Table of contents
Page for this series
Hufschmid's main page

The Kastron Constitution
6) The Women’s Division

22 September 2024

The two primary purposes of the Women's Division

Purpose #1) To compensate for their submissive personality

Men evolved a personality that causes us to compete for leadership, and women evolved to be followers who are taken care of, so men will always dominate a society. The Women's Division is intended to compensate for that by providing the women with some additional influence.

The Women's Division makes it easy for the women to get together to analyze and discuss issues, and develop suggestions for improving the city's culture. Men are prohibited from being members of the Women's Division in order to prevent the women from becoming uncomfortable, dominated, or intimidated by men. The women will have their own facilities to do research, write documents, and get together for discussions, without men.
By providing the women with a government agency of their own, they will be able to work together as a team, and that will allow them to develop more intelligent analyses and suggestions compared to when they are individuals. They will be able to learn from one another, inspire one another, and help one another develop their ideas.

This concept can be seen all throughout history. Specifically, when people form a team, they are always more productive than when they are individuals. Even a team of idiots or animals is more productive than a group of independent idiots and animals.

Allowing men to join the women would undoubtedly help the women to improve their ideas, but the Women's Division is restricted to women so that they don't have to suffer from any awkwardness, pandering, flirting, or intimidation from men. If the women want a man's opinion about something, they can decide which man to invite to a discussion, and they will be in control of the discussion, and the man will be in a submissive position.

Purpose # 2) To provide leadership for the women

An unfortunate aspect of democracies, anarchies, free enterprise systems, and other leaderless systems is that they eventually become dominated by the people who are abnormally selfish, violent, neurotic, and dishonest.

No nation is providing leadership to the women, and the result is that millions of women are whining about their problems to their friends and neighbors; posting angry documents or videos on the Internet; writing angry documents for magazines and newspapers; and making angry remarks on television talk shows.

The women who become the most influential are those who are members of organizations. There are thousands of organizations of women around the world, some of which are listed in Wikipedia here, but the women involved with crime networks have the most influence.

None of the women's organizations have provided us with useful analyses of men or women, culture, or our relationships. There is no evidence that any of them have improved life for men or women. There are more single, divorced, lonely, angry, and miserable women today than there were before these organizations existed.

Some of the accomplishments that they boast about should be condemned as destructive, such as making it acceptable for women to drink alcohol among intoxicated men, and to smoke cigarettes. They also boast about giving women the right to vote, but that hasn't done anything to improve life for anybody, or improve our governments.

Rather than be beneficial, most of the women's organizations are encouraging accusations of sexism and toxic masculinity, and they promote anti-genetic propaganda, support of Israel, and Jewish propaganda about Nazis, Muslims, white privilege, the 9/11 attack, the Holocaust, and hundreds of other issues.

In order to provide the women with better leadership, citizens do not have the right to create their own organizations. The government determines which organizations exist, and the government officials are required to occasionally give a "job performance review" to each organization to ensure that they are beneficial to society.

The Women's Division makes it easier for both men and women to deal with the complaints and suggestions of women because it provides women with a government organization to investigate and develop their ideas. The men will be able to deal with a small number of officials in the Women's Division who put time and effort into developing intelligent documents, rather than thousands of independent women who have a variety of vague and undeveloped complaints.

Although the women choose the leaders of the Women's Division, they must pick women who have been selected as City Elders. That requirement will increase the chances that the women have leaders with desirable minds and attitudes.

Example #1: “Honey Do” lists are not sexist

An example of what the Women's Division can do, and how the men can respond, is the issue of "honey do" lists.

Some married men occasionally tell their friends that they can't join them in some leisure activity because they are busy that day with "honey do's". Although most definitions of that expression imply that both women and men have honey-do lists, I've never heard a woman use that expression.

The expression has spread to the UK, and a British woman, Rebecca Reid, has responded with a document that has the title "Honey do lists are sexist as all hell".

She claims that a honey-do list is the sensible requests from a wife for her husband to contribute equally to the household chores. She essentially accuses men of being parasitic, sexist, and lazy, and that they do the chores in the honey-do list simply to get sex. She complains that men "seem surprisingly comfortable with the idea that sex is a vending machine, where you put chores in and get orgasms out."

The Women's Division makes it easy for women to discuss and investigate such issues, and develop suggestions on how to improve relationships between men and women. They would post their document in the Requests category. The men would then be able to pass judgment on their document, and either approve of their suggestion, or give them constructive criticism about it.

If the women posted a document similar to that written by Rebecca Reid, then the men would be able to respond that it is absurd to accuse men of creating the "honey-do" expression because we are sexist or abusive. That expression was created because men have a strong desire to pamper women. It is an expression that a man uses to let his friends that he is busy doing something that his wife has requested him to do, and that he is doing it for her, not himself, so he cannot delay it for some other day.

The husbands who are truly abusive and selfish do not do "honey do's". Instead, they ignore their wife's requests, or tell her to shut up, or tell her to do the work herself. The women who have a husband that does honey-do lists have a husband who is her servant, and is treating her like a queen.

The men could also verify that the husbands that the women are using as examples of sexism are truly "typical" men. They would undoubtedly discover that the women are picking out the men who are unusually selfish or mentally ill, in which case the men could point out that their complaint is invalid because it is based on misfits.

If details of Rebecca Reid's life were in the People database, the men could also analyze her life, and they might be able to offer some suggestions on why she is so angry at men. For example, in this document, she says that "Since I was 12 years old I've been in pain for at least two days of every month." She has had two miscarriages, and says that she "loved drinking and was a regular smoker".

The people who drink alcohol and smoke cigarettes claim that they "enjoy" it, as if those activities are optional forms of entertainment, but those activities should be regarded as evidence that those people are suffering from something. We should investigate them to determine what is different about those people, and try to understand why they are attracted to alcohol and cigarettes, rather than pretend that those people are random samples of the human population who have simply chosen different activities.

An analysis of Rebecca Reid's life would probably show that she is suffering from some mental and/or physical problems that is causing her to be irritable, which in turn results in her developing a miserable attitude towards men.

Rebecca Reid has written a lot of documents for women, but none of them provide women with an intelligent analysis of marriage, honey-do lists, men, household chores, or anything else. She is like most of the other influential women in the world. Specifically, an angry, bitter, unhappy woman who constantly whines about men.

Example #2: Men are not evil for having cravings for sex

There are frequently news reports about women complaining about their husbands having sexual affairs with other women, and the men are often described as cheaters, philanderers, womanizers, evil, cruel, selfish, and abusive.

In September 2024, RFK Jr. once again became the subject of these complaints. However, whining about these men doesn't improve life for anybody, or help us understand human behavior, or provide us with suggestions on how to improve our relationships.

The people who have risen to influential positions of our modern societies are not providing us with any useful analyses or suggestions. They are encouraging whining, accusations, temper tantrums, and arrogance.

A more sensible analysis of adultery and promiscuity would show us that this is "normal" animal behavior. Male animals have intense cravings for sex, and they are not very finicky about which female they have sex with. The females are finicky, which forces the males to  put a lot of time and effort into trying to titillate the females.

The sexual characteristics are not evil or abusive. It is simply the method that evolved in animals to ensure that the males with the best genetic characteristics were the most likely to reproduce.

With humans, the situation is more complex because humans are degrading genetically. This has resulted in unknown but significant percentage of the population that is suffering from some type of physical or mental disorder, which  is causing them to be somewhat unhappy. This in turn results in them looking for some way to make themselves feel better, such as getting drunk, having lots of sex, shopping for things that they don't actually need, playing with pet animals, eating sweet foods, and trying to become wealthy or famous.

Many of the things that people are doing are to relieve misery or boredom, not because they truly enjoy those things.

As mentioned in many documents, our modern cultures  have evolved to appease our sexual inhibitions, and this has caused a lot of men to develop obsessions for sex and female bodies, and caused women to become angry or hysterical about sexual issues.

If we can figure out how to raise children so that they become as accustomed to human bodies and sex as our prehistoric ancestors, they would become adults who would have an easier time realizing that a man who wants lots of sex is not necessarily any different from a woman who spends an excessive amount of time shopping or eating, or spending excessive amounts of time with cosmetics, jewelry, pet animals, dolls, or babies.

Men and women have slightly different emotional characteristics, so when we are unhappy, we tend to choose slightly different activities to make ourselves feel better. The unhappy men are likely to try to pursue wealth, status, and sex. Some men try to mask their misery with alcohol, drugs, or risky sports. Unhappy men are also likely to become angry and violent.

Although unhappy women are also attracted to wealth, status, alcohol, and drugs, they are not as likely to be interested in sex, risky sports, or violence. They are more likely to spend excessive amounts of time eating, shopping, and playing with babies, cosmetics, and pet animals.

Our culture considers a man to be badly behaved if he has sex with lots of women. We have created words to describe that type of man, such as philanderer and womanizer. However, he is not necessarily any different from a woman who is spending a lot of time eating, shopping, or playing with pet animals.

If a man is a "womanizer" for having lots of sex, then a woman who is spending excessive amounts of time with pets could be described as a "petizer", and an overweight woman could be described as a "foodizer".

If a man is evil for having lots of sex, then a woman should be considered evil for shopping excessively, or spending excessive amounts of time with cosmetics.

Rather than accuse men of being "womanizers", or accuse women of being "petizers", a more sensible attitude is that men and women have subtle differences in our mental characteristics. Neither one of us is better or worse than the other.

We need leaders who will dampen the whining, hatred, and accusations, and encourage research of human behavior. We need leaders who will experiment with making our culture suppress our inappropriate characteristics and encourage our desirable characteristics. We also need to restrict reproduction so that each generation is more emotionally suited to this modern era.

We also need both men and women to control their sexual inhibitions enough to acknowledge the evidence that the primary purpose of an animal's life is to reproduce, and this results in sex being one of the major and most important activities in an animal's life.

We must accept the evidence that men have strong cravings for sex, and women have strong cravings for babies. We must experiment with our culture to deal with these characteristics rather than whine about one another. For example, the schools are required to give the boys and girls practice in dealing with man's sexual cravings.

None of the existing cultures are providing women with leadership. Instead, there are thousands of individual women and organizations whining about men. By providing the women with a government agency, they will be able to work together to develop their complaints and suggestions. The men will respond to that government division, rather than thousands of individual women and organizations.

Example #3: Men are not abusive to women or children

A more complex example is that there are some women who complain that their husbands are abusive to them and/or their children. It is true that some men hit, slap, yell at, or insult their wives or children, but none of the women who have gotten into influential positions in the world today have any concern for why men lose their temper with their wives or children.

By restricting the Women's Division to women who are in good mental health and who have an excellent understanding of evolution and animal behavior, the women will be taught that the issue of abusive men is virtually the same as the issue of abusive mothers.

Mothers are not abusive to children

There are lots of children occasionally accusing their mothers of being abusive, and it is true that there are some women with mental disorders who are abusive to their children. However, it is absurd to accuse mothers of being abusive to their children.

Mothers have such an intense craving to take care of children that they will often sacrifice their lives for their children, but there are two common reasons that children complain about abuse:

1)
Mothers inadvertently abuse their children

None of us knows the proper way to raise children. All of us are guessing about how to raise children, and we base our guesses on information that we picked up from other ignorant people. The end result is that we often choose to do something that is annoying to the children, or that hurts them.

This problem can also be seen in the way people treat pet animals and animals in zoos. Not many people want to hurt animals, but many of the things that people do are irritating or harmful to the animals, such as when they feed them unhealthy foods. Those people are abusive to animals because of ignorance, not because they enjoy torturing animals.

Our emotions cause us to assume that we are raising children properly when the children are smiling and giggling, but that was true only during prehistoric times. Our modern technology allows parents to inadvertently hurt their children. For example, parents today can easily provide their children with excessive quantities of food and candy. Parents also inadvertently hurt their children by "protecting" them from nudity, sex, bacteria, cold weather, household chores, criticism, and disappointments.

Parents can also irritate their children by forcing them to do things that prehistoric parents could not have done, such as forcing their children to learn a certain musical instrument, or practice a certain sport, or enter beauty pageants.

Children must learn how to become an adult, but modern parents are often interfering with that process by protecting their children from disappointments and frustration, and by providing them with whatever makes them happy. Those parents are interfering with the child's development rather than preparing them for life.

Children must become accustomed to the foods that they should be eating, not the foods that they want to eat. They must learn how to deal with problems, criticism, and disappointments, rather than be protected by their mother. They must learn how to interact with other people and form friendships, rather than develop friendships with animals and television characters. They also need to develop a useful skill so that they can contribute to society.

Parents that pamper their children are interfering with the development of their children. Children need parents who behave more similar to military drill sergeants, but that type of parent can result in a child complaining that he is being abused.

Our emotions cause us to assume that women and children who whine about being abused are truly suffering, and that was probably true in prehistoric times, but today women and children are whining for all sorts of nonsensical and selfish reasons.

It is foolish for us to assume that a woman or a child who is complaining about being abused has truly been abused. Today we must investigate both the victims of abuse, and the people accused of abuse, and determine who is truly being abused.

Some of the people who whine about abuse are mentally ill, such as the women who lie about being raped, and some victims arrange for themselves to become victims so that they can manipulate people, such as the Jews who spray swastikas on gravestones or their home.



2)

Children misinterpret their mother's behavior

A child can misinterpret his mother's behavior as being abusive as a result of his selfishness, ignorance, and low level of intelligence. For example, when a mother denies a child the toy, food, pet animal, or clothing item that he is asking her for, he might interpret her behavior as abusive rather than to protect his health, or to avoid wasting the family's money on an unnecessary item.

Likewise, when a mother makes her child clean his bedroom, or do household chores, he might misinterpret her behavior as treating him like a slave, and denying him the opportunity to enjoy life.

The children who are the most selfish, stupid, or mentally disturbed are the most likely to misinterpret their mother's behavior as being abusive. This brings up a very important concept. Specifically, the more badly behaved a child is, the more likely his mother will occasionally lose her temper and yell at, insult, or hit the child. That can result in the child believing that he is being abused, and it can result in other adults assuming that the mother is abusive.

A mother of a badly behaved child might also react by becoming so frustrated that she often ignores the child, which can result in the child misinterpreting the situation as a mother who doesn't like him, and it can result in other adults assuming that the mother is neglecting her children.

Men are more violent than women, so a father who has a badly behaved child is more likely than the mother to respond with insults, anger, and violence.

We have such a strong craving to protect children that our natural assumption is that a child who has been hit by his father is a wonderful, innocent child, and that the father is violent. Likewise, we have a craving to protect women, so also we assume that when a man hits a woman, the men is violent and the woman is innocent. However, in reality, these assumptions are usually incorrect.

An analysis of the women and children who have been hit by their husbands or fathers would show that most of them are so badly behaved that they triggered the man's anger emotion. They are not a random sample of the female or child population.

This issue is complicated by the fact that some men are suffering from problems that cause their anger emotion to be triggered abnormally easily. This results in their wives and children being hit for behavior that the higher-quality men would deal with in a more intelligent manner.

Modern humans must understand that men, women, and children have a temper for an important reason. Specifically, we lose our temper when we become irritated to a certain extreme, and during prehistoric times, that usually occurred only when somebody was truly behaving badly. In such a case, the person who lost his temper would react to the badly behaved person by hitting, yelling at, or killing him. It was nature's way of allowing uneducated and stupid animals to deal with bad behavior.

During prehistoric times, people would usually lose their temper for sensible reasons, such as when somebody was truly abusive, but when people settled into cities, they began losing their temper over events in which their anger was detrimental. For example, children today are losing their temper when they don't get a candy bar that they want, and men are losing their temper when somebody beats them in a recreational activity.

Furthermore, the human race has been degrading genetically during the past few thousand years, and this has resulted in an increase in the number of people who have defects that cause them to lose their temper abnormally easily.

It is no longer sensible for us to deal with bad behavior by losing our temper and hitting or insulting people. We must now make intelligent decisions about whose behavior is inappropriate, and we must deal with those people in a more sensible manner, such as prohibiting them from reproducing, evicting them, euthanizing them, or putting them on restrictions.

As mentioned in other documents, when there is anarchy, the people who rise to leadership positions tend to be "abnormal". They are people with abnormally intense cravings for status, or members of crime networks, or people who are abnormally unhappy, selfish, aggressive, or abusive. The women who are getting in positions of importance today are examples.

They are not providing women with leadership. Instead of providing intelligent analyses of our social problems, and suggesting sensible experiments to improve our lives, they encourage women to whine about men. They encourage women to feel sorry for themselves, and imagine that they are innocent victims of abusive men.

This Constitution requires people in influential positions to meet higher standards than the public, so people like Rebecca Reid should be disqualified as a City Elder, and removed from influential positions.


Most influential women are female versions of Pigpen, but they spread bad attitudes instead of dirt.
Allowing Rebecca Reid to be a leader for the women is as idiotic as allowing a spoiled child with ADHD, alcohol problems, and bipolar disorder to become the leader for a group of children.

It is also as idiotic as allowing a group of billionaires, pedophiles, and Zionist Jews to become the leaders of our nations, businesses, schools, and other organizations.

By restricting the Women's Division officials to those who are in the best mental health and have above-average intelligence, the women will have leaders who are good role models, and who can investigate their complaints, providing intelligent analyses, and help them develop suggestions on how to improve their lives.

The women will have leaders who can acknowledge the evidence that men, women, and children are just a species of ape. The women will have leaders who make them realize that neither men nor women are better than the other, and that both men and women can be badly behaved. The women will be encouraged to look for ways to improve life, rather than whine about men.
The structure of the Women’s Division

The Ministries of the Women's Division

This constitution initializes the Women's Division with five ministries. The Women's Division is required to encourage women to work on a part-time and temporary basis in order to increase the variety of opinions, and to encourage women to get involved with determining their future rather than feel helpless.

The director of the Women's Division is permitted to change the number and purpose of the ministries in their division but, as with all government agencies, the Efficiency Ministry will pass judgment on whether they have too many employees or are using too much resources. The changes that they make to their division must serve the purpose that the Women's Division is designed for. Specifically, to allow the women to easily get together to analyze the city's culture, and make suggestions for improving it. They cannot expand their division to do other things, such as operating daycare centers, or manufacturing food products, or turning the Women's Division into a recreational facility.

The five ministries that this Constitution initializes the division with are:



Babies Ministry

This Ministry analyzes the lives of pregnant women and mothers with babies, and posts suggestions on how to improve their work environments, healthcare, clothing, meals, and whatever else the women feel could be improved upon, or that is worth experimenting with.

They might also suggest improvements to the educational programs for women about pregnancy, childbirth, and babies.

This ministry would also be responsible for helping women deal with unpleasant issues related to babies, such as miscarriages, abortions, and the euthanasia of defective babies.

The lack of leadership in the world today is resulting in some women spending years pouting because of a death of a baby, and some women justify overeating, hoarding, or other bad behavior as a result of the trauma of the death. Women need the opposite. Specifically, they need to be encouraged to deal with life's problems in a more intelligent manner, and without disrupting other people's lives.

In the US, 10% to 20% of the women who realize that they are pregnant will have a miscarriage. That is so many miscarriages that it is idiotic for us to ignore the issue, or let women spend years pouting about a miscarriage. To aggravate this issue, the Death Ministry will euthanize a lot of the fetuses and babies, which means that women must be able to deal with these deaths.

The women who cannot deal with the death of a baby must be regarded as mentally inferior for our modern world, and they should not be allowed to have any more children.





Children Ministry

This ministry deals with the relationships between women and children. For example, this Constitution advocates giving women priority in the jobs that deal with children, such as the schools, restaurants, and activities for children. This ministry allows the women to provide their opinions on which jobs they want restricted to women.

This ministry also allows women to provide their opinions on the work environments for mothers who have young children; the type of restaurants the children should have; the activities and recreational facilities for children; the educational programs for children; and any other complaints or suggestions they have regarding children.

This ministry should also take an active role in ensuring that children, especially the boys, develop sensible attitudes towards women. The women should pass judgment on the effect that paintings, sculptures, television programs, and other types of artwork and information are having on the attitudes of children.

Historians are not yet providing us with an accurate understanding of the lives of previous generations, but most of the paintings made during the Middle Ages show women as mothers, or working with other women, or having meals with their friends and family, or assisting with farm work.

During prehistoric times, the boys did not see any paintings, sculptures, or videos of women. Their only information about women was what they saw with their eyes and heard with their ears.

Prior to the 20th century, the children picked up accurate information about men and women. The boys would have realized that the primary activity of a woman was being a mother.

The situation began to change dramatically during the 20th century because technology allowed businesses and individual men to create a wide variety of sexually titillating paintings, statues, television programs, and movies. Today some men are using text-to-image software to create sexually attractive women. There are also lots of mothers providing their daughters with sexually attractive clothing, cosmetics, and jewelry.

The end result is that the children today are being exposed to a lot of information that creates the impression that women are sexually promiscuous, and that their purpose in life is to be a sex toy.

We must pass judgment on how television programs, statues, paintings, and other information is affecting the attitudes of children. This Constitution allows the government to censor art, and that will allow them to ensure that our statues, paintings, and other types of art are encouraging beneficial attitudes. The government also has control over clothing, and this will allow them to prevent young girls from wearing sexually titillating clothing.

The Children Ministry of the Women's Division should take an active role in passing judgment on the effect that our culture is having on children. The women should pass judgment on the art, the school curriculum, the clothing, and the activities of children.

This constitution requires that artists create statues and images in which women are depicted as people, or as mothers, as in the image below, rather than as sex toys.

The Women's Division does not have the authority to censor art or alter the school curriculum, but when the women disapprove of something or have a recommendation, they can post their suggestion in the Requests category, and the government officials are required to respond to it.





Female Issues Ministry

This Ministry is intended to deal with the issues that some women accuse men of being ignorant about, such as their complaint that there is more medical research of men's health issues, and that the work environments for women are not adjusted to allow them more bathroom breaks when they are menstruating. Some women also complain that men ignore women when we write history books and news reports.

The women are probably correct that men are ignorant about some of issues that affect women, but it's not because of sexism. Some of the problems are due to our sexual inhibitions. For example, many women have complained that their mothers didn't teach them anything about menstruation, but it would be idiotic to accuse mothers of being sexist creatures who deliberately keep their daughters ignorant because they enjoy tormenting them.

Furthermore, many women don't appreciate what other women have done for them. For example, daughters rarely appreciate what their mother did for them, and lots of women don't appreciate the work of the female factory workers, farmers, nurses, doctors, or teachers.

The Women's Division will make it easier for women to get together to determine whether some female issues are being ignored, but they cannot make the idiotic accusation that men are ignoring the issues because we are sexist.





Relationships Ministry

This Ministry analyzes the relationships between men and women, and between women. This Ministry will provide the city with a woman's perspective of such issues as weddings, marriages, courtship activities, sexual harassment, and the education of teenagers about relationships.

For example, some women complain that the men in leadership positions ignore their complaints about lewd remarks and sexual harassment at their job. The Relationships Ministry has the authority to investigate the complaints and pass judgment on whether the woman has a problem dealing with men, or whether the man is truly irritating.

If they determine that the man is badly behaved, they can post their analysis of the situation and their suggestion about what to do about him, such as firing or evicting him. Since they are a government agency, they have a lot more authority than individual women.

When only one woman complains about harassment, the men are likely to ignore her, but when a group of women investigate the complaint, and post a serious document about it, the other government officials will be required to respond.

Another example of what the Relationships Ministry can deal with is that they can investigate complaints about the sexual behavior of their husbands.

Nobody knows how many women are enjoying sex because we provide everybody with tremendous secrecy, and most women are so sexually inhibited that they cannot discuss the issue with anybody, including their own spouse. A lot of men and women also lie about sexual issues because they want to impress other people, or because they are embarrassed of something.

Rebecca Reed wrote this article in which she says that she is asked hundreds of women about their sex lives, and that her discussions with the women agree with the analyses that only 17% of the British women are satisfied with their sex life.

This is a very complex issue because nobody understands themselves or humans well enough to know for sure what will provide us with the most satisfying life. As discussed in other documents, each of us believes that we know what makes ourselves happy, but the only way we would truly know what provides us with the most pleasant life is to have thousands of different lives, each in a different environment.

Do the billionaires have a more satisfying life than the rest of us because they have a larger home, a private jet, and lots of expensive jewelry? Are the people who win recreational events enjoying life more than the people who lost? Are the people who have pet dogs enjoying life more than the people who only have human friends?

Do we need to be able to vote for government officials in order to enjoy life? Do we need to be able to eat whatever we want, and whenever we want, in order to enjoy life? Do we need to be able to own land in order to enjoy life? Do we need to be able to reproduce in order to enjoy life?

None of us knows what will bring us the most satisfaction from life. We need leaders who can provide us with guidance, and experiment with our culture.

Many of the men and women who are unsatisfied with their sex lives are probably unsatisfied simply because of ignorance and because they have idiotic expectations of marriage and sex. For example, many men have picked up the idiotic belief that the more sex they have, and the more women they have sex with, the more exciting their life will be. Some men also believe that the younger the woman is, the more exciting the sex will be. Some men have even been fooled into believing that their life will improve by having sex in bizarre locations, such as airline bathrooms.

Many women have picked up the idiotic belief that their husband should be like a prince in a Disney fantasy, or like the husband in a romance novel. They expect their husband to want to be with them when they give birth, and to be their best friend, and to spend hours a day titillating them with flowers, gifts, praise, and entertainment.

As discussed years ago here, prehistoric boys and girls picked up realistic information about men, women, sex, childbirth, masturbation, and raising children. Modern boys and girls, however, are picking up idiotic expectations of marriage and sex as a result of businesses, religions, Israeli crime networks, Hollywood movies, and lunatics.

Children are also kept ignorant about sex issues. For example, many of the girls today are so ignorant that they don't understand that men enjoy their scent. They think their scent is perverted, and must be washed away with shampoos and soaps, and covered with perfumes. Many children, at least in my generation, also discovered masturbation by accident because we had no idea such an activity was even possible. And some girls discovered menstruation only when it happened to them.

By ensuring that the Women's Division has leaders who understand that humans are apes, the women will get much better leadership in regards to sex issues. The Relationships Ministry can help women control their sexual inhibitions so that they can discuss sex issues in a more serious manner. They will also be able to help schools develop a curriculum that prepares children for marriage, childbirth, menopause, breast-feeding, and other issues that concern the human body and sex.

The officials in the Women Ministry must also be restricted to women who realize that animals have cravings for sex in order to make us reproduce, not to provide us with entertainment. Women have an especially difficult time enjoying sex because they have strong inhibitions about it, which interfere with their ability to relax and enjoy it.

Furthermore, the inhibitions of women make it difficult for them to explain to men what they enjoy and dislike, so women are part of the reason that men are ignorant about women's sexual characteristics.

The Women's Ministry can improve the situation by finding women who are less inhibited, and those women can help design educational materials to give men a better understanding of women.

The schools must also teach the girls that the difficulty women have with enjoying sex is simply an unfortunate aspect of life. It is not due to sexist or abusive men. Women were designed to get most of their enjoyment from children, not from men or sex.

Affection is more satisfying than sex

Both men and women get a lot of enjoyment from affection, but in our modern societies, it is difficult for men and women to be affectionate with each other, unless they are married. The reason is because men have been fooled into believing that women who are affectionate with them are women who want sex, because that is what television programs and Hollywood movies show. Furthermore, the Hollywood movies create the impression that men are affectionate with women only as a way of getting sex.

Another problem with being affectionate with people is that our modern societies have a lot of diversity in religions and customs, which creates tremendous awkwardness in every social encounter, including such common events as greeting one another in the morning.

It is especially difficult for adults to show affection towards children because every nation has a serious problem with pedophilia.

This constitution will improve the situation by requiring the government officials to create a homogeneous society, and requiring the Security and Courts Ministries to evict pedophiles, rapists, and other people who cause trouble.

Since the government has control of culture, the government officials can experiment with reducing the emphasis on sex, and reducing the titillation of men. For example, flirting and sexually attractive clothing is restricted to the courtship and certain other social activities.

Those type of changes will create a more friendly social environment. The women and children will not fear the men, so our relationships should be more pleasant, and more affectionate.

The women and children will be able to ride bicycles and electric vehicles, and walk anywhere in the city without fear, even during the evenings. They will not have to worry about being kidnapped, raped, molested, or grabbed.

The women and children would be able to use stairways and elevators by themselves without any fear, and they would be able to go swimming naked without worrying about men making lewd remarks or trying to see what is between their legs.





Activities Ministry

The Operations Branch of the government has total control of the culture in the city, so the Women's Division has an Activities Ministry to allow them to provide their opinions on the recreational activities, birthday parties, holiday celebrations, social clubs, city festivals, and other leisure activities. This ministry makes it easy for women to suggest new activities, changes to an existing activity, and the termination of an activity.

The Activities Ministry is intended to encourage women to get involved with experimenting with the leisure activities of women so that they don't complain about boredom, or that the city activities have been designed only for men and children.

For example, they could investigate the issue of whether women would get more enjoyment from life if they felt comfortable enough to sing. Prior to the 20th century, women would often sing with their friends, and mothers would often sing to their children, but modern women have been intimidated by the professional singers to such an extent that they are embarrassed to sing.

This constitution encourages participatory activities, so the Activities Ministry should experiment with activities that encourage women to sing in order to determine whether the decrease in singing is because women actually prefer to listen to professional singers, or because our culture encourages the ridicule of people who cannot sing as well as the professionals.

I enjoy recorded music, and music that is played by robots, but for some reason I find singing to be more enjoyable when it comes from a real person, especially if I know them. By experimenting with activities that encourage women to sing, we will discover whether I am unusual, or if most people get more enjoyment from songs when more women are involved with singing.

For example, the Activities Ministry could experiment with social affairs in which the women are encouraged to sing, as in the image below.

With robots to provide the music, it becomes very easy for us to arrange for social affairs in which the people can sing because we don't have to worry about coordinating our singing with a group of human musicians.

By encouraging the women to experiment with social activities, they will discover which activities they enjoy and benefit from, and it will help us understand the differences between what men and women enjoy and benefit from.

The men must provide leadership to the women

The Women's Division does not have any authority to alter culture, so when one of their ministries wants to make changes to our culture, such as creating a new social or recreational event, or altering the school curriculum, they must post their requests for changes.

This allows the other ministers to reject their requests and provide the women with advice. For example, if the Activities Ministry were to post a request for the city to provide smash cake birthday parties, the other ministers could reject that request.

None of the existing cultures are providing leadership to the women. Instead, businesses exploit them for profit, some men exploit them for sex, and most husbands are pandering to their wives, or losing their temper and fighting with them.

The Women's Division will make it easier for men to provide leadership. The women will be able to develop their complaints and suggestions, and then present them to the government officials. The government officials must respond, and they are judged by the value of their response. They will not be able to pander to the women, ignore them, or fight with them. They will be under pressure to provide the women with intelligent advice and suggestions.

The women will be able to easily distribute the advice to the other women because they will have an organization that makes it easy for them to discuss information and pass it around among themselves.

The Women's Division is for research, not parties

The Women's Division doesn't manufacture anything, or directly control the culture of the city. The Women's Division is not a social club or a recreational activity, either. It is a government agency, and its purpose is to allow the women to analyze culture and suggest improvements to it. It is for women who are seriously interested in investigating the lives, customs, and problems of women, and who want to make suggestions on how to improve life for women.

They post their suggestions in the Requests category, just like other government officials. This gives them more authority than the individual citizens who must post their suggestions in the Suggestions category, which has less "status".

The ministers of the other divisions must respond to the requests from the Women's Division, and those ministers are judged by their responses, so they will not be able to react with insults or promises to look into the issue. This will force the ministers in the other divisions to respond to the women's suggestions in a serious manner.

Although it is a government agency intended for research and analyses, the women can do things that would irritate men, such as bring their babies and young children to work, including to some of their discussions.

Men are prohibited in the Women's Division

What is a “woman”?

As of 2024, there are a lot of arguments in the USA over who among us is a "woman". Some people promote the concept of giving each person the freedom to decide for himself if he is male, female, or something else, but providing people with that freedom is not solving the problem. Rather, it increases the number of arguments.

For example, it has allowed people who were born with male sexual organs to get involved with women's sports, resulting in some women complaining that those people should not classify as "women". It has also caused some women to complain that they don't want those "women" in the "women's" bathrooms or "women's" dressing rooms.

The freedom to choose whether we are male or female is another example of a freedom that is detrimental. Rather than improve our lives, it is increasing arguments, stress, frustration, and anger.

The reason this freedom causes trouble is for the same reasons many other freedoms cause trouble. Specifically:



Most people have average or below-average intellectual abilities, so they cannot make intelligent decisions about any issue.





Most people do not have the emotional abilities to discuss issues calmly, look critically at their own opinions, look favorably at other people's opinions, or compromise on policies. Therefore, their emotions distort their conclusions, even if they excel in intelligence and education.

Our prehistoric ancestors had to deal with simplistic problems, such as finding food and protecting themselves from wolves, and even stupid, illiterate, and uneducated people can make sensible decisions about those issues. Today, however, we must deal with a lot of complex problems. The majority of people are no longer able to deal with the problems in their lives.

We have made our social environment more complex, and this requires that the human mind evolve to be able to deal with this more complex environment.

Instead of calmly analyzing and discussing issues, most people argue with one another over who is smart and who is stupid, or who is righteous and who is evil. They behave like apes fighting over territory, not like scientists who are trying to understand and improve our lives.

The decisions about whether a person is male or female must be made by people who have above-average intelligence and self-control. This can result in complicated policies. For example, they might decide on creating four categories of people; namely, men, women, transgender men, and transgender women. With those definitions, a transgender man would be classified as a "transgender man", rather than as a "woman".

Those definitions would divide the population into four groups, and each group could be treated differently at their jobs, and in social and recreational activities. For example, the transgender men would not prohibited from participating in recreational activities for women unless the women invited them. Likewise, a restaurant that sets aside an evening for men would be able to prohibit transgender women.

We must acknowledge and deal with sexual misfits

This constitution is based on the theory that there is no distinct dividing line between male and female. Although most people are "typical" men or women, a small percentage of the population has an "abnormal" mixture of male and female mental and/or physical characteristics.

The minds of some women are abnormally masculine or feminine, and the same is true of men. To complicate the situation, the bodies of some women have partial or complete male sexual organs, and some men have partial or complete female organs.

The Death Ministry of the Health Division is required to euthanize the fetuses and babies that are sexually abnormal. That will eliminate the babies with abnormal sexual organs, but we do not yet have the technology to determine whether a baby's mind has defective sexual emotions. Therefore, we must accept the unpleasant fact that a small percentage of the population will have abnormal sexual desires. We must accept those people, but they must be prohibited from reproducing.

Transgender surgeries are cruel

Ideally, the people who have sexual cravings that do not match their sexual organs would be able to have surgeries to give them the sexual organs that they want. Unfortunately, we do not have the technology to change our sexual organs.

Here is a video of surgeons who are transforming a man into a woman, and here is a video of an attempt to provide a woman with a penis by using skin and muscles from her forearm.

Those videos show that the operations, as of 2024, is brutal, and the result is a seriously defective sexual organ. We do not have the ability to create a penis from a forearm, or provide a man with a vagina.

The attempts to transform a person's sexual organs requires a lot of labor and resources, and it causes the sexually mixed up people to suffer a lot of pain. If the benefits from the surgery outweighed the disadvantages, then the surgery would be justifiable, but do the benefits outweigh the disadvantages? That decision should be made by scientists with self-control, not the public or the businesses that profit from the operations.

A free enterprise system allows people to get any type of surgery they can afford, but this Constitution requires the Health Division to authorize only the medical treatments that are beneficial to society. This Constitution does not permit the healthcare system to provide a person with a medical treatment simply because he wants it.

Everybody must accept their defects

The Teentown Ministry is required to give the teenagers practice in analyzing themselves, comparing themselves to other people, and discovering their particular genetic characteristics. Everybody is expected to acknowledge and accept their particular abilities, disorders, and defects in the same peaceful manner that we accept the color of our eyes and our hair, and our height.

Of course, a lot of people, especially women, cannot accept the color of their hair, and some will not accept their eye color, and a lot of men will not accept their short height. The businesses in a free enterprise system pander to them by providing them with hair dyes, colored contact lenses, and limb lengthening surgeries.

The Medical Ministry is required to make decisions about medical products and services according to what is best for the City Elders, not according to what people or organizations want. For example, how do the Elders benefit by producing hair dyes for people who dislike their hair color, or hair straightening chemicals for people who don't like their curly hair, or hair curling devices for people who dislike their straight hair? And if there is a benefit, does it outweigh the disadvantages of developing, manufacturing, and disposing of the equipment and chemicals required for the procedures?

Most of the products and services that the free enterprise system is providing to people who want to change their genetic characteristics are worthless or detrimental to the human race. Those products are not making our lives better.

Instead of providing products and surgeries for the people who dislike themselves, reproduction is restricted to the people with better characteristics so that each generation is more likely to be satisfied with their physical and mental characteristics. It is cruel and idiotic to allow people who dislike themselves to produce more people with hate themselves.

Everybody must acknowledge their defects

In order for a person to accept his defects, he must be willing to acknowledge that he has a defect. He cannot ignore his defects, or pretend that his defects are actually desirable characteristics.

For example, Dennis Miller believes that his bipolar disorder is a beneficial characteristic because he thinks it is the reason that he became wealthy and famous. His belief is based on the assumption that the people who have the most wealth and fame are having the most satisfying life.

If he had the opportunity to live a second life with a properly functioning brain, and then compare it to the life he has right now, would he prefer to be wealthy and bipolar, or be an ordinary person who has good mental health? I think everybody would prefer to have good mental health.

The people who are struggling to be extremely wealthy and famous assume that it is impossible to enjoy life with an ordinary income, or with ordinary status, but that is a false assumption. It is the result of a mind that is either ignorant about the issue of happiness, or cannot think properly.

The people who believe that they must be wealthy or famous in order to enjoy life have similar problems as the people who believe they must have extreme amounts of food or sex.

The people who cannot be satisfied with an ordinary life seem to be suffering from some internal disorder, and they make the mistake of assuming that they can find happiness by doing something, such as purchasing a larger house, or getting involved with a more dangerous recreational activity, or having more sex, or having sex with younger people.

When they acquire a larger house, or have sex with a younger person, they enjoy some momentary titillation, but then they return to their miserable condition, and that can result in them being fooled into thinking that house was not large enough, or the person they had sex with was not young enough. This can cause them to waste their life searching for happiness, and doing things to an excess.

They assume that they are improving their life as they acquire money or try increasingly risky activities, but they are not achieving anything. They are wasting their life, and frequently irritating other people.

If their brain was functioning properly, they would not have cravings for extreme wealth, danger, or sex. They would be relaxed, and be able to enjoy life as an ordinary person.

Most people can acknowledge that they have physical defects because our physical defects are sometimes so obvious that even idiots and children can see them. However, we have so little understanding of human mental characteristics that none of us can be certain what sort of mental problems we have.

We are so ignorant about mental characteristics that it is difficult for us to determine if a particular characteristic that we notice in our mind is a defect or a benefit. Because we are arrogant creatures, we have a tendency to assume that all of our mental characteristics are benefits.

Dennis Miller is just one example of a person who realizes that he has an unusual mental characteristic, but he interprets it as a benefit rather than a mental disorder.

Another example is Tim Cook, who believes that his homosexuality is one of God's greatest gifts. If he had the opportunity to live a second life as a heterosexual, would he prefer the life of a homosexual? I don't think so.

We must watch for “abnormal” women

We must pass judgment on one another's mental characteristics, behavior, and opinions in order for us to create a useful government. For example, the women who are abnormally masculine are likely to dominate a group of women. The masculine women will undoubtedly be the best leaders for the women, but only if they realize that they are different from the majority.

If the masculine women believe that they are typical women, they will assume that all other women have the same desires that they have. They will assume that the majority of women are behaving in a feminist manner because men are forcing young girls to play with dolls and wear pretty dresses, become mothers, and spend hours a day grooming themselves and cleaning their home.

They will not realize that most women are choosing that type of life, and that most men are pandering to their wives and daughters, and that most women are doing what they want to do.

The masculine women will provide good leadership only if they are able to understand and acknowledge that most women are feminine because of genetics rather than because of "sexism".

It is acceptable for the masculine women to promote policies and social activities for the masculine women, but they must spend most of their time providing leadership for the feminine women. They must realize that most women don't want to be "liberated" from becoming mothers.

Therefore, we must pass judgment on the leaders of the Women's Division to ensure that they are providing leadership rather than pushing our culture to fit their masculine desires.

Most women want to spend a lot of time grooming themselves, playing with babies, and chatting with other women. Men are not forcing women to do such things. There are actually a lot of men who wish their wives and daughters would reduce their use of jewelry and cosmetics, spend less time on phone conversations, and suppress their craving to take care of babies, dogs, retarded children, and incompetent adults. The masculine women could be beneficial leaders by helping the women to control those activities.

In order for the Women's Division to be useful, the women must realize that there is no dividing line between male and female, and that the masculine women are likely to dominate the leadership of the Women's Division, and that can result in the division representing a small minority of masculine women. That would be similar to allowing homosexual men to dominate the government and promote homosexual policies rather than consider what is best for the heterosexual men.

To counteract this potential problem, the Women's Division must consider what would be best for the City Elders. Although some of those women will be unusually masculine, they will be well behaved, rather than angry and whining about men. Furthermore, most of the female City Elders will be feminine, so they will dominate.

Also, everybody is encouraged to get involved with judging whether the leaders of the Women's Division are truly bringing improvements to the lives of women, just like people are encouraged to judge all of the other government agencies. People post their suggestions and complaints about the Women's Division in the Suggestions category. That should reduce the chances that the Women's Division policies become biased in favor of the masculine or homosexual women.

We have the right to know about other people's characteristics

It will be emotionally unpleasant for us to eliminate secrecy and pass judgment on which women are abnormally masculine, but we cannot design our culture to avoid upsetting people. The pain we feel when we hear an opinion we dislike is as meaningless as the unpleasant feeling we experience when we smell our farts.

Unpleasant emotional feelings are routinely stimulated throughout our lives. Everybody needs to find a way to deal with them in a quiet and respectable manner.

It is important for a modern society to eliminate secrecy, and pass judgment on everybody's mental and physical characteristics. This includes passing judgment on which men and women are abnormally masculine or feminine. It is especially important to pass judgment on the people in influential positions.

None of us have control over our genetic qualities, so nobody should be ashamed of what he is, and nobody should insult somebody else's genetic qualities. We must accept what we are, and what other people are. We must find a way to deal with our characteristics rather than hurt one another.

Everybody's life history, including all of their genetic disorders and medical problems, are put into the People database because everybody the right to know the truth about other people, and to analyze the human race.

Men are encouraged to judge the Women's Division

The Women's Division makes it easy for women analyze and discuss their problems, and have influence over their future, but it will fail if it becomes dominated by the type of women who are dominating our nations today; namely, criminals, religious fanatics, Jews, angry feminists, and women with intense cravings for wealth or status.

The women select leaders for their division, but the history of female voters shows that women are worse than men at selecting leaders and role models. Women are more likely than men to mimic one another, and they are more easily deceived and intimidated.

The Efficiency Ministry is responsible for passing judgment on the value of all of the ministers, so they will be involved with ensuring that the Women's Division has appropriate leadership. Also, as mentioned earlier, everybody is encouraged to post their suggestions and complaints in the Suggestions category. Men should become actively involved with helping the women with their leadership, rather than ignoring or pandering to the women.
The women must make intelligent suggestions

The women are accountable for their decisions

Unlike the feminist organizations in a democracy, which can operate in secrecy, and are not held accountable for anything they do, the leaders of the Women's Division are not allowed to be secretive, and they are held accountable for the effect they have on society.

As with all government officials, the director and ministers of the Women's Division must post documents to explain their decisions. For example, if they want a product to be produced, or the school curriculum to be changed, they must post a document in the Requests category to describe it. If they create or delete ministries, or change the policies that they follow, they must post a document in the Explanations category to explain it.

The women who make suggestions that turn out to be beneficial will get credit for it, and the women who make idiotic or selfish suggestions will have that listed as a failure.

Since the Director of the Women's Division must routinely replace the worst performing minister, whichever one of them has the most failures will be the first to be replaced.

Example: Do women work more than men?

For an example of a suggestion that would be regarded as a failure, imagine if one of the ministers in the Women's Division posted the following suggestion in the Request category:

Request for the Operations Division.
22 March 2054
Approved by:
Minister Betty Smith.
Author(s): Sarah Doe

Summary
Reduce the workload of women so that women do equal amounts of work as men.

Details
This document shows that women are working more than men. We want the Operations Division to reduce the workload of female employees so that women are doing the same amount of work as men.

At least one minister in the Operations Division, or the president, would be required to respond within a month by either approving the request, or rejecting it. If he rejects it, he must post a response to explain why. That allows everybody to pass judgment on whether it was rejected for a sensible reason.

The Operations Division should reject that request. Two problems with that document are:

1)
It is a analysis of a small number of people in "farming and herding groups in the Tibetan borderlands in rural China". That is not providing us with an analysis of a random sample of modern human societies. Rather, it is an analysis of a tiny and unusual group of people who did not advance like every other group of people. That is as deceptive as a scientist who studies a group of teenagers who have failed to graduate from high school, and claims that his analysis applies to all teenagers.

A person who treats unusual people as if they are a random sample of the human population should have an "intellectual failure" recorded in their database entry, and their documents should be considered as unacceptable. They should also be disqualified from being a "scientist". They should also be investigated to determine whether they are truly as stupid as they appear, or whether they are deliberately using unusual people in order to manipulate our opinions



2)

The author claims that "women work harder than men", but the author doesn't provide any explanation for how we can measure how "hard" a person is working.

Also, "hard work" is an emotional concept that means different things to different people. A job, recreational activity, or social activity is "hard" only to the people who do not have the physical and mental abilities to do it and/or enjoy it. Otherwise the activity will be "easy" and/or "fun". Likewise, an activity is "boring" or "monotonous" only to the people do not enjoy it.
 
There are some women working harder than men

To complicate this issue, there are some situations in which women must put more effort into their job than men. For example, if a man and woman are hired by a construction crew to build a rock wall, and if both of them are expected to move the same amount of rocks in the same amount of time, but the man has twice the strength of the woman, then the woman will have to exert a lot more effort, or spend more time, to accomplish the same amount of work. In that case, the woman could be described as working harder than the man.

Ironically, that type of "abuse" is the result of women, not "sexist" men. Specifically, it is the result of the women who demand that women be treated in the same manner that we treat men, rather than adjust jobs to fit women.

This concept applies to everybody, not just men and women. For example, if a 22-year-old man and a 60-year-old man are expected to do the same amount of physical labor, then the 60-year-old man will have to work harder, and he is more likely to injure his tendons and muscles than the younger man. Likewise, men that are scrawny have to work harder than the men who have a normal sized body.

The solution to this problem is to treat each person according to his particular physical and mental characteristics.

This is another example of how the people who promote treating people "equally" are promoting policies that are actually cruel and abusive.

We are similar, but not identical

This constitution prohibits different classes of people. Everybody is treated as a team member of equal status, but we are not treated as if we are identical to one another.

The people in leadership positions are required to experiment with job environments, medical policies, meals, and other culture to determine what should be adjusted to fit a particular person. For example, it would be absurd to give every child and adult exactly the same medical treatment and meals.

This constitution restricts the people in leadership positions to those who can acknowledge and understand that there are mental and physical differences between men and women, different races, different age groups, and pregnant women.

The people in leadership positions are required to adjust the work environments, meals, recreational activities, medical treatments, and other culture to fit each particular person.

For example, women evolved a lot of manual dexterity, and this enables them to outperform men in the tasks that require finger coordination, such as typing. A lot of women who can do typing as a full-time job without complaining that it is "hard" work, whereas most men would consider that job to be a form of torture.

If men were expected to type as quickly as women do, we would frequently be reprimanded by our supervisor for typing too slowly, and we would frequently be fired for not having adequate typing abilities. If the men did not understand that men were genetically inferior to women in regards to finger dexterity, the men might accuse the women of having "toxic femininity", and that the "sexist" women have created "glass ceilings" to prevent men from getting promotions.

Typing 30 to 80 words a minute for 8 hours every day is "hard" work only if to the people who do not have the physical and mental ability to do it and enjoy it. Likewise, the work of a carpenter, chemist, machinist, or farmer is "hard" only if to the people who don't have the mental and physical abilities to do and enjoy those jobs.

It is detrimental to allow people to complain that some jobs are hard, frustrating, disgusting, monotonous, or demeaning. It is also detrimental to promote the opposite; specifically, that some jobs are "dream_jobs".

Children should be taught that there are no good or bad jobs, and no hard or easy jobs. Children should be taught to experiment with different tasks, and try to determine what they are good at, and what they enjoy. They should be taught that the genetic differences between us allow us to do and enjoy different types of work, and that we should be grateful that we are not all exactly the same.

We should be grateful for the people who can do the jobs that we don't have the abilities and/or desires to do. We should not insult those people as doing hard work, or disgusting work.

Children should be taught that men and women have slightly different physical and mental abilities, so we should not encourage men and women to compete with one another, or criticize one another.

We should instead try to understand the differences between men and women, and allow men and women to have different jobs, meals, medical treatments, social activities, work environments, and other culture.

The Courts Ministry can fire the Woman's Director

The women in the Women's Division are responsible for selecting and replacing their director, but to provide checks and balances, the Efficiency Minister of the Quality Division is required to pass judgment on the performance of the Women's Division, and can post a request to have an intellectual trial to determine if the director should be fired.

One reason why the Efficiency Minister would want to fire a director is that the women are posting too many idiotic requests, and another reason is that the environment in the Women's Division is causing bad attitudes or undesirable behavior among the women, or the public.

If the Courts Ministry determines that the Women's Director is inappropriate, they can fire her, and by doing so, they force the women to select another, and hopefully more competent, director.