|The Jews are still
failing, over and over
I use AOL for email, and they display news headlines whenever I sign on to check my email. On the morning of 2 May 2014, their number one news item was about a 10 hour battle in the Ukraine and the shooting down of two helicopters. Highlighted in blue was the interesting question, "Proof at last of Russia's intentions?"
Later that evening their number one news article was about a fire in Odessa that killed dozens of people, but the text under the headline was the same:
If you were writing a news article about the fighting in the Ukraine, would you ask, "Proof at last of Russia's intentions?" That question implies that we have been waiting for proof of Russia's intentions, and that the shooting of the two helicopters might be the proof that we have been waiting for.
Russia and China have isolated themselves from the rest of the world throughout human history, and until recently, they would not even allow their citizens to travel outside of their nation. Both of those nations have treated their citizens as prisoners or kidnapping victims. For thousands of years, both nations have had governments that are dominated by antisocial, aggressive, violent savages. Their governments also irritate everybody in the world with their constant envy of us, whining about us, and their hatred and paranoia of us.
On 4 March 2014, Michael Savage, (I mention him here), interviewed Paul Watson (who works with Alex Jones), about the events in Ukraine. The box below has a transcript of a portion of that interview:
Hopefully you can understand how Savage and Watson are trying to manipulate their audience. Specifically, the Jews and their agents bring a problem to our attention, but they make no attempt to encourage us to analyze the problem or suggest possible solutions. Instead, they try to convince us that the problem could accidentally escalate into a disaster, such as a war. They imply that there is nothing we can do to stop this accident from happening.
During that interview, Watson pointed out that the first world war got started over a much less significant issue than the fighting in the Ukraine. I think he and a lot of other Jews are becoming extremely frustrated that they have provided us with more justification for a war, but we are putting up more resistance to starting a war. Their frustration is causing them to make idiotic remarks, such as, "Proof at last of Russia's intentions?"
In April 2014, a few men wearing masks passed out some leaflets outside of a synagogue in the Ukraine. The leaflets told the Jewish people to register with the government. Jews around the world boasted that they are under an attack by anti-Semites. However, the event has a lot of peculiar similarities to Crystal Night of 1938, and therefore, we should consider it as an attempt by Jews to bring pity to themselves, and to frighten the Jews into joining other Jews in fighting the mysterious anti-Semites.
Whenever we find a group of mysterious people doing something in a very secretive manner, such as the group "Anonymous", we should wonder, "Why are these people hiding their identity, and who are they hiding from?"
On 13 April 2014 Glenn Miller traveled to a Jewish community center and killed two people who were supposedly Christians, and then traveled to a Jewish retirement center and killed one woman who was supposedly Christian. Have you noticed the pattern that the people who hate and attack Jews are rarely successful in their attempts to kill Jews? For example: In 2009, James von Brunn traveled to a Holocaust Memorial Museum and killed a black security guard.Virtually all of the anti-Semitic acts, including Crystal Night, follow the suspicious pattern that Jews are rarely hurt. You should also be suspicious of how many of the anti-Semites have a large collection of weapons and ammunition, but when they go on a killing spree, they leave their arsenal at home or in their car.
Malaysian Flight 370; another failure
An article at extremetech.com has such amusing remarks as, "How on earth, with all our technology, do we lose a giant plane?" and "Do we live in the stone age or something?"
The Jews have been struggling to create hatred of Muslims for centuries, and they show no sign of stopping. They also seem to be involved with bringing Muslims to Europe and America in an attempt to create fights. On 16 May 2014, AOL had this news headline:
We are tolerating journalism of an extremely low quality level. We allow journalists to make remarks, such as claiming something has caused global outrage, without demanding that journalists provide evidence for their accusations. Who among the 7 billion people on the planet was outraged by this particular incident?
My suspicion is that the Jews secretly instigated this incident, and then gave it worldwide publicity in the hope of creating anger towards Muslims. Fortunately, most people ignored the incident, and after a few days the incident was forgotten. The Jews have failed yet again.
The Jews are becoming increasingly frustrated that they cannot control, remove, or assassinate President Obama or Eric Holder. They are losing control of governments everywhere. Their attempts to create racial fights is also failing. The image below was another that got worldwide publicity by Jews but, fortunately, most people ignored it.
The Jews have been failing to start racial fights year after year, but they continue to try, and by using the same techniques each time. I find this somewhat amusing because Jews frequently claim that Einstein said something like, "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over while expecting a different result".
Recently there were some attempted kidnappings, which I suppose was another failed operation by Jews. As with the Flight 370, the Jews tell us "al-Qaeda" or "al-Qaida" was somehow involved.
A lot of the sheeple are fooled by the Al-Qaida propaganda, but the sheeple will not determine the future of the human race. Is there anybody of importance who still believes that a mysterious, elusive group of suicidal Muslims are living in caves and trying to kill us?
In May 2014, the journalists told us that Germans were outraged over a soap that was referred to as "88". The media told us that the eighth letter of the alphabet is H, and that the German people were interpreting 88 as representing "HH", which could be interpreted as representing the phrase "Heil Hitler".
Once again we find the media making a remark that they do not and cannot support; namely, that shoppers are outraged. Which shoppers are outraged? How many shoppers?
Incidentally, even if it were true that the Nazis started the World Wars, and even if it were true that the Nazis killed 6 million Jews, why should the German people today feel guilty for Hitler, or what their ancestors did? No other nation shows any guilt for what their ancestors did. Besides, Hitler was from Austria, not Germany. Why not tell the Austrian people to feel guilty for producing Hitler? Austria also produced Josef Fritzl.
When humans settled into cities several thousand years ago, they entered a new social environment, but they continued to behave like savages. For example, they continue to allow their societies to become dominated by whichever man was the most successful at fighting for control. The end result was that their societies soon became dominated by abnormally aggressive, selfish men who had intense cravings for status and material wealth. Those men fooled the citizens into believing in the concept of "monarchies" and "inheritances". They became Kings and Queens, and most other people degraded into "peasants".
It is debatable as to whether serving Jews is an improvement over serving Kings and Queens. Would Kings and Queens have instigated such vicious world wars? Would Kings and Queens have staged the 9/11 attack and ordered the peasants to install explosives in the World Trade Center buildings? I don't think so. I suspect that the 20th century would have been noticeably less violent if the Kings and Queens had still been in control of Europe. I suspect that the Jews are more violent, selfish, and abusive.
a different race?
Ever since I was a child, I have been listening to Jews boast that they are the superior race of people, and that Jews are a race, not a religion. I have heard Jews insist that nobody can become a Jew unless their mother was a Jew. I have heard Jews claim that a Jew who becomes a Christian is a Jewish Christian, and that a Jew who becomes an atheist is a Jewish atheist. I also heard Jews insist that Sammy Davis was not a Jew.
In April 2014, David Duke posted this article in which he tries to discredit Arthur Koestler's theory that the white, Askenazi Jews are descendants of the Khazars. However, nobody, not even David Duke, knows what a "Jew" is, or who among us should be classified as a Jew, or where they originated from. So why is David Duke claiming to be an expert on Jews? Why is he trying to discredit Koestler's theory?
Why do we have trouble controlling ourselves?
An analysis of the 9/11 attack shows that before the Jews run a false flag operation, they try to get as many government officials, policemen, and other people involved in the attack as possible, or under their control through blackmail or bribery, so that they have lots of people to help them with the operation, and to help them suppress the truth.
A lot of people have been described as having an "obsessive compulsive disorder", or OCD. Britain has produced some television shows about people who are obsessed with cleaning items. Some of them have put their obsession to good use; namely, offering cleaning services. Although their obsession is amusing rather than a danger to society, it interferes with their lives, and some of them may be harming their health. For example, a woman named Hayley has such an obsession with sterilizing items with bleach that she spends hours a day exposed to bleach fumes.
Most people believe that the human mind has only two possible conditions, either 1) mentally ill, or 2) healthy. I think it would be more useful to describe a human mind as a random jumble of genetic traits, and that everybody has at least one mental characteristic that we could describe as a "defect" or a "problem". I don't think it is sensible to describe anybody as having a perfect brain. Everybody is defective to some degree.
As children grow up, they begin wondering what to do with their life. Children fantasize about all sorts of activities, but only a small percentage of the population actually makes a serious attempt to become government officials or billionaires.
It was tolerable for our prehistoric ancestors to have intellectual and emotional problems because they didn't have to do much with their mind. Their body was more important. A savage only has to be capable of feeding himself, reproducing, and raising babies. It does not matter if a savage occasionally hallucinates, or suffers from ringing in his ears, or if he gets dreams mixed up with reality, or if he has an intense craving for status or material items.
|Elliott Rodger and mental problems
On 23 May 2014, about 2 miles away from my home, Elliott Rodger killed 6 people and wounded 13 others. This appears to be another Jewish false flag operation that failed, similar to the Boston marathon bombing, the Sandy Hook school massacre, and many other recent, bizarre events, but I don't want to speculate on that possibility. Rather, the incident shows a serious problem that every nation is suffering from. Specifically, no nation shows any concern about the mental health of its citizens, or their morale, or whether the people are enjoying their lives.
In his videos and biography, he frequently complains that he is lonely, and that both men and women ignore him. (One video is here) He was unhappy with his lonely life, and he reacted by trying to figure out why he was so lonely. Since he had been given lots of money by his parents, he knew that he was not suffering from poverty, and since his parents had provided him with an education, he knew that he was not suffering from ignorance, either. So, why was he lonely?
Although nobody actually did anything to hurt Rodger directly, we could say that society is indirectly to blame for his anger because everybody ignored him.
These concepts apply to businesses, orchestras, and other organizations. In the world today, most people believe that businesses and other organizations should not be allowed to discriminate when hiring members. The end result is that many businesses hire an employee who nobody wants as a member, and those misfit employees are either ignored or treated like trash. We should describe this as tormenting the misfits, and it is also tormenting the people who have to work with the misfits.
This concept also applies to neighborhoods. In the world today, neighborhoods are not allowed to discriminate against who lives in their neighborhood, and the end result is that many of us are living among people we ignore, fear, or hate. We are tormenting one another with this philosophy. Every neighborhood should be allowed to choose who they want to live with, and evict the people they don't want.
Since none of us are perfect, all of us are living and working among mentally defective people. A society needs some type of quality control so that it can pass judgment on which citizens have mental problems that are beyond the tolerable threshold, and need to be evicted or restricted.
Trying to figure out who among us is too mentally ill to live with us will not be easy. For example, at godlikeproductions.com, where Jews regularly post propaganda to cover up their crimes, Aaron Bradley showed some support for Rodger. If you were a leader in the quality control division of the government, would you recommend that he be evicted, restricted, or considered to be within the acceptable limits? Of course, you don't have enough information about him to make a sensible decision, but this is just an example to encourage you to think about this issue. Take a look at a message he posted (he refers to Rodger as the "shooter"). It began:Grieving UCSB Sorority Slut proves shooter's pointAaron Bradley believes that college girls are supposed to "put out". If you have a sister or daughter in college, have you told her that one of her responsibilities is to "put out"? Although men are attracted to that philosophy, would you want men in leadership positions promoting that philosophy?
Now consider the differences and similarities between an obese person and Aaron Bradley. Many obese people realize that they are eating excessively, and they often become upset with themselves for not having the self-control that they wish they had. Many of them struggle to control themselves with various diets, and sometimes they seek help from other people, such as by joining weight-loss organizations, or by asking for gastric bypass surgery.
In his biography, Rodger mentions an incident in which he was sitting alone at a Starbucks cafe and saw a couple kissing each other. He became very angry and envious. When they got up to go to their car, he followed them, tossed the rest of his coffee on them, and then ran away. He wanted to hurt people who didn't even know of his existence simply because they were kissing in front of him.
If the police had seen Rodger throw coffee on the couple that kissed in front of him, they probably would have scolded him rather than arrested him, and the couple that he threw coffee on would probably have told the police that it was too insignificant for them to file a complaint.
As I mentioned years ago (here), during eighth grade I noticed that I was losing my physical abilities. By the end of high school, my body was very weak, and even though my emotions wanted to get married, whenever I met a woman who started showing an interest in me, it would cause me to think about supporting and caring for a wife and children, and that would cause me to back away. My body was too weak to want to deal with the responsibilities of a family.
Now consider what Rodger's life might have been if his mental disorder was a bit less severe. In such a case, his envy and anger would have been less intense, and his antisocial behavior would have been less disgusting. This would have made him less repulsive to other people, and that could have allowed him to find a few friends and a wife. Since his parents were willing to give him large amounts of money, it would have been easy for him to start a business, purchase a business, or get involved with Hollywood or government. Therefore, it would have been easier for him to become an influential person in American society.
Have you noticed that people in leadership positions in business, government, charities, churches, the media, and the schools show no interest in developing wonderful cities, or better transportation systems, or better school systems?
Aside from a few exceptions, such as Josef Fritzl, parents show a concern for the quality of their children's lives. Parents do not want to see any of their children lonely, suffering from bicycle accidents, or becoming damaged by toxic chemicals. Parents put an effort into helping their children to get exercise, eat a proper diet, learn about life, maintain good health, learn a useful skill, and have a pleasant life.
Asking the majority of people what they think is as useless as asking a group of fish where they are traveling to. The fish have no idea where they are going; they just follow each other.
The majority of people don't have enough intelligence to understand a government of representatives, a free enterprise system, evolution, religion, or many of the other issues that we have to deal with in this modern world. They are overwhelmed with the complexity of modern life. Unfortunately, they don't understand that they are overwhelmed. They insist that they are super geniuses who know everything about the universe.
A more appropriate philosophy is that everybody in society is a team member, including the government officials; that nobody is a peasant or a King; and that nobody's child deserves special treatment.
We must change our attitudes towards humans. People are not a perfect creation of a god. Every person is just a random collection of genetic traits, and each of us can be described as being "defective" or "imperfect" to some degree.
This photo shows people in Norway who got together in their streets to cry and pout as a result of the bombing attributed to Anders Breivik.
An interesting aspect of Rodger's videos and biography is his extreme boasting. For example, near the end of his biography he writes:Humanity has never accepted me among them, and now I know why. I am more than human. I am superior to them all. I am Elliot Rodger; Magnificent, glorious, supreme, eminent; Divine! I am the closest thing there is to a living god. Humanity is a disgusting, depraved, and evil species. It is my purpose to punish them all. I will purify the world of everything that is wrong with it.Men have a very strong craving to climb to the top of the social hierarchy, be admired by other men, and impress women. I would bet that every man occasionally titillates himself with praise, such as by telling himself that he is highly educated, strong, talented, intelligent, or coordinated. Many men also occasionally boast to other people about their education, talent, strength, and coordination.
Religion is like a coloring book, as I described years ago here. Every Jew, Catholic, Buddhist, and Hindu picks out the attitudes and activities that he is attracted to, and he ignores the attitudes and activities that he doesn't like. Most Jews do not like the idea of putting blood on their doorway at Passover, so they disregard that activity, but they are attracted to the concept that they are the superior race, so they follow that concept.
Are we too incompetent to participate in our health care?
Millions of people besides me need thyroid hormones, and we need to take them every day for the rest of our lives. That provides a very large market for thyroid hormones. There are millions of other people who need other medical drugs. Ideally, we would be able to order the drugs online, but our government requires us to get a doctor's prescription.
Scientists have developed a lot of equipment for measuring our medical condition. For example, there are devices that can measure anti-bodies, hormone levels, white blood cells, and blood pressure. However, most of the equipment is bulky and expensive. Some exceptions are the devices that can measure blood sugar, pulse, and blood pressure. Those devices are so small that they are portable.
However, if anybody purchased a Star Trek "Tricorder" for his own use, and especially if he allowed his friends to use it, he would be arrested for practicing medicine without a license. This would undoubtedly result in criminals selling these devices illegally, and thousands of people would be in jail for using or selling them.
Although I agree that most people cannot do a good job of maintaining their health, one significant difference between my philosophy and that of the government officials is that I think we should design society for the high quality people, whereas the government officials want to design society to give special pampering to the mentally incompetent and the criminals.
I don't believe that our government officials put any effort into developing a sensible policy for medical drugs. They restricted prescriptions to a one year supply of medicine, but what does the Earth's rotation around the sun have to do with our medical needs? I don't think the government officials researched the issue and came to the conclusion that one year is coincidentally the most optimum limit for medicines. I suspect that this policy was the idea of doctors or pharmaceutical companies, and the purpose was to help them make more money, not to help us.
There would be a dramatic change in governments if we could review their policies in the same serious manner that scientists review one another, and if we could replace the officials who consistently do the worst job. For example, in May 2014 China installed an oil rig in an area of the ocean near Vietnam where the two nations are arguing over who owns that part of the ocean. Imagine if the Chinese officials had to first present this policy to the nation and get a critical review of it.
The Chinese government believes that by acquiring more oil, they will improve their nation. This attitude is common all around the world. All throughout my life I have heard Americans, mainly those who call themselves "conservatives", whining that the government is hurting the nation by restricting or prohibiting oil exploration in national parks and certain other areas. They believe that by acquiring more oil, America will improve.
One lesson that we should learn from the scientists who are pushing us into accepting carbon taxes is that we must encourage people to propose alternative policies. As I mentioned in a previous document (here), if scientists were serious about their global warming theories, then they would have considered alternatives to carbon taxes, but they are conveniently ignoring the fact that there are alternatives. They are trying to trick us into believing that there is only one solution; namely, carbon taxes.
|The Trans-Pacific Partnership
As of May 2014, America, Japan, and ten other nations are still struggling to agree on a "Trans-Pacific Partnership". The purpose of this partnership is to make it easier for the nations to engage in foreign trade.
Many people boast about protecting ancient traditions, but in this modern world, we have to think about everything we do. We must pass judgment on whether a prehistoric tradition will help us or hurt us. Some ancient traditions, such as celebrating birthdays, may be beneficial or harmless, but we are hurting ourselves when we encourage farms or businesses to use prehistoric technology.
Incidentally, that picture shows a scarecrow that is holding a bow. Apparently, the people in the 1400s believed that by holding a bow, the birds would be more frightened!
Australia, New Zealand, America, and some other nations can produce beef, lamb, and certain other meat products at a much lower cost than the Japanese. Therefore, from the point of view of the Japanese people, they should have access to foreign meat. However, the Japanese government is restricting the importation of foreign meat in order to protect a few inefficient Japanese businesses.
Every year the Japanese impress us with their latest improvements to robots, cameras, automobiles, and rockets, but they are not impressing anybody with their latest achievements in language, eating utensils, school systems, or agriculture. Actually, they haven't made any improvements to their eating utensils for 5000 years. They made a few improvements to their written language, but it is still an incredibly crude, burdensome language.
I mentioned that the reason the Japanese can make impressive achievements with robots is because they are free to explore robot technology rather than pressured to mimic the robot technology of their ancestors. However, even though the robot engineers are free of their ancestors, each engineer is under pressure by his own emotions to design robots in a certain manner, and every business is under pressure to design robots that appease consumers.
Consumers have a craving for robots and artificial limbs that look like real humans, but we should not care what consumers want. We should ask ourselves, "What will provide us with the most pleasant life?"
We could also design artificial limbs with storage areas for phones, medical monitoring devices, or water bottles, and they could be decorated with iridescent colors, or tiny lights.
|Will any of us live to see proper
There may be a few men in our government who are doing a wonderful job as leader, but every nation seems to be dominated by government officials who exploit their authority to please their selfish cravings. They are not interested in improving society, providing guidance to us, or helping us to develop our talents. They focus on mansions, pampering by servants, eliminating competitors, and feeling important. They never provide us with intelligent analyses of our problems, or about life. Nothing they say is worth recording for the future generations.
Imagine government officials who have the attitude of a drill sergeant. In such a case, government officials would not be aloof Kings and Queens who use their authority to satisfy their personal cravings for material wealth, fame, and pampering. Instead, they would be a team member who was working with us, and for the purpose of making society better for everybody.
There are already a lot of Asians who believe that powdered rhinoceros horns are an aphrodisiac, so imagine businesses taking advantage of that by encouraging the Asians to believe that when a man loves a woman, he provides her with a small vial of powdered rhinoceros horn. Imagine the Asian women becoming convinced that they should receive a vile when they are engaged, and when they are married, and for each of their anniversaries.
You would probably consider the Asian people to be incredibly foolish, gullible, or ignorant, but how is a craving for diamonds any more sensible? What is the difference between an Asian who proudly displays a vial of powdered rhinoceros horn on a necklace, and an American who proudly displays a diamond on a necklace? What is the difference between Africans who are raising rhinoceroses for their horns, and Africans who are mining diamonds?
In a previous document I mentioned a video documentary (here), about a Chinese man who traveled around China to convince poor people to enroll in the fraudulent Hongbo College. In that documentary, the man seems to justify his abusive behavior by pointing out that the students who enrolled in the college were not interested in getting an education. He implies that many of them realized that the college was a fraud, but they didn't care because all they wanted was a diploma.Our leaders should provide guidance during problems
Consider the similarity between the way animals and humans react to floods. When a rainstorm floods a nest of ants, the ants react by grabbing their eggs and larvae and running away from the water. After the water has drained away, the ants return to the nest, or build a new nest if the old one was destroyed, and then they resume their life. When the next rainstorm occurs, the ants repeat the process. They cycle repeats over and over, century after century.
The natural tendency of a human is to behave like an animal. One of the reasons that we need leaders is to dampen our animal cravings and provide us with guidance so that we behave in a more intelligent manner.
When a group of people experience a flood, our leaders should get together and put some effort into determining why the flood occurred, and then they would experiment with methods of reducing floods in the future. They would do something to improve our lives, not ignore the problem like a stupid animal.
Now consider the similarity between the way humans and animals provide themselves with a place to sleep at night. The animals that are nomadic will wander around during the day, and in the evening they find a location to sleep, but they do not coordinate their activities, or consider the history of the location, such as whether it is a floodplain. Each animal simply finds a location that is near the other animals, and then lays down to sleep.
Now consider how animals react to crime. This is a documentary about a tribe of monkeys in the Japanese mountains. One day a monkey from some other area chased after one of the females of the tribe, apparently to rape her. She ran away while screaming, and some of the other males of her tribe rushed over to protect her. They chased after the other male, but after he crossed a stream of water, they decided not to bother chasing him any further. Their attitude was that the problem was over, and they resumed their life as if nothing had happened. They were successful in preventing that particular attempted rape, but they didn't do anything to prevent future rapes.
When Vahey was confronted by a woman about the photos on his USB drive, he told her, "I was molested as a boy, that is why I do this. I have been doing this my whole life."
If we had total video surveillance of the entire planet, we might find that pedophilia is so common that several men are molesting children as you read this sentence. And we might find that after those men have finished, a few other men begin to molest some other children.
Total video surveillance would also show us that there are lots of other destructive activities occurring on a regular basis, such as burglaries, men and women who are deceiving each other into marriage, government officials who are taking bribes, and teenage gangs that are fighting with each other.
Our leaders should analyze all of our chemicals and products to determine if any of them are harming our health or the planet. For example, years ago I noticed that the soft plastic and silicone spatulas seem to be shedding material. Some hard plastics seem to be stable, but the soft plastics and rubbers do not. I stopped using spatulas in case consuming small bits of plastic or rubber on a continuous basis is dangerous, but is it? Or are those materials safe for us to eat?