|Is the human race as
pathetic as it seems?
I asked that question a few months ago in this document, but I
still don't know how to answer it.
It's easy to see that the world has improved during the past few years.
For example, there are so many millions of people around the world who
realize that the 9/11 attack was an Israeli false flag operation to
trick the USA into a war that it is very unlikely that Israel will be
able to trick another nation into starting a war. However, some significant problems continue, such as:
Lies about history
When will our military or law
enforcement agencies start removing the criminals from our government,
media, schools, and other organizations? When will employees feel safe
to discuss issues? When are the Germans going to stop acting like beaten
dogs and tell the Jews that the truth doesn't need
protection with Holocaust denial laws?
Journalists, schools, government officials, and other
people in positions of influence are continuing
to lie to us about the 9/11 attack, the Apollo moon
world wars, the Holocaust, Anne Frank's diary, the attack on the USS
Liberty, and other events.
• Censorship and
Some employees in USA are afraid that they will be fired or ridiculed
if they express their opinions about the genetic
differences between men and women, the 9/11 attack, the Sandy
Hook elementary school shooting, or other issues, and the
German citizens are terrified of being arrested for "Holocaust Denial"
if they dare to discuss the suspicious aspects of
the world wars and
During 2018, a lot of people have made definite
accusations that Steven Spielberg, Tom Hanks, and other
celebrities and government officials are pedophiles,
but so far no police agency has shown any interest in
investigating the accusations. Rather, the
journalists ridicule the "pizzagate
doesn't President Trump ask
Although a few criminals have been arrested
during the past few years,
the incredibly sluggish pace of progress in eliminating
the crime networks implies that those of us who
are fighting the crime networks are outnumbered
by criminals, or that the criminals dominate
the positions of
It also implies that the
people are as apathetic
and easily manipulated as a group of sheep.
is also possible that those of us who are fighting the crime network
are a group of people who are so arrogant, anti-social, selfish, and/or
mentally disturbed that we cannot work together well enough to
defeat a crime network. If you have trouble believing that our group
could be that neurotic and incompetent, consider how many religious
fanatics have gotten into fights throughout history with
people of a different religion, or who believe in evolution. Not
everybody is capable of exerting enough self-control to compromise on
issues and work together as a team.
I think that millions of sheeple would help us
in the fight if they
knew about it, but the majority of people do not seem to realize that
there is a battle occurring. Why is this battle so secretive? Why
doesn't President Trump expose this battle and ask
Criminals want secrecy for obvious reasons, but why
would those of us who are fighting the crime network want
Some of many possibilities are:
1) The criminals outnumber us
by so much, and they hold so many positions
of influence in our nation, that many of us are afraid of retaliation
criminals. Perhaps even Trump and some military officials are
frightened by the size of the crime network.
If possibilities 2b or 4
are correct, that we should tell those people to deal with the
embarrassment. When we fight a crime network at a sluggish pace, we
allow the criminals to remain active for a longer period of time. It
would make more sense to speed up
the battle with the criminals, and tell the people who are
embarrassed of their past to deal with it. It is their
fault that they are embarrassed, not ours. We are
under no obligation to suffer the abuse of a crime network simply
because some people are embarrassed of what they have done.
2) Many people who are fighting the criminals were originally working
with the crime network. These people would want secrecy for
different reasons, such as:
2a) They don't want the criminals to
that they have turned against them.
3) Trump is a member of a rival crime network, and
so he doesn't want to give us honest law enforcement agencies or media
companies. Rather, he wants to eliminate his rivals, put his criminal
friends in control of the FBI, media, military, and other government
and take control of the nation.
2b) They were tricked or
forced into joining the network, or forced to perform some illegal or
embarrassing initiation ritual, and they are worried that the criminals
will expose whatever they did. As a result, they want to fight the
network in a very secretive, cautious manner.
4) Many of the people who are fighting the criminals have done
some embarrassing or illegal things, and they are
hoping to keep themselves and their crimes a secret by fighting the
criminals in a
Will the criminals
dominate the world?
Palermo officials estimate
that 80% of the businesses are paying protection fees to organized
crime. I think the article is interesting because it
about a couple who are trying to get married without
to organized crime.
Why does Palermo have such a problem with crime networks? In
many documents I have pointed out that an organization is a
reflection of its members. If you understand that concept, then you
should realize that Palermo has more of a problem with crime
than most other cities because the people in Palermo have a higher
percentage of criminals, and/or a higher percentage of selfish,
apathetic people who do not care enough about the crime to want to put
some effort into stopping it.
To rephrase this, Palermo has an extreme problem with crime
because the people in Palermo are - as a group - lower quality
than the people in cities that have less crime.
article I mentioned, a couple is trying to get married
contributing to organized crime. If the majority of people in Palermo
had the same attitude, they would be slowly destroying
the organized crime networks rather than supporting them.
Unfortunately, the majority of people in Palermo don't
care whether they are funding a crime network, and many
people are willing to join the crime
The people in the USA, as a group, are higher quality than those in
Palermo, but that's not saying much. Organized crime
citizens are significant problems in the USA, also,
and if you doubt that, consider these issues:
• The Russians Collusion
2017 and 2018, the FBI and media have been struggling to
convince us that Donald Trump got elected because of a few Russians.
However, they have no explanation for how
those Russians altered the elections.
Were the Russians using voodoo
dolls to manipulate the election?
How can such
dishonest officials and journalists continue
to hold positions of importance? Why haven't they been arrested,
or at least fired? Why don't the citizens complain
about these disgusting people?
How can a nation take care of itself or eliminate organized crime when
the people either lack the
mental characteristics necessary to realize that
FBI and media is corrupt, or are too apathetic
2017 and 2018, a lot of people have provided evidence that there is a
gigantic pedophile network operating in the world,
and that they have
infiltrated and dominated our governments and media, and are in control
police departments, pizza shops, donut shops, and other organizations.
Some people have
gone even further and made accusations that they have been raped and
abused by specific people in Hollywood, the government, the police
departments, and the donut shops. Isaac Kappy has gone so far as to claim
that Steven Spielberg's friends murdered Heather
However, as of August 2018, if any of our law enforcement agencies are
investigating the accusations, they are doing so secretly. Their
silence about the issue is allowing journalists to ridicule the
accusations as "fake news".
||How can a nation take care of
itself when the majority of its citizens don't care whether
network has infiltrated or taken control of their government, media,
and other organizations?
How can a nation take care of itself when the
law enforcement agencies and public ignore the pedophile
children's cartoons and company logos?
For example, click here
full-sized image of Chief Zephyr (to the right),
a lion that has a pedophile symbol repeated all over its face and body.
||Some photos on the Internet show
people who have been roasted and put on a dinner
table to be eaten.
Click here to
the full-sized image (to the right), and
notice that the
children are tied to their chairs.
Is that photo supposed to be a
funny, Halloween prank? Or is it a scene from a Hollywood horror movie?
is it a real photo of what pedophiles are actually doing? Can
anybody identify those
How can a nation take care of
itself when the majority of its citizens and law enforcement agencies don't care
whether these photos are actual images of roasted people?
||And consider all of the photos of children
tied up. How can our nation eliminate
crime networks when our law enforcement agencies, FBI
citizens don't care
whether those photos are showing children who are sold to pedophiles?
those photos are staged, why are we allowing people to post them on the
Internet and deceive people into believing that children are
kidnapped, and that people are being roasted? No business would allow
its employees to pass around staged photos and make
accusations that the executives are kidnapping and roasting people. Why
does our government allow it? Why doesn't the FBI look into this issue?
The 9/11 attack
has been almost 18 years since the 9/11 attack, and during that time a
lot of us have provided the world with a lot of evidence that it was an
Israeli false flag operation to trick the USA into starting a war.
there are so few Americans willing to look at that evidence, and so few
Americans who care about corruption, that most people are not putting
any pressure on the government, media, school teachers, or other people
to stop lying about the attack.
Even more amazing to me, there
are not even enough Americans who care about this deception to demand
that the military remove its troops from the Middle East and stop
fighting with people who had nothing to do with the attack. Lots of
conservatives are putting pressure on Trump to build a wall along
Mexico, but they don't put any pressure on him to expose the truth
about 9/11 or stop the fraudulent war.
denial and hate crimes
How are we going to
improve this nation when the people don't have any interest in stopping
a fraudulent war? How can we improve our nation when most people don't
even care that thousands of their citizens are becoming crippled,
maimed, and brain damaged from
the fraudulent war?
Another example of how pathetic many Americans are is that this
article claims that 15 FBI agents and more than 300
firefighters and police officers have already died
as a result of breathing the demolition debris from the 9/11 attack,
and more than 7,500 other people have been diagnosed with cancer.
That's a lot of deaths and cancer, and it is the result of a small
group of Jews who demolished the World Trade Center towers
However, there are very few American citizens,
policemen, FBI agents, professors, or firemen who want to expose the
9/11 attack as an Israeli false flag operation, and even fewer
Americans seem interested in arresting the criminals and
preventing them from committing more crimes.
The people who are
suffering cancer as a result of the 9/11 attack don't even show any
interest in exposing the truth about the attack. All they care about is
getting the insurance companies or government to pay their medical
By doing nothing to stop crime and corruption,
there have been a lot of suspicious events and deaths since the 9/11
very few people show an interest in investigating the suspicious
events, and even fewer people are interested in stopping the crime
are pushing nations into arresting people for "Holocaust
anti-Semitism, and "hate crimes". Some European and Asian nations have already
been convinced to create such laws. This is as idiotic as
the Jews to have us arrested for being a "do-do head".
In 2018 the state of South Carolina passed a law to make
anti-Semitism illegal on college campuses. The state of South
Carolina uses this
document to define anti-Semitism. One of the definitions is:
Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating
There have already been some Jews who have been
caught lying about the Holocaust, and Norman Finkelstein wrote a book
in which he accuses Jews of lying about being
"Holocaust survivors", and he claims
that some books about the Holocaust are frauds,
so why should it be illegal for college students to investigate the
Holocaust and join in on the discussions and accusations that Jews are
exaggerating or lying about the Holocaust?
Why are so many nations allowing the Jews to get
away with this abuse?
Is the world dominated by people who are so trusting,
gullible, neurotic, ignorant, and/or stupid
that they cannot understand that the Jews are tricking us into
arresting people who are trying to expose the truth about history? Or
do a lot of people realize that the Jews are abusive, but they
are such apathetic or mentally ill sheeple that they don't
care that the Jews are abusing us?
Regardless of why people are allowing this abuse, a nation cannot
take care of itself when it citizens allow their legal
system to be used to suppress honest people, censor discussions, and
The Russians, Germans, British, Americans, Chinese, and Japanese
suffered tremendously during the world wars, and I would expect them to
be disgusted that the Jews tricked them
those wars, and then fooled them with the Holocaust lies, but how many
people in those nations care enough to look at the
evidence that they
were lied to and abused? And of those people, how many of them care
about the abuse?
How can a nation take care of itself when the majority of people allow
this type of abuse?
• The “Wolf in
Sheep's Clothing” trick
think that most of the people who are exposing the 9/11 attack, the
Holocaust, the pedophile network, and other crimes are actually "wolves
in sheep's clothing" who are doing "damage control". However,
nation is dominated by people who are too stupid to understand this
trick, or too apathetic to learn about the trick and
watch out for it, then the criminals will be able to easily
manipulate the nation with it.
An example of the wolf in sheep's
clothing trick are the videos by Isaac Kappy. During the summer of
2018, Kappy began making videos to accuse people in Hollywood of being
pedophiles. He stated that Steven Spielberg, Tom Hanks, and some other
famous people are definitely pedophiles, and that
friends murdered Heather O'Rourke. (Kappy
does not have his own YouTube channel, so find his videos by
searching for his name, like
Not long after Kappy began making those accusations,
Daniel Lee, a Jewish evangelist, joined in on accusing
Hollywood celebrities and government officials of being pedophiles. For
example, he says
that Supreme Court Justice Antonin
Scalia was killed by a 13-year-old boy that he was raping.
Few, if any, of Kappy's or Lee's
accusations are new. I heard about most of them
many months or years
earlier, but they had been presented in the form of rumors or
Kappy and Lee are attracting attention because they are making definite
rather than cautious speculations. For example, Kappy
is stating as a fact
that Spielberg is a pedophile, and that his friends killed Heather
Kappy and Lee are attracting a lot of attention because if they are
incorrect, they are committing a very serious crime. Kappy even taunts
Spielberg and the others with remarks that are essentially, "Hey
Spielberg! If you don't
like what I'm saying about you, sue me! Let's go to court over this!"
of the people that Kappy or Lee accuse of pedophilia or murder are
complaining about slander or false accusations. Furthermore, as of
August 2018, the journalists have not shown any interest in
discrediting the accusations, or condemning them as "fake news". This
is causing a lot of us to assume that the accusations are true.
even though Kappy and Lee may be exposing pedophiles and murderers,
that does not
guarantee that either of them is honest. As I've mentioned in other
documents, the best policy for us is to be suspicious of
everybody. Our nations allow citizens to have an absurd
amount of secrecy, and there are no repercussions for people
who deceive us about themselves, so each of us should be
suspicious of everybody. We should be especially suspicious of crime
investigators who are willing to expose one particular crime, but no
For example, notice that many of the people who
are willing to expose
Steven Spielberg as a pedophile have no interest in
exposing the lies
of the Holocaust, Anne Frank's diary, the
demolition of the World Trade Center towers, or the school shootings.
This should make you wonder if they are really trying to expose
pedophiles, or if they are doing some type of damage
said he would take care of me if I can attract the Gullible
Goyim to my videos and away from those
anti-Semites, like Eric Hufschmid.”
By making definite statements about
Spielberg, Kappy is attracting attention, which could be the
reason he is doing this. Specifically, he may be a Pied Piper who
trying to lure people over to him and away from the people who are
truly trying to expose and stop the pedophile network, and who are
also trying to expose 9/11, the Holocaust, and other crimes.
If Kappy and Lee
can succeed in getting people to follow them, then they will essentially lead the people into a "goy
will allow them to control
the information that the people are exposed
to. They will tell the naive people that Tom Hanks and Steven
Spielberg are pedophiles, and they will protect the lies about the Holocaust and Anne
• The “Contaminate
Punch Bowl” trick
Kappy and Lee can also limit the number of people who are
pedophiles to those who have already been suspected, such as Hanks and Spielberg, thereby protecting possibly thousands
of other pedophiles. They may also be trying to protect the connection
pedophiles in Hollywood and those in the government, media, police
departments, FBI, and British government.
To make the issue more complex, we must also be
suspicious of the victims
of the pedophile networks who are coming
forward to complain about the networks. Some of them may not truly be
victims, and some of them may be victims who later decided to join the
pedophile network. In other words, some of the victims
pedophile networks may also be Pied Pipers. For
example, Liz Crokin made this video
in August 2018 to warn people that she believes Asia Argento, Corey
Feldman, and Rose McGowan were victims of the pedophile network when
they were young, but they are now working with the network as Pied
Pipers, although she refers to them
as "pawns of the Deep State" rather than "Pied Pipers".
We also have to be suspicious of the police and FBI agents who are
trying to stop pedophilia. For example, I think that Ted Gunderson
a member of the pedophile network, but he would pretend to be helping
the victims so that he could observe them, manipulate them, and set
them up for blackmail, intimidation, or death. I think his true goal
was to protect the pedophiles.
However, do not let the confusion about this issue frighten you, or
overwhelm you to the point at which you want to run away and hide from
it. And don't be
of the Pied Pipers or other wolves in
sheep's clothing. For example, don't be afraid to pass around links to
the videos of Kappy or Lee. Their videos may help other people
realize that there truly is a pedophile network operating in
Hollywood. As long as you also explain to the people about the Pied
Piper trick, they will not be manipulated.
Another trick that criminals use to fool us
into dismissing accusations against them is to mix something idiotic
with the truth. People who don't understand this
trick will notice the false information, and then assume all of the
information is false.
This trick is especially useful for pedophiles because their victims
are children, who are easily manipulated. Specifically,
the pedophiles will convince the children to believe something
idiotic, and when the children repeat that false information
to their parents, teachers, or police, the adults will
dismiss everything the children say as nonsense.
An extreme example is Holly Baglio, who claims
to have been to the moon, Saturn, and other places that she could not
possibly have been to. Her "friends" are not showing any
interest in helping her understand that she was never on Saturn or
Mars, so we should consider that her friends are as uneducated as she
is, or they are members of the pedophile network, and they want to
keep Baglio confused and ignorant.
Baglio's "friends" may
also be observing who contacts her, thereby allowing
the pedophile network to identify people who want to help her
expose the pedophile network.
Some people might wonder if Holly Baglio is working with the pedophile
network and trying to make the victims seem crazy so that we ignore the
real victims, but regardless of whether the pedophiles fooled her, or
whether she is trying to fool us, she is giving us an example of the
"Contaminate the Punch Bowl"
trick, and she is evidence that we really
do have a pedophile network operating in our world. A crime
investigator would be a sucker to ignore Baglio's accusations simply
because some of her remarks are idiotic.
Many of the victims of child
abuse mention concepts
that seem to
be nonsensical. For example, they claim to have "multiple
personalities"; that they were "programmed"; that their "personality
was split"; that they "disassociate"; and that they were a victim of a
"CIA trauma based mind control program".
example of the effect of trauma
If you are unfamiliar with this issue, watch this video
in which Katy Groves talks about these concepts. It is easy to dismiss
her as insane, but we ought to consider that tormenting some children
will indeed result in some bizarre behavior and suppressed memories.
Since our language doesn't have any words to describe their feelings,
they have picked such words as "multiple personalities", which might
have specific meaning to them, but which sounds nonsensical to
Katy Groves claims that when she was a young child, in
addition to being
sexually abused on a regular basis, she was tormented. For example, one
of the things she was forced to
do by the pedophiles was to rip the eyes out of another young girl, and
then kill her. What happens to a young child when they
put through years of that type of abuse?
previous document, I pointed out that the Yanny - Laurel
an example of how we cannot use our senses as scientific instruments.
The animal and human brain was not designed to
thoughts. Rather, it evolved only to help us survive and reproduce.
Evolution and natural selection are not intelligent entities.
just descriptions of how random events can cause living creatures to
change through time. Evolution has no concern for whether a creature's
brain is producing intelligent thoughts, or that we enjoy life. All
that matters is that the
creature be able to reproduce successfully.
I'll give a personal example of how our brain
will produce irrational
thoughts in an attempt to help us to survive and reproduce.
I left home when I was 19, and I traveled around a bit. I stayed at a
cheap hotel in Ithaca, New York for a few days. Somehow, I cannot
remember how, I encountered a man who was also traveling around. He was
about 10 years older than me, and he told me that he was on welfare,
lived at home with his mother in some other state, and would travel
around during the summer because he would get bored and lonely.
After talking for a while, he told me he recently bought a pet dog, and
the dog is in his car, and he wanted to check if the
dog needed some water. He asked me to walk
over with him to his car. So we walked to a nearby parking lot, and he
had a very friendly dog in the back seat. It was not a puppy, so it was
already accustomed to people and very well behaved.
I don't remember what he said to me, but I suppose he suggested that we
sit in his car since there were no benches in the parking lot to sit
on, so we got into his car and sat there talking for a while.
Like most cars in the 1970s, his front seat was a
bench seat, rather than bucket seats. He sat on the driver's
side, and I was in the passenger section of the front seat.
He told me how lonely he was, and that he was very excited that he met
because we would could be friends. I started wondering how I'm
tell this man that I'm just passing through the area, and that we are
going to see each other for much longer.
After a while he told me that the other night he went to a pornography
theater and watched a movie in which people were peeing and pooping on
one another. He said he had never seen anything like it before. I had
never heard of anything like it before, either.
expected him to tell me that he was disgusted and shocked by what he
saw, so I was surprised to hear him ask me if I would
him down to the nearby creek and pee and poop on him. I
decided that I have to get away from him because he might be dangerous.
At that time in my life I did not have any concept of pedophile
networks, but I was aware of the concept of serial killers.
(Originally I wrote that I was aware of John Wayne Gacy's murders,
but I have since discovered that Gacy was arrested a couple years after
this incident, so I would not have been aware of Gacy at this time.)
I was worried that if I opened the door to run away, he might grab me,
so I started wondering how I should get away.
He continued talking, and soon he was saying that he wants to poop and
pee on me.
I started getting more worried when he said that. At
some point he slid over on the seat towards me and asked if he could
kiss me, and he extended one of his hands towards me, as if he wanted
to put it around my head. I put my arm up to block him, and he grabbed
my arm at my wrist. It was at that point that I realized I am so weak
that there is no possible way I could fight him. He was not an athlete,
or even unusually large. Rather, I am just very weak.
After he grabbed my arm, he stopped moving towards me. He obviously had
no intention of forcing me into anything, so I relaxed a bit. If he had
been a serial killer, I would have probably have become a victim at
that point because I do not remember anybody being in the parking lot
at that time, and the only way I would have been able to get away from
him would be if he was very un-coordinated, stupid, or
After he moved towards me, I noticed that he had a strong smell of an
alcoholic beverage of some type. I have not been around enough people
who drink to know what the smell was, but it reminded me of
I was trying to figure out how to get out of the car and get back
to the hotel, but I was a bit nervous and worried so I wasn't thinking
well. I told him that we could go down to the creek and do
he wants, and I opened the car door to get out, to make it look like I
was going to go to the creek with him.
I was thinking I could run away after getting out of the car, but he
got out of the same side of the car, still holding onto my wrist.
I told him that we should first walk over to my hotel, which was very
close by, so that I can go to the bathroom. I didn't think of it at the
time, but he wanted us to pee and poop on each other, and I foolishly
asked to go to the hotel so that I could go to the bathroom. I don't
know what I would have said if he had responded, "No! Don't use the hotel bathroom; pee and
poop on me!"
Anyway, he had a sad look on his face and agreed to walk over to the
hotel. He then let go of my wrist. He obviously was not a murderer,
and he made a remark about how I will probably run into the
hotel and he will never see me again. I tried to reassure him that I
would not run away. I was now visualizing how heartbroken he was going
to be when I run away from him. He was so excited that I would be his
friend, but I would soon abandon him, and then all he would
have was a dog. I actually started feeling sorry for him!
When I got to the hotel, I opened the front door and he remained
outside. I literally ran up the stairs into my room and shut
the door, and I stayed there the rest of the night. I didn't bother
eating anything for dinner that night. I did not want to leave the room.
Now comes the point of this story. The next day I looked around for
him, but I didn't see him or his car, so I decided to walk to the
market to get something to eat. I bought a small cup of Dannon
strawberry flavored yogurt. I suppose I bought some other food, also,
but I don't remember.
can remember about the food is removing the lid from the yogurt
stirring in the strawberries, and then noticing that it had a strong
resemblance to the smell of that man. I put a spoonful in my mouth, but
instead of enjoying it, a very strong, unpleasant emotional feeling was
triggered. After a couple of spoonfuls, I couldn't stand it any longer,
and I threw it away.
Furthermore, for many days later, anytime I smelled that strawberry
odor, very unpleasant emotional feelings were triggered. It took
several weeks before I could enjoy the
smell of strawberries again.
That incident shows a very important aspect of the human and animal
brain. Specifically, our brain is designed for survival and
reproduction, not intelligent thought.
When we encounter a dangerous situation, our mind is designed to look
for unique characteristics of the situation, and associate them with
danger. When we encounter those same characteristics later in life, our
mind will trigger unpleasant emotional feelings to make us avoid a
possibly dangerous situation.
In my case, my mind came to the
conclusion that the strawberry smell was the characteristic to watch
out for. That odor was the most unique aspect of the incident. If I had
frequently been around people who drink a lot, then my mind would have
been so familiar with that strawberry odor that it probably would not
have associated that odor with danger. Instead, my mind would have
picked out some other unusual characteristic, such as the man's
hairstyle, verbal expressions, or clothing style.
I was not hurt, raped, or even frightened by
much. My "traumatic" encounter with that man lasted only a few
minutes, and it was was trivial, but it
had a noticeable, irrational,
and long-lasting effect on my mind.
Now consider what might happen to a child who is much younger than 19
years, and who is being abused to a phenomenal
extent, such as being raped to the point where they are experiencing
severe pain and bleeding, and who are also being forced to do
unpleasant things, such as gouging out another child's eyeballs while
the child is alive, killing a child, or eating pieces of a child.
The brief and trivial "trauma" that I experienced caused my
associate strawberries with danger, and the smell of strawberries would
trigger unpleasant emotional feelings for days.
What would happen to a young child who experiences trauma that is so
intense that it is almost beyond belief? And what happens to a child
when that trauma occurs over and over, year after year?
What affect does extreme levels of abuse have on a child? Perhaps some
children react by withdrawing into fantasies in which
they imagine they are somebody else and in some other place. Their
fantasies may result in them thinking of themselves as having "more
children who have internal trauma?
The victims of pedophiles are tormented by
something that is outside
their mind; namely, other people. What happens
to a child who is born
with a type of mental or physical disorder that causes him to be
tormented in a similar
manner? In that case the misery will be generated from inside
his own mind. If his
mind associates anything outside of him with those
his mind will be making a very serious mistake.
For example, consider that a defective child is eating some strawberry
flavored yogurt, and his internal pains start to become severe. If his
mind makes the mistaken assumption that it is due to the strawberry
odor, then the next time he notices a strawberry odor, it will trigger
Imagine that a mentally ill child is sitting at home with his parents
internal mental anguish starts to increase. If there is anything
in the room, his mind may associate that item with the pain. For
example, if he doesn't like the type of furniture his parents have
selected, his mind might associate that style of furniture with misery,
thereby giving him a very strong, unpleasant reaction to that type of
furniture. He may complain that he doesn't like the furniture; that it
makes him feel awful.
Or, if he just had a haircut, his mind may assume that it is
that haircut that is making him miserable, and he may never again want
that type of haircut. He may describe the type of haircut as
unpleasant, or that it makes him feel sick.
This problems might even happen to "normal" people. For example,
mother is starting to feed her baby some solid foods. She gives the
baby some strawberries, but coincidentally at the time she feeds him,
he is suffering pains from some air bubbles that are passing through
his intestines. If his mind makes the assumption that the strawberries
are the cause of the pains in his stomach, he may develop a fear of
strawberries that persists for weeks.
To rephrase this concept, a child who is suffering from internal pains
may associate "ordinary" things with his misery, resulting in
him becoming emotionally upset whenever he is reminded of those things.
ordinary items will trigger miserable feelings, causing him to want to
stay away from them.
There is a small percentage of children who
want to dress in different manners, get odd tattoos, use
different expressions when they speak, have different
hairstyles, or get together with their friends in the evening at a
graveyard. Why do some children want to be so different?
Perhaps some of them are suffering from internal pains, and their mind
is making the mistake of associating ordinary things with the
misery they feel, causing them to want to get away from those
For example, parents rarely take their children to graveyards,
and as a result,
the mentally ill children will not acquire many memories associated
with graveyards. Since those children will accumulate lots of unpleasant
memories of school, their neighborhood, shopping centers, and city
parks, they will feel more comfortable at the graveyards.
When a child complains that some particular furniture, or other item,
makes them feel sick, sad, or annoyed, we have a tendency to assume
they are merely expressing their dislike of the item. However, we
should consider that some of these children are truly having an
unpleasant emotional reaction to the item due to their mind associating
the item with their internal misery. In such a case, the complaints of
these children are an indication that they are suffering from some type
of internal problem.
people never satisfied
what they have?
one extreme are the adults who enjoy their material items, take care
of them, and do not want to replace them. They may have enough money to
replace them, but they do not want to. When we ask them why they don't
replace a worn out jacket, or an old coffee cup, or an old lawnmower,
some of them respond that the item has a "sentimental value"
to them. These people have developed an emotional
attraction to the inanimate objects.
At the other extreme are the people who frequently replace their
clothing, tools, automobile, furniture, appliances, and carpeting. Some
of these people replace items even when they don't have enough money to
do so, causing them to go into debt. Why don't these people develop
emotional attractions to their material items?
To summarize these questions, why are some people developing
emotional attractions to inanimate objects, while other people have so
little attraction to their items that they want to
replace them on a regular basis?
There are undoubtedly different reasons for why a person will develop
an emotional attraction to an inanimate object. One possibility is that
when a person is frequently in a pleasant emotional
state with a
particular item, his mind may associate that item with the pleasant
the previous section I pointed out that our mind is designed to evoke
unpleasant feelings in order to make us avoid situations and items that
may be dangerous. In this section I'm pointing out the opposite;
namely, that our mind is designed to evoke pleasant feelings in order
to cause us to repeat whatever has been beneficial to us in the past.
An example of this concept is that the children who enjoy
care center will accumulate lots of pleasant
memories of the other
children, the adults, the room that they spend their time in, and the
items in the room. When their mother tells them to get ready for
daycare, the children will recall those pleasant memories, and they
will enjoy going to daycare.
At the other extreme, consider the children who go to daycare centers
that are operated
by pedophiles. Those children can accumulate a lot of miserable
memories of being raped, of
watching animals be killed, and of being threatened with death if they
dare talk about what they have seen. Those children can develop
miserable memories of the room, those particular adults, and even some
of the objects in the room. When their mother tells them to get ready
for daycare, those horrible memories will be recalled, and that can
trigger miserable feelings, which in turn can result in them begging
not to be taken to daycare.
This concept applies to "ordinary" people, not just victims of
pedophiles, and it applies to "ordinary" objects in our environment,
such as coffee cups, furniture, wallpaper, and clothing.
For example, imagine a woman who is in good mental and physical health,
and who is enjoying her life. When she gets up in the morning, she is
in a pleasant mood.
If she frequently has a cup of coffee every morning, and tends
to drink from a particular cup, and in a particular room, she will
start accumulating pleasant memories of that activity. After many
months, when she looks at that coffee cup, or the
room, or the furniture in it, some of those pleasant memories will be
triggered, causing her to feel an emotional attachment to the item, (as
in the drawing below, left).
That coffee cup will trigger pleasant memories, so she will
want to toss it in the trash and get a new cup. She
may not even want
drink the coffee in a different room because the room may also trigger
pleasant memories. Her mind might also make the mistake of assuming
that it is the coffee
that brings the pleasure, and so she may not want to try any other
||Your emotional state determines whether the
memories you accumulate each day are pleasant or miserable.
At the other extreme, imagine a man who
has some type of mental or
physical defect that is causing him to suffer from internal pains, or
perhaps he is lonely and miserable due to having a odd personality.
Regardless of why he is miserable, if he gets into the routine of
drinking a cup of coffee in the morning, instead of accumulating
pleasant memories of the activity, he will
memories, and his mind may make the mistake of associating the items
around him with his misery.
As the weeks pass by, he will accumulate so many unpleasant
that when he looks at his coffee cup, or the furniture in that room,
those unpleasant memories will be evoked, which will trigger unpleasant
emotional feelings, and that can cause him to want to throw the coffee
cup away and get a new cup, or get new furniture for the room.
He will receive some pleasure when he replaces those items because he
will feel as if he is throwing away the items that are making him
miserable, and because we are titillated when we acquire new items. He
will initially enjoy those new items, but the enjoyment will not last.
As the weeks pass by, his mind will associate his unpleasant feelings
with the items around him, and eventually those new items will trigger
unpleasant memories, thereby causing him to want to replace those
items, also. This cycle will repeat over and over. He will never be
satisfied with what he has.
What this means is that when we find people regularly
replacing items that are in good shape, and they don't have any
intelligent reason for why they are replacing them, we ought to
consider that the person is unhappy, and he is trying to eliminate the
source of misery and bring some pleasure into his life.
appreciate items more when you "interact"
As I've mentioned many times, life is more
complex than it may appear. In regards to how our mind will trigger
emotional pleasure or pain when we encounter certain odors, items,
hairstyles, or activities, our reaction to also influenced by
with the item.
For example, when we are making a meal, we interact with food, knives,
pots, and other kitchen utensils and appliances. When we are repairing
a bicycle, we are interacting with tools and bicycles. When we go to
school, we interact with other students, teachers, textbooks, and other
If our interaction with the items causes us frustration and problems,
such as when our attempts to make a meal results in our
burning or cutting of our fingers, or if we frequently create meals
that have a terrible appearance and flavor, we will accumulate
unpleasant memories associated with the
making of a meal. In such a case, when
we look at a kitchen, or at kitchen appliances, we will be reminded of
those unpleasant memories, and that will trigger unpleasant feelings,
which will cause us to want to stay away from the kitchen.
At the other extreme, if our interaction with an item is pleasant,
will accumulate pleasant memories with the item. For example, if we are
successful in creating a wonderful meal, and if we enjoy our time in
the kitchen, we will accumulate pleasant
memories of the kitchen, the kitchen appliances, and the process of
making a meal.
If we are routinely successful, then we will build up a lot of pleasant
memories. As a result, when we look at the kitchen or the kitchen
appliances, those pleasant memories will be recalled, and that will
trigger pleasant feelings. That will cause us to enjoy going into the
kitchen and creating another wonderful meal. Furthermore, the meals
produce will evoke those pleasant memories, also, thereby making the
food seem to taste better.
This concept also applies to locations. For
example, if an animal or human spends some time at a particular pond,
garden, or forest, and if he enjoys his time, he will accumulate
pleasant memories of that area. Eventually he will have so many
pleasant memories of the area that thinking about or looking
the area will trigger pleasant feelings, causing him to enjoy that area
more than the areas he
has never been to before.
Conversely, if a person at a pond is terrified or injured by
spiders or snakes, or by broken glass or razor blades in the dirt, or
by toxic fumes that are drifting into the area from a nearby factory,
then he will develop unpleasant memories of the
area. When he thinks about or sees the area on another day, those unpleasant
trigger unpleasant feelings, and that will cause him to want to avoid the area.
Our memories about an activity or item will become even more pleasant
if we are also interacting with people that we enjoy.
For example, when we get together with friends to make a meal together,
then in addition to accumulating pleasant memories of interacting with
the food and utensils, we will also accumulate pleasant memories of
interacting with our friends. That meal will seem to taste much better
than the food given to us by strangers.
When a stranger serves us a meal, the food will not
evoke any memories, and that means the food will not trigger any pleasant
memories. The food will seem neutral. Therefore, in order for
us to be excited by the food, the stranger must arrange it in a
visually attractive manner so that when we look at it, we are
titillated by its visual appearance. This is the reason restaurants are
under a lot of pressure to arrange food in a visually attractive
provide a pleasant social environment in which to eat. The
restaurants that don't show much of a concern for such issues may
produce food that tastes just as good, but the consumers will find the
food less appealing, and so those restaurants eventually go out of
If we were living in the type of city that I've described, in which
there are no servants, and everybody
has to share in the chores,
some of the people that we know would choose to work in the restaurants a few hours
a month. This would have a beneficial effect on all of us, even those
of us who do
not choose to work in restaurants. The reason is because we
would occasionally notice some of our friends, neighbors, coworkers,
children, or relatives working in the restaurants. This would make the
food appear to be better tasting.
In other words, if we were living in a city in which the meals were
prepared by people we know, we would
enjoy the restaurants and the meals more than we would in a city that
uses illegal immigrants to produce the meals. And if people we knew were also involved with decorating the restaurants, the interior of the restaurants would be more pleasant than if a stranger had decorated them.
A lot of people believe that in order to enjoy life to the maximum,
they need to become so wealthy that they can hire servants to pamper
them like a baby, but I think that philosophy is false. Adult humans
and animals were designed to deal with problems.
Adults were not designed to be pampered like babies.
We evolved to work with and for our team
animals, such as humans, also evolved to work together. Business executives in a free enterprise system describe their business as a "team" of people, but they are not truly teams. They are more accurately described as "kingdoms"
because most of the employees are in the role of a peasant who is
working to make a few people extremely wealthy rather than working for
the benefit of the team.
We were not designed to be
slaves or peasants who work to provide extreme wealth for some some
business executive, King, Hollywood celebrity, religious leader, or
government official. We were designed to work with and for
our team. Therefore, in order to truly enjoy our lives, we would have
to design a new economic system so that businesses are dedicated
to improving society rather than making profit, and nobody is
allowed to become wealthy or pampered, and nobody is allowed to inherit
positions of importance. Every business, and every job, should have
some benefit to society.
Nobody should have a job that is
intended to deceive, manipulate, abuse, or cheat other people. For
example, we should not allow businesses to manipulate children into
desiring certain types of candy, clothing, or toys. Nobody should be
trying to push adults into desiring any particular camera, phone, or
food. The reason I suggest this is because we do not get enjoyment from
abusing, deceiving, cheating, or manipulating people. Rather, we get
enjoyment from doing something our team members appreciate.
will be most satisfied with life and our jobs when we create a social
environment that is more similar to what it was in prehistoric times in
which people were more equal to one another, and they worked for the
benefit of the group. This is one reason I suggest we live in a city in
which the government is in control of the economic system; there is no
peasant or wealthy class; and we all participate in the chores of the
by sharing in the chores, we won't have the idiotic
situation we have today in which some people are working absurd numbers
of hours, and other people are doing virtually nothing of value. I
think that type of social environment will provide us with a more
pleasant life. I think it will also improve people's attitudes because
it will eliminate the resentment and anger towards wealthy people and
advantage to sharing in the chores is that we will enjoy the city more.
When we all participate some type of work for our museums, parks,
schools, gardens, restaurants, social clubs, recreational areas, office
paths, or swimming areas, we will interact with those things, and
that will cause us to appreciate them.
For a personal example, the photo to the
right shows a small dresser that I have next to my bed. I bought it at
an unfinished furniture shop around 1985. It was already assembled so
all I had to do was stain it, but the act of staining
it caused me to develop a greater emotional attraction to it than the
furniture that I had no involvement with.
On top of the dresser is a ceramic vase that I made in high school. I
doubt that I would have purchased such a vase, but since I made it
myself, it evokes pleasant memories, so I enjoy it.
On the wall is some molding that I put up in some rooms, and I put up
wallpaper, also. As a result, I have some emotional attraction to the
molding and wallpaper.
in case you are wondering why I put the wallpaper along the bottom of
the wall, under the "chair rail" molding, rather than above the chair
rail molding, which apparently is the more typical method, the reason
is because at the time I was not taking thyroid hormones, so I was too
physically weak to be interested in attempting a more complex project.
be designed for replaceable artwork
Only the parents of the children
who created this art would regard it as being worthy of framing and
we develop emotional attractions to the things that we create and
interact with, we tend to develop such a strong attraction to the
that we create that we will use it as a decoration
in our home or
office for years, even though we would have regarded it as awful
if a stranger had created it.
Mothers have such strong attractions to their
children that the crude
art their children create can evoke pleasant feelings in the mothers,
and that can cause the mothers to decorate their home or office with it.
When strangers produce artwork, and when we have no involvement in that
artwork, we will not develop an emotional attraction to it. The artwork
strangers will appeal to us only if we enjoy its visual image. However,
we can get bored with its visual image after a certain number of months
or years. Therefore, it would be nice if we could easily replace the
artwork in our homes, offices, and city.
Unfortunately, in a free enterprise system, it is expensive and
difficult for us to replace our artwork on a regular basis.
This is one of the reasons I suggest we live in a city in which the
government owns all of the home and office furnishings. Everybody would
be free to pick up whatever decorations and furniture they want for
their home and office, and when they get tired of it, they give it
back to the city and pick up some new items.
In this type of city, the statues, fountains, stained-glass
windows, and other decorations in
the city parks and plazas would be designed to be easily replaceable so
that they can be changed for different seasons or holiday celebrations,
and to prevent us from getting bored with them.
The walls in the homes and the businesses would
built into them to hold murals and
paintings so that we don't have to pound nails into the walls. The
paintings and murals would not hang from a string, which requires
constant adjustments. Instead, the fixtures would hold them securely in
||Instead of installing permanent
fountains and statues in the city parks and plazas, we could make them easily
Stained-glass windows could also be designed to be easily removed for
cleaning and replacement, also.
It would require a bit more labor to design the
paintings, murals, fountains, stained-glass windows, and other artwork
to be easily replaceable, but so what? What are we living for?
currently put a lot of labor and resources into providing billionaires
with mansions and yachts, and we waste a lot of resources on Israel and
wars, and we put lots of resources into Hollywood movies. I think we should
change our priorities and put more labor and resources into making our
parks, footpaths, factories, plazas, and homes more pleasant.
If we were to install fixtures into the walls of our homes and
offices, we would be restricted to placing the artwork in those
location of our choosing, but so what? We don't need the freedom to
pound nails into walls. We are not going to suffer if we have to put
pictures and murals into designated areas on the walls. Furthermore,
most people want to put artwork in the same locations of the wall as
everybody else, so most of us would not have any complaints about the
locations chosen for artwork.
In case you're having trouble understanding the concept of putting
"fixtures" into the city for artwork, consider an artist who
murals. Instead of painting directly onto the sides of buildings or
walls, he would paint the murals on stiff sheets of some material. If
the mural was for outdoor use, it would be put on a sheet that is
weatherproof, and that sheet, (or several sheets, if it is a large
mural), would then be attached to the side of a building, or along a
wall, on the fixtures that have been built into the wall specifically
for holding the sheets. The sheets would also have corresponding
fixtures so that the murals could be attached without nails, glue, or
When people wanted to replace the mural with a different one, they
would detach those sheets and replace them with another set. In this
way the city would be able to quickly and easily change its decorations
according to the seasons, the holiday celebrations, and the city
The sheets could hold paintings, scientific
photographs, mosaics of
colored tiles, and wood carvings. They could also have lights within
them to create interesting displays
during the evening.
There are some businesses producing sheets of polyester fabric with
photos and designs printed on them for consumers to hang on walls, as
in the two photos below.
However, instead of producing low-quality
items for consumers, the city would authorize higher quality artwork.