Everybody has physical and mental defects, but the people in leadership positions should have fewer of the defects that interfere with leadership abilities. This requires passing judgment on which defects a person has, and whether any of them interfere with his ability to be a leader.

Some physical defects can interfere with a person's leadership abilities by either disrupting the function of his brain, such as by creating improper blood chemistry, or by creating such pains that he develops bad attitudes or has trouble concentrating on his work.

There are other defects that are insignificant. For example, a birthmark is a defect, but a typical birthmark does not interfere with a person's leadership abilities. However, a birthmark can interfere with a person's leadership abilities if it causes the person to become so ugly that he is rejected by other people, thereby causing him to have a lonely and miserable life. That rejection can cause a person to suffer from low self-esteem, become envious of other people, or become angry that he has to suffer while other people enjoy life. Those bad attitudes will make him undesirable as a leader.

Google censors her face to protect... who? And from what?

Kiana Smith has a birthmark on her face that is so ugly that when I searched the Google images for "Kiana Smith birthmark", Google blurred a lot of the photos.

Can a person become an effective leader if he is so ugly that Google hides his face?

Howard Stern considers his face to be ugly, and has admitted to having two surgeries to reduce his ugliness; has his ugliness had a detrimental effect on his life and attitude? What would his life and attitude have been like if he had been born with a more ordinary face, or if he had been good-looking?

Every culture is ignoring the issue of how ugliness affects a person's life, but ignoring unpleasant issues is behaving like a stupid rabbit that is hiding from a wolf.

Now that we are preventing nature from eliminating the genetically inferior people, we must be able to deal with the unpleasant aspects of life that our prehistoric ancestors did not have to be concerned about. One of those unpleasant aspects is that we inherited the emotion of animals to like certain visual images and dislike others. When we see an ugly person, an unpleasant emotion is triggered, and that causes us to want to avoid him.

The reason Google censors Kiana Smith's face is to protect us from having that unpleasant emotion stimulated by her ugly face. The censorship is not to protect Kiana Smith, or to make her life better. It is to make our lives more pleasant.

Censoring ugly people is as insulting as making them wear a paper bag.

That censorship should be considered as an insult to Kiana Smith. Censoring her face is as insulting as making her put a paper bag over her head whenever she goes out into public.

We do not regard ourselves to be insulting an ugly person when we censor their ugly face because we are thinking of ourselves when we do it. We do things to make ourselves feel better, and we are not concerned with the effect we have on other people, or whether other people are having a pleasant life.

All of us want to deny that we have selfish and cruel thoughts, and this results in people claiming that they want to censor Kiana Smith's face in order to make her life more pleasant, but we do not censor ugly people for their benefit. We do it for our benefit. We do not want to look at ugly people. We censor the ugly people because that is what our emotions want us to do. We are not using our intelligence to analyze the issue, and developing intelligent reasons for censoring their ugly face.

Our selfishness is also the reason that parents resist aborting and euthanizing defective babies. They want the babies to titillate themselves, and they don't care about quality of their children's lives, or what effect the children will have on society.

We do not treat people equally. We give special preference to people who are good looking, and we try to avoid the people who are deformed and ugly. We also do this with animals. Specifically, we enjoy the animals that we regard as good-looking, and we dislike animals that we regard as ugly. All animals are equally wonderful, but we regard some of them as disgusting simply because of their visual appearance.

All of us inadvertently torture the deformed and ugly people, and we all give special treatment to the people who are good looking, especially the young girls.

Kiana Smith has such an unpleasant life that she got involved with the Vascular Birthmarks Foundation, and is going through a lot of surgery in an attempt to become less ugly. If she were a top government official, she might be more concerned with birthmarks and cosmetic surgery than in taking care of the nation.

It is risky to put extremely ugly people into leadership positions because they are people who we torment incessantly, and that can cause them to develop detrimental attitudes and behavior.

Likewise, it is risky to put a short man into a leadership position because he is likely to suffer from low self-esteem, and in some cases, as with Chris Morgan, become angry at women.

To make the situation more complex, the people who are extremely good-looking can also develop unpleasant attitudes because they might think of themselves as superior to everybody else, and the special treatment they got during their life might cause them to expect special treatment when they are in a leadership position.

Furthermore, the men who are extremely good-looking will regularly encounter women who are attracted to them, and when they are in leadership positions, the women become even more attracted to them.

Women have a resistance to adultery, except when they encounter a good-looking man with high status. That puts those men into a situation that is similar to having chocolate bars chasing after fat people and begging to be eaten.

We don't want to deal with the issue of ugly or deformed people, or short men, or extremely good-looking people, but we must face these problems and pass judgment on whether a person has the appropriate physical characteristics for a leader.

Mental defects interfere with the function of our brain, thereby causing a person to become inappropriate as a leader, but it is still impossible for us to identify mental defects, and to determine which mental defects are so significant that it disqualifies a person from leadership.

Some of the people who have become extremely wealthy and famous have admitted to having bipolar disorder, ADHD, Asperger’s, dyslexia, or OCD, but they often regard those mental disorders as beneficial characteristics rather than as defects.

Some of them have boasted that their mental defect is actually a gift because it has allowed them to become wealthy and famous. However, their belief that wealth and fame has given them a wonderful life is proof that their mental disorder has interfered with the function of their brain, and has caused them to develop an unrealistic view of life.

Every culture is promoting the theory that the more wealth we have, the more happy we will be, but we should consider a person's brain to be inadequate for leadership position if he cannot understand such concepts as:

•	A person is "wealthy" only compared to somebody with less wealth.
•	The wealthy people of 2024 are living in extreme poverty compared to the people in the future.
•	The wealthy people a few centuries ago were living in poverty that was more extreme than the welfare recipients of the USA in 2024.

Furthermore, excessive amounts of wealth has disadvantages, such as when a person's house is so large that he needs servants to keep it clean. The servants give the house a social environment that is more similar to that of a business with employees, especially if the home is so large that the servants are in the house all day and night.

The people who believe they need more wealth than everybody else are promoting an idiotic concept, and they must be regarded as unacceptable for a top leadership position. The people who are even more unacceptable for leadership are those who promote the attitude that we will have the best life when we become so wealthy that we can hire servants or slaves to work for us and pamper us.

We must restrict leadership positions to people who show a better understanding of happiness and wealth, and who want other people to be their friends rather than their servants or slaves.

The people who believe that they must be wealthier than the typical person must be disqualified from leadership. It does not matter whether a person repeats the phrase, "Money cannot buy happiness". We have to judge a person by what he actually does, not by what he says.

Millions of people have repeated that phrase while struggling - and sometimes cheating - to get more money. They behave like parrots that mimic noises that they don't understand.

This hypocritical behavior can also be seen in regards to food. Specifically, lots of people repeat remarks similar to "we need to control our food consumption and eat healthy food", but they eat excessively, and frequently eat unhealthy amounts of sugar and salt.

We like to believe that we have wonderful minds, but we have the brain of an ape. This results in us occasionally doing something that contradicts what we claim to believe in. We need to be more critical of ourselves, and watch for hypocrisy.

Our world is currently dominated by people who have abnormal cravings for material wealth, and who want to be a pampered by servants rather than one of our friends. Those people cannot provide us with intelligent analyses of life or culture, or provide us with sensible guidance. They encourage crude, animal behavior.

Although material wealth makes our lives more comfortable, an important concept that modern humans must understand is that we do not benefit by having a larger quantity of items than other people. We can enjoy life even when everybody has the same amount of wealth. This concept applies to everything, not just "wealth". For example:

•	Food and water. We need food and water, and we will have the most pleasant life when we create meals that are attractive, healthy, and tasty, and when we drink water that is clean, but we will not improve our lives by having more food or water than everybody else.
•	Sex and masturbation. We have sexual cravings that we need to relieve once in a while through sex or masturbation, but we cannot improve our life simply by doing those things more often than everybody else.
•	Children. We get pleasure from children, but having more children than everybody else will not bring us more pleasure. Instead, since children are a burden, the more children we have to take care, the more of a burden we impose on ourselves.

Our craving to have more material wealth than other people is due to our craving for status. That craving also results in us competing to have the most sex, the most Christmas decorations on our house, the most frightening Halloween pumpkin, the largest yacht, and the most trophies. We want to feel important and special.

Our craving for material wealth causes us to assume that the wealthy people are having a better life than we are, but it is more likely that the extremely wealthy people are suffering from some type of mental problem. Likewise, the people who have excessive amounts of sex, food, trophies, or children are likely to be suffering from some mental disorder.

It is foolish to envy other people, or try to be imitate their life, especially when we don't have any evidence that their life is better than ours. If we thoroughly understood the human mind, we might discover that many of the famous and influential people should be described as mentally ill.

Sam Altman is an example of a man who is extremely wealthy, and who has admitted to having a mental problem, but he regards his problem is a gift. He described it as:


Years ago I mentioned that one method to get a better understanding of yourself is to imagine that there is a planet in which the only people on the planet are identical clones of you. What would life be like on a planet in which everybody was a clone of Sam Altman?

If Altman's "missing circuit" was truly a gift, then a world of Alman clones would be a better place. However, it would be a miserable world. if those clones were so anti-social and has such intense cravings for wealth and status that they were all struggling to be the boss and use other people as their servants, or if they were all willing to join crime networks.

Many of the wealthy and famous people have been accused of being involved with pedophilia, murder rituals, crime networks, human trafficking, and various other appalling activities. They are not choosing those activities because they have mental "gifts". Rather, they get involved with those activities because they have mental disorders. Their brains do not function properly. We should not envy those people, or allow them to become our leaders. They should not even be allowed to reproduce.

Why would a person regard a mental defect as a gift?

The wealthy and famous people are above-average in intelligence and education, so why would they regard a mental disorder as a gift? The reason is because humans, especially men, are extremely arrogant, so we resist looking critically at ourselves.

Many people are aware that they have some "unusual" mental characteristics, but we prefer to regard them as meaningless, a gift, or amusing. For example, we frequently giggle at ourselves when we mispronounce words, forget something, stumble as we walk, or knock something over on a table. If a robot were as clumsy and forgetful as we are, we would be annoyed with it, not giggle at it. We would complain that the robot is defective.

Our arrogance causes us to resist the possibility that some of our mental characteristics are detrimental defects. We prefer to defend our characteristics. For example, when somebody complains about one of our irritating characteristics, we are likely to regard his remark as an attack on one of our wonderful characteristics, rather than as useful constructive criticism to improve ourselves with. We are likely to react by defending ourselves, or by criticizing him, or by reprimanding him with a remark similar to, "He who cast the first stone!", or by boasting "Well, that's the way I am!".

We resist the possibility that our mind is an imperfect modification of monkey brain, and that we have mental characteristics that cause trouble for ourselves, our family, and other people. Each of us prefers to believe that we are the best person in the world, and that we deserve to be the leader of the world. Even children believe that they are intelligent, talented, and knowledgeable.

Some people have suffered so many failures and disappointments that their self-esteem has been reduced to the point that they never boast about themselves, but they were born with the same arrogance as everybody else.

Arrogance is an animal characteristic that we all inherited, and our arrogance is so extreme that almost everybody denies being arrogant.

Are humans “intelligent”?

All of us believe that we are extremely intelligent, and that the human race is intelligent, but those beliefs are more examples of how our arrogance is warping our view of life. Humans are intelligent only if we compare ourselves to creatures that are less intelligent. That type of comparison is as worthless and deceptive as as a person who believes that he is wealthy because he is comparing himself to somebody who has less wealth.

If there is intelligent life on another planet, and if they have been evolving for millions of years longer than humans, then they could be much more intelligent than us. Furthermore, if they have been restricting their reproduction for thousands of generations, they have superior health and behavior. Compared to them, we would appear to be ugly, sickly, stinky, stupid, untrustworthy, violent, unpredictable, and deformed apes.

They would also have superior material wealth, healthcare, foods, clothing, and knowledge. They would regard all humans, including the billionaire humans, as living in extreme poverty and ignorance.

We assume aliens are naked, but if any aliens had the intelligence to figure out how to travel to our solar system, they would have the intelligence to create clothing that is as superior to ours as our clothing is superior to the clothing of the ancient Greeks.

The people who promote the concept that there are aliens on other planets assume that the aliens are naked and hairless because nobody has seen an alien. Our mind cannot imagine what a more advanced creature would look like, or what their hair, fingers, clothing, foods, communication devices, homes, or robots would be like.

For all we know, there is a planet where the creatures evolved from bacteria that eat hydrogen sulfide. Does any human have the intelligence to be certain whether intelligent life can exist on hydrogen sulfide? Or perhaps there is a planet covered in water, and there are creatures similar to dolphins that are more intelligent than humans.

Bats have fingers on their wings, so they have the potential to evolve into a creature that has hands that can make and use tools. If there is a planet with a denser atmosphere than ours, the bats could be heavier, which would allow them to have larger brains and more strength. They could evolve into creatures that are more intelligent than us, but with the ability to fly.

Likewise, we cannot imagine what the humans millions of years in the future will be like, so we cannot compare ourselves to them. If we could compare ourselves to them, we would discover that it is like a comparison of us to Australopithecus afarensis.

We cannot imagine the distant future

Our mind thinks by processing the information in its memory. Therefore, when we try to predict the future, we analyze what we know, and we try to guess at how the changes of the past will continue in the future. This allows us to make fairly accurate guesses about what will happen during the next few months, but not for the next few decades or centuries.

For example, in 1930 a German man drew a picture of what he assumed telephones would be like in the future, (drawing to the right).

Although he accurately predicted wireless telephones, all he did was take some components of an existing telephone and combine them with an existing radio receiver, headphones, and television screen. He made a collage of existing components, which is similar to the artist who takes the head of one animal and puts it on the body of another.

His memory had no information about integrated circuits, bluetooth earphones, LCD screens, voice recognition software, or GPS software, so he could not predict the cell phones that we have today. The most creative aspect of his design was his prediction that television screens would continue to decrease in size to the point at which they are small and thin enough to hold in with one hand.

We do not have any information about life on other planets, so when we try to guess at what the plants and animals on other planets would look like, the only information that we can process is the information about the Earth's creatures. The end result is that we modify some of the Earth's creatures, but that gives us modified Earth creatures, not alien creatures.

Likewise, when we try to guess at what the hairstyles, clothing, furniture, meals, and robots, that an intelligent alien species would have, all we can do is modify the items that we are familiar with, which is human hairstyles, clothing, and other technology. However, that gives us aliens that look like humans, which most people assume is incorrect, so they give up trying to create alien hairstyles and clothing and leave the aliens bald and naked.

We also cannot imagine what the eyes of aliens would look like, so the eyes are usually dark blobs. We cannot imagine what their teeth look like, so they usually have their mouth closed.

A more advanced alien species would have a more complex language and be able to pronounce words that we have trouble with. That would make it impossible for us to pronounce their words properly, or use use their language properly, just as a monkey has trouble pronouncing human words and understanding our grammar.

This concept can help us expose liars

The people who describe aliens as bald and naked have not seen a real alien. They are either lying, or they were fooled by a human who was dressed in an alien costume.

If a person were to encounter a real alien, he would have detailed information about his hair, eyes, clothing, food, voice, and technology that nobody has ever imagined.

Although this concept might seem to be useless, it is beneficial to understand because it can help us determine when somebody is lying. When a person lies, he is usually incapable of providing adequate and sensible details. His lies will be a collage of whatever information he has in his memory.

Existing cultures promote the fantasy that only a small percentage of the population has a mental problem, and that the rest of us are "normal" and "healthy", but this constitution is based on the theory that everybody has mental and physical problems, and that half the population is below-average.

Every culture also promotes the attitude that it is impolite, hateful, or cruel to criticize a person's mental characteristics, but this constitution requires the schools, voters, Behavior Ministry, and many other people to routinely analyze other people's mental and physical characteristics for the purpose of passing judgment on their talents, limitations, and defects.

We are not hurting a person when we analyze his physical or mental characteristics, or when we describe one of his characteristics as "defective" or "irritating". Rather, it is necessary for us to maintain our society, just as a farmer must pass judgment on his plants and animals in order to maintain a successful farm.

All cultures evolved to give us what we want, and what we all want to do is deceive people into thinking that we belong at the top of the hierarchy. We deceive people by hiding or lying about the unpleasant information about our medical history, school records, and job performance reports, and by using hair dyes, toupees, wigs, and cosmetic surgeries.

This constitution changes the situation by discouraging deception and by maintaining a People database that has information about everybody's life so that everybody can see the truth about one another. Our emotions want to be deceptive, but deception is detrimental to all of us.

A person who cannot acknowledge his particular mental and physical characteristics is a misfit in this modern world. Everybody today needs to be able to face reality, and that means accepting what your mind and body happens to be, and acknowledging what your life has been like and how you have treated other people.

It is not cruel to require people to be honest about themselves, or to point out to them that some of their qualities are defective or irritating.

For example, we are not cruel if we tell Tim Cook that his homosexuality is a genetic defect, not a wonderful gift from God. We are not hurting him when we tell him that the reason he repeatedly tells himself that homosexuality is God's greatest gift is because he is suffering from his homosexuality, and he is trying to make himself feel better. We are not cruel to tell him that he is tormenting himself by trying to force life to fit an idiotic, religious fantasy, and that he should learn to accept his defects.

Since there is no dividing line between male and female, there are lots of sexual mistakes with humans and animals, but it is absurd to consider those mistakes as gifts from God. We hurt ourselves when we ignore reality and try to force life to follow a fantasy because we will become disappointed, angry, or frustrated every time we encounter a situation that conflicts with our fantasy.

Sam Altman is also homosexual. Although that might not have any connection with his hero fantasies, or his missing brain circuits, we should investigate the causes of homosexuality rather than be afraid to upset the homosexuals. We might discover that whatever is causing people to become homosexual is often also causing problems in other sections of their brain.

Every culture encourages us to have doctors analyze our health and dentists analyze our teeth. Every culture also requires pilots and certain other people to meet certain health requirements. However, every culture is refusing to apply that concept to our minds.

This constitution regards an analysis of a person's past behavior and mental characteristics to be more important for the person and society than an analysis of his body. It is more important for us to pass judgment on whether a person has the mental qualities necessary to be a government official, doctor, pilot, scientist, technician, or parent, than to pass judgment on whether he has an appropriate heart pressure and eyesight.

We deny a person certain jobs if his body is below certain standards.		We must deny jobs to people whose mind is below certain standards.

A person's mind has more of an effect on his job performance, treatment of other people, and effect on society than his blood pressure.

RFK Jr. believes that a parasitic worm that ate a portion of his brain is responsible for the problems he was having with his memory and thinking in 2010, but he believes that he has since recovered from those problems.

If it is true that a portion of his brain has been destroyed, it is idiotic to believe that he has recovered from it because our brain does not have the ability to repair damages. Or brain can compensate, to a certain extent, for some types of damage but it cannot regrow damaged sections.

Rather than assume that he has recovered from the damage, we should analyze his mental characteristics and determine whether he has the abilities that we want in a leader. We must not be afraid to hurt his feelings by telling him that he is suffering from brain damage that makes him unacceptable for a top government official.

However, we cannot pass judgment on his mental abilities when people are allowed to be secretive about their health issues. We must eliminate secrecy.

Joe Biden and Donald Trump are also remaining secretive about their mental and physical health. This constitution changes the situation dramatically by prohibiting secrecy, and maintaining a People database of everybody's life.

If some of our health problems are due to environmental issues, such as toxic chemicals, or worms or get into our brain, then we would be able to reduce the suffering, so it would be cruel to ignore the issue. We should investigate these issues rather than be frightened of hurting somebody's feelings.

Likewise, we should analyze homosexuals and other people with weird sexual cravings to determine which of those problems are inheritable genetic characteristics, and which are due to environmental issues. We must not let them intimidate us into feeling guilty for hurting their feelings. If their feelings are hurt, it is because they chose to react to the investigations by pouting rather than being excited to learn about themselves.

The only way we can learn about something is to investigate it, so the people who oppose investigations or promote secrecy are interfering with our understanding of life. We must resist being intimidated by those people. We are not cruel for investigating issues; rather, they are destructive for suppressing investigations.

We should be willing to investigate every issue. If a person's feelings are hurt by an investigation of sexual attitudes, the Holocaust, the 9/11 attack, the Apollo moon landing, the differences between men and women, or climate change, then he should be regarded as mentally unfit for this modern world.

Unfortunately, all of the governments, and many of the businesses, courts, think tanks, charities, and other organizations, are dominated by people who oppose investigations and promote secrecy, and the reason seems to be that achieved their influential positions through blackmail, false flag operations, inheritances, joining crime networks, and other types of cheating. They oppose investigations because they don't want their crimes, incompetence, mental disorders, and propaganda to be exposed.

Very few of the people in influential positions are providing us with intelligent analyses of our problems, or sensible suggestions on how to improve our future. Most of them seem to be suffering from significant mental disorders. They waste their lives on the pursuit of excessive amounts of wealth and status, and they cause trouble for the world with their dishonest and selfish behavior, and their promotion of secrecy and deception. They must be prohibited from getting into influential positions.

In order to provide ourselves with beneficial leadership, we must pass judgment on the mental characteristics of the candidates for leadership. We must look at the history of a person's life and decide whether he has the intellectual and emotional characteristics that we need for leaders. We must resist feeling guilty for telling a person that his mental characteristics are unacceptable for an influential position. We must not be intimidated by his insults, glares, or accusations.

We routinely pass judgment on the characteristics of refrigerators, cell phones, and automobiles, and we should pass judgment on our minds. Each of us should try to understand our particular mental and physical characteristics, and help other people understand their characteristics.

The people who react to being judged with temper tantrums, pouting, whining, or accusations should be regarded as having a mind that is too similar to an animal to belong in a modern society. Those people degrade our social environment because they make us afraid to be honest. They cause us to frequently lie to other people in order to tell them what they want to hear in order to avoid their insults and tantrums.

We would create a much more pleasant and beneficial social environment if we were living among people who can handle critical opinions without temper tantrums, pouting, whining, or accusations. By restricting a city to those type of people, we would be able to discuss every issue without fear that somebody will have a temper tantrum or start crying.

This constitution does not encourage lying in order to avoid hurting a person's feelings. Rather, the people who cannot handle the truth, or differences of opinion, should be evicted. Nobody should feel pressure to lie to somebody in order to prevent them from having a temper tantrum.

When a person is unhappy because of a mental or physical disorder, his natural assumption is that his unhappiness is the result of something outside of him, not the result of an internal physical or mental problem. That mistaken assumption will cause the person to believe that he can end his misery by finding something, or changing something, in his environment. That will cause him to waste his life doing things that can only bring momentary relief. He will be essentially chasing after a rainbow. Four  examples of this futile behavior are:

1)	Pursuing a goal to find happiness. Perhaps the most common reaction to unhappiness is for a person to assume that he can find happiness by achieving a goal that brings happiness, such as becoming extremely wealthy or famous, winning a trophy, traveling to an "exotic" location, climbing Mount Everest, or skiing at a "luxurious" ski resort. Benjamin Sifrit and his girlfriend came to the conclusion that they might find happiness by committing burglaries, and when that failed to relieve their misery, they assumed that they would find happiness by committing random murders.
2)	Distractions. Some miserable people distract themselves with risky, intense, or dangerous activities. Those activities can be so emotionally stimulating, or require such high levels of concentration, that the person becomes temporarily unaware of how miserable he is. Another distraction is to work all day, every day, so that the person is always too busy to notice his misery.
3)	Masturbation. One of the easiest ways for unhappy people to feel better is to stimulate a pleasant emotion, such as with sex, praise, food, or shopping. Another method is to withdraw into a fantasy, such as a religious fantasy in which they repeatedly titillate themselves by imagining that they will have a wonderful life as soon as they get to heaven. Other people prefer titillating themselves with daydreams of being a hero, or of having a wonderful friend or spouse, or having a wonderful life in a Harry Potter or science fiction fantasy.
4)	Drugs. Many unhappy people use alcohol, oxycodone, marijuana, or other drugs to temporarily reduce their misery.

The unhappy people are a bad influence, especially on children, because they create the impression that what they are doing is providing them with a better life than the ordinary people. For example:

•	When they boast about skiing at Lake Tahoe or watching a polo game, they can fool people into believing that those activities are more exciting than the activities of the ordinary people.
•	When they boast about traveling to an exotic location, they can fool people into believing that some locations are "exotic", and that the ordinary people are going to "boring" locations.
•	When they talk about their "extraordinary" wines and champagnes, and when they laugh about getting drunk, they can fool people into believing that alcohol is one of life's greatest pleasures.
•	When they complain that their job is boring or monotonous, and that they are searching for a "dream job", they can fool people into believing that they should look for a dream job, also. (Jobs are a complex issue.)

An unhappy person is especially troublesome if he comes to the conclusion that his misery is the result of other people, such as believing that he is a victim of sexism, white privilege, racism, or anti-Semitism. Those people instigate hatred and fights.

Unhappy people are also a bad influence on the economy because they prefer products that are "exciting" rather than functional and practical. For example, they are likely to prefer bicycles, automobiles, boats, and other vehicles to be extremely fast and noisy because they are likely to regard vehicles as sources of pleasure and excitement rather than as transportation devices.

They are a bad influence on television programs because they want titillation rather than an education. This results in programs that promote "popular legends", and which dramatize ordinary situations.

The unhappy people are also a bad influence on school curriculum, recreational activities, and foods because they want everything to be "exciting".

The unhappy children are a bad influence on the other children because they encourage obnoxious or risky activities, and they encourage bad attitudes, such as doing things that are "fun", and avoiding "miserable" things, such as homework and household chores.

Some unhappy people achieve something impressive in their attempt to find relief from their misery, such as the people who develop new technology in a desperate attempt to become wealthy, or who entertain us with impressive athletic abilities, comedy routines, or musical abilities.

Those people can become wealthy and famous in a free enterprise system. Since we have a emotional desire to admire and mimic the people who are high in the social hierarchy, we can be fooled into believing that they are better people than the rest of us, and that we should mimic their attitudes and goals. In reality, they are inferior people who are suffering, and we should not mimic them.

For example, Michael Phelps became a very famous athlete, but it seems to be because he was suffering from ADHD. It would be foolish for parents to encourage children to spend as much of their childhood as he did practicing to win a sport. He is not a good role model for children. He is an example of how a mental disorder can interfere with a person's life and happiness, but which can cause a person to excel in some activity.

Although there is no dividing line between "happy" and "unhappy" people, we must pass judgment on the quality of a person's mind. Even though some unhappy people occasionally impress or entertain us, they are inferior as leaders. The reason is because they are more concerned with finding relief from their misery than they are with analyzing the problems of a modern society, and experimenting with ways to improve our lives.

When they become leaders, they do things to make themselves feel good, such as by arranging for themselves to be pampered by servants, or having lots of sex, or gathering lots of material items, or arranging for photographs with "important" people, or suppressing their critics.

They believe that their opinions and behavior are sensible, but they have never experienced life with a healthy brain, so they have no idea how their mental disorders have affected their life. People with mental disorders cannot imagine what life would be like if they had had a healthy brain, just as we cannot imagine what they think.

For example, Bambie Thug (photo to the right) believes that she is special, but it is extremely unlikely that she would dress or behave like she does, believe that she is a witch, or want to be referred to  as "Thug", if she had not been suffering from ADHD, and whatever other problems she has.

And those of us without that mysterious disorder cannot understand why she behaves as she does.

Until we have the technology to allow mentally ill people to experience life has a healthy person, they should refrain from boasting that their mental characteristics are a gift, or that they are special people, or that they are enjoying their life. They should instead try to understand their problems and try to deal with them without causing trouble for themselves and other people.

We should not ignore or pity the people with mental problems. We should not be afraid of hurting their feelings by disqualifying them from influential positions, and pointing out to them that there is something wrong with them. They are not good role models, and they should not be influencing our lives or future.

This concept applies to children, also. We should not ignore or pity the children who have bizarre behavior. The unhappy and weird children should not be leaders for other children. They must be separated from the other children.

Every culture promotes the animal attitude that all children are wonderful, and this results in every culture ignoring the unhappy and weird children, or making excuses for them. However, the low-quality children are a bad influence on other people. They should be put into their own school classes, and they should be investigated to determine whether their problems are genetic or environmental.

If we determine that their problem is due to something in the environment, such as chemicals that disrupt the development of a fetus, or food allergies, then we should be able to reduce the problem in future generations. If their problem is due to an inheritable genetic characteristic, then they should have restrictions on reproducing.

We are not cruel when we analyze children and identify those with destructive physical and mental characteristics, or when we tell a child that he is too abnormal to reproduce, or that he is mentally unfit for a leadership position.

This constitution considers happiness to be the state at which our emotions are not causing us any unpleasantness, and that a person is unhappy when one of his unpleasant emotions is triggered.

For example, when we experience hunger, we could describe that feeling as causing us to become unhappy. A person who has an appropriate hunger emotion can easily deal with the unpleasant feeling, and his hunger disappears when he eats. However, if a person's hunger emotion is excessively intense, then he will experience a higher level of unhappiness when he is hungry. Or, if his hunger emotion is triggered too easily, he will become hungry too soon after eating, which results in him spending more time in a state of unhappiness than a normal person.

However, even though hunger is an unpleasant emotion, it will not ruin our life. Rather, we can have a more pleasant life when we deliberately allow ourselves to "suffer" from hunger because it will make the food taste better, and it allows us to enjoy the foods with subtle flavors.

The same concept applies to sex. Our craving for sex increases each day, eventually causing us to notice and suffer from it, but a "normal" person can easily deal with that type of suffering without causing trouble for other people, and his suffering disappears when he masturbates or has sex. However, a person who has a sex emotion that is excessively intense, or which is triggered too easily, will spend more time suffering from the craving.

Even though the craving for sex is an unpleasant emotion, it will not ruin our life. Rather, by deliberately letting the craving grow and increase, we will get more pleasure from masturbation or sex.

Our emotional cravings for food, water, and sex cause us to routinely "suffer" from unpleasant emotional feelings, so we could describe everybody as regularly becoming unhappy every day of our lives. However, for a normal person, that type of unhappiness is so trivial and temporary that we don't regard ourselves as suffering from it. One of the ironic aspects of life is that suffering is what makes our life pleasurable.

Another example of how we should learn to enjoy suffering is that we should enjoy "bad" weather. For example is when the weather is hot, we will suffer from the heat, but that allows us to enjoy jumping into a cool pool of water.

None of the existing cities provide us with easy access to pools, but by designing a city so that we live and work in clusters of tall buildings, and by putting the transportation system underground, we will have plenty of land for pools.

We can also make gigantic swimming pools, and put them within walking distances of the apartment and office buildings, thereby providing everybody with easy access to pools. The pools can also be decorative, rather than rectangular pits lined with concrete. That type of city will make it much easier for us to enjoy the "suffering" of hot weather.



It would be even easier for us to enjoy the pools if we were free to take off our clothes and jump into the pools naked. Bathing suits can protect our skin from sitting on rocks, and prevent sexual organs from bouncing around when we run around the beach, but they are a nuisance when we just want to spend a few minutes in a pool.

Another example of how we can enjoy "suffering" is that we will suffer if we are prohibited from putting plants, bouquets of flowers, terrariums, aquariums, pets, and water fountains in our homes and offices. That type of suffering will allow us to get more enjoyment from nature when we walk out of the buildings and into the surrounding parks, ponds, and gardens.

Furthermore, that policy eliminates the undesirable chores of producing, distributing, and maintaining all of those things in our homes and offices, which gives us more time to do something that is more pleasurable.

We can design our cities so that we enjoy "suffering" from hot weather and a lack of nature in our buildings, but there is a type of suffering that is undesirable. Specifically, the suffering that results when unpleasant emotions are almost constantly stimulated as a result of a genetic disorder or environmental problem. An example are the people with Prader-Willi syndrome, who suffer from hunger constantly regardless of how much food they eat.

Another example are the people who suffer from whatever mental and/or physical disorder causes bipolar problems, ADHD, migraine headaches, fibromyalgia, and schizophrenia. They are frequently in a state of misery, but there is nothing they can do to relieve it. Likewise, concussions can cause a person to suffer in a way that cannot be relieved.

Those people are miserable because of problems inside their mind and/or body, and there is nothing they can do to stop the misery. Their mental and physical disorders cause them to suffer throughout their entire lives. They are the people that this constitution regards as "unhappy people" because they are suffering from an abnormal and perpetual type of unhappiness.

If the unhappy people can accept the concept that they are suffering because of their mental or physical disorders, then they would not cause trouble for us, but their tendency is to assume that their misery is due to something outside of them, in which case they blame their misery on other people, poverty, bad luck, a lack of opportunities, sexism, racism, bad parenting, or anti-Semitism. This can cause them to become angry at other people, or pursue wealth and fame, or get involved with crime or drugs.

This concept applies to all animals, not just humans. Specifically, certain mental and physical disorders can cause an animal to suffer from internal pains, and that can result in the animal assuming that his misery is due to other creatures, which would cause him to be more likely to run away from them, or attack them.

We have emotions that cause unpleasant feelings for a very important reason. Specifically, to push us into doing something. For example, we experience the unpleasant feeling of hunger to push us into finding food, and we experience the unpleasant craving for sex to push us into reproducing.

Our unhappiness causes us to do things, and it allows us to enjoy life. We must learn to enjoy the unhappiness of hunger; the "misery" of working; the "irritation" of competition; the "unpleasant" weather; and the "cruelty" of constructive criticism.

However, unhappiness should be temporary, not perpetual. We should be able to do something to relieve the unhappiness, such as jump into a cool pool on a hot summer day, or turn on an air cooling system. However, if a person's unhappiness is due to mental or physical disorders, then he cannot relieve his unhappiness no matter what type of life he has, and no matter how much wealth, food, fame, or sex he has.

It is detrimental for us to fantasize about avoiding work and have other people pamper us while we "do what we want to do". Likewise, it is a waste of our life to fantasize about heaven (the image below is another assumption of the rooms in heaven).



Instead of fantasizing about dying and going to heaven, we should learn to enjoy working with one another to create a life for ourselves that is similar to heaven. We should enjoy the suffering of creating and maintaining a beautiful city, with beautiful parks and gardens. We should enjoy the suffering caused by the Earth's weather.

We should also enjoy the suffering that we experience when we try new social and recreational activities that are different from what we have become accustomed to because that will allow us to learn about ourselves and our culture, and improve our lives.

The people who suffer from physical or mental disorders have abnormal behavior because their disorders interfere with their decisions about what to do, what to believe, how to treat other people, and what their goals should be. They will also waste a lot of their time doing idiotic things in a futile attempt to eliminate a source of misery that cannot be eliminated, or trying to bring pleasure into their miserable lives.

When we encounter a person with abnormal behavior, we should not dismiss it as meaningless. Abnormal behavior is a symptom that something is different about the person, and it could be more than just a "difference". It could be a "problem", and the person could be suffering from it. We should try to understand why people have abnormal behavior, and determine whether it is an inheritable genetic trait, a random genetic defect, or something due to the environment.

If we could measure the strength of our emotions, and measure the time that they remain stimulated, we would discover that some people have an emotion that is unusually strong, or which remains stimulated for an unusually long time. We would also find some people at the other extreme; specifically, people who have some emotions that are below-average in strength or duration.

We might discover that the people who struggle to be wealthy have abnormally intense cravings for material wealth or status.

The people who have an abnormally low emotional level are also likely to be suffering. For example, if their fear of the unknown is "too low", they will be willing to do dangerous activities. That can result in them hurting themselves and destroying things.

Likewise, a person who has an abnormally low desire to be accepted by other people will not have a "normal" interest in friends or society, or care much what other people think about him. That can result in him being much more willing to behave in a selfish, violent, dishonest, or abusive manner. For example, Sam Altman described his mental problem as:

The people who don't care what other people think about them are not "gifted" people. Rather, they potentially dangerous, anti-social people who are the most likely to become members of crime networks.

Until recently, nature was ensuring that humans had appropriate emotions for the environment that they were living in, but we are no longer letting nature do this. We must now pass judgment on who has appropriate mental qualities.

None of us knows enough about ourselves to determine whether we are enjoying our life, and it is even more difficult for us to determine whether somebody else is enjoying his life. However, it is better for us to pass judgment on a person's happiness than to ignore the issue.

The universe is incredible, but how many people enjoy it? Although we live for only a few decades, our lives can be wonderful. There is so much for us to enjoy. We are surrounded by beautiful trees, butterflies, creeks, clouds, and flowers. I have been amazed time after time with the beautiful but tiny flowers of the "weeds" in our yards.

Recently I was amazed to find what I assumed were tiny mushrooms on some dead leaves after a rain. I took a photo of it, and did a search for the photo, and it appears to be a slime mold called Diachea leucopodia.

In addition to enjoying their visual beauty of the things in the universe, we can enjoy learning about them. It is also interesting to learn about our history, and the history of the earth.

However, the people who are suffering from internal problems are not likely to notice how wonderful the world is. They are not likely to enjoy the slime molds, or the tiny flowers, or the tiny jumping spiders. They are more likely to complain about their boring, monotonous, and dreary life. And they are likely to get involved with idiotic attempts to make themselves feel good, which can cause trouble for them and the rest of us.

We must pass judgment on why a person does what he does, and whether he is showing signs of excessive attempts to titillate himself, or attempts to distract himself from his misery.

Many people have come to the conclusion that the men who rape women are doing so because they are angry, not because they want sex. However, nobody has provided an intelligent reason for why they are angry. The religious fanatics believe it is because they are "evil", or because they are the wrong religion, and the people who believe the human mind is like a piece of clay will blame their anger on bad parenting, discrimination, anti-Semitism, or being molested as a child. They are suffering, not enjoying the sex.

A more sensible explanation is that the rapists are angry for the same reason that animals become angry. Specifically, something triggered their anger emotion. This brings up the issue of what triggered it, and why they did not control themselves.

If we had a database that contained the details of everybody's life, including analyses of their physical and mental health, we might notice that a rapist is suffering from a physical or mental disorder that is causing him to be extremely irritable. Or we might notice that he has had a tendency to react to problems with anger all throughout his life, which would imply that he is more prone to anger than normal people, or has less self-control.

Every culture is reacting to criminals by punishing them or giving them pity, but this does nothing to reduce crime. We must gather data about everybody, and analyze their physical and mental characteristics in order to figure out what is different about the people who have trouble controlling their anger, selfishness, appetite, cravings for status, and other emotions.. We also need to determine how many of those people are suffering from inheritable problems.

For example, why do some people want to get intoxicated on a regular basis? Are they really enjoying their life? Or are they using alcohol as a method to distract themselves from their misery, or to deal with emotional disorders that make it difficult for them to socialize?

Are the people who struggle to become famous or wealthy truly enjoying their lives? Or did they get involved with that struggle because they are suffering from some type of mental disorder, and are hoping that money or fame will bring them happiness?

Everybody would benefit if we could get a better understanding of our mental characteristics, and what can cause us to become irritable or unhappy. None of us are perfect, so all of us are likely to occasionally suffer from some type of internal misery, although some people might have only trivial problems, such as the irritation of excessive gases in their digestive system.

When we know enough about ourselves to identify the problems that are coming from inside of us, we are less likely to foolishly believe that we can reduce our suffering with alcohol, crimes, food, sex, revenge, or material wealth, and more likely to deal with it in an intelligent manner.

When a person believes that his misery is coming from outside of him, he becomes a disruption to other people, and he wastes his life chasing after a rainbow because he will remain miserable no matter how much material wealth, sex, revenge, or status he acquires.

The people who are unhappy due to internal problems are irritable rather than relaxed. This can result in them hating or complaining about the government, their job, their parents, the laws, and their neighbors. Their whining is annoying, and if they become angry or rebellious, they become destructive. If they get involved with crimes, they hurt even more people.

The people who get involved with protests and rebellions claim to be trying to improve society, but they chant angry slogans rather than provide us with intelligent analyses and suggestions.

If we had a database of everybody's life, we might discover that the people most likely to join protests and rebellions are unhappy with their life, and have a greater tendency than normal people to react problems with anger and hatred.

That would explain why they scream, attack people, throw rocks, burn trash cans, and vandalize public property, rather than provide us with intelligent analyses and suggestions.

The protests and rebellions seem to be the tantrums of people who are irritable and miserable, and who do not have much self-control. They behave like an angry child rather than an intelligent adult.

The people who get involved with protests and rebellions are trying to become our leaders. As discussed in this section of this Constitution, a person who tries to control our future is electing himself to the position of World Leader.

We must do "quality control analyses" of the people who are trying to determine our future. We must analyze their mental and physical qualities and pass judgment on whether they have the characteristics we want in our leaders. We must demand that those people meet high standards, and provide us with intelligent analyses and explanations for their policies.

The people who join protests and rebellions are trying to control our future with intimidation and violence, and they should not be tolerated. We must demand that everybody who wants to control our future provide us with intelligent analyses of our problems, and provide supporting evidence for their suggestions.

All of the progress during the past few thousand years has come from people who put time and effort into analyzing and discussing issues, and experimenting with new ideas.

We improve our lives through research, discussions, and experiments.		Temper tantrums are destructive, and must be forbidden.

We cannot improve life with tantrums, or by burning buildings. We should analyze the people who want to change the world through tantrums to determine what is different about them. We must demand that everybody who wants to change our future do so by presenting their suggestions to us in the same calm, peaceful manner that scientists present their theories.

The people who are willing to cheat have an advantage in both a free enterprise system and a democracy because those systems are variations of anarchy. This is why every nation in the world today has become dominated by dishonest, selfish, and anti-social people. They became influential because of their low quality minds, not because they are the most talented leaders.

We must raise standards for people who try to influence our lives. We must pass judgment on whether the people trying to get into influential positions are truly interested in, and capable of, improving society, or whether they are unhappy people who are searching for relief, or whether they are simply trying to feel important.

Each of us has a modified ape brain, and nobody's brain is perfect, so we are putting modified apes with mental defects into leadership no matter who we select to be our leaders. We must not be afraid, ashamed, or embarrassed to pass judgment on whether a candidate for leadership has the mental characteristics that we want, and whether his imperfections are too significant for a leadership position. We must be able to calmly tell a candidate that his characteristics disqualify him from an influential position. Passing judgment on a person's mental characteristics should be as routine as determining his blood pressure.

There are lots of groups of people who get together to judge the taste, color, and scent of wines, and we should be able to judge the mental characteristics of people in the same calm manner. The people who oppose analyses of their mental characteristics should be regarded as unacceptable for influential positions.

The battle for life ensures that the majority of all plants and animals are well adapted to their environment, and only a small percentage of the population are misfits. However, if the environment changes, the number of misfits increases. If the environment changes enough, the majority of creatures become misfits, and some of the creatures who were misfits in the previous environment become better adapted than the majority  to the new environment. This results in that particular species evolving to fit the new environment.

This has been happening to the human race during the past few thousand years. Specifically, as our ancestors developed technology, they continuously changed their environment, causing an increasingly large percentage of the population to become misfits.

For example, the people who had trouble digesting barley or animal milk became misfits in the societies that depended upon those foods. Likewise, the men who wanted to spend their time hunting for animals rather than farming or making tools became misfits. The people who did not want to follow laws or time schedules also became misfits.

As of 2024, the majority of people are misfits. For example, most people have a resistance to learning information, and they cannot handle the concept that humans are apes. They also cannot handle the large amounts of food that we produce today, or the options that we have today, such as gambling, alcohol, religion, material wealth, credit cards, pornography, guns, voting, and abortion. They are routinely hurting themselves and other people with their decisions about what to eat, who to vote for, and how to treat other people. Furthermore, an increasingly large percentage of the population is becoming unemployable.

If a person is unable to understand, or unwilling to believe, that humans are a species of ape, or if he is unable or unwilling to learn a useful skill, get a useful job, follow the laws, and treat people with respect, then he is just as much of a misfit as an adult who is too stupid to use a language.

Those misfits are a bad influence on society because they promote idiotic theories, commit crimes, and behave like animals. They also interfere with scientific research. For example, some researchers at the University of California at Riverside announced in April 2023 that "poverty" is the fourth greatest cause of death in the USA. This news article about it quotes Professor Brady as saying:


There are two significant flaws with the professor's theory:

1)

Nobody in the USA is suffering from "poverty". The American people who are "in poverty" today are actually living in extreme wealth and luxury compared to all of our ancestors. They have higher-quality food, water, and medical care than the wealthiest of our ancestors, and a wider variety of high-quality food is available to them every day of the year, regardless of the weather. They also have better clothing and housing, and they have electricity and lots of other luxuries. Therefore, if poverty causes health problems and premature deaths, then our prehistoric ancestors would have suffered from tremendous health problems and premature deaths, and we would notice that health problems have been decreasing during the past few thousand as a result of our increasing level of wealth. Although we don't know the details of our ancestors lives, many of them seemed to be healthy, but there are lots of people today who are sickly.

2)

Poverty does not cause health problems. As discussed here, poverty is not causing health problems or premature deaths. Rather, the people who inherited certain health disorders have more difficulty making a living, which can cause them to become poor. Their bad health is not the result of poverty; rather, their poverty is the result of their unhealthy body, and their unhealthy body is the result of inheriting inferior genetic characteristics. To complicate the issue, the people with genetically inferior brains are also more likely to be poor, and even if they were born with good health, they are more likely to inadvertently hurt their health by making idiotic decisions about food, drugs, alcohol, recreational activities, and safety procedures. In those cases, the poor people are suffering from health problems because of their inferior brain, not because of their poverty.

If we could measure intelligence, we would discover that the poor people tend to be less intelligent and educated than the rest of us, but it would be incorrect to claim that poverty causes stupidity or ignorance. The theory that poverty causes health problems is just as idiotic.

The people who believe that poverty is causing problems for us are mental misfits in our modern era. They cannot provide us with intelligent analyses of our problems, or provide us with sensible guidance. They create idiotic theories that cause trouble. For example, their attempt to end poverty by giving handouts of food to hungry people is increasing the number of hungry people rather than reducing the problem.

Likewise, their attempts to reduce crime with punishments, rehabilitation programs, and electric shocks is allowing criminals to repeatedly commit crimes, and to reproduce, thereby increasing the number of defective people in each generation.

The people who are unhealthy, obese, stupid, uneducated, dishonest, violent, or suffering from debt, gambling problems, or alcoholism are not victims of poverty, bad luck, racism, sexism, or lack of opportunities. They are victims of their genetic inferiority. The only way to reduce the number of people who suffer from those type of problems is to restrict reproduction to the people who have superior genetics.

In order to create a society in which we share the wealth, everybody must understand the concept that "Money cannot buy happiness". Unfortunately, as mentioned earlier in this document, most people repeat that phrase, but they do not understand it.

Most people are so convinced that their life and health will improve if they could get more money that they waste a lot of their time fantasizing about winning lotteries, finding a wealthy spouse, whining about high prices or low salaries, or cheating to get more money.

Millions of Americans already have such an excess of material items that their house is cluttered with it, but they want more. Many Americans have so many unnecessary items that they cannot get their automobile into their garage, and many of them have attics, closets, or basements that are stuffed with unnecessary items. Many of them also have houses that are so large that they don't use all of their rooms.

Our societies have become dominated by people who cannot control their craving for material wealth or status. Those people must be regarded as emotionally and/or intellectually unfit for influential positions in this modern world. They are analogous to obese people.

In prehistoric times, the people with abnormal cravings for material wealth and status might have been irritating, but today they are a bad influence on the world because they encourage selfishness, hoarding, and stupid attitudes, such as we need a gigantic mansion in order to enjoy life.

The prehistoric people who could not control their craving for wealth might have been irritating, but they didn't cause much trouble.		Today the wealthy people encourage idiotic behavior, and the wealthy people of the future will be even worse.

To make the situation even worse, there has recently been a lot of evidence that the extremely wealthy people acquired their wealth by joining crime networks. Their fighting and cheating for wealth has caused our economic system to become an unpleasant battle for money, rather than a beneficial competition. They cannot provide us with intelligent guidance or analyses. They encourage animal behavior.

Some of them are also importing people from other nations to use as cheap labor because they are more concerned with material wealth and pampering by servants than in creating a pleasant social environment. They want slaves and servants, not friends. They seem to get together with other people only to show off, or to exploit somebody.

A lot of evidence has recently been provided that the extremely wealthy people are involved with crime networks and pedophilia. To make the situation more appalling, many of the influential people in the entertainment business seem to be joining a crime network with an initiation ceremony that requires that they authorize the murder of one of their close friends or relatives.

Our craving for material wealth causes us to admire the billionaires, but they should not be admired or envied. They became billionaires because they have no interest in creating a society in which they are living among friends or team members. They want to create a society in which they are pampered royalty, and they want us to be their servants. They also want to pass their wealth onto their children. They want to create a medieval kingdom.

There are always more failures than successes, so there are more people who failed to become billionaires than who succeeded at becoming a billionaire. Those "billionaire failures" have incomes that are similar to the rest of us, but their minds are not the same as ours. The billionaire failures are as inappropriate as leaders as those who were successful.

To complicate this issue, the people who fail at something are often worse than the people who are successful. For example, some of the people who have failed to become billionaires were failures because they were too dishonest, selfish, stupid, or mentally ill.

This concept applies to more than the billionaires. For example:

•

Food Some people have so much trouble controlling their consumption of food that they become obese, but a person who has a normal weight is not necessarily a higher-quality person. There are certain to be people who have as much trouble controlling their craving for food as the obese people, but they are not obese because they have some type of physical disorder that prevents their body from absorbing nutrients properly, or converting nutrients into fat. Our leaders must understand this concept because when we start to restrict reproduction, if we were to restrict reproduction to the people who are of normal weight without checking if their digestive system is working properly, then we would inadvertently breed humans into a creature that has an increasingly defective digestive system, resulting in each generation having to eat an increasingly large amounts of food.

•

Crime There are a lot of people who have never committed a crime, but that doesn't prove that they are more honest than the people who have committed crimes. Some of those honest people just did not notice any good opportunity to commit a crime. Nobody commits crimes all day, every day. Many people commit a crime only when they see an opportunity to get away with the crime. Therefore, in order to determine who among us is truly honest, we would have to give everybody a variety of opportunities to commit crimes. To complicate the issue, some of the "honest" people who never committed a crime may have tried to commit a crime but failed because of their ignorance, stupidity, or mental disorders, or because somebody or some thing interfered with their attempt.

When engineers want to determine if a jet engine will work properly, they test it in a variety of different environments, including tossing a bird into the engine. If it were practical to put humans into a laboratory and test them in a variety of environments, we would discover that some of the honest people become criminals in certain environments; some of the people of normal weight become overweight; and some of the people who are healthy become sickly.

The human mind has not evolved to deal with the large amount of food, material items, pornography, and other things that technology has provided us. If we do not restrict reproduction to improve the intellectual and emotional characteristics of the human race, the people of the future will whine about issues that are even more absurd than what people are whining about today.

For example, there will people in the future who whine that they can afford only one, used robot, and they cannot afford a vacation on the moon. If we could see those people whining about their poverty, we would be appalled, but if our ancestors could see us whining about poverty, they would be equally appalled.

Some wealthy people have been accused of behavior that is undesirable, but not illegal, such as cheating their friends during casual recreational events. For example, some people insist that Donald Trump cheats when he plays golf, and some people insist that Bill Clinton cheated more than Donald Trump.

There have also been wealthy people who have been arrested for shoplifting inexpensive items, even though they could easily afford them. For example, Melissa Ivers was making almost $300,000 a year as a dentist and an associate chief medical officer for the University of New Mexico Health System, but she was arrested after repeatedly shoplifting inexpensive items from a Target store.

She had enough money to afford those items, so why did she steal them? Why would Donald Trump or Bill Clinton cheat his friends when they play golf? Their behavior is similar to that of an animal that grabs at whatever attracts its attention, with no concern for what they are doing, or what effect they have on other people.

Every culture judges a crime according to how it affects our emotions. For example, we are very upset by murder, so we consider murder to be a serious crime, but we are only slightly upset by a person who shoplifts inexpensive items from a large business, so we consider that to be a trivial crime, and we are even less upset by a person who cheats his friends during recreational events, so we do not consider that to be a crime.

However, a person who cheats his friends during casual recreational events is likely to be even more willing to cheat strangers and foreign nations. Furthermore, a person who will cheat when there is no significant reward is likely to cheat when there is a tremendous benefit to cheating, such as getting elected, or making his business successful, or becoming famous.

We should not ignore or make excuses for dishonest or anti-social behavior simply because the behavior doesn't stimulate much anger. A person's behavior is an indication of how his mind functions. We must set high standards for people in influential positions, and we must not be afraid to pass judgment on a person's mental characteristics.

During the Middle Ages, the Kings and Queens would make friendships and get married to people for financial and political reasons, and some of the wealthy and influential people today seem to be doing the same thing. That type of behavior should be considered as abusive, disgusting, and unacceptable.

People who treat other people in such manners should be regarded as behaving in a crude, animal-like manner. They should not be in influential positions. We must restrict reproduction so that each generation becomes more trustworthy, sociable, and friendly.

Animals do not pass judgment on their leaders. They become submissive to whichever animal gets into the top position. Humans inherited that craving, but it causes tremendous problems in modern societies because it allows incompetent and abusive people to remain in influential positions.

We must treat our leaders with respect, but we must be critical of their job performance. We must pass judgment on their leadership abilities and replace those who are inadequate or dishonest. This requires that we have enough self-control to suppress our craving to become submissive to our leaders.

An example of how we should analyze people in leadership positions is here.