Can we trust the
American Free Press?
25 August 2006
Why would firemen start fires?
Do you have the emotional toughness to discuss the possibility
that 9/11 was a setup by Zionists in order to fool us into hating Arabs?
Can you also discuss the possibility that the American citizens who
struggle to expose Zionist crimes are actually Zionists?
you start a lot of
fires to stop a fire?
It seems like a crazy concept. However, firemen frequently set many
fires in order to control a large fire.
It is important to note that firemen set only small
fires, and they remain in control of those fires.
Why would Zionists expose Zionism?
If you were a Zionist, would you
expose Zionism? Again, it seems like a crazy concept.
However, Zionists will expose small amounts of Zionism in order to maintain
control of the Goyim.
As with firemen, they only do a little damage, and they remain in control
of the situation.
By exposing a little Zionism, they lure the Goyim over to them.
The Gullible Goyim gather around the Zionists to learn more about the
The Zionists remain in control.
Why do we question the American
Some people have made the assumption that I doubt the honesty
of the American Free Press only because
I assumed the AFP censored four of Bollyn's articles, as mentioned in this
So let me clear this issue up first (there is more at the very end of
I discuss this censoring issue more in my response to
Every editor has the right to reject articles. The rejection of articles
is not evidence that the AFP has been
infiltrated or influenced by the criminal network.
However, I never said "the one and only reason" that I accuse American
Free Press of infiltration is because they censored or delayed articles
In this article:
I mention the infiltration of the American Free Press:
|They started selling Hufschmid's book in 2002, but about a year later
they abruptly stopped selling it. How abruptly? Well, they had taken a
customer's order, took his money, but never sent him a book. The customer
contacted Hufschmid a few weeks later to ask why he had not received his
Obviously, somebody told the American Free Press to stop selling the
book, and the employees did not bother (or were afraid) to fill the final
order. The American Free Press has yet to explain why they did this, and
why they would treat their customer in this manner.
That was written before Bollyn's articles were censored. Therefore,
I made my accusations
before the censoring,
because of the censoring.
Am I jealous that they don't sell
When I complain about the publicity that Dylan Avery's video
Loose Change has been getting, many people respond that I am jealous
1) Why does the AFP prefer to beg for money?
I suppose people will now respond that I am jealous that the American
Free Press sells other people's books and videos.
However, there are two important issues to consider before making such
The American Free Press claims to be suffering financial problems,
so they beg for donations. For some
2) Why doesn't the AFP provide an explanation for why they avoid
my book and video?
Help American Free Press keep this web
page on their web site new link
They also beg on their subscription form:
Your advance renewals and donations help
make it possible for AFP to continue...
PDF document is here
-- html version of the pdf file is
They are having a conference September 2 - 3, 2006 and they tell
us that if we cannot be there, we can contribute money to help bring students
to the meeting:
SORRY, I CAN’T COME! BUT I CONTRIBUTE
$ ______ to help pay for student passes—$125 each
version of the pdf file ... this document
How many students will they bring? And which students? Does anybody
verify the AFP does what they say?
My book was bringing the AFP some profit.
When they stopped selling my book, they voluntarily and deliberately
terminated one of their sources of income.
Why would they rather beg for donations? Is this your idea of a respectable
Some people will make excuses for them, such as,
"Well, maybe they didn't make enough
money from your book to make it worth their trouble!"
If you jump to such assumptions, (and even if you don't) you should
look at this document:
That document explains that it is absurd to make assumptions, and then
disprove your own assumptions!
In other words, don't assume that my book was a financial burden on
the AFP, or a burden on their employees, and then deduce that they couldn't
afford the burden.
Selling my book was no trouble or
expense to them. All they did was take orders. They would send me
the names and addresses, and I did the shipping.
They didn't have to buy any inventory, and there was no legal contract
between us. There was
no burden on them.
All they did was collect money.
Why would they abruptly terminate an offer as nice as that?
Perhaps they beg for money to create the illusion that they are struggling
Plus, when they fake poverty, they may fool wealthy people into donating
large amounts of money, or even fool people into including the American
Free Press in their will.
The American Free Press can prove my insinuations are incorrect by providing
us with their financial records, including those of the Spotlight
Nobody is obligated to sell anything I produce. However, if
the American Free Press doesn't want to sell my book or video, they could
up a reason, such as, "We don't want to sell it".
The American Free Press is "controlled
They could even make up a sensible
reason, such as:
"We prefer to sell the books and videos we produce or authorize.
We are not a retail store, so we don't want to carry many books and videos
from other people."
Instead of behaving in a respectable manner, they refuse
to explain to me -- or Bollyn! -- why they stopped selling my book.
The only reason American Free Press initially decided to sell my book
is because Bollyn encouraged (pressured?) them to do so.
A year or so ago Bollyn was at their office in Washington DC, and he
asked Anne Cronin why they would not
sell my video. She made some sort of vague remark about how my video is
crummy. She was especially annoyed with the section in which my head expands
and contracts like a cartoon character.
Bollyn was confused. He called me on the phone and asked if I have another
video in which my head expands and contracts.
I had to explain to him that I only have one video, and that Cronin
is either getting my video mixed up with some other video, or the AFP is
simply making a lousy excuse to ignore
Anne Cronin's absurd remark reminds
me of the remark Larry Silverstein made on television in which he accused
the fire department of demolishing Building 7.
The attitude of both Larry Silverstein and the American Free Press is:
"Kiss my Khazar butt!"
To summarize this, even if Bollyn's four articles had not
been censored or delayed, I would continue to stand by my accusation that
the AFP is controlled by Zionists.
I have been suspicious of the AFP
It is also possible that the Spotlight and the AFP were created
by Zionists, so they never had to infiltrate it. The newspaper
may have been a trick from the first day to fool the Americans into following
Zionists rather than other Goyim.
Michael Piper's latest book is called the Judas
Goats. Maybe Michael Piper and the other people at the AFP are
the Judas Goats!
I heard about the AFP in 2002 when I became involved in the
September 11 attack. It was a sometime around spring of 2002 that Christopher
Bollyn, who was living in Europe at the time, contacted me by e-mail when
he saw my web site about 9/11.
Michael Collins Piper
When we discussed the evidence that the September 11 attack was a hoax,
he would occasionally make remarks about how he had to be careful what
he wrote because the editors at the paper didn't want to offend the military
people and other readers of the newspaper.
I thought it was peculiar that a newspaper that claims to be fighting
corruption is tiptoeing around the corruption out of fear of upsetting
Eventually I started looking at their articles, and I subscribed to
the newspaper. That's when I noticed that they have a lot of peculiar
authors. Let's take a look at some of them.
I trusted and was impressed by Piper, and I suggested to Daryl
Smith that he interview Piper. Smith talked to Piper and was impressed,
also. So Smith interviewed him a few times during the end of 2005 and the
beginning of 2006.
After a few interviews, however, Piper stopped answering phone calls
or email. He seemed to be avoiding Smith.
A couple of Smith's guests told Smith that they had been warned to stay
away from Smith, so Smith made a remark on his radio show that he assumes
Piper had also been threatened.
Piper responded to this accusation by announcing on his
radio show that he was not frightened or scared of anybody.
This issue would not have much significance except that we have seen
this odd behavior with many guests.
Specifically, many people start out being friendly to both me and Smith.
Later they turn on one or both of us, or they simply stop communicating
In most cases, we come to the conclusion that they were infiltrators.
What gives them away as infiltrators is that they have no qualms about
providing assistance to WingTV, Mark Farrell, Mark Glenn, John Kaminski,
911truth.org, Kurt Nimmo, and others who appear to be working for the Zionist
Isn't it interesting that Mike Piper started out being friendly to Smith,
and then stopped talking to him, but he continues to support... guess who?
WingTV, Mark Farrell, Mark Glenn, and all the other Zionist infiltrators.
More amazing, Piper continues to praise and support David Duke!
Please investigatet David Duke before you defend him up as a great leader
who is going to save us from Zionism. Have you seen this yet:
Are they real Nazis?
He writes articles and book reviews for the AFP. In a review
of a "fascinating new book, Suppressed Science" by Jack Phillips, he writes:
|In another chapter, Phillips explores the art of dowsing—using divining
rods to locate sources of underground water.
As is typical with liars,
he follows that sentence with a remark that allows himself to get out of
trouble for promoting such nonsense:
|Most mainstream scientists reject it.
Tiffany then continues promoting the possibility that dowsing
|However, some progress has been made toward giving dowsing a scientific
foundation, says Phillips. Dr. Elizabeth Jurka has found that the brains
of dowsers, when dowsing, show four different types of brainwaves, as if
the individuals were asleep and awake at the same time. And another scientist,
Dr. Zaboj V. Harvalik,....
The American Free Press is selling
that deceptive book, but they will not
sell my book. How do you
John Tiffany also gave a favorable review to Victor Thorn's book 9/11
Evil. Furthermore, the AFP sells
Thorn's book. Is it because Thorn's book is better than mine?
The American Free Press prints some of his less deceptive articles.
However, by giving him publicity, they are promoting
a liar. I have several articles that mention Szymanski,
He has been writing articles for AFP for years. In this article
he implies that America and Russia have the ability to control weather
all around the world:
He discusses the possibility that we have the ability to create and
destroy hurricanes, and that we could have stopped the Katrina hurricane.
There is no evidence that there
are any machines in America or Russia that can control the weather. Unfortunately,
trying to show that this theory is a hoax as futile as trying to show that
the aliens in New Mexico are a hoax, or that the image of Jesus on a cheese
sandwich is a hoax.
I don't want to waste my time trying to talk people out of believing
that America and Russia are having "Weather Wars". However, I will make
the accusation that Mike Blair and other people who promote Weather Wars,
crop circles, and aliens are fully aware that they are lying.
I will accuse Mike Blair and the others of being con artists; criminals;
Deception Delivery Devices.
I don't know why Blair and others are trying to deceive us, or who they
work for. Maybe Blair works for America, and maybe he thinks that he is
going to help us by running a psy-op that will counteract the Mossad psy-ops.
Or maybe he works for the Mossad.
He frequently writes about "Bilderberg". He writes as
if they are an organization:
Paul Craig Roberts
Tucker has been investigating these issues for many years, whereas
I only recently took a look at Bilderberg, the Council on Foreign Relations,
the Project for a New American Century, and other issues.
My opinion is that the Bilderberg is not an organization; rather,
it is analogous to a conference, a party, a social event, or an AIPAC meeting:
While some people show up at many Bilderberg meetings, some people have
only been to one meeting, and others have been to only a few of them. This
is evidence that "the Bilderberg" is not an organization. Rather,
it is a meeting; a conference.
Getting invited to the Bilderberg meeting is similar to getting invited
to an AIPAC meeting. Specifically, the people who are invited are either
part of the Zionist criminal network, or they are fools who the Zionists
are trying to influence.
James Tucker frequently writes about the people who attend the "Bilderberg"
meetings. It is certainly of value to know who is invited to these meetings
because that can give us a clue as to who the Zionists are trying to influence.
However, the Bilderbergs are not an organization. Doesn't James Tucker
understand this? He has been investigating crime many more years than I
have, so he should know more than I
However, his articles make it appear as if he just got into this business
two weeks ago. Is he really as stupid as he appears? I don't think so.
He does not work for the American Free Press, but they publish
some of his articles. I stand by my accusations that Paul Craig Roberts
liar who tries to protect Israel
He wrote an article about the September 11 attack. One of his
|According to the 911Truth.org News Service, he copied his letter, via
email, to David Ray Griffin, author of the book about 9-11 called The New
Pearl Harbor. Ryan also copied it to Catherine Austin Fitts, a member of
the 911Truth.org board.
Why would Anderson promote 911Truth.org
as a "News Service"? And why does he promote Catherine Austin Fitts?
What is the Freedom Law School?
The people at 911Truth.org have proven themselves to be Zionist
Deniers who sabotage other people's attempt to expose 9/11.
Here is one article that mentions them:
Mark Anderson wrote an article in the 7 August 2006 issue of AFP about
Aaron Russo's "highly anticipated film", America: freedom to fascism.
This film has liars, such as Mike
Ruppert and Catherine Austin Fitts posing as experts on America's
Mike Piper has also been promoting
Aaron Russo's film on his radio show, but I had assumed that Piper just
didn't realize that Russo, Fitts, and Ruppert are liars.
A couple of years ago I made a remark to Christopher Bollyn that Cathy
O'Brien has one of the wildest books I've ever seen, Trance: Formation
Christopher Bollyn mentioned this to Mike Piper, and Piper responded
witn an e-mail message to both of us
that said something to the effect that we should not believe Cathy O'Brien.
He told us that he thinks her book was intended to help make Jim Traficant
Mike Piper and the AFP defend Jim Traficant as a patriotic American
who was put in jail by Zionists. Mike Brown wrote an article in
the August 21, 2006 issue of American Free Press that claims Traficant
is a victim of a corrupt judicial system.
Why is the American Free Press spending so much of their time defending
Traficant? Is their defense of Traficant simply for appearance? Are they
pretending to care while they secretly laugh?
It is extremely unusual for an advertiser in a newspaper to
have anything other than a business relationship with the management of
If Zionists infiltrate other
organizations, why not this
Now that WingTV has exposed themselves as a defender of Zionism, their
close relationship with the American Free Press should be considered as
that the American Free Press is a Zionist organization.
This in turn should make us wonder about any advertiser that has more
than a normal business relationship with them.
One of their primary advertisers is the Freedom Law School.
The president of this law school is Peymon Mottahedeh. He is speaking
at the upcoming AFP/TBR conference on September 2 and 3. Why would they
invite an advertiser to speak at this meetings? Obviously, there is more
here than a typical business relationship.
The Freedom Law School is not an ordinary law school. Rather, it is
a small organization that people join in order to avoid paying income taxes.
Instead of paying a lot of taxes to the IRS, people can join the Freedom
Law School and give the school a smaller amount of their money.
The Freedom Law School could be exactly what it appears; namely, a group
of people who are trying to avoid paying income tax.
However, we should consider the possibility that their cozy relationship
with the American Free Press is because the Freedom Law School is
a Zionist trap.
Have you looked at the evidence that Zionists created or infiltrated
the Nazi party, the white supremacists groups, the 9/11 truth groups, the
antiwar groups, the Republicans, the Democrats, and the Veterans groups?
Perhaps the Freedom Law School is
Have you looked at the evidence that Zionists have taken over the television
industry, Hollywood, and most publications?
If the Zionists started, infiltrated, or dominated all of those groups,
don't you think the Zionists might consider starting or infiltrating the
groups that help us avoid paying taxes?
To put that another way, if the Federal Reserve is controlled by Zionists,
and if income taxes are a Zionist scam, why would Zionists allow the Goyim
to form organizations to avoid paying income taxes?
Don't you think the Zionists might try to stop us from rebelling against
their income taxes?
Why would the American Free Press promote an organization that encourages
us to avoid paying taxes?
If you have trouble with that question, substitute "Zionist propaganda
newspaper" for "American Free Press":
Why would a Zionist propaganda newspaper promote an organization that
encourages us to avoid paying taxes?
An interesting coincidence is that the president of the Freedom Law
School is an Iranian Jew.
The ordinary citizens who join this law school may be allowed
to avoid paying taxes, so from their point of view, the school may be a
wonderful method to avoid to paying taxes.
However, if somebody the Zionists don't like joins the organization,
the Zionists may allow him to avoid taxes for a couple years, and then
they may send a couple of Zionist IRS agents to give him an offer he can't
The Zionist IRS agents may tell their victim that he has been caught
in a trap, but he has options. He can try to fight the corrupt IRS in our
corrupt court system, and after he wastes all his money he will be sent
to jail for tax evasion, or he can become a Useful Idiot.
An interesting aspect of this trap is that it could operate without
the honest IRS agents knowing about it.
If I can think of such tricks, couldn't
the Zionists also think of them?
If this law school is a trap, we ought to wonder if any of the people
at the American Free Press have been caught by it.
Who is in control of who? Is the American Free Press a Zionist Organization?
Or are they victims of the Zionists?
Here is a brief video that has some information about Mark Lane,
the lawyer who may be in control of the American Free Press:
My other articles related to this one: