoagland would have to lie in order to defend themselves.
The only reason the government would want to arrest Richard Hoagland is if they wanted to frighten people into thinking that they better not disagree with the official story of the Apollo moon landing or they may end up in court.
The government would never arrest a real Apollo investigator because a real Apollo investigator would have serious evidence that the moon landing was a hoax, and the government would not want that brought out in the public.
Consider how this applies to the arrest of Holocaust Deniers:
• The Jews would never want to arrest a real Holocaust investigator because he would fight back with serious evidence.
Are the Germans as stupid as they appear?
In February 2007 a German court sentenced Zundel to jail for five years. How could the Germans be so stupid as to put an old man in jail at taxpayers expense simply because he disagrees with the official story of the Holocaust? Can't the German people think of a better way to spend their tax money?
Here are some possibilities in regards to Zundel:
• BlackmailOne Jewish newspaper, in this article, says that Zundel is not really disagreeing with the official story of the Holocaust. Rather, he simply "hates Jewish people".
Although we cannot believe the media on the Holocaust issue, especially not the Jewish reporters, it appears as if Zundel does not truly want to expose the Holocaust. Rather, he puts up only a superficial fight.
This implies that he is working with the Zionists, either because he
is a Crypto-Zionist, or they have blackmailed him.
The truth seekers are not stupid
One of the peculiar aspects of most of the Holocaust investigators, 9/11 truth seekers, antiwar activists, etc., is that they talk a lot, but they don't give good arguments, and they never advocate any action.
I used to assume they were stupid, but it makes more sense to accuse them of being Crypto-Zionists or blackmail victims.
Germar Rudolf supposedly has a Ph.D. in chemistry, and he got it from
a German university, not an American university. He is certain to be above
In 2002, he published his analysis of the Apollo moon landing on the
website (another site you should be suspicious of):
Almost all of us grew up believing that the Apollo moon landing was real. Only a few people have bothered to analyze the Apollo moon landing to determine if it was real, or if it was staged here on the Earth.
Of all the people who analyzed the Apollo moon landing, most of them come to the conclusion that it was indeed staged here on the Earth. Only a few people go so far as to publish a paper to defend the official story. Germar Rudolf is one of those very few.
I would guess that Rudolf was told to write that article, and he agreed to do it either because he is a Crypto-Zionist, or because he is one of their blackmail victims.
Incidentally, I have another Science Challenge about Apollo:
Stand up to the HoloHoax!
Fredrick Toben, Ernst Zundel, Germar Rudolf, and almost everybody else who is arrested for Holocaust denial seems to be either a Zionist, or one of their blackmail victims.
They allow themselves to be arrested in order to frighten the Gullible Goyim into remaining silent about the HoloHoax.
A clever trick, isn't it?
More on the possibility that David Irving
is part of a Zionist trick to frighten us:
More on the possibility that Zundel
is part of a Zionist trick to frighten us:
The real holocaust investigator seems to be Professor
Don't be frightened by the Holohoax arrests. What are you; a human or a mouse?
And take this issue of blackmail seriously. The Zionists are not going
to sit by while people expose their crimes. When somebody tries to expose
the Holocaust, 9/11, or other crimes, they will be contacted by "helpful"
people and "concerned citizens". You should consider all of these people
to be possible Zionists.
Deceptive Romantic Relationships
There are lots of ways to deceive people. One of the ultimate sacrifices that a Zionist can make for Israel is to form a long-term romantic relationship with a Goyim in order to manipulate him, spy on him, or set him up to be arrested.
This may have been what happened to the former New Jersey governor McGreevey. The story varies depending on the source, but everybody agrees that he resigned in Aug 2004 on the grounds that he is homosexual, and that he had an affair with a man named Golan Cipel.
Golan Cipel is an Israeli citizen (the original article has been erased, so look at the archived copy before it is erased) and a former lieutenant in the Israeli Navy. Governor McGreevey made Cipel the head of New Jersey Homeland Security.
One interesting aspect of this case is that an Israeli citizen was given an important position in America's government. How many nations allow foreign citizens to get top positions in their government?
I also find it interesting to consider that Cipel is telling the truth when he says he is heterosexual, and that Governor McGreevey is telling the truth about his homosexual affair with Cipel.
In such a case, perhaps Cipel volunteered to pretend he is homosexual in order to manipulate McGreevey into giving him a high level position in the American government.
If you are heterosexual, imagine the American government asking you to have a long-term homosexual relationship with an official from some other nation. They will set you up with the official when he arrives for a dinner, and you would have to fake a romantic interest in him. If the official likes you, you will have to move to his nation, carry on a homosexual relationship with him, and try to get into their government. Would you volunteer for that type of assignment?
Governor McGreevey resigned on the grounds that he is homosexual, but perhaps the real reason for his resignation is that he realized that he was being taken advantage of, and he could not think of any other way to get out of the mess.
He may have been told that he will be blackmailed if he sends Cipel home to Israel. Perhaps he was warned that the Mossad will arrange a suicide or a plane accident if he causes trouble for Israel. So perhaps he decided to quit politics in a manner that does not upset Israel.
How will we know the truth about that case? Simple; just bring all the information out in the open. Take a look at the lives of Cipel and McGreevey. Take a look at their friends and associates, the phone calls they made, and the flow of money.
However, as usual, the Israeli citizen quietly returned to Israel, and
nobody in the USA investigated anything. Does that remind you of the five
dancing Israelis who were caught on September 11th, and then were sent
back to Israel?
Is Ingrid Rimland a female version of Golan Cipel?
Since an Israeli man is willing to form a homosexual relationship with a New Jersey governor in order to get into the US government, why not consider the possibility that Ingrid Rimland would form a relationship with a Holocaust investigator in order to set him up?
More about Rimland in this article:
Are UFOs suppressed?
Since this article talks about the suppression of information as a sign of guilt, I don't want people to use it to justify UFOs.
People who promote the UFO stories tell us that the government is suppressing information about aliens, and therefore the aliens really exist.
However, I do not see any suppression of UFO information. Rather, I see the exact opposite. I see public libraries, bookstores, television programs, and movies full of UFO material.
The stories about the alien spacecraft in Roswell, New Mexico come from a couple of people who said they saw something mysterious, or found something mysterious. This is not evidence of an alien spacecraft. What is especially suspicious is that some of these UFO witnesses work for the military.
The government can fool people into promoting UFOs by creating the impression that the government is suppressing information about UFOs. Many people will jump to the conclusion that the UFOs must really exist.
How do we determine the truth in regards to UFOs and crop circles? By exposing all of the information about it. The truth about the UFOs does not need anybody to protect it, not even the UFO supporters. Both the government and the UFO supporters must show us all other information about UFOs.
However, the people who believe in UFOs have no evidence. They only have a few blurry photos, and some of them have a cousin who has a friend who met somebody on a trip who said he saw a Martian.
People who believe in crop circles have nothing but photographs of crop circles. These photographs prove that crop circles exist, but they do not prove that they were created by an alien life form. Humans can and do create crop circles, also.
You should find it peculiar that the people who promote UFOs, such as Richard Hoagland and Art Bell, also promote the official story on 9/11 and other crimes. Do you really think this is a coincidence?
Steven Greer, who has The Disclosure Project, creates the impression that he is exposing the truth about the UFOs, but I bet that if you look at him and his associates, you will find that most of them are working for some government agency or some group of criminals, and they are trying to make us look like idiots.
How do we know if I am correct about Greer? Simple; just expose all the information about him, his friends, his sources of income, and his evidence of UFOs.
If you are interested in getting to the truth, demand that the television
networks put all of us on television, allow us to provide the evidence
we have, and let us discuss these issues.